SavedAdd your journal

Journals / A+Arch Design International Journal of Architecture and Design / 2020 / Volume: 6 Issue: 2

A Critical Analysis of Housing Affordability Literature: Turkish Housing Experience

Şeyda Emekci(ANKARA YILDIRIM BEYAZIT UNIVERSITY)
Pages
—
Publication Date
2020-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The concept will be explained through the Turkish housing experience.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Measuring housing affordability is a key challenge for most communities.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Housing affordability has often been described as the ratio of household incomes to housing expenditures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The concept will be explained through the Turkish housing experience.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:affordability · housing policy · lifetime affordability

Abstract

Measuring housing affordability is a key challenge for most communities. Housing affordability has often been described as the ratio of household incomes to housing expenditures. However, in the affordability literature, “housing expenditures” are still under discussion. This article introduces the concept of “lifetime affordability” to describe the affordability of households during the housing life cycle period considering the complexity of determining realistic housing affordability. The concept will be explained through the Turkish housing experience.

🔖

Cite This Article

Emekci, Ş. (2020). A Critical Analysis of Housing Affordability Literature: Turkish Housing Experience. A+Arch Design International Journal of Architecture and Design, Volume: 6 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1170015

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Aksoy, E. (2017). Housing Affordability of Different Income Groups in Turkey: Regional Comparison. Middle East Technical University.
  2. Bacher, J. C. (1993). Keeping to the Marketplace: The Evolution of Canadian Housing Policy. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
  3. Belsky, E. S., Goodman, J., & Drew, R. (2005). Measuring the nation’s rental housing affordability problems (The Joint Center for Housing Studies). Harvard University. http://www.jchs.harvard.edu/publications/rental/rd05- 1_measuring_rental_affordability05.pdf
  4. Bogdon, A., & Can, A. (1997). Indicators of local housing affordability: Comparative and spatial approaches. 25, 43–80.
  5. Bramley, G. (1990). Access, Affordability and Housing Need. 16.
  6. Bramley, G, Bartlett, W., & Lambert, C. (2004). Key Issues in Housing: Policies and Market in 21st Century in Britain. Palgrave Macmillan.
  7. Bramley, G. (1994). An affordability crisis in British housing: Dimensions, causes and policy impact. Housing Studies, 9(1), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1080/02673039408720777
  8. Burke, T., & Ralston, L. (2004). Measuring housing affordability. AHURI Research and Policy Bulletin, 45. https://www.ahuri.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0016/2923/AHURI_RAP_Issue_45_Measuring_housing_affordability.pdf
  9. Chaplin, R., & Freeman, A. (1999). Towards an accurate description of affordability. Urban Studies, 36(11), 1949–1957.
  10. Çoban, A. N. (2012). Cumhuriyetin ilanından günümüze konut politikası. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 67(03), 075–108.
  11. Fallis, G. (1993). On Chosen Social Policy Instruments: The Case of Non-Profit Housing, Housing Allowance or Income Assistance. Pergamon Press.