Journals / Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

-

BUDDİZM’DE TANRI ANLAYIŞI ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Pages
85–105
Publication Date
2015-04-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore while the Theravada school has atheistic features, the Mahayana sect has a polytheistic conception of God

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Buddhism is a religion that was founded in the VI. century by Goutama Buddha.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The main goal of the Goutama’s doctrine is the release of human beings from the pains and sufferings of life and the reaching of nirvana.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore while the Theravada school has atheistic features, the Mahayana sect has a polytheistic conception of God
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ateizm · Politeizm · Nirvana

Abstract

Buddhism is a religion that was founded in the VI. century by Goutama Buddha. The main goal of the Goutama’s doctrine is the release of human beings from the pains and sufferings of life and the reaching of nirvana. While other religions claim that salvation is only possible by obedience to and worship of God, Buddha did not place any god in his system. Therefore Buddhism is considered by some researchers as an atheistic religion. However Buddhism doesn’t contain all the intellectual arguments typical of atheism. Although it did not have a god idea, at least in the period of its establishment, some schools of Buddhism have deified Buddha and a lot of other beings. Also Buddhism accepts a number of superhuman stages of existence as in theistic religions. Therefore while the Theravada school has atheistic features, the Mahayana sect has a polytheistic conception of God

Özet

Budizm VI. yüzyılda Goutama Budda tarafından kurulmuş bir dindir. Goutama’nın öğretisinin temel hedefi, insanın içinde bulunduğu acı ve ızdıraplardan kurtulup nirvanaya ulaşmasıdır. Diğer dinler kurtuluşun ancak Tanrı’ya ibadet ve taatle mümkün olabileceğini iddia ederken Budda, sisteminde herhangi bir tanrıya yer vermemiştir. Bu yapısı nedeniyle Budizm, kimi araştırmacılara göre ateist bir din olarak kabul edilir. Ancak Budizm’in ateizm olarak adlandırılan düşüncenin tüm argümanlarını bünyesinde barındırdığı söylenemez. Zira her ne kadar kuruluş döneminde bir tanrı düşüncesine sahip değilse de Budizm’in bazı ekolleri sonradan başta Budda olmak üzere pek çok varlığı tanrılaştırmıştır. Ayrıca o, tıpkı teistik dinlerde olduğu gibi insanüstü bir takım var oluş aşamalarının olduğunu kabul eder. Bu bakımdan tanrı anlayışı ile ilgili olarak Budizm’in Teravada mezhebi ateistik özellikler taşırken Mahayana politeist bir yapıya sahiptir denebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARATAŞ, D. İ. (2015). -. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 85–105. https://ajindex.com/articles/117011

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. ANAND, Y. P. (2004), “Mhatma Ghandi and Buddhism”, The Journal Oriental of Studies, http://www.iop.or.jp/Documents/0414/anand.pdf, Erişim Tarihi:10/01/2015 Vol. 14, Tokyo, ss. 60-70
  2. BARUAH, Bibhuti (2000),
  3. Buddhist Sects and Sectarianism, New Delhi. BUCKLEY, Michael J. (1987),
  4. At the Origins of Modern Atheism, USA BURTON, David (2007), “Buddhism”, The Routledge Companion to Philosophy of Religion, Ed. Chad Meister, Paul Copan, New York, ss. 16-26.
  5. CARUS, Paul (1915),
  6. The Gospel of Buddha, Chicago ve London. CLİTEUR, Paul (2009), “The Definition of Atheism”, Journal of Religion and Society, Vol. 11, Netherlands, ss. 1-23.
  7. COOMARASWAMY, Ananda, (2000),
  8. Hinduizm ve Budizm, İstanbul DHAMMANADA, Sri K. (2002),
  9. What Budhists Believe, Kuala Lumpur, http://www.buddhanet.net/pdf_file/whatbelieve.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 10/09/2013
  10. DARGYAY, Eva K. (1985) “The Concept of Creator God in Tantric Buddhism” The Journal of the International Assocation of Buddhist Studies, ed. A. K. Narain, Universty of Wisconsin, Madison USA. Vol. 8, ss. 31-47.
  11. DE BARY, William Theodore (1972),
  12. The Buddhist Tradation, New York. DHARMASİRİ, Ganupala (2000),
  13. Essentials of Buddhism, Sri Lanka. EDWARDS, Paul (2006), “Atheism”, The Ecyclopedia of Philosophy, ed. Donald M. Borchert, Vol. 1, USA, ss.356-377.
  14. FLEW, Antony (1972), “The Presumption of Atheism”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 2, No: 1, ss. 29-46.
  15. GETTY, Alice (1914),
  16. The Gods of Northern Buddhism, Oxford. GLASENAPP, (1966),
  17. Helmut Von, Buddhsim: A None-theistic Religion, İngilizceye çev. Irmgard Schloegl, New York, Braziller. GNANARAMA, Ven. Pategama (2000),
  18. Essentials of Buddhism, Singapore. GÜNGÖREN, İlhan (1995),
  19. Zen Budizmi Bir Yaşama Sanatı, İstanbul.
  20. HARVEY, Peter (1990),
  21. An Introduction to Buddhism, Cambridge. HAYES, Richard (1998), “Principled Atheism in the Buddhist Scholastic Tradation” Journal of Indian Philoosphy, 16, by Kluwer Academic Publishers, ss. 5-28.
  22. HOPKİNS, Edward Washburn (1976),
  23. The Religions of India, New Delhi. İTİL, Abidin (1963), “Budda Tanrıyı Reddediyor mu?”, A.Ü.İ.F.D. c. I, Sayı 1, Ankara, ss. 11-16.
  24. JAYATİLLEKE, K. N. (2008),
  25. Facets of Buddhism, The Wheel Publication No. 162, 163, 164, Buddhist Publication Society, Kandy, Sri, Lanka. KARATAŞ, İbrahim E. (1999), Hint Dinlerinde Tanrı Anlayışı (Hinduizm Örneği), Bursa, (Basılmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). KEOWN, Damien (1996),
  26. Buddhism A Brief Insight, New York. LARGUNPAİ, Seree (1995), World Lover World Leaver. The Book of Ecclesiastes an Thai Buddhism.