Journals / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3

Threshold Dynamics of Regime Collapse in Authoritarian Systems: A Conceptual Framework Based on the Jenga Metaphor

Otoriter Rejimlerde Eşiksel Çöküş Dinamikleri: Jenga Metaforu Temelli Bir Kavramsal Çerçeve

Pages
533–554
Publication Date
2026-07-22
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The Jenga metaphor thus provides a useful framework for understanding the nonlinear dynamics of political fragility and regime breakdown.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study proposes the Jenga game as an analytical metaphor for explaining the collapse of political regimes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The empirical sections analyze Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union, and Iran to demonstrate how imbalances across these dimensions produce systemic breakdown.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The Jenga metaphor thus provides a useful framework for understanding the nonlinear dynamics of political fragility and regime breakdown.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Siyasal çöküş · rejim çözülmesi · Jenga metaforu

Abstract

This study proposes the Jenga game as an analytical metaphor for explaining the collapse of political regimes. In the Jenga model, a structure remains standing as long as the balance among its blocks is maintained; however, cumulative weakening eventually leads to a sudden and irreversible collapse once a critical threshold is crossed. Building on this logic, the study conceptualizes political systems through three interdependent dimensions: coercive capacity (lower block), elite coordination (middle block), and normative legitimacy (upper block). Drawing on threshold and tipping point theories, the article argues that regime collapse is not the result of a single event but rather the outcome of accumulated structural erosion. The empirical sections analyze Yugoslavia, the Soviet Union, and Iran to demonstrate how imbalances across these dimensions produce systemic breakdown. The findings suggest that political systems may appear stable for long periods, yet underlying vulnerabilities can lead to rapid collapse once critical thresholds are exceeded. The Jenga metaphor thus provides a useful framework for understanding the nonlinear dynamics of political fragility and regime breakdown.

Özet

Bu çalışma, siyasal rejimlerin çöküşünü açıklamak amacıyla Jenga oyununu analitik bir metafor olarak önermektedir. Jenga modelinde yapı, bloklar arasındaki dengenin korunmasıyla ayakta kalmakta; ancak birikimli zayıflama belirli bir eşik aşıldığında ani ve geri döndürülemez bir çöküşe yol açmaktadır. Bu çalışmada siyasal sistemler, zor kapasitesi (alt blok), elit koordinasyonu (orta blok) ve normatif meşruiyet (üst blok) olmak üzere üç temel boyut üzerinden kavramsallaştırılmaktadır. Eşik ve kırılma noktası teorilerinden hareketle, rejim çöküşünün tekil bir olaydan ziyade birikimli yapısal aşınmanın sonucu olduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Yugoslavya, Sovyetler Birliği ve İran örnekleri üzerinden yapılan analizler, bu boyutlar arasındaki dengenin bozulmasının sistemik kırılmaya yol açtığını göstermektedir. Çalışma, siyasal sistemlerin uzun süre istikrarlı görünebilmesine rağmen belirli eşikler aşıldığında hızlı biçimde çözülebileceğini ortaya koymaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ertekin, B. A. (2026). Threshold Dynamics of Regime Collapse in Authoritarian Systems: A Conceptual Framework Based on the Jenga Metaphor. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 3, 533–554. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.1926840

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (61)

  1. Abrahamian, E. (1982). Iran between two revolutions. Princeton University Press.
  2. Bachkatov, N. (2011, December). Dissolution chaotique de l’URSS. Le Monde Diplomatique, 5. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2011/12/BACHKATOV/47060
  3. Barang, M. (1975, May). Iran: renaissance d’un empire. Le Monde Diplomatique. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1975/05/BARANG/33158
  4. Bellin, E. (2004). The Robustness of Authoritarianism in the Middle East: Exceptionalism in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics, 36(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/4150140
  5. Bouthoul, Gaston., (1975), Siyaset Sosyolojisi, (Çev. Selahattin Yıldırım), Gelişim Yayınları, İstanbul.
  6. Brzezinski, Z. (1994). Büyük çöküş (G. Keskil & G. Pakkan, Çev.; 3. bs.). Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları.
  7. Brun, T.-A. (1978, July). Les échecs du développement à l’occidentale accroissent les difficultés du régime iranien. Le Monde Diplomatique, 17-18. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1978/07/BRUN/34800
  8. Chauvier, J.-M. (1991, September). Fin du pouvoir communiste en URSS et batailles à venir. Le Monde Diplomatique, 1,10-11. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1991/09/CHAUVIER/43786
  9. Chauvier, J.-M. (2005, June). Retour, vingt ans après, sur la perestroïka gorbatchévienne. Le Monde Diplomatique, 18-19. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2005/06/CHAUVIER/12473
  10. Cohen, L. J. (1992). The disintegration of Yugoslavia. Current History, 91(568), 369-375. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45316718
  11. De La Gorce, P.-M. (1991, September). La fin du pouvoir communiste en URSS sous l’œil de Washington. Le Monde Diplomatique, 14. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1991/09/LA_GORCE/43800
  12. Elorriaga, J. F. (1990, February). La fédération yougoslave menacée d’éclatement. Le Monde Diplomatique, 5. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1990/02/FERNANDEZ_ELORRIAGA/42359
  13. European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS). (2022, July). The European Parliament and the break-up of the Soviet Union in 1991 (pp. 1-8). European Parliament.
  14. Faroughy, A. (1978, July). L’opposition iranienne face au chah et à la domination étrangère. Le Monde Diplomatique, 18-19. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1978/07/FAROUGHY/34801
  15. Faroughy, A. (1979, June). L’Iran entre les asprations révolutionnaires et la paralysie. Le Monde Diplomatique, 4-5. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1979/06/FAROUGHY/35151
  16. Ferro, M. (1990, May). En Asie centrale soviétique, des républiques à la dérive. Le Monde Diplomatique, 10-11. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1990/05/FERRO/42568
  17. Fukuyama, F. (2018). Siyasi düzen ve siyasi çürüme (M. M. Özeren, Çev.). Profil Kitap.
  18. Geddes, B. (1999). What do we know about democratization after twenty years? Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 115-144.
  19. Genetski, R. (2017). Rich nation, poor nation. FastPencil Publishing.
  20. Gladwell, M. (2015). The tipping point: How little things can make a big difference. Abacus.
  21. Goldstone, J. A. (2025). Erken modern dünyada devrimler ve isyanlar (Ö. Akpınar, Çev.). VakıfBank Kültür Yayınları.
  22. Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83(6), 1420-1443. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2778111
  23. Huntington, S. P. (2006). Political order in changing societies (New foreword by F. Fukuyama). Yale University Press.
  24. Huntington, S. P. (1996). The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. Simon & Schuster.
  25. Huntington, S. P. (1991). Democracy’s third wave. Journal of Democracy, 2(2), 12-34.
  26. İbn Haldun. (2017). Mukaddime I (A. Tekin, Haz.). İlgi Kültür Sanat Yayınları.
  27. Ignacio, R. (1991, August). De la guerre civile. Le Monde Diplomatique, 1. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1991/08/RAMONET/43733 Jaksic, B. (1995, July). La faillite des élites nationales. Le Monde Diplomatique, 1-4-5. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1995/07/JAKSIC/6515
  28. Julien, C. (1979, May). Tortionnaires. Le Monde Diplomatique, 1. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1979/05/JULIEN/35098
  29. Kapeliouk, A. (1991, September). M. Boris Eltsine et l’ordre nouveau. Le Monde Diplomatique, 12. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1991/09/KAPELIOUK/43824
  30. Keddie, N. (1977, August). Iran: de l’indépendance religieuse à l’opposition politique. Le Monde Diplomatique, 11-12. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1977/08/KEDDIE/34368
  31. Kennedy, P. (1989). The rise and fall of the great powers: Economic change and military conflict from 1500 to 2000. Vintage Books.
  32. Lefebvre D’Ovidio, F. (Ed.). (2024). The dissolution of the USSR as seen from world capitals. Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale. https://diplomatic-documents.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/ICEDD_DISSOLUTION_CAPITAL.pdf
  33. Lepingwell, J. W. R. (1992). Soviet civil-military relations and the August coup. World Politics, 44(4), 539-572. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2010487
  34. Lichtenwalter, S., & Baker, P. (2010). Teaching Note: Teaching About Oppression Through Jenga: A Game-Based Learning Example For Socıal Work Educators. Journal of Social Work Education, 46(2), 305-313. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23044412
  35. Lipset, S. M. (1960). Political man: The social bases of politics. Doubleday.
  36. Montazami, B. (1978, December). L’Iran du refus: La « croissance miraculeuse » et le bouleversement. Le Monde Diplomatique, 11. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1978/12/MONTAZAMI/34953
  37. Nathan, A. J. (2003). Authoritarian resilience. Journal of Democracy, 14(1), 6-17.
  38. Roberts, A. (1978). Yugoslavia: The constitution and the succession. The World Today, 34(4), 136-146. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40395044
  39. Rondot, P. (1984, March). Le Dhofar: de la guerre au développement. Le Monde Diplomatique, 21. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1984/03/RONDOT/37882
  40. Roskin, M. G., Cord, R. L., Medeiros, J. A., & Jones, W. S. (2012). Political science: An introduction (12th ed.). Pearson Longman.
  41. Samary, C. (2006). Les séquelles des guerres yougoslaves entre deux mondes. L’Atlas Géopolitique, 140-141. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/publications/l_atlas_geopolitique/a53544
  42. Salmon, J. (1980, November). Le conflit de souveraineté sur Abou-Moussa et les Petite et Grande Tomb. Le Monde Diplomatique, 10. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1980/11/SALMON/35836
  43. Schelling, T. C. (1978). Micromotives and macrobehavior. W. W. Norton & Company.
  44. Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge University Press.
  45. Spencer, H. (1960). The man versus the state. The Caxton Printers.
  46. Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. (1974). Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. https://ia600107.us.archive.org/9/items/1974YugoslavConstitution/Yugoslavia-Constitution1974_text.pdf
  47. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). University of California Press.
  48. Tilly, C. (1992). Coercion, capital, and European states. Wiley-Blackwell.
  49. Viennot, J.-P. (1974, June). La politique de Téhéran renforce la solidarité des mouvements progressistes dans la région du Golfe. Le Monde Diplomatique, 16-17. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1974/06/VIENNOT/32425
  50. Yang, A. H., & Chiang, J. H.-C. (2019, February 20). The Risky Game of Jenga Being Playing in the Taiwan Strait - The National Interest. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/risky-game-jenga-being-playing-taiwan-strait-45127
  51. Barang, M. (1975, May). Iran: renaissance d’un empire. Le Monde Diplomatique. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1975/05/BARANG/33158
  52. De La Gorce, P.-M. (1991, September). La fin du pouvoir communiste en URSS sous l’œil de Washington. Le Monde Diplomatique, 14. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1991/09/LA_GORCE/43800
  53. Elorriaga, J. F. (1990, February). La fédération yougoslave menacée d’éclatement. Le Monde Diplomatique, 5. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1990/02/FERNANDEZ_ELORRIAGA/42359
  54. Faroughy, A. (1978, July). L’opposition iranienne face au chah et à la domination étrangère. Le Monde Diplomatique, 18-19. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1978/07/FAROUGHY/34801
  55. Ignacio, R. (1991, August). De la guerre civile. Le Monde Diplomatique, 1. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1991/08/RAMONET/43733 Jaksic, B. (1995, July). La faillite des élites nationales. Le Monde Diplomatique, 1-4-5. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1995/07/JAKSIC/6515
  56. Kapeliouk, A. (1991, September). M. Boris Eltsine et l’ordre nouveau. Le Monde Diplomatique, 12. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1991/09/KAPELIOUK/43824
  57. Keddie, N. (1977, August). Iran: de l’indépendance religieuse à l’opposition politique. Le Monde Diplomatique, 11-12. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1977/08/KEDDIE/34368
  58. Montazami, B. (1978, December). L’Iran du refus: La « croissance miraculeuse » et le bouleversement. Le Monde Diplomatique, 11. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1978/12/MONTAZAMI/34953
  59. Rondot, P. (1984, March). Le Dhofar: de la guerre au développement. Le Monde Diplomatique, 21. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1984/03/RONDOT/37882
  60. Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. (1974). Constitution of the Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia. https://ia600107.us.archive.org/9/items/1974YugoslavConstitution/Yugoslavia-Constitution1974_text.pdf
  61. Viennot, J.-P. (1974, June). La politique de Téhéran renforce la solidarité des mouvements progressistes dans la région du Golfe. Le Monde Diplomatique, 16-17. https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/1974/06/VIENNOT/32425