SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Endüstri Mühendisliği / 2022 / Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3

EFFECTS OF REVISING THE DECISIONS IN SUPPLY CHAINS

TEDARİK ZİNCİRLERİNDE KARARLARI REVİZE ETMENİN ETKİLERİ

Mehmet Alegöz(Eskişehir Teknik Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6290-0448
Pages
440–451
Publication Date
2022-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Computational results bring significant managerial insights regarding the economic and environmental effects of revising the decisions in supply chains.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Real life applications reveal that the supply chain actors may revise their decisions such as the wholesale prices or selling prices, when they feel that their decisions are no longer the optimal decisions for them.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Motivating from this fact, this study investigates the economic and environmental effects of revising the decisions in a closed-loop supply chain consisting of a manufacturer, a remanufacturer, and a retailer.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Computational results bring significant managerial insights regarding the economic and environmental effects of revising the decisions in supply chains.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tedarik Zinciri Yönetimi · Kapalı Devre Tedarik Zincirleri · Optimizasyon

Abstract

Real life applications reveal that the supply chain actors may revise their decisions such as the wholesale prices or selling prices, when they feel that their decisions are no longer the optimal decisions for them. Motivating from this fact, this study investigates the economic and environmental effects of revising the decisions in a closed-loop supply chain consisting of a manufacturer, a remanufacturer, and a retailer. To this end, we propose game theory based models for the cases where the actors do not have the ability of revising their decisions (Case NR) and the actors have the ability of revising the decisions (Case R). After obtaining the equilibrium decisions in both cases, we compare the decisions under various parameter settings. Computational results bring significant managerial insights regarding the economic and environmental effects of revising the decisions in supply chains.

Özet

Gerçek hayat uygulamaları, tedarik zinciri aktörlerinin, verdikleri kararların kendileri için en iyi karalar olmadığını düşündükleri durumlarda toptan ve perakende satış fiyatı gibi kararlarını revize ettiklerini göstermektedir. Bu gerçekten yola çıkarak, bu çalışma bir üretici, bir yeniden üretici ve bir perakendeciden oluşan kapalı devre bir tedarik zincirinde kararları revize edebilmenin ekonomik ve çevresel etkilerine odaklanmaktadır. Bu amaçla aktörlerin kararlarını revize etme imkanlarının olmadığı (Durum NR) ve aktörlerin kararlarını revize etme imkanlarının olduğu (Durum R) durumlara yönelik oyun teorisi temelli yaklaşımlar öne sürülmüştür. Her iki durum için de aktörlerin denge durumu kararları elde edildikten sonra, farklı parametreler altında bu kararlar birbirleri ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Hesaplama sonuçları tedarik zincirlerinde kararları revize edebilmenin ekonomik ve çevresel etkileri konusunda önemli yönetimsel bulguları beraberinde getirmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Alegöz, M. (2022). EFFECTS OF REVISING THE DECISIONS IN SUPPLY CHAINS. Endüstri Mühendisliği, Cilt: 33 Sayı: 3, 440–451. https://doi.org/10.46465/endustrimuhendisligi.1110656

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (22)

  1. Banasik, A., Kanellopoulos, A., Claassen, G. D. H., Bloemhof-Ruwaard, J. M., & van der Vorst, J. G. (2017). Closing loops in agricultural supply chains using multi-objective optimization: A case study of an industrial mushroom supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.08.012
  2. Bai, Q., Xu, J., & Zhang, Y. (2018). Emission reduction decision and coordination of a make-to-order supply chain with two products under cap-and-trade regulation. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 119, 131-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.03.032
  3. Bazan, E., Jaber, M. Y., & Zanoni, S. (2015). Supply chain models with greenhouse gases emissions, energy usage and different coordination decisions. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39(17), 5131-5151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2015.03.044
  4. Bazan, E., Jaber, M. Y., & Zanoni, S. (2017). Carbon emissions and energy effects on a two-level manufacturer-retailer closed-loop supply chain model with remanufacturing subject to different coordination mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 183, 394-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.07.009
  5. Chen, C. K., & Akmalul'Ulya, M. (2019). Analyses of the reward-penalty mechanism in green closed-loop supply chains with product remanufacturing. International Journal of Production Economics, 210, 211-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.01.006
  6. Chen, H., Dong, Z., Li, G., & He, K. (2021). Remanufacturing process innovation in closed-loop supply chain under cost-sharing mechanism and different power structures. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 162, 107743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107743
  7. Choi, T. M., Li, Y., & Xu, L. (2013). Channel leadership, performance and coordination in closed loop supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(1), 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.002
  8. Chukwudi, A. E., Udoka, E., & Charles, I. (2017). Game theory basics and its application in cyber security. Advances in Wireless Communications and Networks, 3(4), 45-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.awcn.20170304.13
  9. Chung, L. K., Yang, L. S., Chiou, Y. C., & Yi, C. (2010). The study of Stackelberg equilibrium for post-disaster stockpiles distribution problem. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, 8, 103-115. https://doi.org/10.11175/easts.8.103
  10. Feng, L., Govindan, K., & Li, C. (2017). Strategic planning: Design and coordination for dual-recycling channel reverse supply chain considering consumer behaviour. European Journal of Operational Research, 260(2), 601-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.12.050
  11. Heydari, J., Govindan, K., & Jafari, A. (2017). Reverse and closed loop supply chain coordination by considering government role. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 52, 379-398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.03.008
  12. Huang, Z., Shao, W., Meng, L., Zhang, G., & Qiang, Q. (2022). Pricing Decision for a Closed-Loop Supply Chain with Technology Licensing under Collection and Remanufacturing Cost Disruptions. Sustainability, 14(6), 3354. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14063354
  13. Li, K., Liu, J., Fu, H., & Liu, B. (2020). Acquisition and pricing strategies in hybrid manufacturing-remanufacturing systems. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 57, 217-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.09.006
  14. Liu, J., Mantin, B., & Song, X. (2022). Rent, sell, and remanufacture: The manufacturer's choice when remanufacturing can be outsourced. European Journal of Operational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2022.02.018
  15. Saha, S., Sarmah, S. P., & Moon, I. (2016). Dual channel closed-loop supply chain coordination with a reward-driven remanufacturing policy. International Journal of Production Research, 54(5), 1503-1517. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2015.1090031
  16. Tang, S., Wang, W., & Zhou, G. (2020). Remanufacturing in a competitive market: A closed-loop supply chain in a Stackelberg game framework. Expert Systems with Applications, 161, 113655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113655
  17. Yang, L., Hu, Y., & Huang, L. (2020). Collecting mode selection in a remanufacturing supply chain under cap-and-trade regulation. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(2), 480-496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.006
  18. Yi, P., Huang, M., Guo, L., & Shi, T. (2016). Dual recycling channel decision in retailer oriented closed-loop supply chain for construction machinery remanufacturing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1393-1405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.104
  19. Yu, M., Bai, B., Xiong, S., & Liao, X. (2021). Evaluating environmental impacts and economic performance of remanufacturing electric vehicle lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128935
  20. Zeng, A. Z. (2013). Coordination mechanisms for a three‐stage reverse supply chain to increase profitable returns. Naval Research Logistics, 60(1), 31-45. https://doi.org/10.1002/nav.21517
  21. Zhang, C. T., & Ren, M. L. (2016). Closed-loop supply chain coordination strategy for the remanufacture of patented products under competitive demand. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 40(13-14), 6243-6255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2016.02.006
  22. Zhou, Q., Meng, C., & Yuen, K. F. (2021). Remanufacturing authorization strategy for competition among OEM, authorized remanufacturer, and unauthorized remanufacturer. International Journal of Production Economics, 242, 108295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108295