ISSUE OF IN-SERVICE TRAINING OF THE TEACHERS ASSIGNED IN SCIENCE AND ART CENTERS

İsmail SATMAZ; İlke EVİN GENCEL

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2016 / Sayı: 42

ISSUE OF IN-SERVICE TRAINING OF THE TEACHERS ASSIGNED IN SCIENCE AND ART CENTERS

BİLİM SANAT MERKEZLERİNDE GÖREVLENDİRİLEN ÖĞRETMENLERİN HİZMET İÇİ EĞİTİM SORUNU

İsmail SATMAZ

İlke EVİN GENCEL

Journal: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
Issue: 2016 · Sayı: 42
Pages: 59–73
Publication Date: 2016-12-01
DOI: —

🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.

DergiPark Record ↗

✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight

⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In accordance with the findings, the participants’ expectations and problems through in-service training process were revealed and some suggestions were developed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯

Objective & Hypothesis: The aim of the study was to determine the opinions of the teachers who serve in the newly opened Science and Art Centers (SAC) where gifted students attend, about in-service training.

📊

Key Findings & Data:The participant of the study consisted of 30 teachers in different branches who are assigned in Canakkale, Aydın, Bandırma, Batman, Bolu, Adıyaman, Konya Selçuklu SAC that enrolled the students in the academic year of 2014-2015 for the first time.

💡

Conclusion & Impact:In accordance with the findings, the participants’ expectations and problems through in-service training process were revealed and some suggestions were developed.

🔬Design:Research Article

📍Scope:2014-2015 Verileri

⚙️Variables:bilim ve sanat merkezleri · üstün yetenekliler · üstün yetenekli eğitimi

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the opinions of the teachers who serve in the newly opened Science and Art Centers (SAC) where gifted students attend, about in-service training. The participant of the study consisted of 30 teachers in different branches who are assigned in Canakkale, Aydın, Bandırma, Batman, Bolu, Adıyaman, Konya Selçuklu SAC that enrolled the students in the academic year of 2014-2015 for the first time. The phenomenological method was used which is the one of the qualitative research methods. The data have been obtained via semi-structured interviews and were analyzed with the inductive content analysis. The data were coded by using Nvivo 10. In accordance with the findings, the participants’ expectations and problems through in-service training process were revealed and some suggestions were developed.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin eğitim aldığı, yeni açılan Bilim Sanat Merkezlerinde (BİLSEM) görev yapan öğretmenlerin hizmet içi eğitim sorunu ilgili görüşlerini belirlemektir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu, 2014-2015 eğitim-öğretim yılında ilk defa öğrenci alan Çanakkale, Aydın Ticaret Borsası, Bandırma, Batman, Bolu, Adıyaman, Konya Selçuklu BİLSEM’lerde görevlendirilen farklı branşlardaki 30 öğretmen oluşturmuştur. Nitel araştırma yöntemiyle gerçekleştirilen çalışmada veriler yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme tekniği ile toplanmıştır. Veriler NVivo 10 nitel veri analizi paket programından yararlanılarak çözümlenmiştir. Bulgular doğrultusunda yeni açılan BİLSEM’lerde görevli öğretmenlerin hizmet içi eğitim sürecinden beklentileri ve yaşanan sorunlar ilişkin görüşleri ortaya konarak ve çözüm önerileri geliştirilmiştir.

Keywords

bilim ve sanat merkezleri üstün yetenekliler üstün yetenekli eğitimi hizmet içi eğitim science and art centers gifted students gifted students education in-service training

🔖

Cite This Article

SATMAZ, İ., GENCEL, İ. E. (2016). ISSUE OF IN-SERVICE TRAINING OF THE TEACHERS ASSIGNED IN SCIENCE AND ART CENTERS. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayı: 42, 59–73. https://ajindex.com/articles/117604

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

Open in New Tab ↗

↗New Tab

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001).
A Taxonomy For Learning, Teaching, And Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. NY:Longman. Blumen Pard, S. (2002) Effects of a Teacher Training Workshop on Creativity, Cognition,and School Achievement in Gifted and Non-gifted Second-grade Students in Lima, Peru, High Ability Studies, 13:1, 47-58.
Chan, D. W. (2001). Characteristics and Competencies of Teachers of Gifted Learners: The Hong Kong perspective. Roeper Review, 23 (4), 197-202.
Clark, B. (2002). Growing up Gifted: Developing the Potential of Children at Home and at School (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall. Colangelo, N. & Davis, G. A. (2003). Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson Education. Colangelo, N., & Davis, G. A. (2003). Introduction and overview. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed.) (pp. 3-10). Boston: Pearson Education. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Fiedler, E.D., Lange, R.E. & Winebrenner, S. (2002). Insearch of reality: Unraveling the myths about tracking, ability grouping, and the gifted. Roeper Review, 24(3), 108-111.
Fraser-Seeto, K. T., Howard, S. J., & Woodcock, S. (2015). An Investigation of Teachers' Awareness and Willingness to Engage with a Self-Directed Professional Development Package on Gifted and Talented Education. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(1), 1-14.
Gagne, F. (2010). Motivation within the DMGT 2.0 framework. High Ability Studies, 1(2), 81- 99. Geake, J. G. & Gross, M.U.M. (2008). Teachers' Negative Affect Toward Academically Gifted Students, Gifted Child Quarterly 52 (3), 217-231.
George, D. (2003). Gifted education: Identification and provision (2nd ed.). London: David Fulton Publishers.
Gross, M. U. M. (2005). Exceptionally Gifted Children. London and New York: Routledge Falmer. Harris, D. N. & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher tarining, teacher quality and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics. 95, 798-812.
Horn, C. (2002). "Raising expectations of children from poverty". Gifted Education Press Quarterly, 16(4), 2-5.
Jacob, B. & Lefgren, L. (2004). The impact of teacher training on student achievement: quasiexperimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. Journal of Human Resources, 39 (1), 50-79.
Kaplan, S. (2005). Layering differentiated curricul