SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3

Investigating Pre-Service Language Teachers’ Experiences with Generative AI in Language Education

Yabancı Dil Öğretmen Adaylarının Dil Eğitiminde Üretken Yapay Zekâ Deneyimlerinin İncelenmesi

Ramazan Yetkin(NIGDE OMER HALISDEMIR UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-4688-509X
Zekiye Özer-Altınkaya(NIGDE OMER HALISDEMIR UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-8673-8687
Pages
525–544
Publication Date
2026-07-27
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, the study underscores the potential of Gen AI as a supportive tool in teacher education while reinforcing the necessity of human oversight and reflective practice.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The rapid expansion of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, has significantly influenced practices in language teacher education, creating new opportunities for innovation and instructional support.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study explores how pre-service English teachers experience and perceive the use of Gen AI in language education contexts. 14 participants engaged in AI-supported activities, and data were collected through reflective journals, semi-structured focus group interviews, and analysis of instructional materials they developed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, the study underscores the potential of Gen AI as a supportive tool in teacher education while reinforcing the necessity of human oversight and reflective practice.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Üretken yapay zeka · öğretmen adayları · öğretmen eğitimi

Abstract

The rapid expansion of generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) tools, such as ChatGPT, has significantly influenced practices in language teacher education, creating new opportunities for innovation and instructional support. This study explores how pre-service English teachers experience and perceive the use of Gen AI in language education contexts. 14 participants engaged in AI-supported activities, and data were collected through reflective journals, semi-structured focus group interviews, and analysis of instructional materials they developed. Thematic analysis revealed several affordances of Gen AI, including enhanced creativity, increased efficiency, adaptability, and support for professional development. However, participants also reported challenges, such as concerns about reliability, risks of over-reliance, cultural limitations, and ethical considerations. The findings emphasize the importance of maintaining a balance between AI use and pedagogical judgment, highlighting the need for teacher guidance and critical engagement. Overall, the study underscores the potential of Gen AI as a supportive tool in teacher education while reinforcing the necessity of human oversight and reflective practice.

Özet

Üretken yapay zekâ araçlarının, örneğin ChatGPT’nin, hızla yaygınlaşması, dil öğretmeni eğitimindeki uygulamaları önemli ölçüde etkilemiş ve yenilik ile öğretimsel destek açısından yeni olanaklar yaratmıştır. Bu çalışma, İngilizce öğretmeni adaylarının dil eğitimi bağlamlarında üretken yapay zekâ kullanımına ilişkin deneyimlerini ve algılarını incelemektedir. Araştırmaya katılan on dört katılımcı, yapay zekâ destekli etkinliklere katılmış; veriler yansıtıcı günlükler, yarı yapılandırılmış odak grup görüşmeleri ve katılımcıların geliştirdikleri öğretim materyallerinin analizi yoluyla toplanmıştır. Tematik analiz, üretken yapay zekânın sağladığı çeşitli olanakları ortaya koymuş; artan yaratıcılık, verimlilik, uyarlanabilirlik ve mesleki gelişime katkı öne çıkmıştır. Bununla birlikte katılımcılar, güvenilirlik konusundaki endişeler, aşırı bağımlılık riski, kültürel sınırlılıklar ve etik hususlar gibi zorluklara da dikkat çekmiştir. Bulgular, yapay zekâ kullanımının pedagojik yargıyla dengelenmesinin önemini vurgulamakta; öğretmen rehberliği ve eleştirel katılımın gerekliliğine işaret etmektedir. Sonuç olarak, bu çalışma üretken yapay zekânın öğretmen eğitiminde destekleyici bir araç olarak potansiyelini ortaya koyarken, insan denetimi ve yansıtıcı uygulamaların gerekliliğini de vurgulamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yetkin, R., Özer-Altınkaya, Z. (2026). Investigating Pre-Service Language Teachers’ Experiences with Generative AI in Language Education. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 3, 525–544. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1829191

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (53)

  1. Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218
  2. Alexander, K., Savvidou, C., & Alexander, C. (2023). Who wrote this essay? Detecting AI-generated writing in second language education in higher education. Teaching English with Technology, 23(2), 25-43. https://doi.org/10.56297/BUKA4060/XHLD5365
  3. Alvarez, L., Ortoleva, G., Sutter Widmer, D., Fritz, M., Bugmann, J., Boéchat-Heer, S., & Ramillon, C. (2024). Future teachers’ beliefs about generative AI: Assessing technology acceptance as students or as aspiring professionals. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 32(3), 383–408. https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/224377/
  4. Alwaqdani, M. (2025). Investigating teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence tools in education: Potential and difficulties. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 2737–2755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12903-9
  5. Arslan, S. (2025). English-as-a-foreign language university instructors’ perceptions of integrating artificial intelligence: A Turkish perspective. System, 131, 103680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103680
  6. Azungah, T. (2018). Qualitative research: Deductive and inductive approaches to data analysis. Qualitative Research Journal, 18(4), 383–400. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-D-18-00035
  7. Babanoğlu, M. P., Karataş, T. Ö., & Dündar, E. (2025). Envisioning the future of AI-assisted EFL teaching and learning: Conceptual representations of prospective teachers. Sage Open, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251341590
  8. Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745
  9. Bobkina, J., & Romero, E.D. (2026). Integrating AI in EFL Education: Empowering Pre-service Teachers with Skills, Perspectives, and Innovative Classroom Strategies. In: Durak, G., Çankaya, S., Sharples, M. (Eds) Generative AI in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-95-4871-2_17
  10. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  11. Cennetkusu, N. G. (2026). EFL teachers’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence in language teaching: A mixed-methods study in Türkiye. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102580
  12. Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers’ acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910-922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
  13. Chounta, I. A., Bardone, E., Raudsep, A., & Pedaste, M. (2022). Exploring teachers’ perceptions of artificial intelligence as a tool to support their practice in Estonian K-12 education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 32(3), 725-755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-021-00243-5
  14. Dai, K., & Liu, Q. (2024). Leveraging artificial intelligence (AI) in English as a foreign language (EFL) classes: Challenges and opportunities in the spotlight. Computers in Human Behavior, 159, 108354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108354
  15. Derinalp, P., & Halife, M. (2025). Pre-service English as a foreign language teachers’ attitudes toward artificial intelligence. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi [Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences], 18(3), 609-629. http://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1644354
  16. ElSayary, A. (2024). An investigation of teachers’ perceptions of using ChatGPT as a supporting tool for teaching and learning in the digital era. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 40(3), 931-945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12926
  17. Emerson, R. W. (2015). Convenience sampling, random sampling, and snowball sampling: How does sampling affect the validity of research? Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 109(2), 164–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X1510900215
  18. Fathi, J., & Rahimi, M. (2026). Utilising artificial intelligence-enhanced writing mediation to develop academic writing skills in EFL learners: A qualitative study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 39(1–2), 263–302 https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2024.2374772
  19. Fathi, J., Rahimi, M., & Derakhshan, A. (2024). Improving EFL learners’ speaking skills and willingness to communicate via artificial intelligence-mediated interactions. System, 121, 103254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103254
  20. Gao, Y., Wang, Q., & Wang, X. (2024). Exploring EFL university teachers’ beliefs in integrating ChatGPT and other large language models in language education: A study in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 44(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2024.2305173
  21. Hartono, W. J., Nurfitri, N., Ridwan, R., Kase, E. B., Lake, F., & Zebua, R. S. Y. (2023). Artificial intelligence (AI) solutions in English language teaching: Teachers-students’ perceptions and experiences. Journal on Education, 6(1), 1452-1461.
  22. Hınız, G. (2024). A year of generative AI in English language teaching and learning - a case study. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2404132
  23. Hojeij, Z., Kuhail, M. A., & ElSayary, A. (2025). Investigating in-service teachers’ views on ChatGPT integration. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 22(4), 548–573. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-04-2024-0094
  24. Huang, F., Wang, Y., & Zhang, H. (2024). Modelling generative AI acceptance, perceived teachers’ enthusiasm and self‐efficacy to English as a foreign language learners’ well‐being in the digital era. European Journal of Education, 59, e12770. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12770
  25. Hwang, G. J., Xie, H., Wah, B. W., & Gašević, D. (2020). Vision, challenges, roles and research issues of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100001
  26. Karaduman, C. (2025). Pre-service EFL teachers’ perceived AI literacy and competency: The integration of ChatGPT into English language teacher education. Sage Open, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251379712
  27. Karataş, F., Abedi, F. Y., Ozek Gunyel, F., Karadeniz, D., & Kuzgun, Y. (2024). Incorporating AI in foreign language education: An investigation into ChatGPT’s effect on foreign language learners. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 19343–19366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12574-6
  28. Kartal, G. (2024). ChatGPT as a personalized professional development tool: Voices of English teachers. In Z. Çetin Köroğlu & A. Çakır (Eds.), Fostering foreign language teaching and learning environments with contemporary technologies (pp. 48–69). IGI Global.
  29. Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  30. Kerr, R. C., & Kim, H. (2025). from prompts to plans: A case study of pre-service EFL teachers' use of generative AI for lesson planning. English Teaching, 80(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.80.1.202503.95
  31. Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). Exploring generative artificial intelligence preparedness among university language instructors: A case study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 5, 100156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100156
  32. Ma, Q., Crosthwaite, P., Sun, D., & Zou, D. (2024). Exploring ChatGPT literacy in language education: A global perspective and comprehensive approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100278
  33. Mahapatra, S. (2024). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9
  34. Mohamed, A. M. (2024). Exploring the potential of an AI-based chatbot (ChatGPT) in enhancing English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teaching: Perceptions of EFL faculty members. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3195-3217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11917-z
  35. Özer-Altınkaya, Z., & Yetkin, R. (2025). Exploring pre-service English language teachers’ readiness for AI-integrated language instruction. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 20(4), 584–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2025.2451299
  36. Pack, A., & Maloney, J. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in TESOL: Some ethical and pedagogical considerations. TESOL Quarterly, 15(1), 1007–1018. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3320
  37. Prestridge, S., Fry, K., & Kim, E. J. A. (2025). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs for Gen AI use in secondary school. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 34(2), 183–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2024.2428606
  38. Punar Özçelik, N., & Yangın Ekşi, G. (2024). Cultivating writing skills: the role of ChatGPT as a learning assistant—a case study. Smart Learning Environments, 11, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00296-8
  39. Qiao, H., & Zhao, A. (2023). Artificial intelligence-based language learning: Illuminating the impact on speaking skills and self-regulation in Chinese EFL context. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1255594. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1255594
  40. Shafiee Rad, H. (2024). Revolutionizing L2 speaking proficiency, willingness to communicate, and perceptions through artificial intelligence: A case of Speeko application. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 18(4), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2024.2309539
  41. Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843
  42. Su, Y., Luo, M., & Zhong, C. (2025). To chat or not: Pre-service English teachers’ perceptions of and needs in chatbot’s educational application. Sage Open, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251321853
  43. Sui, C.-J., & Chang, C.-Y. (2026). Generative AI and education: Exploring the interplay between teachers’ epistemic beliefs and self-regulated learning. Educational Technology & Society, 29(3), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202607_29(3).RP03
  44. Tanik Önal, N., Önal, N., & Ilhan, A. G. (2026). Artificial intelligence in early childhood classrooms: Insights from in-service and pre-service teachers. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2025.2610619
  45. Tolstykh, O. M., & Oshchepkova, T. (2024). Beyond ChatGPT: Roles that artificial intelligence tools can play in an English language classroom. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4, 60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00158-9
  46. Wei, L. (2023). Artificial intelligence in language instruction: Impact on English learning achievement, L2 motivation, and self-regulated learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1261955. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1261955
  47. Yan, D. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on learners in a L2 writing practicum: An exploratory investigation. Education and Information Technologies, 28(11), 13943-13967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11742-4
  48. Yang, H., Kim, H., Lee, J. H., & Shin, D. (2022). Implementation of an AI chatbot as an English conversation partner in EFL speaking classes. ReCALL, 34(3), 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344022000039
  49. Yetkin, R. (2026). Redefining teacher–technology relationships: AI-driven platforms in EFL classrooms through the eyes of pre-service teachers. European Journal of Education, 61(1), e70453. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70453
  50. Yetkin, R., & Özer-Altınkaya, Z. (2024). AI in the language classroom: Insights from pre-service English teachers. E-Learning and Digital Media. https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241267011
  51. Yuan, L., & Liu, X. (2024). The effect of artificial intelligence tools on EFL learners’ engagement, enjoyment, and motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 162, 108474. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108474
  52. Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025
  53. Zou, B., Du, Y., Wang, Z., Chen, J., & Zhang, W. (2023). An investigation into artificial intelligence speech evaluation programs with automatic feedback for developing EFL learners’ speaking skills. Sage Open, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231193818