Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2013 / Sayı: 36

SOCIALIZATION OF INSTRUCTORS AT ENGLISH PREPARATORY SCHOOL

İNGİLİZCE HAZIRLIK OKULLARINDAKİ OKUTMANLARIN TOPLUMSALLAŞMALARI

Pages
62–75
Publication Date
2013-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results were interpreted according to the general qualities of higher education and specific structural and functional characteristics of higher education in Turkey.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of experience, satisfaction from preservice and in-service training, satisfaction from mentoring, satisfaction from compensations and social benefits for both organizational and task socialization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, the study was designed as a correlational study and an adapted scale was administered to 228 instructors working in English preparatory schools of four public universities in Ankara.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results were interpreted according to the general qualities of higher education and specific structural and functional characteristics of higher education in Turkey.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:örgütsel toplumsallaşma · yükseköğretim · örgütsel kültür

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive value of experience, satisfaction from preservice and in-service training, satisfaction from mentoring, satisfaction from compensations and social benefits for both organizational and task socialization. For this purpose, the study was designed as a correlational study and an adapted scale was administered to 228 instructors working in English preparatory schools of four public universities in Ankara. The results of study showed that satisfaction from pre-service training, compensations and social services are significant predictors for both organizational and task socialization. The results were interpreted according to the general qualities of higher education and specific structural and functional characteristics of higher education in Turkey.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, deneyim, hizmet öncesi ve hizmet içi eğitim, mentörlük, tazminat ve ek ödemeler ve sosyal hizmetlerden duyulan memnuniyetin örgüte yönelik toplumsallaşma ile göreve yönelik toplumsallaşmayı ne düzeyde yordadığını ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaca yönelik olarak çalışma ilişkisel bir çalışma olarak desenlenmiş ve uyarlanan bir ölçek Ankara’da bulunan dört devlet üniversitesinin İngilizce hazırlık okullarında çalışan toplam 228 öğretim elemanına uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerle yapılan doğrusal regresyon analizi sonuçları hizmet öncesi eğitim, tazminat ve ek ödemelerden duyulan memnuniyet ve sosyal hizmetlerden duyulan memnuniyetin hem örgüte hem de göreve yönelik toplumsallaşma için anlamlı bir yordayıcılar olduğunu göstermiştir. Elde edilen bulgular yükseköğretimin genel özellikleri ile Türkiye’de yükseköğretimin yapılandırılması ve işleyişi bağlamında tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KONDAKÇI, Y., ATAMAN, F. (2013). SOCIALIZATION OF INSTRUCTORS AT ENGLISH PREPARATORY SCHOOL. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 36, 62–75. https://ajindex.com/articles/117631

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing next generation faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 95-122.
  2. Bauer, T.N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo, D.M. and Tucker, J.S. (2007). Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: A meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92 (3), 707-721.
  3. Birnbaum, R. (1988). How Colleges Work: The Cybernetics of Academic Organizations and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Blackler, F. (1995). ‘Knowledge, knowledge work and organizations: An overview and analysis’, Organization Studies, 16(6), 1021–1046.
  4. Bogler, R. ve Kremer-Hayon, L. (1999). The socialization of faculty members to university culture and norms. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 23, 31-40.
  5. Boice, R. (1991a). New faculty as colleagues. Qualitative Studies in Education, 4, 29-44.
  6. Boice, R. (1991b). New faculty as teachers. Journal of Higher Education, 62, 150-173.
  7. Chao, G.T., O’Leary-Kelly, A.M., Wolf, S., Klein, H.J. ve Gardner, P. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences, Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 730– 43. Colbeck, C.L. (2008). Professional identity theory development and doctoral education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 113, 9-16.
  8. De Vos, A. (2002). The Individual Antecedents and the Development of Newcomers' Psychological Contracts During the Socialization Process: A Longitudinal Study. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Gent Universitesi, Gent, Belçika. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N. ve Hyun, H. (2011). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (8. baskı). New York: McGraw-Hill. Haueter, J., Macan, T.H. ve Winter, J. (2003). Measurement of newcomer socialization: Construct validation of a multidimensional measure. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 63, 20-39.
  9. Ibarra, H. (1999). Provisional selves: Experimenting with image and identity in professional adaptation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 764-791.
  10. Jex, S.M. ve Britt, T.W. (2008). Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach (2. baskı). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. King, R. C. ve Sethi, V. 1998. The impact of socialization on the role adjustment of information systems professionals. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14 (4), 195-217.
  11. Lindholm, J.A. (2004). Pathways to professoriate: The role of self, others, and environment in shaping academic career aspirations. Journal of Higher Education, 75, 60