SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 35 Sayı: 1

More Comprehension on Bacterial Biodosimeters

Bakteriyel Biyodozimetreleri Daha İyi Anlama

Muhammet Arslan(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-5565-0770
Meltem Delimanlar(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TEKNOLOJİ FAKÜLTESİ, BİYOMEDİKAL MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0003-4152-7805
Ahmet Koluman(PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TEKNOLOJİ FAKÜLTESİ, BİYOMEDİKAL MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-5308-8884
Pages
99–104
Publication Date
2024-07-04
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review aims to consolidate the existing knowledge on bacterial biodosimeters and stimulate further research to harness their full potential in radiation monitoring and protection.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The topic of bacterial biodosimetry, which is a type of biodosimetry, that uses bacteria as a challenge organism to measure the fluence of a reactor by determining its ability to inactivate them is emerging.
📊
Key Findings & Data:These biodosimeters capitalize on the unique responses of bacterial systems to ionizing radiation, providing valuable insights into the biological effects of radiation, and enabling accurate dose estimation, and the potential health risks for living organisms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review aims to consolidate the existing knowledge on bacterial biodosimeters and stimulate further research to harness their full potential in radiation monitoring and protection.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bakteriyel Biyodozimetre · Biyodozimetre · Maruziyet

Abstract

The topic of bacterial biodosimetry, which is a type of biodosimetry, that uses bacteria as a challenge organism to measure the fluence of a reactor by determining its ability to inactivate them is emerging. These biodosimeters capitalize on the unique responses of bacterial systems to ionizing radiation, providing valuable insights into the biological effects of radiation, and enabling accurate dose estimation, and the potential health risks for living organisms. This review covers the details of the advantages and disadvantages of using bacteria for area monitoring of radiation and the current state of knowledge regarding bacterial biodosimeters. Additionally, we discuss detection methodologies for bacteria, irradiation protocols, and the factors that can affect the culture conditions. This review aims to consolidate the existing knowledge on bacterial biodosimeters and stimulate further research to harness their full potential in radiation monitoring and protection.

Özet

Bakteriyel biyodozimetre konusu, reaktörün etkin dozunu ölçmek için bakterileri meydan okuma organizması olarak kullanan bir tür biyodozimetre olan bakteriyel biyodozimetrenin ortaya çıkışıyla gündeme gelmektedir. Bu biyodozimetreler, bakteri sistemlerinin iyonlaştırıcı radyasyona karşı benzersiz tepkilerinden faydalanarak, radyasyonun biyolojik etkileri hakkında değerli bilgiler sunmakta ve doğru doz tahminini sağlamaktadır, aynı zamanda canlı organizmalar için potansiyel sağlık risklerini belirlemektedir. Bu derleme, radyasyonun alan izlemesi için bakterilerin kullanılmasının avantajları ve dezavantajlarının detaylarını ve bakteriyel biyodozimetreler hakkındaki mevcut bilgi durumunu kapsamaktadır. Ayrıca, bakterilerin tespit yöntemlerini, radyasyon maruziyeti protokollerini ve kültür koşullarını etkileyebilecek faktörleri tartışmaktayız. Bu derleme, bakteriyel biyodozimetrelerin var olan bilgisini bir araya getirme ve radyasyon izleme ve koruma konularında potansiyellerini tam olarak kullanmak için daha fazla araştırmayı teşvik etmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Arslan, M., Delimanlar, M., Koluman, A. (2024). More Comprehension on Bacterial Biodosimeters. Etlik Veteriner Mikrobiyoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 35 Sayı: 1, 99–104. https://doi.org/10.35864/evmd.1380917

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (24)

  1. Albander, H. (2021). Occupational health and radiation Safety of radiography workers. In IntechOpen eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.95061
  2. Boice, J. D., Dauer, L. T., Kase, K. R., Mettler, F. A., & Vetter, R. J. (2020). Evolution of radiation protection for medical workers. British Journal of Radiology, 93(1112), 20200282. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20200282
  3. De Deene, Y. (2022). Radiation Dosimetry by Use of Radiosensitive Hydrogels and Polymers: Mechanisms, State-of-the-Art and Perspective from 3D to 4D. Gels, 8(9), 599. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8090599
  4. Farci, D., Haniewicz, P., & Piano, D. (2022). The structured organization of Deinococcus radiodurans ’ cell envelope. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 119(45). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2209111119
  5. Ghosal, D., Omelchenko, M. V., Gaidamakova, E. K., Matrosova, V. Y., Василенко, А. Т., Venkateswaran, A., Zhai, M., Kostandarithes, H. M., Brim, H., Makarova, K. S., Wackett, L. P., Fredrickson, J. K., & Daly, M. J. (2005). How radiation kills cells: Survival ofDeinococcus radioduransandShewanella oneidensisunder oxidative stress. Fems Microbiology Reviews, 29(2), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fmrre.2004.12.007
  6. Heron, J. L., Padovani, R., Smith, I., & Czarwinski, R. (2010). Radiation protection of medical staff. European Journal of Radiology, 76(1), 20–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.034
  7. International Conference on Occupational Radiation Protection – Strengthening Radiation Protection of Workers – Twenty years of progress and the Way forward. (n.d.). https://www.iaea.org/events/occupational-radiation-protection-2022
  8. Liu, F., Li, N., & Zhang, Y. (2023). The radioresistant and survival mechanisms of Deinococcus radiodurans. Radiation Medicine and Protection, 4(2), 70–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmp.2023.03.001
  9. Macchione, M. A., Páez, S. L., Strumia, M. C., Valente, M., & Mattea, F. (2022). Chemical Overview of gel Dosimetry Systems: A Comprehensive Review. Gels, 8(10), 663. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8100663
  10. Nocker, A., Shah, M. S., Dannenmann, B., Schulze‐Osthoff, K., Wingender, J., & Probst, A. J. (2018). Assessment of UV-C-induced water disinfection by differential PCR-based quantification of bacterial DNA damage. Journal of Microbiological Methods, 149, 89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2018.03.007
  11. Radiation Biodosimetry Medical Countermeasure Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff. (2016, April). U.S. Food And Drug Administration. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-
  12. information/search-fda-guidance-documents/radiation-biodosimetry-medical-countermeasure-devices Sholom, S., McKeever, S., Escalona, M., Ryan, T. L., & Balajee, A. S. (2022). A comparative validation of biodosimetry and physical dosimetry techniques for possible triage applications in emergency dosimetry. Journal of Radiological Protection, 42(2), 021515. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/ac5815
  13. Sperle, P., Khan, M. S., Drewes, J. E., & Wurzbacher, C. (2023). A practical bacterial biodosimetry procedure to assess performance of Lab-Scale flow-through ultraviolet water disinfection reactors. ACS ES&T Water, 3(8), 2130–2139. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.2c00648
  14. Sproull, M., Camphausen, K., & Koblentz, G. D. (2017). Biodosimetry: a future tool for medical management of radiological emergencies. Health Security, 15(6), 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2017.0050
  15. Suárez, R. C., Gustafsson, M., & Mrabit, K. (2001). IAEA Occupational Radiation Protection Programme. Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 96(1), 17–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006575
  16. Swartz, H. M., Flood, A. B., & Williams, B. B. (2014). Overview of the principles and practice of biodosimetry. Radiation and Environmental Biophysics, 53(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-014-0522-0
  17. Wang, Y., & Salazar, J. K. (2015). Culture-Independent rapid detection methods for bacterial pathogens and toxins in food matrices. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety, 15(1), 183–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12175
  18. Wilkins, R., Rodrigues, M. A., & Beaton-Green, L. A. (2017). The application of Imaging Flow Cytometry to High-Throughput Biodosimetry. Genome Integrity, 8. https://doi.org/10.4103/2041-9414.198912
  19. Wise, K. (2006). Preparing Spread Plates Protocols. Am. Soc. Microbiol. Microbe Libr. https://www.asmscience.org/content/education/protocol/protocol.3085
  20. Workers. (n.d.). https://www.iaea.org/topics/radiation-protection/workers. [Accessed:Sep. 30, 2023]. Workplace Monitoring - home. (n.d.).
  21. https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/orpnet/training/workplacemonitoring/SitePages/Home.aspx Yukihara, E., McKeever, S., Andersen, C., Bos, A., Bailiff, I., Yoshimura, E. M., Sawakuchi, G. O., Bossin, L., &
  22. Christensen, J. B. (2022). Luminescence dosimetry. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00102-0
  23. Zhang, X., Jiang, X., Yang, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhao, J., Qu, K., & Zhao, C. (2018). Online Monitoring of Bacterial
  24. Growth with an Electrical Sensor. Analytical Chemistry, 90(10), 6006–6011. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.8b01214