SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2011 / Sayı: 29

STUDENTS’ OPINIONS ABOUT WEB ASSISTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING IN ANORGANIC CHEMISTRY

ANORGANİK KİMYA DERSİNDE WEB DESTEKLİ İŞBİRLİKLİ ÖĞRENMEYE YÖNELİK ÖĞRENCİ GÖRÜŞLERİ

Barış DEMİRDAĞ
Mehmet KARTAL
Pages
36–49
Publication Date
2011-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings will be guide for researchers to design and plan web assisted learning approach.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim of this study is to define students‘ opinions related to web assisted collaborative learning (WACL) approach in coordination chemistry topic in anorganic chemistry course.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Working group in the study are second class chemistry teacher candidates (n=18) in second semester of 2009-2010 educational year in Dokuz Eylül University.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings will be guide for researchers to design and plan web assisted learning approach.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2009-2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İşbirlikli öğrenme · web destekli işbirlikli öğrenme · anorganik kimya

Abstract

Aim of this study is to define students‘ opinions related to web assisted collaborative learning (WACL) approach in coordination chemistry topic in anorganic chemistry course. In accordance with this aim, it was used case study which is a qualitative research method. Working group in the study are second class chemistry teacher candidates (n=18) in second semester of 2009-2010 educational year in Dokuz Eylül University. The Questionnaire About Students‘ Opinions Related the Learning Approach (QASO), Interview Form (IF), Web Page Forum Activity (WPA) as qualitative data collection tools were used in the study. The findings show that they have commonly positive opinions related to this learning approach. The students declaired that they wanted not to be delivered the courses completely via web, a lecturer to whom they would consult must be throughout learning process, they wanted to be gived more feedback by the lecturer. Also, they stated that if any member of group was sensitive and not experienced, it was not compatible with collaboration. The findings will be guide for researchers to design and plan web assisted learning approach.

Özet

Bu çalışmadaki amaç; anorganik kimya dersinde koordinasyon kimyası konusunun öğretiminde web destekli işbirlikli öğrenmeye (WDİÖ) yönelik öğrencilerin görüşlerini belirlemektir. Bu amaçla, araştırmada nitel bir araştırma modeli olan durum çalışması yöntemi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi 2. sınıf kimya öğretmen adayları oluşturmuştur (n=18). Öğrencilerin öğrenme sürecine yönelik görüşlerini belirlemek için Web Destekli İşbirlikli Öğrenmeye Yönelik Görüş Anketi (WDİÖG), Görüşme Formu (GF), Web Sayfası Forum Etkinliği (WFE) kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen veriler içerik analizi ve betimsel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Öğrenciler genel olarak öğrenme sürecine yönelik olumlu görüş belirtmişlerdir. Derslerin tamamen web üzerinden yapılmamasını, mutlaka bir öğretmenin öğretim sürecinde yer almasını, işbirlikli çalışmalarda bazı grup üyelerinin pasif olabildiğini, öğretmenin web ortamında daha fazla geri bildirim vermesi gerektiğini ifade etmişlerdir. Araştırmada elde edilen bulgular web destekli işbirlikli öğrenme ortamlarının tasarlanmasında önemli bir yol gösterici olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRDAĞ, B., KARTAL, M. (2011). STUDENTS’ OPINIONS ABOUT WEB ASSISTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING IN ANORGANIC CHEMISTRY. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 29, 36–49. https://ajindex.com/articles/118009

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Andres, H. P. (2002). A Comparison of Face to Face and Virtual Software Development Teams. Team Performance Management, 8(1/2), 39-48.
  2. Aycock, A., Garnham, C. & Kaleta, R. 2002. Lessons Learned from the Hybrid Course Project. Teaching with Technology Today, Volume 8, Number 6: March 20, 2002. http://www.uwsa.edu/ttt/articles/garnham.htm (son erişim:10.10.2010) Bandiera M. & Bruno C. (2006). Active/Cooperative Learning in Schools. JBE, Volume 40 Number 3, Summer 2006.
  3. Barke, H. D., Hazari, A. Yitbarek, S. (2009) Misconceptions in Chemistry: Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009.
  4. Blas, T. M. & Fernández, A. S. (2009), The Role of New Technologies in The Learning Process: Moodle as a Teaching Tool in Physics. Computers & Education 52 (2009) 35– 44. Brunner, D. (2006). The Potential of the Hybrid Course Vis-à-Vis Online and Traditional Courses. Teaching Theology and Religion, ISSN 1368-4868, 2006, vol. 9 no. 4, pp 229–235.
  5. Delialioglu, Ö. & Yildirim, Z. (2008). Design And Development Of A Technology Enhanced Hybrid Instruction Based On Molta Model: Its Effectiveness In Comparison To Traditional Instruction. Computers & Education 51 (2008) 474–483.
  6. Dziuban, C., Hartman, J. L. & Moskal, P. (2004). Blended Learning. Educase Center for Applied Researh, Researh Bulletin, Volume 2004, Issue 7, March 30, 2004.
  7. El-Daghaidy, H. & Nouby, A. (2008). Effectiveness of a Blended e-learning Cooperative Approach in a Egyptian Teacher Educatin Programme. Computers&Education 51 (2008) 988-1006
  8. Ferguson, J. M. & DeFelice, A. E. (2010). Length of Online Course and Student Satisfaction, Perceived Learning, and Academic Performance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, Vol 11, No 2 (2010), ISSN: 1492-3831
  9. Fraenkel, J.R. & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. (6th Ed.) New York: Mc Graw Hill. Fung, Y. Y. H. (2004). Collaborative Online Learning: Interaction Patterns And Limiting Factors, Open Learning: The Journal of Open and Distance Learning, 19: 2, 135 — 149. Hofstein, A. & Lunetta, V. N. (2003). The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty first century. Science Education, 88:28 – 54. Huang, C. J., Chen, X-H. & Chen, C-H. (2008). Developing Argumentation Processing Agents For Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, Expert Systems with Applications (2008), doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2008.01.036. Johnson, D. & Johnson, R. (2002). Learning Together and Alon