SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2018 / Volume: 11 Issue: 3

PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND JOB PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF WORK ENGAGEMENT

Psikolojik İyi-Oluş ve İş Performansı: Çalışmaya Tutkunluğun Aracı Rolü

Bilal Çankır(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi)
Safiye Şahin(İstanbul Medeniyet Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1734-9586
Pages
2549–2560
Publication Date
2018-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It was found that the level of psychological well-being, work engagement and job performance of textile workers were below the average and low.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to determine the mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between psychological well-being and job performance.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The sample of the research was composed of 322 textile workers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It was found that the level of psychological well-being, work engagement and job performance of textile workers were below the average and low.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Çalışmaya Tutkunluk · Psikolojik İyi Oluş · İş Performansı

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the mediating role of work engagement in the relationship between psychological well-being and job performance. The data were collected from textile workers to test the research’s model. The sample of the research was composed of 322 textile workers. Psychological well-being scale, work satisfaction scale and work performance scale were used as data collection tools. The research’s model was tested by structural equation analysis. It was found that the level of psychological well-being, work engagement and job performance of textile workers were below the average and low. As a result, it was determined that work engagement partially mediated the relationship between psychological well-being and job performance.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, psikolojik iyi oluşun iş performansına etkisinde çalışmaya tutkunluğun aracı rolünü belirlemektir. Bu doğrultuda oluşturulan araştırma modelini test etmek amacıyla tekstil çalışanlarından veri toplanmıştır. Araştırmanın örneklemini 322 tekstil çalışanı oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak, literatürde daha önce kullanılan, geçerlilik ve güvenirlik analizleri yapılmış olan psikolojik iyi oluş ölçeği, çalışmaya tutkunluk ölçeği ve iş performansı ölçeği kullanılmıştır. Araştırma modeli yapısal eşitlik analizi ile test edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, psikolojik iyi oluşun iş performansına etkisinde çalışmaya tutkunluğun kısmi aracı rolü olduğu belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Çankır, B., Şahin, S. (2018). PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING AND JOB PERFORMANCE: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF WORK ENGAGEMENT. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Volume: 11 Issue: 3, 2549–2560. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsosbil.487244

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (36)

  1. Çankır, B., & Yener, S., 2017, “İş’te Pozitif Davranış”, Çizgi Kitapevi: Konya.
  2. Caymaz, E., Erenel, F., & Gürer, B. (2013). “Liderlik karizması, adanmışlık ve gruba aidiyetin gönüllü çalışma performansına etkileri: AKUT Arama Kurtarma Derneği örneği”, Journal of Human Sciences, Vol: 10(1), pp: 129-147.
  3. Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S., & Slaughter, J. E. (2011). “Work engagement: A quantitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 64(1), pp: 89-136.
  4. Çöl, G. (2011). “Algılanan güçlendirmenin iş gören performansı üzerine etkileri”, Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Vol. 9(1), pp: 35-46.
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). “Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health”, Canadian psychology/Psychologie canadienne, Vol: 49(3), pp: 182.
  6. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-W., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Social indicators research series: Vol. 39. Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 247-266). New York, NY, US: Springer Science + Business Media.
  7. Gechman, A., & Wiener, Y. (1975). “Job involvement and satisfaction as related to mental health and personal time devoted to work”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol: 60, pp: 521-523.
  8. Hallberg, U. E., Johansson, G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2007). “Type A behavior and work situation: Associations with burnout and work engagement”, Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, Vol. 48, pp: 135-142.
  9. Holman, D., Chissick, C., & Totterdell, P. (2002). “The effects of performance monitoring on emotional labor and psychological well-being in call centers”, Motivation and Emotion, Vol: 26(1), pp: 57-81.
  10. Huppert, F. A. (2009). “Psychological well‐being: Evidence regarding its causes and consequences”, Applied Psychology: Health and Well‐Being, Vol: 1(2), pp: 137-164.Jamal, M., & Mitchell, V. F. (1980). “Work, nonwork, and mental health: A model and a test”, Industrial Relations, Vol: 19, pp: 88-93.
  11. Jenaro, C., Flores, N., Orgaz, M. B., & Cruz, M. (2011). “Vigour and dedication in nursing professionals: towards a better understanding of work engagement”, Journal of advanced nursing, Vol: 67(4), pp: 865-875.
  12. Johnson, E. P. (2003). Appropriating Blackness: Performance and the politics of authenticity. Duke University Press.
  13. Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). “Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 42(1), pp: 58-74.
  14. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
  15. Mäkikangas, A., Rantanen, J., Bakker, A. B., Kinnunen, M. L., Pulkkinen, L., & Kokko, K. (2015). “The circumplex model of occupational psychological well-being: Its relation with personality”, Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 1.
  16. Martin, T N. (1984). “Role stress and inability to leave as predictors of mental health”, Human Relations, Vol: 37, pp: 969-983.
  17. Motowidlo, S. J. (2003). Job performance. Handbook of Psychology.
  18. Poon, J. M. (2013). “Relationships among perceived career support, affective commitment, and work engagement”, International Journal of Psychology, Vol: 48(6), pp: 1148-1155.
  19. Rich, B. L., Lepine, J. A., & Crawford, E. R. (2010). “Job engagement: Antecedents and effects on job performance”, Academy of Management Journal. Vol. 53(3), pp: 617-625.
  20. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). “On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonis well-being”, Annual review of psychology, Vol: 52, pp: 141-166.
  21. Ryff, C. D. (1995). Psychological well-being in adult life. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol: 4, pp: 99-104.
  22. Ryff, D. C., & Keyes, C. L. M., 1995, The Structure of Psychological Well Being Revisited. Journal of Psychological and Social Psychology, Vol: 69(4), pp: 719-727.
  23. Samman, E. (2007). Psychological and Subjective wellbeing: A proposal for internationally comparable indicators. Oxford Development Studies.
  24. Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2003). “Utrecht work engagement scale: Preliminary manual”, Occupational Health Psychology Unit, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
  25. Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). “The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 3(1), pp: 71-92.
  26. Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M., & De Witte, H. (2017). “An Ultra-Short Measure for Work Engagement: The UWES-3 Validation Across Five Countries”, European Journal of Psychological Assessment.
  27. Sekaran, U. (1985). “The paths to mental health: An exploratory study of husbands and wives in dual-career families”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol: 58, pp: 129-137.
  28. Shimazu, A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2009). “Is workaholism good or bad for employee psychological well-being? The distinctiveness of workaholism and work engagement among Japanese employees”, Industrial health, Vol: 47(5), pp: 495-502.
  29. Shimazu, A., Schaufeli, W. B., Kubota, K., & Kawakami, N. (2012). “Do workaholism and work engagement predict employee psychological well-being and performance in opposite directions?”, Industrial health, Vol: 50(4), pp: 316-321.
  30. Sigler, T. H., & Pearson, C. M. (2000). “Creating an empowering culture: examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment”, Journal of quality management, Vol. 5(1), pp: 27-52.
  31. Siu, O. L. (2002). “Occupational stressors and well‐being among Chinese employees: The role of organisational commitment”, Applied Psychology, Vol. 51(4), pp: 527-544.
  32. Sonnentag, S., & Frese, M. (2002). “Performance concepts and performance theory”, Psychological Management of individual performance, Vol. 23(1), pp: 3-25.
  33. Telef, B. B. (2013). “Psikolojik iyi oluş ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması”, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Vol: 28(3).
  34. Van Scotter, J.R. & Motowidlo S.J. (1996). “Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 81, pp: 525-531.
  35. Wright, T. A., & Cropanzano, R. (2000). “Psychological well-being and job satisfaction as predictors of job performance”, Journal of occupational health psychology, Vol: 5(1), pp: 84.
  36. Wright, T. A., Cropanzano, R., & Bonett, D. G. (2007). “The moderating role of employee positive well being on the relation between job satisfaction and job performance”, Journal of occupational health psychology, Vol: 12(2), 93.