Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 27 Issue: 2

A UTILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION FRAMEWORK FOR MIXED ICE–EV FLEETS UNDER CARBON TAX, SUBSIDIES, ENVIRONMENTAL PREFERENCE, AND RISK

Nazife Merve Hamzaoğlu(İSTANBUL KÜLTÜR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6240-7613
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results indicate that carbon taxes discourage ICE usage, subsidies and infrastructure investments accelerate electrification, environmental awareness amplifies these effects.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The transition toward sustainability has become the major challenge of the twenty-first century.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The transport sector is responsible for nearly one-quarter of carbon dioxide emissions, and the core of current decarbonization strategies is electrification.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results indicate that carbon taxes discourage ICE usage, subsidies and infrastructure investments accelerate electrification, environmental awareness amplifies these effects.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Behavioral Firm Model · Environmental Awareness · Economic Policy

Abstract

The transition toward sustainability has become the major challenge of the twenty-first century. The transport sector is responsible for nearly one-quarter of carbon dioxide emissions, and the core of current decarbonization strategies is electrification. This study develops an analytical model to explain how fleet operators determine the optimal mix of internal combustion engine (ICE) and electric vehicles (EVs) under various policy and behavioral influences. Unlike classical firm models focusing solely on profit maximization, the proposed framework reflects the evolving corporate behavior in the sustainability era, where firms derive utility from both economic performance and their environmental and social standing. By extending a risk-adjusted Cobb–Douglas utility function to incorporate environmental awareness and uncertainty, the model explains how carbon taxation, decarbonization subsidies, perceived risk influence fleet composition. The results indicate that carbon taxes discourage ICE usage, subsidies and infrastructure investments accelerate electrification, environmental awareness amplifies these effects. Beyond economic incentives, the findings highlight the strategic importance of ESG commitments and risk management in corporate decision-making during the Sustainability era. This model contributes by developing a theoretical framework that integrates microeconomic optimization, behavioral economics, and policy design, providing guidance for both firms and regulators in advancing sustainable transportation systems.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hamzaoğlu, N. M. (2026). A UTILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION FRAMEWORK FOR MIXED ICE–EV FLEETS UNDER CARBON TAX, SUBSIDIES, ENVIRONMENTAL PREFERENCE, AND RISK. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 27 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1819261

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (30)

  1. Ahjum, F., Merven, B., Stone, A., & Caetano, T. (2018). Road transport vehicles in South Africa towards 2050: Factors influencing technology choice and implications for fuel supply. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa, 29(3), 33–50. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2018/v29i3a5596
  2. Al-Hawary, S., Oraini, B., Alenazi, S., Vasudevan, A., Mohammad, A., & Ali, I. (2025). Decarbonizing marine logistics: Multi-echelon green supply chain models for offshore vessel networks. Sustainable Marine Structures, 227–247. https://doi.org/10.36956/sms.v7i3.2471
  3. Alkatheeri, S. M., Alshuraian, M., & Shams, R. (2023). An organizational and operational capability and maturity assessment for SMEs in emerging markets towards the ESG criteria adaptation. International Journal of Advanced Corporate Learning, 16(2), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1004075
  4. Aniegbunem, G., & Kraj, A. (2023). Economic analysis of sustainable transportation transitions: Case study of the University of Saskatchewan ground services fleet. Sustainability, 15(7), Article 5926. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075926
  5. Apicella, G., Carannante, M., & D’Amato, V. (2025). Policyholders’ subjective beliefs: Approaching new drivers of insurance ESG reputational risk. Decisions in Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10203-025-00516-x
  6. Aydemi̇r, A., Yılmaz, G., & Çiriş, H. (2023). Evaluating the feasibility of a shared-fleet operation in healthcare logistics between public organizations. Sustainability, 15(21), Article 115361. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152115361
  7. Balistreri, E. J., McDaniel, C. A., & Wong, E. V. (2002). An estimation of U.S. industry-level capital-labor substitution elasticities: Cobb-Douglas as a reasonable starting point? Office of Economics, U.S. International Trade Commission. http://journalofpolicymodels.com/articles/prodfun_jpm.pdf
  8. Chandra, I., Singh, N. K., Samuel, P., Bajaj, M., & Zaitsev, I. (2024). Coordinated charging of EV fleets in community parking lots to maximize benefits using a three-stage energy management system. Scientific Reports, 14, Article 32026. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83579-x
  9. Climate Watch. (2025). Agriculture [Dataset]. In Greenhouse gas emissions by sector. Our World in Data.
  10. Figliozzi, M., Boudart, J., & Feng, W. (2011). Economic and environmental optimization of vehicle fleets: Impact of policy, market, utilization, and technological factors. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (2252), 1–6. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1266&context=cengin_fac
  11. Fournel, J.-F. (2025). Electric vehicle subsidies: Cost-effectiveness and emission reductions [Doctoral dissertation, Toulouse School of Economics]. https://www.jeanfrancoisfournel.com/uploads/ev_subsidies.pdf
  12. Fraselle, J., Limbourg, S. L., & Vidal, L. (2021). Cost and environmental impacts of a mixed fleet of vehicles. Sustainability, 13(16), Article 9413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169413
  13. Frost & Sullivan. (2024). Global fleets drive to decarbonization. Frost & Sullivan. https://www.wexinc.com/resource/global-fleets-drive-to-decarbonization/
  14. Goulianou, P., Regan, A., & Goodchild, A. (2024). Long-term planning for a mixed urban freight fleet with EVs and ICEVs in the USA. Sustainability, 16(8), Article 3144. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16083144
  15. Hensel-Roth, T., Stocker, R., Dilekci, A., & Nobili, F. (2023). Electrifying fleets: Challenges, opportunities and considerations. Charles River Associates. https://dynamon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/CRA-Whitepaper-Fleet-Electrification-Sep-2023-1.pdf
  16. International Energy Agency. (2024). Greenhouse gas emissions from transportation [Data set]. https://doi.org/10.1002/cnl2.81
  17. Kazanç, H. C., Soysal, M., & Çimen, M. (2021). Modeling heterogeneous fleet vehicle allocation problem with emissions considerations. The Open Transportation Journal, 15(1), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874447802115010093
  18. Koçak, O., Öztürk, İ., & Menegaki, A. N (2021). The resilience of green firms in the twirl of COVID-19: Evidence from S&P 500 Carbon Efficiency Index with a Fourier approach. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2442–2458. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2872
  19. Loni, A., & Asadi, S. (2024). Power system resilience: The role of electric vehicles and social disparities in mitigating the US power outages. Smart Grids and Sustainable Energy, 9, Article 23, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40866-024-00204-6
  20. Muehlegger, E., & Rapson, D. S. (2020). Correcting estimates of electric vehicle emissions abatement: Implications for climate policy (NBER Working Paper No. 27197). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w27197/w27197.pdf
  21. Ritchie, H. (2020). Cars, planes, trains: Where do CO₂ emissions from transport come from? Our World in Data. https://ourworldindata.org/co2-emissions-from-transport
  22. Rodrigues, H., Faia, V., & Santos, P. (2024). Accelerating light-duty fleet decarbonisation through energy efficiency audits: Results and methodology assessment. E3S Web of Conferences, 487, Article 02001. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202448702001
  23. Schenone, M. (2022). Decarbonization and efficiency: The potential of digital fleet management. https://doi.org/10.3233/pmst220070
  24. Shafiei, E., Thorkelsson, H., Asgeirsson, E. I., Davidsdottir, B., Raberto, M., & Stefansson, H. (2012). An agent-based modeling approach to predict the evolution of market share of electric vehicles: A case study from Iceland. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(9), 1638–1653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.05.011
  25. Soni, A., & Berthelot, L. P. (2025). Covering all the bases: Domain expansion and typologies of subnational electric vehicle policies in the United States. Review of Policy Research 43(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.70059
  26. Taghavi, S. M., Zandieh, M., Sadeghi, H., & Sadeghi, M. (2022). Green-resilient supplier selection and order allocation under disruption by utilizing conditional value at risk: Mixed response strategies. Process Integration and Optimization for Sustainability, 6(3), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41660-022-00298-4
  27. Wang, K., Fan, K. J., & Chen, Y. (2025). Optimization of logistics distribution centers based on economic efficiency and sustainability: Data support from the Hohhot–Baotou–Ordos–Ulanqab urban agglomeration. Sustainability, 17(7), Article 3273. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17073273
  28. Wiig-Andersen, D. (2023). The impact of carbon pricing policies in reducing CO2 emissions from road transportation [Doctoral dissertation, The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania]. https://repository.upenn.edu/bitstreams/5f938c4c-0cef-41b4-b3c9-ca15bed92871/download
  29. Yan, S., & Eskeland, G. S. (2016). Greening the vehicle fleet: Evidence from Norway's CO2 differentiated registration tax (NHH Dept. of Business and Management Science Discussion Paper No. 2016/14). SSRN. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm?abstractid=2834804
  30. Zoltowska, I. (2025). Risk preferences of EV fleet aggregators in day-ahead market bidding: Mean-CVaR linear programming model. Energies, 18(1), Article 93. https://doi.org/10.3390/en18010093