SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1

An Examination of the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Short Form of the APS-R Perfectionism Scale in Adolescents

Ergenlerde APS-R Mükemmeliyetçilik Ölçeği Türkçe Kısa Formu’nun Geçerlik ve Güvenirliğinin İncelenmesi

Büşra Kökçam(UŞAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8329-749X
Zeliha Traş(NECMETTİN ERBAKAN UNIVERSITY A.K. EDUCATION FACULTY NO: 455 MERAM YENİYOL KONYA/TURKEY)0000-0003-2670-0868
Pages
295–318
Publication Date
2026-04-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Altogether, the development and rigorous assessment of the APS-R Turkish Short Form —including its factor structure, measurement, and structural invariance, replication, construct validity, cross-validation, and factor mixture modeling — offers a valuable tool for both academic and practical applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aimed to enhance the utility of the Almost Perfect Scale–Revised, one of the most widely used tools for measuring higher-order dimensions of perfectionism, by developing a shorter and more refined Turkish version.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Responses from 1391 high school students from 12 schools were randomly split into two groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Altogether, the development and rigorous assessment of the APS-R Turkish Short Form —including its factor structure, measurement, and structural invariance, replication, construct validity, cross-validation, and factor mixture modeling — offers a valuable tool for both academic and practical applications.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mükemmeliyetçilik · Ölçme değişmezliği · Yapısal değişmezlik

Abstract

This study aimed to enhance the utility of the Almost Perfect Scale–Revised, one of the most widely used tools for measuring higher-order dimensions of perfectionism, by developing a shorter and more refined Turkish version. Responses from 1391 high school students from 12 schools were randomly split into two groups. Firstly, in Sample 1, a short form was developed based on item content and factor structure, followed by an evaluation of its validity and reliability. Secondly, the assumption of measurement invariance across sex was tested, confirming strict measurement invariance and structural invariance. Thirdly, in Sample 2, evidence was obtained for cross-validation to replicate the factor structure and reliability of the short form, as well as to assess its convergent and discriminant validity. Finally, considering that perfectionism is examined in the literature using both dimensional and group-based approaches, factor mixture modeling was employed to simultaneously assess the dimensional and categorical structure of the APS-R Turkish Short Form. Results supported a mixed structure of perfectionism, endorsing a four-class, two-factor model. Altogether, the development and rigorous assessment of the APS-R Turkish Short Form —including its factor structure, measurement, and structural invariance, replication, construct validity, cross-validation, and factor mixture modeling — offers a valuable tool for both academic and practical applications.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, mükemmeliyetçiliğin üst boyutlarını ölçmek için en sık kullanılan araçlardan biri olan APS-R Mükemmeliyetçilik Ölçeği’nin kullanışlılığını artırmak için daha kısa ve rafine bir formunun oluşturulması amaçlanmıştır. 12 liseden 1391 öğrencinin yanıtları rastgele ikiye bölünmüş, ilk olarak çalışma grubu 1’de madde içerikleri ve faktör yapısı göz önüne alınarak kısa form oluşturulmuş, ardından geçerliği ve güvenirliği incelenmiştir. İkinci olarak kısa formun cinsiyete göre ölçme değişmezliği varsayımının test edilmesi sonucu, cinsiyete göre katı ölçme değişmezliği ve yapısal değişmezlik doğrulanmıştır. Üçüncü olarak çalışma grubu 2’de kısa formun çapraz geçerliliğinin yanı sıra benzeşim ve ayrışım geçerliğine ilişkin kanıtlar elde edilmiştir. Son olarak ilgili alanyazında mükemmeliyetçilik, boyutsal yaklaşımların yanı sıra grup temelli yaklaşımlarla incelendiğinden APS-R Mükemmeliyetçilik Ölçeği Kısa Formu’nun boyutsal ve kategorik yapısını eş zamanlı olarak değerlendirebilmek için faktör karma modellemesi kullanılmıştır. Sonuçlar, kısa formda incelenen mükemmeliyetçiliğin karma bir yapıya sahip olduğunu ortaya koyarak dört sınıflı ve iki faktörlü modeli desteklemiştir. Kısa formun geliştirilmesi ve değerlendirilmesinde izlenen titiz prosedür, APS-R Mükemmeliyetçilik Ölçeği Kısa Formu’nu hem akademik hem de pratik uygulamalar için önemli ve değerli bir araç hâline getirmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kökçam, B., Traş, Z. (2026). An Examination of the Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Short Form of the APS-R Perfectionism Scale in Adolescents. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 295–318. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1620788

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (51)

  1. Bauer, J. (2022). A primer to latent profile and latent class analysis. M. Goller, E. Kyndt, S. Paloniemi, & C. Damşa (Ed.), Methods for researching professional learning and development: Challenges, applications and empirical illustrations içinde (s. 243-268). Springer.
  2. Bieling, P. J., Israeli, A. L., & Antony, M. M. (2004). Is perfectionism good, bad, or both? Examining models of the perfectionism construct. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(6), 1373–1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00235-6
  3. Bryant, F. B. & Satorra, A. (2012). Principles and practice of scaled difference chi-square testing. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 19(3), 372-398. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2012.687671
  4. Clark, S. L., Muthén, B., Kaprio, J., D'Onofrio, B. M., Viken, R., & Rose, R. J. (2013). Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: An example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 20(4), 681-703. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.824786
  5. Dimitrov, D. M. (2010). Testing for factorial invariance in the context of construct validation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 43(2), 121-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175610373459
  6. Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. SAGE.
  7. Flett, G. L., Mara, C. A., Hewitt, P. L., Sirois, F., & Molnar, D. S. (2016). How should Discrepancy be assessed in perfectionism research? A psychometric analysis and proposed refinement of the Almost Perfect Scale–Revised. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(7), 718-732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916651382
  8. Frost, R. O., Marten, P., Lahart, C., & Rosenblate, R. (1990). The dimensions of perfectionism. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 14, 449–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01172967
  9. Frost, R. O., Heimberg, R. G., Holt, C. S., Mattia, J. I., & Neubauer, A. L. (1993). A comparison of two measures of perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(93)90181-2
  10. Gaudreau, P. (2019). On the distinction between personal standards perfectionism and excellencism: A theory elaboration and research agenda. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(2), 197-215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618797940
  11. Gaudreau, P. & Thompson, A. (2010). Testing a 2×2 model of dispositional perfectionism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(5), 532-537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.11.031
  12. Hill, A. P. (2014). Perfectionistic strivings and the perils of partialling. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 12, 302–315.
  13. Hill, A. P. & Curran, T. (2016). Multidimensional perfectionism and burnout: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 269-288. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315596286
  14. Hill, R. W., Huelsman, T. J., Furr, R. M., Kibler, J., Vicente, B. B., & Kennedy, C. (2004). A new measure of perfectionism: The Perfectionism Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 82(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_13
  15. Kağan, M. (2011). Frost Çok Boyutlu Mükemmelliyetçilik Ölçeğinin Türkçe formunun psikometrik özellikleri. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 12(3), 192-197.
  16. Keith, T. Z. (2019). Multiple regression and beyond: An introduction to multiple regression and structural equation modeling. Routledge.
  17. Kim, L. E., Chen, L., MacCann, C., Karlov, L., & Kleitman, S. (2015). Evidence for three factors of perfectionism: Perfectionistic strivings, order, and perfectionistic concerns. Personality and Individual Differences, 84, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.01.033
  18. Kökçam, B., Doğan, M., Karadeniz, S., & Kıyak, S. (2024). Üniversite öğrencilerinde mükemmeliyetçilik ve tükenmişlik arasındaki ilişkide okul bağlılığının aracı rolünün incelenmesi. A. Ersoy & Ş. Çınkır (Ed.), International Education Congress 2024 Conference Proceedings Book içinde (s. 1527-1536). Edu.
  19. Madigan, D. J. (2019). A meta-analysis of perfectionism and academic achievement. Educational Psychology Review, 31, 967-989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09484-2
  20. Masyn, K. E. (2013). Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. T. D. Little (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of quantitative methods içinde (c. 2: Statistical analysis, s. 551-611). Oxford University. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199934898.013.0025
  21. Meyer, D., Dimitriadou, E., Hornik, K., Weingessel, A., Leisch, F., Chang, C. C., & Lin, C. C. (2024). e1071: misc functions of the department of statistics, probability theory group (formerly: E1071), TU Wien. R package version 1.7-16. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/e1071/e1071.pdf sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  22. Muthén, L. K. & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2017). Mplus User’s Guide (8. b.). Muthén & Muthén.
  23. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396
  24. Nylund-Gibson, K. & Choi, A. Y. (2018). Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 4(4), 440–461. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000176
  25. Quested, E., Cumming, J., & Duda, J. L. (2014). Profiles of perfectionism, motivation, and self-evaluations among dancers: An extended analysis of Cumming and Duda (2012). International Journal of Sport Psychology, 45(4), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.7352/IJSP 2014.45.349
  26. Raykov, T. (2009). Evaluation of scale reliability for unidimensional measures using latent variable modeling. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 42, 223–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748175609344096
  27. Rice, K. G. & Ashby, J. S. (2007). An efficient method for classifying perfectionists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 54(1), 72-85. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.54.1.72
  28. Rice, K. G., Ashby, J. S., & Gilman, R. (2011). Classifying adolescent perfectionists. Psychological Assessment, 23(3), 563–577. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022482
  29. Rice, K. G., Richardson, C. M. E., & Tueller, S. (2014). The Short Form of the Revised Almost Perfect Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 96(3), 368-379. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2013.838172
  30. Rycroft, C. (1972). A critical dictionary of psychoanalysis. Penguin.
  31. Sanderson, N. (2014). Frustration and disappointment. Journal of Child Psychotherapy, 40(1), 36-57. https://doi.org/10.1080/0075417X.2014.883136
  32. Sapmaz, F. (2006). Üniversite öğrencilerinin uyumlu ve uyumsuz mükemmeliyetçilik özelliklerinin psikolojik belirti düzeyleri açısından incelenmesi. (Yüksek Lisans Tezi). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  33. Sass, D. A. & Schmitt, T. A. (2013). Testing measurement and structural invariance: Implications for practice. T. Teo (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methods for educational research içinde (s. 315-345). Brill.
  34. Seong, H. & Chang, E. (2021). Profiles of perfectionism, achievement emotions, and academic burnout in South Korean adolescents: Testing the 2×2 model of perfectionism. Learning and Individual Differences, 90, 102045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102045
  35. Sironic, A. & Reeve, R. A. (2012). More evidence for four perfectionism subgroups. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2012.04.003
  36. Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445
  37. Slaney, R. B., Mobley, M., Trippi, J., Ashby, J., & Johnson, D. G. (1996). The Almost Perfect Scale–Revised. University Park.
  38. Slaney, R. B., Rice, K. G., Mobley, M., Trippi, J., & Ashby, J. S. (2001). The Revised Almost Perfect Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 34(3), 130–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2002.12069030 Smith, G. T., McCarthy, D. M., & Anderson, K. G. (2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102
  39. Smith, M. M., Saklofske, D. H., Yan, G., & Sherry, S. B. (2015). A person‐centered perspective on multidimensional perfectionism in Canadian and Chinese university students: A multigroup latent profile analysis. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 44(2), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12042
  40. Smith, M. M., Sherry, S. B., Chen, S., Saklofske, D. H., Mushquash, C., Flett, G. L., & Hewitt, P. L. (2018). The perniciousness of perfectionism: A meta‐analytic review of the perfectionism–suicide relationship. Journal of Personality, 86(3), 522-542. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12333
  41. Stairs, A. M., Smith, G. T., Zapolski, T. C. B., Combs, J. L., & Settles, R. E. (2012). Clarifying the construct of perfectionism. Assessment, 19, 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191111411663
  42. Ståhlberg, J., Tuominen, H., Pulkka, A. T., & Niemivirta, M. (2021). Students' perfectionistic profiles: Stability, change, and associations with achievement goal orientations. Psychology in the Schools, 58(1), 162-184. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22444
  43. Stoeber, J. (2018). The psychology of perfectionism: An Introduction. J. Stoeber (Ed.), The psychology of perfectionism: Theory, research, applications içinde (s. 3-16). Routledge.
  44. Stoeber, J. & Gaudreau, P. (2017). The advantages of partialling perfectionistic strivings and perfectionistic concerns: Critical issues and recommendations. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 379-386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.08.039
  45. Stoeber, J. & Otto, K. (2006). Positive conceptions of perfectionism: Approaches, evidence, challenges. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1004_2
  46. Suddarth, B. B. & Slaney, R. B. (2001). An investigation of the dimensions of perfectionism in college students. Measurement ve Evaluation in Counseling ve Development, 34, 157–165.
  47. Ulu, İ. P. (2007). An investigation of adaptive and maladaptive dimensions of perfectionism in relation to adult attachment and Big Five personality traits. (Doktora Tezi). https://tez.yok.gov.tr/ sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  48. Ulu, I. P., Tezer, E., & Slaney, R. B. (2012). Investigation of adaptive and maladaptive perfectionism with Turkish Almost Perfect Scale—Revised. Psychological Reports, 110(3), 1007-1020. https://doi.org/10.2466/09.02.20.PR0.110.3.1007-1020
  49. Wang, D., Hou, Z. J., Ni, J., Tian, L., Zhang, X., Chi, H. Y., & Zhao, A. (2020). The effect of perfectionism on career adaptability and career decision-making difficulties. Journal of Career Development, 47(4), 469-483. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845318803192
  50. Wang, K., Yuen, M., & Slaney, R. (2009). Perfectionism, depression, loneliness, and life satisfaction: A study of high school students in Hong Kong. The Counseling Psychologist, 37, 249–274. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000008315975
  51. Wickham, H. (2016). Ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis (2. b.) Springer International.