SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1

Active packaging applications in fresh chicken meat

Taze tavuk etlerinde aktif ambalajlama uygulamaları

Özlem Kızılırmak Esmer(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4652-0514
Özge Özer(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-7751-1800
Farnaz Naserifar(EGE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
87–92
Publication Date
2020-06-07
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, scientific studies investigating the effects of active packaging applications on the quality, safety and shelf life of fresh chicken meats were evaluated.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Chicken meat is a food, with a short shelf life due to its high protein and moisture content, which is highly susceptible to both microbial and biochemical degradation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Furthermore, to increase the reliable production of fresh chicken meat and to ensure its microbial safety in order to prevent wasting until reaching the end consumer are very important due to the possibility of contamination with pathogenic microorganisms which are caused by the food nature and processing conditions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, scientific studies investigating the effects of active packaging applications on the quality, safety and shelf life of fresh chicken meats were evaluated.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Aktif ambalajlama · Biyobozunur ambalajlama · antimikrobiyal ambalajlama

Abstract

Chicken meat is a food, with a short shelf life due to its high protein and moisture content, which is highly susceptible to both microbial and biochemical degradation. Furthermore, to increase the reliable production of fresh chicken meat and to ensure its microbial safety in order to prevent wasting until reaching the end consumer are very important due to the possibility of contamination with pathogenic microorganisms which are caused by the food nature and processing conditions. In fresh chicken meats, since food preservation methods like the addition of preservatives, heat treatment applications and/or freezing etc. are not used; the use of packaging technologies to prevent biochemical changes and microbial deterioration in the product becomes more important than processed food products. With innovative packaging technologies, the quality of fresh chicken meats can be increased and the shelf life extended, thus Ensuring better food safety. Active packaging technologies can be utilized in this context. For this purpose, by the action of active ingredients such as antimicrobial substances, antioxidant substances, CO 2 , ethanol, etc. added to the packaging material or packaging medium, the properties of the food can also be maintained well after packaging. In recent years, in the studies on the active packaging technology of fresh chicken meat; synthetic/biodegradable polymers are started to be used which are prepared by using essential oils, extracts from natural plant or food industry wastes, with antimicrobial or antioxidant properties. For fresh chicken meats packed with this technology; there are results that the reproduction rate of the degrading microorganisms is slowed, the growth of pathogen microorganisms is inhibited and/or lipid oxidation rate is reduced. In this review, scientific studies investigating the effects of active packaging applications on the quality, safety and shelf life of fresh chicken meats were evaluated.

Özet

Tavuk eti yüksek protein ve nem içeriği nedeniyle hem mikrobiyal hem de biyokimyasal bozulmalara oldukça açık olmasından dolayı raf ömrü kısa olan bir gıdadır. Ayrıca gerek gıdanın doğası gerek işleme koşulları nedeniyle patojen mikroorganizmalarla kontamine olma ihtimalinden dolayı taze tavuk etinin güvenilir bir şekilde üretimini arttırmak ve son tüketiciye ulaşana kadar israf olmasını önlemek amacıyla mikrobiyal güvenilirliğini sağlamak oldukça önemlidir. Taze tavuk etlerinde koruyucu katkı maddeleri ilavesi, ısıl işlem uygulamaları ve/veya dondurma vb. gıda muhafaza yöntemleri kullanılmadığından üründe gerçekleşebilecek biyokimyasal değişimler ve mikrobiyal bozulmaları önlemek için ambalajlama teknolojilerinden yararlanılması işlenmiş gıda ürünlerine göre daha da önem kazanmaktadır. Yenilikçi ambalajlama teknolojileri ile taze tavuk etlerinin kalitesi arttırılıp raf ömrü uzatılabilir ve böylece güvenilirliği de daha iyi sağlanabilir. Bu bağlamda aktif ambalajlama teknolojilerinden yararlanılabilir. Bu amaçla ambalaj malzemesine ya da ambalaj ortamına eklenen antimikrobiyal maddeler, antioksidan maddeler, CO 2 , etanoL vs. gibi aktif maddelerin etkisiyle gıdanın özellikleri ambalajlandıktan sonra da iyi bir şekilde muhafaza edilebilmektedir. Son yıllarda taze tavuk etlerinin aktif ambalajlama teknolojisi ile ilgili olarak yapılan çalışmalarda; antimikrobiyal ya da antioksidan özelliklerde esansiyel yağlar ile doğal bitki ya da gıda sanayii atıklarından elde edilen ekstraktlar kullanılarak hazırlanan sentetik ve/veya biyobozunur polimerler kullanılmaya başlanmıştır. Bu teknoloji ile ambalajlanmış taze tavuk etlerinde bozulma yapan mikroorganizmaların üreme hızlarının yavaşlatıldığı, patojen mikroorganizmaların üremesinin engellendiği ve/veya lipid oksidasyon hızının azaltıldığına yönelik sonuçlar bulunmaktadır. Bu derleme makalesinde aktif ambalajlama uygulamalarının son yıllarda gerçekleştirilen bilimsel çalışmalar temelinde taze tavuk etlerinin kalitesi, güvenilirliği ve raf ömrü açısından etkileri incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Esmer, Ö. K., Özer, Ö., Naserifar, F. (2020). Active packaging applications in fresh chicken meat. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 31 Sayı: 1, 87–92. https://doi.org/10.35864/evmd.623386

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (39)

  1. Ahmed I, Lin H, Zou L, Brody AL, Li Z, (2017). A comprehensive review on the application of active packaging technologies to muscle foods. Food Control. 82, 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2017.06.009
  2. Ahmed J, Arfat YA, Bher A, Mulla M, Jacob H, (2018b). Active chicken meat packaging based on polylactide films and bimetallic ag–cu nanoparticles and essential oil. Journal of Food Science. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14121
  3. Ahmed J, Mulla M, Ali Arfat Y, Bher A, Jacob H, (2018a). Compression molded LLDPE films loaded with bimetallic (Ag-Cu) nanoparticles and cinnamon essential oil for chicken meat packaging applications. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 93, 329–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.03.051
  4. Appendini P, Hotchkiss JH, (2002). Review of antimicrobial food packaging. Innovative Food Science and Emerging Technologies 3(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1466-8564(02)00012-7
  5. Azlin-Hasim S, Cruz-Romero MC, Morris MA, Cummins E, Kerry JP, (2015). Effects of a combination of antimicrobial silver low density polyethylene nanocomposite films and modified atmosphere packaging on the shelf life of chicken breast fillets. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 4, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2015.03.003
  6. Bolumar T, Andersen ML, Orlien V, (2011). Antioxidant active packaging for chicken meat processed by high pressure treatment. Food Chemistry. 129 (4), 1406–1412. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05.082
  7. Cui H, Bai M, Li C, Liub R, Lin L, (2018). Fabrication of chitosan nanofibers containing tea tree oil liposomes against Salmonella spp. in chicken. LWT-Food Science and Technology. 96, 671–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.026
  8. de Melo AAM, Geraldine RM, Silveira MFA, Torres MCL, E Rezende CSM, (2012). Microbiological quality and other characteristics of refrigerated chicken meat in contact with cellulose acetate-based film incorporated with rosemary essential oil. Brazilian Journal of Microbiology. 43 (4), 1419-1427. doi: 10.1590/S1517-838220120004000025
  9. Fang Z, Zhao Y, Warner RD, Johnson SK, (2017). Active and intelligent packaging in meat industry. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 61 (2), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2017.01.002
  10. Ghollasi-Mood F, Mohsenzadeh M, Housaindokht MR, Varidi M, (2016). Microbial and chemical spoilage of chicken meat during storage at isothermal and fluctuation temperature under aerobic conditions. Iranian journal of veterinary science and technology. 8 (1). doi: 10.22067/veterinary.v8i1.54563
  11. Gibis, D, Rieblingera K, (2011). Oxygen scavenging films for food application. Procedia Food Science 1, 229 – 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profoo.2011.09.036
  12. Han JH, (2000). Antimicrobial food packaging. Food Technology 54 (3), 56–65. DOI: 10.1533/9781855737020.1.50
  13. Higueras L, López-Carballo G, Hernández-Muñoz P, Catalá R, Gavara R, (2014). Antimicrobial packaging of chicken fillets based on the release of carvacrol from chitosan/cyclodextrin film. International Journal of Food Microbiology. 188, 53–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.07.018
  14. Keokamnerd T, Acton JC, Han IY, Dawson PL, (2008). Effect of Commercial Rosemary Oleoresin Preparations on Ground Chicken Thigh Meat Quality Packaged in a High-Oxygen Atmosphere. Poultry Science. 87, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2007-00066
  15. Khaneghaha AM, Hashemib SMB, Limboc S, (2018). Antimicrobial agents and packaging systems in antimicrobial active food packaging: An overviewof approaches and interactions. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 111, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2018.05.001
  16. Kızılırmak Esmer Ö, Şahin B, (2018). Active packaging applied to dairy products. Conto F, Del Nobile DA, Faccia M, Zambrini AV, Conte A. Eds. Advances in Dairy products. John Wiley and Sons Ltd. UK,. p. 356-377.
  17. Konuk Takma D, Korel F, (2018). Active packaging films as a carrier of black cumin essential oil: Development and effect on quality and shelf-life of chicken breast meat. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.11.002
  18. Lin L, Liao X, Surendhiran D, Cui H, (2018). Preparation of ε-polylysine/chitosan nanofibers for food packaging against Salmonella on chicken. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 17, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.06.013
  19. López de Dicastillo C, Castro-López MDM, López-Vilariño JM, González-Rodríguez MV, (2013). Immobilization of green tea extract on polypropylene films to control the antioxidant activity in food packaging. Food Research International. 53 (1), 522–528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2013.05.022
  20. Lorenzo JM, Sineiro J, Amado IR, Franco D, (2014). Influence of natural extracts on the shelf life of modified atmosphere-packaged pork patties. Meat Science. 96, 526-534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.08.007
  21. Majid I, Nayik GA, Dar SM, Nanda V, (2018). Novel food packaging technologies: Innovations and future prospective. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 17, 454–462. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2016.11.003
  22. Mastromatteo M, Mastromatteo M, Conte A, Del Nobile MA, (2010). Advances in controlled release devices for food packaging applications. Trends in Food Science and Technology. 21 (12), 591-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2010.07.010
  23. Mulla M, Ahmed J, Al-Attar H, Castro-Aguirre E, Arfat YA, (2017). Antimicrobial efficacy of clove essential oil infused into chemically modified LLDPE film for chicken meat packaging. Food Control. 73 (part B), 663–671. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.09.018
  24. Muppalla SHR, Kanatt SR, Chawla SP, Sharma A, (2014). Carboxymethyl cellulose–polyvinyl alcohol films with clove oil for active packaging of ground chicken meat. ScienceDirect. 2 (2), 51–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2014.07.002
  25. Panea B, Ripoll G, González J, Fernández-Cuello A, Albertí P, (2014). Effect of nanocomposite packaging containing different proportions of ZnO and Ag on chicken breast meat quality. Journal of Food Engineering. 123, 104-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.09.029
  26. Pires JRA, Souza VGL, Fernando AL, (2018). Chitosan/montmorillonite bionanocomposites incorporated with rosemary and ginger essential oil as packaging for fresh poultry meat. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. 17, 142–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.06.011
  27. Rouger A, Tresse O, Zagorec M, (2017). Bacterial Contaminants of Poultry Meat: Sources, Species, and Dynamics. Microorganisms. 5 (50). doi:10.3390/microorganisms5030050 Serrano-León JS, Bergamaschi KB, Yoshida CMP, Saldaña E, Selani MM, (2018). Chitosan active films containing agro-industrial residue extracts for shelf life extension of chicken restructured product. Food Research International. 108, 93–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2018.03.031
  28. Singh P, Wani A. A, Saengerlaub S, (2011). Active packaging of food products: Recent trends. Nutrition and Food Science 41 (4), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.1108/00346651111151384
  29. Sireli T. Kanatlı etlerinde bozulma. Erişim adresi: http://www.sagliklitavuk.org/assets/userfiles/files/uzmanlardan/Kanatli_Etlerde_Bozulma.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 14 Ocak 2019
  30. Souza VGL, Pires JRA, Vieira ET, Coelhoso IM, Duarte MP, Fernando AL, (2019). Activity of chitosan-montmorillonite bionanocomposites incorporated with rosemary essential oil: From in vitro assays to application in fresh poultry meat. Food Hydrocolloids. 89, 241-252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.10.049f
  31. Soysal Ç, Bozkurt H, Dirican E, Güçlü M, Bozhüyük ED, (2015). Effect of antimicrobial packaging on physicochemical and microbial quality of chicken drumsticks. Food Control. 54, 294–299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2015.02.009
  32. Söğüt E, Seydim AC, (2019). The effects of chitosan- and polycaprolactone-based bilayer films incorporated with grape seed extract and nanocellulose on the quality of chicken breast fillets. LWT - Food Science and Technology. 101, 799–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.097
  33. Suppakul P, Miltz J, Sonneveld K, Bigger SW, (2003). Active packaging technologies with an emphasis on antimicrobial packaging and its applications. Journal of Food Science 68 (2), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2003.tb05687.x
  34. Tian F, Decker EA, Goddard JM, (2013). Controlling lipid oxidation via a biomimetic iron chelating active packaging material. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 61 (50), 12397–12404. doi: 10.1021/jf4041832
  35. Vilela C, Kurek M, Hayouka Z, Rocker B, Yildirim S, Antunes MDC, Nilsen-Nygaard J, Pettersen MK, Freire CSR, (2018). A concise guide to active agents for active food packaging. Trends in Food Science & Technology. 80, 212-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2018.08.006
  36. Üçüncü M, eds., (2007). Gıda Ambalajlama Teknolojisi. 2.Baskı. Meta Basım Matbaacılık Hizmetleri. İzmir. Pp.809-817.
  37. Yildirim S, Röcker B, Pettersen MK, Nilsen-Nygaard J, Ayhan Z, Rutkaite R, Radusin T, Suminska P, Marcos B, Coma V, (2018). Active Packaging Applications for Food. ComprehensiveReviewsinFoodScienceandFoodSafety. 17, 165-199. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12322
  38. Zhang H, Wu J, Guo X, (2016). Effects of antimicrobial and antioxidant activities of spice extracts on raw chicken meat quality. Food Science and Human Wellness. 5, 39-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fshw.2015.11.003
  39. Konuk Takma D, Korel F, (2018). Active packaging films as a carrier of black cumin essential oil: Development and effect on quality and shelf-life of chicken breast meat. Food Packaging and Shelf Life. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2018.11.002