Journals / Education Reform Journal / 2022 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The Conformity and Applicability of the 2023 Education Vision: An Analysis Based on Educators' Views

Pages
76–91
Publication Date
2022-12-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study concluded that the perception of the participants regarding the implementation of 2023 VB as planned is low excepts for assistants and assistant principles.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to examine the perceptions of principles, assistant principals, teachers, and academicians on the applicability of the policies included in the 2023 Education Vision Blueprint (VB) published by the Ministry of National Education (MEB) to improve the quality of education.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Conducting phenomenological method as one of the qualitative research designs, the participants of the study consists of 68 principals, 70 assistant principals, 112 teachers and 13 academicians working in schools affiliated to the Ministry of National Education and the universities.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study concluded that the perception of the participants regarding the implementation of 2023 VB as planned is low excepts for assistants and assistant principles.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Academicians · 2023 VB · 2023 Education Vision

Abstract

This study aims to examine the perceptions of principles, assistant principals, teachers, and academicians on the applicability of the policies included in the 2023 Education Vision Blueprint (VB) published by the Ministry of National Education (MEB) to improve the quality of education. Conducting phenomenological method as one of the qualitative research designs, the participants of the study consists of 68 principals, 70 assistant principals, 112 teachers and 13 academicians working in schools affiliated to the Ministry of National Education and the universities. Data were collected through the 2023 Vision Blueprint Evaluation Questionnaire developed by educational experts. Content analysis was used to evaluate the qualitative data and the and descriptive statistics were used to interpret the quantitative data. The results of the research show that most practitioners and academicians read 2023 VB but they did not attend any meeting related to the VB. Practitioners consisting of principals, assistant principals, and teachers believe that VB meets the needs of today's education system while academicians are more likely to have negative opinions on this subject. The study concluded that the perception of the participants regarding the implementation of 2023 VB as planned is low excepts for assistants and assistant principles. By comparing perceptions and views of school administrators, teachers, and academicians, this research will make important contributions to the current literature on 2023 VB to develop and implement effective educational policies.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, M., KARATAŞ, D. D. İ. H. (2022). The Conformity and Applicability of the 2023 Education Vision: An Analysis Based on Educators' Views. Education Reform Journal, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 76–91. https://ajindex.com/articles/872633

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Akça, Y., Şahan, G., & Tural, A. (2017). Türkiye’nin Kalkınma Planlarında Eğitim Politikalarının Değerlendirilmesi. 10. Akinoğlu, O. (2005). TÜRKİYE’DE UYGULANAN VE DEĞİŞEN EĞİTİM PROGRAMLARININ PSİKOLOJİK TEMELLERİ. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 22(22), 31–45.
  2. ANYON, J. (2008). What “Counts” as Educational Policy? Notes toward a New Paradigm. Harvard Educational Review, 75(1), 65–88. ASSESSMENT & TEACHING of 21st CENTURY SKILLS. (2002).
  3. Aziz, M., Bloom, D. E., Humair, S., Jimenez, E., Rosenberg, L., & Sathar, Z. (2014). Education System Reform in Pakistan: Why, When, and How? In IZA Policy Papers (No. 76). Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). Retrieved from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) website: https://ideas.repec.org/p/iza/izapps/pp76.html
  4. Balci, E. (2020). Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi İktidarı Döneminde Türkiye’de Eğitim Politikaları. İnsan ve İnsan Dergisi. https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.819185
  5. BALTACI, A., & COŞKUN 2, M. K. (2019). 2023 Eğitim Vizyon Belgesine İlişkin Öğretmen Algısı. HAYEF: Journal of Education, 16, 130–155.
  6. Barton, L., & Walker, S. (1985). Education and Social Change. London; Dover, N.H: Law Book Co of Australasia. Bush, T., Abdul Hamid, S., Ng, A., & Kaparou, M. (2018). School leadership theories and the Malaysia Education Blueprint: Findings from a systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Management, 32(7), 1245–1265. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-06-2017-0158
  7. Cetin, H., Yazar, M., Aydın, S., & Yazici, N. (2018). İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmen Adaylarının Türk Eğitim Sistemi Sorunlarına İlişkin Görüşleri ve Çözüm Önerileri. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Research, 12, 117–135. https://doi.org/10.29329/mjer.2018.153.7
  8. Codd, J. A. (1988). The construction and deconstruction of educational policy documents. Journal of Education Policy, 3(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268093880030303
  9. Conley, D. (2003). Who Governs Our Schools? Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE. Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles. Doğan, S. (2019). 2023 Eğitim Vizyonu Belgesine İlişkin Okul Yöneticileri ve Öğretmen Görüşleri. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 8(2), 571–592.
  10. Erdoğan, H., Müd, Ş., Ki̇