SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 27 Issue: 3

INNOVATION AT A FISCAL COST? ACCOUNTING EVIDENCE ON R&D EXPENDITURES, PUBLIC FINANCIAL STRUCTURE AND FISCAL DISCIPLINE IN OECD COUNTRIES

Özge Özkan(MALATYA TURGUT ÖZAL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-9047-8627
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-09-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicate that R&D expenditures have a negative short-term effect on budget balance, and increases in government spending and public expenditures deteriorate fiscal balance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the effects of R&D expenditures on public financial structure and fiscal discipline in OECD countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, annual data for 37 OECD countries covering the period 2013–2023 are utilized.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicate that R&D expenditures have a negative short-term effect on budget balance, and increases in government spending and public expenditures deteriorate fiscal balance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2013–2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:R&D Expenditures · Fiscal Discipline · Public Accounting

Abstract

This study examines the effects of R&D expenditures on public financial structure and fiscal discipline in OECD countries. Although the contribution of R&D to economic growth has been widely discussed in the literature, its impact on budget balance has been addressed in a limited number of studies. In this context, annual data for 37 OECD countries covering the period 2013–2023 are utilized. Net lending (+) / net borrowing (-) (as a percentage of GDP) was used as the dependent variable; inflation rate and GDP growth rate were used as control variables; and the independent variables were R&D expenditure as a percentage of GDP, government debt as a percentage of GDP, government expenditure as a percentage of GDP, and total expenditure as a percentage of GDP. A dynamic panel data approach (GMM) is employed, and the results are tested using the Driscoll–Kraay robust estimator. The findings indicate that R&D expenditures have a negative short-term effect on budget balance, and increases in government spending and public expenditures deteriorate fiscal balance. In contrast, economic growth is found to support budget balance. The results suggest that the predominant classification of R&D expenditures as current expenses in public accounting may create pressure on fiscal discipline. By analyzing the relationship between R&D and fiscal discipline from a public accounting perspective, this study provides a comprehensive contribution to the literature.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özkan, Ö. (2026). INNOVATION AT A FISCAL COST? ACCOUNTING EVIDENCE ON R&D EXPENDITURES, PUBLIC FINANCIAL STRUCTURE AND FISCAL DISCIPLINE IN OECD COUNTRIES. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 27 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1918777

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (42)

  1. Abdulkadir, A., Afriana, W., & Azis, H. (2020). The effects of R&D expenditures on economic growth in OECD countries. Airlangga Journal of Innovation Management, 1(2), 175–183. https://doi.org/10.20473/ajim.v1i2.21607
  2. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297968
  3. Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In C. K. Rowley (Ed.), Readings in industrial economics: Volume two: Private enterprise and state intervention (pp. 219–236). Macmillan Education UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-15486-9_13
  4. Béjaoui, R., & Bouzgarrou, H. (2014). Determinants of Tunisian bank profitability. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 8(4), 121–131. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2455975
  5. Calò, S., Kraemer, R., & Tomasone, F. (2024, September 10). The innovation channel of fiscal consolidation. European Stability Mechanism.
  6. Ciaffi, G., Deleidi, M., & Mazzucato, M. (2024). Measuring the macroeconomic responses to public investment in innovation: Evidence from OECD countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 33(2), 363–382. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtae005
  7. Council on Competitiveness. (2025, October 31). R&D spending will shape the next frontier of competitiveness. https://compete.org/2025/10/31/rd-spending-will-shape-the-next-frontier-of-competitiveness/
  8. Ding, Y., Yin, F., Chin, L., Zhou, K., Taghizadeh-Hesary, F., & Li, Y. (2025). Can government R&D expenditure promote innovation? New evidence from 37 OECD countries. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 31(2), 572–596. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2024.22293
  9. Driscoll, J. C., & Kraay, A. C. (1998). Consistent covariance matrix estimation with spatially dependent panel data. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(4), 549–560. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465398557825
  10. European Commission, Eurostat. (2014). Government and NPI units performing non-market production: Methodological report. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/3859598/5937049/KS-GQ-14-004-EN.pdf
  11. European Environment Agency. (2025). Europe’s environment 2025: 4.8 Transformative innovation [Thematic briefing]. https://www.eea.europa.eu/en/europe-environment-2025
  12. European Stability Mechanism. (2024). The innovation channel of fiscal consolidation. https://www.esm.europa.eu/blog/innovation-channel-fiscal-consolidation
  13. Eurostat. (2020). Draft EPSAS screening report—IPSAS 31: Intangible assets. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/72d8c340-45a2-4770-8473-058a584a9433/Draft%20screening%20report%20IPSAS31.pdf
  14. Fieldhouse, A. J., & Mertens, K. (2025). The social returns to public R&D (NBER Working Paper No. w33780). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.1086/738899
  15. Fieldhouse, A., & Mertens, K. (2023). The returns to government R&D: Evidence from US appropriations shocks. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas. https://doi.org/10.24149/wp2305r2
  16. Giraldo, C., Giraldo, I., Gomez-Gonzalez, J. E., & Uribe, J. M. (2026). R&D investment and financial stability. Applied Economics, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2026.2624042
  17. Glötzl, F., & Rezai, A. (2018). A sectoral net lending perspective on Europe. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 42(3), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bex047
  18. Gülmez, A., & Yardımcıoğlu, F. (2012). OECD ülkelerinde Ar-Ge harcamaları ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Panel eşbütünleşme ve panel nedensellik analizi (1990–2010). Maliye Dergisi, 163(1), 335–353.
  19. Güloğlu, B., & Tekin, R. B. (2012). A panel causality analysis of the relationship among research and development, innovation, and economic growth in high-income OECD countries. Eurasian Economic Review, 2(1), 32–47. https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353831
  20. Haque, N. U., & Ullah, R. R. (2022). Estimating the footprint of government on the economy. The Pakistan Development Review, 61(4), 551–562. https://doi.org/10.30541/v61i4pp.551-562
  21. International Accounting Standards Board. (2023). International Accounting Standard 38: Intangible assets. IFRS Foundation. https://www.ifrs.org/content/dam/ifrs/publications/html-standards/english/2023/issued/ias38.html
  22. International Monetary Fund. (2014). Government finance statistics manual 2014. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/gfs/manual/pdf/all.pdf
  23. International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board. (2024). IPSAS 31: Intangible assets. In Handbook of International Public Sector Accounting Pronouncements. IFAC. https://ifacweb.blob.core.windows.net/publicfiles/2024-12/B04-IPSAS-31.pdf
  24. Irish Fiscal Advisory Council. (2014). Analytical note 6: Adoption of new international standards for national accounts and balance of payments. https://www.fiscalcouncil.ie/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/AN-ESA-Revisions-5-Final.pdf
  25. Kutbay, H., & Öz, E. (2017). Ar-Ge harcamalarının ekonomik büyüme üzerine etkisi: Türkiye ve seçilmiş ülkelerde vergi teşvikleri boyutuyla ekonometrik analiz. Maliye Dergisi, 2(173), 331–361.
  26. Lawson, E. (2025, June 20). Analysis: Government-funded R&D leads to long-term economic growth. Texas A&M Stories. https://stories.tamu.edu/news/2025/06/20/analysis-government-funded-rd-leads-to-long-term-economic-growth/
  27. Mertler, C. A., Vannatta, R. A., & LaVenia, K. N. (2021). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003047223
  28. Mohnen, P., & Hall, B. H. (2013). Innovation and productivity: An update. Eurasian Business Review, 3(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.14208/BF03353817
  29. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Reviving productivity growth: A review of policies (OECD Economics Department Working Papers No. 1822). OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2024/10/reviving-productivity-growth_936a1da3/61244acd-en.pdf
  30. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2025). Main science and technology indicators (MSTI) [Data set]. https://data-explorer.oecd.org
  31. Pellens, M., Peters, B., Hud, M., Rammer, C., & Licht, G. (2024). Public R&D investment in economic crises. Research Policy, 53(10), Article 105084. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2024.105084
  32. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037. https://doi.org/10.1086/261420
  33. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2). http://www.jstor.org/stable/2937632
  34. Sandven, T., & Smith, K. (1998). Understanding R&D intensity indicators: Effects of differences in industrial structure and country size (IDEA Paper Series No. 14). University of Oslo, STEP Group.
  35. Sever, C. (2025). Government debt and growth: The role of R&D (IMF Working Paper No. 2025/036). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798229001090.001
  36. Şimşek, B. (2025). Ar-Ge ve eğitim harcamalarının ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkisi: Gelişmiş ülkeler örneği. Journal of Economic Research Foundation, 2(1), 48–58. https://doi.org/10.62844/jerf.18
  37. Şit, A., Radulescu, M., Güneş, H., Simba, H. M. A., Şit, M., & Karadağ, H. (2024). Rethinking of government institutions and governance quality indicators on economic growth in Sub-Saharan African countries. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(4), 20883–20905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02040-6
  38. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Pearson.
  39. Toth, P., Tkacova, A., & Gavurova, B. (2025). The impact of public debt on economic growth: Evidence from advanced economies and the European Union. Journal of International Studies, 18(3), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2025/18-3/9
  40. Tujula, M., & Wolswijk, G. (2004). What determines fiscal balances? An empirical investigation in determinants of changes in OECD budget balances (ECB Working Paper No. 422). ECB.
  41. World Bank. (2024). Net lending (+)/net borrowing (–) (% of GDP) [Data set]. World Development Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/metadataglossary/World-Development-Indicators/series?search=net%20borrowing%20and%20lending
  42. World Economics. (2026, July). OECD. https://www.worldeconomics.com/Regions/OECD/