Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Sayı: 35

THE REASONS FOR THE MISCONCEPTIONS ACCORDING TO CHEMISTRY PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS

KİMYA ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARINA GÖRE KAVRAM YANILGILARININ NEDENLERİ

Pages
59–95
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the study, pre-service chemistry teachers stated that the reasons behind misconceptions were factors such as students, teachers, learning/studying environments, family, media and friends.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, the views of pre-service teachers were obtained in order to determine the reasons for the misconceptions students hold.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data was collected via an interview form and open-ended questions which were prepared in accordance with the views of experts in the field.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the study, pre-service chemistry teachers stated that the reasons behind misconceptions were factors such as students, teachers, learning/studying environments, family, media and friends.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Kavram yanılgısı · öğretmen adayları · olgubilim

Abstract

In the present study, the views of pre-service teachers were obtained in order to determine the reasons for the misconceptions students hold. Data was collected via an interview form and open-ended questions which were prepared in accordance with the views of experts in the field. The obtained data of the study were analyzed via the NVivo qualitative analysis program. Phenomenology pattern, which is one of the appropriate qualitative research patterns, was used in this study since the aim was to determine the reasons behind student misconceptions. Coding theory was conducted within an inductive process for the determination of misconception reasons. According to the results of the study, pre-service chemistry teachers stated that the reasons behind misconceptions were factors such as students, teachers, learning/studying environments, family, media and friends.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, öğrencilerin sahip oldukları kavram yanılgılarının nedenlerini belirlemek amacıyla öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri alınmıştır. Çalışmada veriler uzman görüşüne başvurularak hazırlanmış olan görüşme formu ve açık uçlu sorularla toplanılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen veriler NVivo nitel veri analiz programı ile analiz edilmiştir. Çalışmada kavram yanılgılarının nedenleri belirlenmeye çalışıldığından nitel araştırma desenlerinden araştırmanın doğasına uygun olan olgubilim (phenomenology) deseni kullanılmıştır. Öğrencilerin kavram yanılgılarının nedenlerinin tespit edilmesinde kodlama stratejisi tümevarımsal bir süreç izlenerek yapılmıştır. Çalışmada elde edilen sonuçlara göre kimya öğretmen adayları kavram yanılgılarının nedenleri arasında öğrencilerin kendileri, öğretmenler, öğrenme/çalışma ortamları ve aile, medya ve arkadaş faktörlerini göstermişlerdir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞEN, Ş., YILMAZ, A. (2013). THE REASONS FOR THE MISCONCEPTIONS ACCORDING TO CHEMISTRY PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 35, 59–95. https://ajindex.com/articles/117666

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Acar Sesen, B. ve İnce, E. (2010). Internet as a source of misconception: “Radiation and radioactivity”. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(4), 94- 100. Al khawaldeh, S. A., & Al Olaimat, A. M. (2010). The contribution of conceptual change texts accompanied by concept mapping to eleventh-grade students understanding of cellular respiration concepts. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 19(2), 115-125.
  2. Altınkaynak Yaylacı, Ö., Yamak, H. ve Kavak, N. (2011). Examining pre-service science teachers’ opinions about holistic approach in science: Electrical energy example. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2764–2770.
  3. Andersson, B. (1986). Pupils' explanations of some aspects of chemical reactions. Science Education, 70(5), 549-563.
  4. Andre, T., & Ding, P. (1991). Student misconceptions, declarative knowledge, stimulus conditions, and problem solving in basic electricity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 16,303–313.
  5. Bar, V., & Travis, A. (1991). Children's views concerning phase changes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(4), 363-382.
  6. Barras, R. (1984). Some misconceptions and misunderstandings perpetuated by teachers and textbooks of biology. Journal of Biological Education, 18, 201-206.
  7. Beaty, W. J. (1987). The origin of misconceptions in optics. American Journal of Physics, 55, 872-873.
  8. Cansüngü Koray, Ö. ve Bal, Ş. (2002). Fen öğretiminde kavram yanılgıları ve kavramsal değişim stratejisi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 10(1), 83-90.
  9. Chi, M. T. H. (1992). Conceptual change within and across ontological categories: Examples from learning and discovery in science. In R. Giere (Ed.), Cognitive Models of Science: Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, (pp. 129-186). University of Minnesota Press:
  10. Minneapolis, MN. Chiapetta, E., & McBride, J. (1980). Exploring the effects of general remediation on ninth-graders' achievement of the mole concept. Science Education, 64(5), 609-614.
  11. Chiu, M. H. (2005). A national survey of students’ conceptions in chemistry in Taiwan. Chemical Education International, 6 (1), Retrieved December 28, 2011, from http://old.iupac.org/publications/cei/vol6/07_Chiu.pdf.
  12. Cho, H. H., Kahle, J. B., & Nordland, F. H. (1985). An investigation of high school biology textbooks as sources of misconceptions and difficulties in genetics and some suggestions for teaching genetics. Science Education, 69(5), 707–719.
  13. Coştu, B., Ayas, A. ve Ünal,S. (2007). Kavram yanılgıları ve olası nedenleri: