✨
AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI Insight⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)
This method will also provide us the universal and stable face of religion on the one hand and its variable and changeable one on the other.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The most significant point Amidî emphasizes in his works is the distinction between demonstrative and dialectical/rhetorical arguments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:From this he expected to ensure whether the conclusions they derived from the Holy Text to be binding or not.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This method will also provide us the universal and stable face of religion on the one hand and its variable and changeable one on the other.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Amidî · theological method · dialectiacal and rhetorical arguments
Özet
The most significant point Amidî emphasizes in his works is the distinction between demonstrative and dialectical/rhetorical arguments. From this he expected to ensure whether the conclusions they derived from the Holy Text to be binding or not. This method makes it difficult for people do impose the conclusions they derived from the Holy Scripture as a binding faith priniciple to faithful. This method will also provide us the universal and stable face of religion on the one hand and its variable and changeable one on the other.
🔖
Cite This Article
HARMAN, V. (2012). Seyfeddin Amidî'nin Kelam Sisteminde Kat'ilik ve Zannilik Açısından Deliller. Kader, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 129–146. https://ajindex.com/articles/114522