SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afet ve Risk Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1

Digital Solutions for Disaster Management: Analyzing the Impact of the February 2023 Earthquake in Türkiye

Selma Nazlıoğlu(ATILIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ, YAZILIM MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-8609-5714
Güler Kalem(ATILIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ, YAZILIM MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-5426-2821
Ali Yazıcı(ATILIM ÜNİVERSİTESİ, MÜHENDİSLİK FAKÜLTESİ, YAZILIM MÜHENDİSLİĞİ BÖLÜMÜ)0000-0001-5405-802X
Pages
158–171
Publication Date
2024-03-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Private organizations exhibit strong involvement in developing IT platforms, while public entities and NGOs contribute to a lesser extent.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This research investigates the involvement of information technologies, including communication platforms and social media solutions, in managing earthquake disasters, specifically focusing on the February 2023 earthquake in Türkiye.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to achieve this, a comparative framework is constructed, which incorporates four main categories, namely goal, providers, target phase, and platform.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Private organizations exhibit strong involvement in developing IT platforms, while public entities and NGOs contribute to a lesser extent.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2023 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Disaster Management Systems · Disaster Management Phases · Earthquake Digital Solutions

Abstract

This research investigates the involvement of information technologies, including communication platforms and social media solutions, in managing earthquake disasters, specifically focusing on the February 2023 earthquake in Türkiye. In order to achieve this, a comparative framework is constructed, which incorporates four main categories, namely goal, providers, target phase, and platform. The data is gathered from diverse sources, and a total of 130 solutions are identified immediately following the February 2023 earthquake in Türkiye. After conducting a thorough examination of these solutions and removing any duplicates and irrelevant options, the final dataset comprises 89 unique solutions sourced from 82 providers. According to the study's findings, the solutions employed in mitigation and preparedness phases prioritize proactive measures and planning, while the ones in response phase witnesses a significant increase in activities related to aid campaigns, emergency response, information dissemination, and support services. The solutions in recovery phase further intensifies support services to aid affected communities. Web-based platforms are predominantly used during different phases of disaster management, with mobile platforms playing a crucial role in communication and on-the-ground activities. Private organizations exhibit strong involvement in developing IT platforms, while public entities and NGOs contribute to a lesser extent.

Özet

This research investigates the involvement of information technologies, including communication platforms and social media solutions, in managing earthquake disasters, specifically focusing on the February 2023 earthquake in Türkiye. In order to achieve this, a comparative framework is constructed, which incorporates four main categories, namely goal, providers, target phase, and platform. The data is gathered from diverse sources, and a total of 130 solutions are identified immediately following the February 2023 earthquake in Türkiye. After conducting a thorough examination of these solutions and removing any duplicates and irrelevant options, the final dataset comprises 89 unique solutions sourced from 82 providers. According to the study's findings, the solutions employed in mitigation and preparedness phases prioritize proactive measures and planning, while the ones in response phase witnesses a significant increase in activities related to aid campaigns, emergency response, information dissemination, and support services. The solutions in recovery phase further intensifies support services to aid affected communities. Web-based platforms are predominantly used during different phases of disaster management, with mobile platforms playing a crucial role in communication and on-the-ground activities. Private organizations exhibit strong involvement in developing IT platforms, while public entities and NGOs contribute to a lesser extent.

🔖

Cite This Article

Nazlıoğlu, S., Kalem, G., Yazıcı, A. (2024). Digital Solutions for Disaster Management: Analyzing the Impact of the February 2023 Earthquake in Türkiye. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 158–171. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1336337

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Abid, S. K., Sulaiman, N., Chan, S. W., Nazir, U., Abid, M., Han, H., Ariza-Montes, A., Vega-Muñoz, A. (2021). Toward an Integrated Disaster Management Approach: How Artificial Intelligence Can Boost Disaster Management. Sustainability, 13:12560. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212560
  2. Ajami, S., Fattahi, M. (2009). The role of earthquake information management systems (EIMSs) in reducing destruction: A comparative study of Japan, Turkey and Iran. Disaster Prevention and Management, 18(2): 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653560910953225
  3. Alawad, W., Halima, N. B., Aziz, L. (2023). An Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) System for Disaster and Crisis Management in Smart Cities. Electronics, 12(4):1051. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics12041051
  4. Barth, B., Kabbinahithilu, G. C., Marchal, J., de Cola, T., Friedemann, M., Muna J. (2023). Web-Based Solutions for Communication and Knowledge Management in Disaster Situations. IEEE Internet Computing, 27(1):53-59. 10.1109/MIC.2022.3210758
  5. Bozkurt, Y., Demir, T. (2023). Afet Yönetiminde İletişim ve Medya Üzerine Bir Değerlendirme: Kahramanmaraş Merkezli Depremler. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 11: 22-32. https://doi.org/10.58627/dpuiibf.1288685
  6. Chun-Yuan, W., Jinyun, G., Ming-feng, K. (2020). The building of social resilience in Sichuan after the Wenchuan earthquake: A perspective of the socio-government interactions. Safety Science, 126:104662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104662
  7. Colajanni, G., Daniele, P., Nagurney, A., Nagurney, L. S., Sciacca D. (2023). A three-stage stochastic optimization model integrating 5G technology and UAVs for disaster management. J Glob Optim, 86:741-780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10898-023-01274-z
  8. Erkal, T., Değerliyurt, M. (2018). Türkiye’de Afet Yönetimi. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi, 22: 148-164.
  9. Junxiang, Z., Peng, W. (2022). BIM/GIS data integration from the perspective of information flow. Automation in Construction, 136: 104166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104166
  10. Kaya, A. Y. (2023). The Use of Web GIS in The Rapid Evaluation Process of The Post-Earthquake Urban Building Stock. Afet Ve Risk Dergisi, 6(1): 333-350. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1241016
  11. Lin, B. C., Lee, C. H. (2023). Conducting an adaptive evaluation framework of importance and performance for community-based earthquake disaster management. Natural Hazards, 115:1255–1274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-022-05594-3
  12. Lixin, Y., Lingling, G., Dong, Z., Junxue Z., Zhanwu G. (2012). An analysis on disasters management system in China. Natural hazards, 60:295–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-011-0011-6 Maki, N., Johnson, L. (2016). How will we Manage Recovery from a Catastrophic Disaster? Organization Structure for Recovery Management in the World. J of Disaster Research, 11(5):889-896. 10.20965/jdr.2016.p0889
  13. McLoughlin, D. (1985) A Framework for Integrated Emergency Management. Public Administration Review, 45:165-72. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/3135011. Accessed 14 Sept. 2023.
  14. Necmioğlu, Ö. (2022). Türkiye’de Etkin Bir Tsunami Erken Uyarı Sistemi ve Tsunami Risk Azaltımı İçin Gereksinimler. Afet Ve Risk Dergisi, 5(1), 216-228. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1011371
  15. Sakurai, M., Murayama, Y. (2019). Information technologies and disaster management – Benefits and issues. Progress in Disaster Science, 2:100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100012.
  16. Sim, T., He, M. (2023). Core competencies in disaster management for social workers in China: A modified e-Delphi study. Journal of Social Work, 23(4): 656-676. https://doi.org/10.1177/14680173231162536 URL 1, https://www.undrr.org/terminology (Last visit date: 31.07.2023)
  17. URL 2, https://bit.ly/3SdoOG9 (Last visit date:11.01.2024)
  18. URL 3, https://ahbap.org/ (Last visit date: 31.07.2023)
  19. URL 4, https://deprem.io/ (Last visit date: 31.07.2023)
  20. Usta, E., Yükseler, M. (2021). Afetlerde Sosyal Medya Kullanımı ve Etik İkilemler: İzmir Seferihisar Depremi Örneği. Afet Ve Risk Dergisi, 4(2): 249-269. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.981246
  21. Varol, N., Kaya, Ç. M. (2018). Afet Risk Yönetiminde Transdisipliner Yaklaşım. Afet Ve Risk Dergisi, 1(1): 1-8. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.418307
  22. Xiangnan, H., Kapucu, N., Shi, J., Zhu, Z. (2021). Disaster policy and emergency management reforms in China: From Wenchuan earthquake to Jiuzhaigou earthquake. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 52: 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2020.101964 Zhang, W., Yin, Y. (2022). Earthquake disaster collection system based on mobile terminal. IEEE International Conference on Electrical Engineering, Big Data and Algorithms (EEBDA) pp 1399-1403. 10.1109/EEBDA53927.2022.9744754