SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Afet ve Risk Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1

Green Minds, Gray Worlds: A Socio-Cognitive Analysis of Representations of Climate Change

Yeşil Zihinler, Gri Dünyalar: İklim Değişikliği Temsillerinin Sosyo-Bilişsel Analizi

Mehmet Karasu(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6620-2807
Kumsal Altürk(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0009-0008-0008-9507
Zeynep Polat(VAN YÜZÜNCÜ YIL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Pages
231–254
Publication Date
2025-04-10
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results show that the participants are aware that climate conditions have changed, that they can competently describe climate change to someone who does not know, that they consider themselves to have above-average knowledge on the subject, and that they follow current developments related to climate change closely.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study examines the social and cognitive processes of people who do and do not engage in pro-environmental behaviors to reduce the negative effects of climate change from the perspective of Social Representations Theory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study employed a nested mixed research model, and 384 university students participated through convenience sampling.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results show that the participants are aware that climate conditions have changed, that they can competently describe climate change to someone who does not know, that they consider themselves to have above-average knowledge on the subject, and that they follow current developments related to climate change closely.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bilişsel Polifazi · Çevre Dostu Davranışlar · İklim Değişikliği

Abstract

This study examines the social and cognitive processes of people who do and do not engage in pro-environmental behaviors to reduce the negative effects of climate change from the perspective of Social Representations Theory. The study employed a nested mixed research model, and 384 university students participated through convenience sampling. The data collected was subjected to several forms of analysis. These included statistical analysis, prototype analysis, and content analysis. The results show that the participants are aware that climate conditions have changed, that they can competently describe climate change to someone who does not know, that they consider themselves to have above-average knowledge on the subject, and that they follow current developments related to climate change closely. In addition, participants indicated that they frequently access news about climate change through the Internet and television. However, it is observed that most of the participants do not participate in scientific, philosophical, or artistic activities related to climate change and do not adopt a climate-friendly lifestyle. According to the results of prototype analysis and content analysis, there are significant similarities between the social representations of climate change and the feelings of those who engage in, as well as those who do not engage in, pro-environmental behavior. Both groups represent climate change through its impacts (e.g. drought, seasonal changes, diseases) and its causes (e.g. fossil fuels, industrialization, lack of awareness). They do not mention the solution proposals on this issue. In addition, both groups express anthropogenic causes of climate change (e.g., environmental pollution, air pollution, pollution) and causes of climate change that cannot actually be directly observed (e.g., greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide, ozone depletion). When the emotions aroused by climate change were examined; the most frequently expressed emotions for the participants who reported that they exhibited pro-environmental behavior were bad, sadness, fear, anxiety and worry, while the participants who reported that they did not exhibit pro-environmental behavior most frequently expressed bad, fear, sadness, anxiety and worry. s. These findings are discussed at the socio-cognitive level within the literature on social representations.

Özet

Bu araştırmada, iklim değişikliğinin olumsuz etkilerini azaltmak amacıyla çevre dostu davranışlar sergileyen ve sergilemeyen insanların sosyal ve bilişsel süreçleri Sosyal Temsiller Teorisi perspektifiyle incelenmiştir. İç içe karma araştırma modelinin kullanıldığı çalışmaya, kolay örnekleme yoluyla 384 üniversite öğrencisi (Kadın = 231, Erkek = 153) katılmıştır. Veriler, çeşitli istatistiksel analizlere, prototip analizine ve içerik analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Sonuçlar, katılımcıların iklimsel koşulların değiştiğini fark ettiklerini, iklim değişikliğini yetkin bir şekilde bilmeyen birine tarif edebileceklerini, bu konuda ortalamanın üzerinde bilgi sahibi olduklarını düşündüklerini ve iklim değişikliğiyle ilgili güncel gelişmeleri dikkatle takip ettiklerini göstermektedir. Ayrıca, katılımcılar iklim değişikliği ile ilgili haberlere sıklıkla internet ve televizyon aracılığıyla ulaştıklarını belirtmektedirler. Ancak, çoğu katılımcının iklim değişikliğiyle ilgili bilimsel, felsefi veya sanatsal etkinliklere katılmadıkları ve iklim dostu bir yaşam tarzına geçmedikleri görülmektedir. Prototip analizi ve içerik analizi sonuçlarına göre, çevre dostu davranış sergileyenler ile sergilemeyenlerin iklim değişikliğine ilişkin sosyal temsilleri ve bu konudaki duyguları arasında önemli ölçüde benzerlikler görülmektedir. Her iki grup iklim değişikliğini, bu değişikliğin etkileri (örn., kuraklık, mevsim değişikliği, hastalıklar) ve nedenleri (örn., fosil yakıtlar, sanayileşme, bilinçsizlik) aracılığıyla temsil etmektedir. Bu konudaki çözüm önerilerine ise değinmemektedirler. Ayrıca her iki grup iklim değişikliğinin antropojenik nedenlerini (örn., çevre kirliliği, hava kirliliği, kirlilik) ve iklim değişikliğinin aslında doğrudan gözlenemeyen nedenlerini (örn., sera gazları, karbondioksit, ozon tabakasının delinmesi) vurgulamaktadır. İklim değişikliğinin katılımcılarda uyandırdığı duygular incelendiğinde; çevre dostu davranış sergilediğini bildiren katılımcılar için en sık ifade edilen duygular, kötü, üzüntü, korku, endişe ve kaygı iken; çevre dostu davranış sergilemediğini bildiren katılımcılar en sık kötü, korku, üzüntü, kaygı, endişe duygularını ifade etmişlerdir. Bu sonuçlar, sosyal temsiller literatürü çerçevesinde sosyo-bilişsel düzeyde tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karasu, M., Altürk, K., Polat, Z. (2025). Green Minds, Gray Worlds: A Socio-Cognitive Analysis of Representations of Climate Change. Afet ve Risk Dergisi, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 231–254. https://doi.org/10.35341/afet.1526083

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (70)

  1. Altman, I. ve Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychology: Trait, interactionist, organismic, and transitional approaches. D. Stokols ve I. Altman (Ed.), Handbook of environmental psychology içinde (ss. 7-40). Wiley.
  2. Balarabe, U. B. ve Hamza, Y. G. (2020). Climate change: Media coverage and perspectives of climate change in Kano, Nigeria. Journal of Energy Research and Reviews, 6(2), 11-19. https://doi.org/10.9734/jenrr/2020/v6i230163
  3. Batel, S. ve Devine-Wright, P. (2015). Towards a better understanding of people’s responses to renewable energy technologies: Insights from Social Representations Theory. Public Understanding of Science, 24, 311-325. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513514165
  4. Bauer, M. W. ve Gaskell, G. (2008). Social representations theory: A progressive research programme for social psychology. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(4), 335-353. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00374.x
  5. Bilgin, N. (2014). Sosyal bilimlerde içerik analizi: Teknikler ve örnek çalışmalar (3. Baskı). Siyasal Kitabevi.
  6. Cabecinhas, R., Lázaro, A. ve Carvalho, A. (2008). Media uses and social representations of climate change. Carvalho, A. (Ed.), Communicating climate change: Discourses, mediations and perceptions içinde (ss. 170-189). Universidade do Minho.
  7. Callaghan, P., Moloney, G. ve Blair, D. (2012). Contagion in the representational field of water recycling: Informing new environment practice through social representation theory. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 20-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.1101
  8. Castro, P. (2006). Applying social psychology to the study of environmental concern and environmental worldviews: Contributions from the social representations approach. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 16, 247-266. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.864
  9. Cattaneo, C., Beine, M., Fröhlich, C. J., Kniveton, D., Martinez-Zarzoso, I., Mastrorillo, M., Millock, K., Piguet, E. ve Schraven, B. (2019). Human migration in the era of climate change. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 13(2), 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1093/reep/rez008
  10. Chang, J. J., Kim, S. H., Shim, J. C. ve Ma, D. H. (2016). Who is responsible for climate change? Attribution of responsibility, news media, and South Koreans’ perceived risk of climate change. Mass Communication and Society, 19(5), 566-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2016.1180395
  11. Chen, M. F. (2019). Social representations of climate change and pro-environmental behavior intentions in Taiwan. International Sociology, 34(3), 327-346. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580919832737
  12. Cheng, P., Wei, J. ve Ge, Y. (2017). Who should be blamed? The attribution of responsibility for a city smog event in China. Natural Hazards, 85(2), 669-689. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2597-1
  13. Dany, L., Urdapilleta, I. ve Monaco, G. L. (2015). Free associations and social representations: Some reflections on rank-frequency and importance-frequency methods. Quality & Quantity, 49(2), 489-507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0005-z
  14. de-Graft Aikins, A. (2012). Familiarising the unfamiliar: cognitive polyphasia, emotions and the creation of social representations. Papers on Social Representations, 21, 7.1-7.28.
  15. Doyle, J. (2007). Picturing the clima(c)tic: Greenpeace and the representational politics of climate change communication. Science as Culture, 16, 129-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430701368938
  16. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü. (2020). COP24 Özel raporu: Sağlık ve iklim değişikliği (E. D. Evci-Kiraz, Çev. Ed.). Hermes Ofset Matbaacılık. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/276405/9786057496713-tur.pdf (Son erişim: 27.09.2024)
  17. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620766
  18. Festinger, L. ve Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 203-210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593
  19. Forster, P. M., Smith, C., Walsh, T., Lamb, W. F., Lamboll, R., Hall, B.,. ve Zhai, P. (2024). Indicators of Global Climate Change 2023: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence. Earth System Science Data, 16(6), 2625-2658. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2625-2024
  20. Gifford, R. (2011). The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation. American Psychologist, 66, 290-302. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023566
  21. Glassman, W. E. ve Hadad, M. (2018) Psikolojide yaklaşımlar (H. Kaynak, Çev.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  22. Guimelli, C. (1998). Differentiation between the central core elements of social representations: Normative and functional elements. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 57(4), 209-224.
  23. Guimelli, C. ve Rimé, B. (2009). Émotions et représentations sociales [Duygular ve sosyal temsiller]. P. Rateau ve P. Moliner (Ed.), Représentations sociales et processus sociocognitifs [Sosyal temsiller ve sosyo-bilişsel süreçler] içinde (ss. 165-180). Presses Universitaires de Rennes.
  24. Höijer, B. (2010). Emotional anchoring and objectification in the media reporting on climate change. Public Understanding of Science, 19(6), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662509348863
  25. IPCC. (2013). Climate change 2013 the physical science basis: Working group I contribution to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [T. F., Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex ve P. M. Midgley (Ed.)]. Cambridge University Press. https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/02/WG1AR5_all_final.pdf (Son erişim: 27.09.2024)
  26. IPCC. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II, and III to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Core writing team; Lee, H., Romero, J. vd. (Ed.)]. IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647
  27. Joffe, H. (2003). Risk: From perception to social representation. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603763276126
  28. Jovchelovitch, S. (2002). Re-thinking the diversity of knowledge: Cognitive polyphasia, belief and representation. Psychologie et Société, 5(1), 121-138.
  29. Kaşdarma, E. (2024). İklim değişikliğiyle mücadeleye etki eden psikolojik engellerin incelenmesi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13(1), 382-403. https://doi.org/10.15869/itobiad.1344616
  30. Kay, N. ve Gaymard, S. (2021). Climate change in the Cameroonian press: An analysis of its representations. Public Understanding of Science, 30(4), 417-433. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520976013
  31. Kıral Uçar, G., Gezici Yalçın, M., ve Özdemir, G. (2019). İklim değişikliği inkârının sosyal baskınlık yönelimi ve ekolojik adil dünya inancı ile ilişkisi. Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen-Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(37), 739-764. https://doi.org/10.21550/sosbilder.535560
  32. Leiserowitz, A. A. (2006). Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: The role of affect, imagery and values. Climate Change, 77, 45-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9059-9
  33. Leiserowitz, A., Carman, J., Buttermore, N., Wang, X., Rosenthal, S., Marlon, J. R. ve Mulcahy, K. (2021). International public Opinion on climate change. Yale program on climate change communication. https://climatecommunication.yale.edu/publications/international-public-opinion-on-climate-change/4/ (Son erişim: 15.12.2024)
  34. Lo Monaco, G., Piermattéo, A., Rateau, P. ve Tavani, J. L. (2016). Methods for studying the structure of social representations: A critical review and agenda for future research. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 47(3), 306-331. https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12124
  35. Lorenzoni, I. ve Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climate Change, 77, 73-95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9072-z
  36. Lorenzoni, I., Leiserowitz, A., de Franca Doria M, Poortinga, W. ve Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Cross-national comparisons of image associations with ‘global warming’ and ‘climate change’ among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. Journal of Risk Research, 9, 265-281. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870600613658
  37. Mambet Doue, C., Navarro Carrascal, O., Restrepo, D., Krien, N., Rommel, D., Lemee, C.,. ve Fleury-Bahi, G. (2020). The social representations of climate change: comparison of two territories exposed to the coastal flooding risk. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and management, 12(3), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2019-0064
  38. Mebane, M. E., Benedetti, M., Barni, D. ve Francescato, D. (2023). Promoting climate change awareness with high school students for a sustainable community. Sustainability, 15(14), 11260. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151411260
  39. Mesurado, B., Vidal, E. M. ve Mestre, A. L. (2018). Negative emotions and behaviour: The role of regulatory emotional self-efficacy. Journal of Adolescence, 64, 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.01.007
  40. Milfont, T. L. (2010). Global warming, climate change and human psychology. Corral Verdugo, V., Garcia-Cadena, C. H. ve Frias-Arment, M. (Ed.), Psychological approaches to sustainability: Current trends in theory, research and practice içinde (ss. 19-42). Nova Science.
  41. Moloney, G., Leviston, Z., Lynam, T., Price, J., Stone-Jovicich, S. ve Blair, D. (2014). Using social representations theory to make sense of climate change: What scientists and nonscientists in Australia think. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 19. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06592-190319
  42. Moscovici, S. (1963). Attitudes and opinions. Annual Review of Psychology, 14(1), 231-260. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.14.020163.001311
  43. Moscovici, S. (1973). Foreword. C. Herzlich (Ed.), Health and illness: A social psychological analysis içinde (ss. ix-xiv). Academic Press.
  44. Moscovici, S. (1976). La psychanalyse, son image et son public [Psikanaliz: İmajı ve kamusallığı] (2. Baskı). Paris, PUF.
  45. Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. R. M. Farr ve S. Moscovici (Ed.), Social representations içinde (ss. 3-69). Cambridge University Press.
  46. Moscovici, S. (1988) Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology 18, 211-250. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420180303
  47. Moscovici, S. (1994). Social representations and pragmatic communications. Social Science Information, 33(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901894033002002
  48. Nishan, K. C., Chhetri, V. T., Bhattarai, S., Subedi, S., Karki, M., Bhandari, B.,. ve Acharya, S. (2023). Climate change knowledge among the community school students of Sindhuli district of central Nepal. Banko Janakari, 33(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v33i1.49013
  49. Ogunbode, C. A., Doran, R., Hanss, D., Ojala, M., Salmela-Aro, K., van den Broek, K. L.,. ve Karasu, M. (2022). Climate anxiety, wellbeing and pro-environmental action: correlates of negative emotional responses to climate change in 32 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101887
  50. Olausson, U. (2011). We’re the ones to blame: Citizens’ representations of climate change and the role of the media. Environmental Communication, 5, 281-299. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.585026
  51. Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D. C., Adams, H., Adelekan, I., Adler, C., Adrian, R., Aldunce, P., Ali, E., Ara Begum, R.,. ve Tignor, M. (Ed.). (2022). Technical summary. Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change içinde (ss. 37-118). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.002
  52. Reser, J. ve Swim, J. (2011). Adapting to and coping with the threat and impacts of climate change. American Psychologist, 66(4), 277-289. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023412
  53. Roberto, A. J., Goodall, C. E. ve Witte, K. (2020). Raising the alarm and calming fears: Perceived threat and efficacy during risk and crisis. Handbook of risk and crisis communication içinde (ss. 285-301). Routledge.
  54. Schmitt, M. T., Neufeld, S. D., Mackay, C. M. ve Dys‐Steenbergen, O. (2020). The perils of explaining climate inaction in terms of psychological barriers. Journal of Social Issues, 76(1), 123-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12360
  55. Schneider, C. R., Zaval, L. ve Markowitz, E. M. (2021). Positive emotions and climate change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 42, 114-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.04.009
  56. Seneviratne, S. I., Zhang, X., Adnan, M., Badi, W., Dereczynski, C., Di Luca, A. vd. (2021). Weather and climate extreme events in a changing climate. V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger vd. (Ed.), Climate change 2021: The physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the sixth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change içinde (ss. 1513-1766). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.013
  57. Smale, D. A., Wernberg, T., Oliver, E. C., Thomsen, M., Harvey, B. P., Straub, S. C.,. ve Moore, P. J. (2019). Marine heatwaves threaten global biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. Nature Climate Change, 9(4), 306-312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0412-1
  58. Smith, N. ve Joffe, H. (2012). How the public engages with global warming: A social representations approach. Public Understanding of Science, 22, 16-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662512440913
  59. Smith, N. W. ve Joffe, H. (2009). Climate change in the British press: The role of the visual. Journal of Risk Research, 12(5), 647-663. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870802586512
  60. Tam, K. P. ve Chan, H. W. (2018). Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change, 48, 182-194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001
  61. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2024). Peoples’ climate vote 2024: Results. UNDP. https://peoplesclimate.vote/download (Son erişim: 13.12.2024)
  62. Wagner, W. ve Kronberger, N. (2001). Killer tomatoes! Collective symbolic coping with biotechnology. K. Deaux ve G. Philogene (Ed.), Representations of the social içinde (ss. 147-164). Blackwell.
  63. Weber E. U (2006). Experience-based and description-based perceptions of long-term risk: Why global warming does not scare us (yet). Climatic Change, 77, 103-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-9060-3
  64. Werner, C. M., Brown, B. B. ve Altman, I. (2002). Transactionally oriented research: Examples and strategies. R. B. Bechtel ve A. Churchman (Ed.), Handbook of environmental psychology içinde (ss. 203-221). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
  65. Forster, P. M., Smith, C., Walsh, T., Lamb, W. F., Lamboll, R., Hall, B.,. ve Zhai, P. (2024). Indicators of Global Climate Change 2023: annual update of key indicators of the state of the climate system and human influence. Earth System Science Data, 16(6), 2625-2658. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-2625-2024
  66. Mambet Doue, C., Navarro Carrascal, O., Restrepo, D., Krien, N., Rommel, D., Lemee, C.,. ve Fleury-Bahi, G. (2020). The social representations of climate change: comparison of two territories exposed to the coastal flooding risk. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and management, 12(3), 389-406. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCCSM-11-2019-0064
  67. Nishan, K. C., Chhetri, V. T., Bhattarai, S., Subedi, S., Karki, M., Bhandari, B.,. ve Acharya, S. (2023). Climate change knowledge among the community school students of Sindhuli district of central Nepal. Banko Janakari, 33(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.3126/banko.v33i1.49013
  68. Ogunbode, C. A., Doran, R., Hanss, D., Ojala, M., Salmela-Aro, K., van den Broek, K. L.,. ve Karasu, M. (2022). Climate anxiety, wellbeing and pro-environmental action: correlates of negative emotional responses to climate change in 32 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 84, 101887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101887
  69. Pörtner, H. O., Roberts, D. C., Adams, H., Adelekan, I., Adler, C., Adrian, R., Aldunce, P., Ali, E., Ara Begum, R.,. ve Tignor, M. (Ed.). (2022). Technical summary. Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change içinde (ss. 37-118). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.002
  70. Smale, D. A., Wernberg, T., Oliver, E. C., Thomsen, M., Harvey, B. P., Straub, S. C.,. ve Moore, P. J. (2019). Marine heatwaves threaten global biodiversity and the provision of ecosystem services. Nature Climate Change, 9(4), 306-312. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0412-1