SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2

NAVIGATING US CLIMATE POLICY UNCERTAINTY: NOVEL EVIDENCE FROM CARBON MARKETS, CRYPTOCURRENCY (DeFi), AND RENEWABLE ENERGY INNOVATIONS

ABD İKLİM POLİTİKASI BELİRSİZLİĞİNİ ANLAMAK: KARBON PİYASALARI, MERKEZİYETSİZ FİNANS (DeFi) VE YENİLENEBİLİR ENERJİ İNOVASYONLARINDAN YENİLİKÇİ KANITLAR

Cengizhan Karaca(GAZİANTEP ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0002-8121-7142
Pages
811–843
Publication Date
2025-06-15
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings reveal that there is a negative relationship between the CARBON and the CPU index in the long term.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to reveal the dynamics between climate policy uncertainty (CPU) and S&P Global Carbon Credit Index (CARBON), S&P Cryptocurrency DeFi Index (DeFi), and WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index (NEX) using data from December 2017 to March 2024 in the US.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although the DeFi does not have a statistically significant effect in the long term, it reveals that it has a negative effect on the CPU index in the short term.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings reveal that there is a negative relationship between the CARBON and the CPU index in the long term.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İklim Politika Belirsizliği · Merkeziyetsiz Finans (DeFi) · Yenilenebilir Enerji

Abstract

The aim of this study is to reveal the dynamics between climate policy uncertainty (CPU) and S&P Global Carbon Credit Index (CARBON), S&P Cryptocurrency DeFi Index (DeFi), and WilderHill New Energy Global Innovation Index (NEX) using data from December 2017 to March 2024 in the US. Fourier Bootstrap ARDL, Fourier Bootstrap quantile causality, and KRLS methods are used in the study. The findings reveal that there is a negative relationship between the CARBON and the CPU index in the long term. Although the DeFi does not have a statistically significant effect in the long term, it reveals that it has a negative effect on the CPU index in the short term. In contrast, the NEX has a positive relationship with the CPU index in both the short and long term. Moreover, there is a U-shaped non-linear relationship between the NEX and the CPU index, which weakens in moderate climate uncertainties and strengthens again in high uncertainty. Considering the causality results, there exists a causality from CARBON to CPU in the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th quantiles, and from CPU to CARBON in the 2nd and 3rd quantiles. Additionally, there is a causality from DeFi to CPU in the 8th quantile and from CPU to DeFi in the 1st quantile. Finally, there is a causal relationship from NEX to CPU in the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th quantiles and from CPU to NEX in the 9th quantile.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ABD’de Aralık 2017 ile Mart 2024 arasındaki verileri kullanarak iklim politikası belirsizliği (CPU) ile S&P Küresel Karbon Kredi Endeksi (CARBON), S&P Kripto Para DeFi Endeksi (DeFi) ve WilderHill Yeni Enerji Küresel İnovasyon Endeksi (NEX) arasındaki dinamikleri ortaya koymaktır. Çalışmada Fourier Bootstrap ARDL, Fourier Bootstrap kantil nedensellik ve KRLS yöntemleri kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, CARBON ile CPU endeksi arasında uzun vadede negatif bir ilişki olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. DeFi’nin uzun vadede istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bir etkisi olmasa da, kısa vadede CPU endeksi üzerinde negatif bir etkisi olduğunu ortaya koymaktadır. Buna karşılık, NEX’in hem kısa hem de uzun vadede CPU endeksi ile pozitif bir ilişkisi vardır. Ayrıca, NEX ile CPU endeksi arasında ılımlı iklim belirsizliklerinde zayıflayan ve yüksek belirsizlikte tekrar güçlenen U şeklinde doğrusal olmayan bir ilişki vardır. Nedensellik sonuçlarını göz önünde bulundurarak, 2., 3. ve 4. kantillerde CARBON’dan CPU’ya ve 2. ve 3. kantillerde CPU’dan CARBON’a bir nedensellik vardır. Ek olarak, 8. kantilde DeFi’den CPU’ya ve 1. kantilde CPU’dan DeFi’ye bir nedensellik bulunmaktadır. Son olarak, 2., 3., 4. ve 5. kantillerde NEX’ten CPU’ya ve 9. kantilde CPU’dan NEX’e doğru bir nedensellik ilişkisi bulunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Karaca, C. (2025). NAVIGATING US CLIMATE POLICY UNCERTAINTY: NOVEL EVIDENCE FROM CARBON MARKETS, CRYPTOCURRENCY (DeFi), AND RENEWABLE ENERGY INNOVATIONS. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 2, 811–843. https://doi.org/10.16953/deusosbil.1599272

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (59)

  1. Akyol, G., Bi̇li̇rer, M., & Zeren, F. (2023). Türkiye’de ihracat, döviz kuru, işsizlik ve ekonomik büyüme ilişkisi: Fourier kantil nedensellik ve fourier adl eşbütünleşme testlerinden yeni kanıtlar. Finans Ekonomi ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8 (2), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.29106/fesa.1256614
  2. Ameen, M. H., & Afşar, A. (2022). Investigating the effects of climate policy uncertainty on the US petroleum markets. International Journal of Energy Studies, 7 (1), 1–20. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article- file/2177093
  3. Amin, M. R., Akindayomi, A., Sarker, M. S. R., & Bhuyan, R. (2023). Climate policy uncertainty and corporate tax avoidance. Finance Research Letters, 58, 104581. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104581
  4. Athari, S. A., & Kirikkaleli, D. (2024). How do climate policy uncertainty and renewable energy and clean technology stock prices co-move? Evidence from Canada. Empirical Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02643-7
  5. Becker, R., Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27 (3), 381–409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x
  6. Bouri, E., Iqbal, N., & Klein, T. (2022). Climate policy uncertainty and the price dynamics of green and brown energy stocks. Finance Research Letters, 47, 102740. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102740
  7. Cavlak, O. D. (2022). A nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) approach for U.S. climate policy uncertainty index, Renewable Energy Consumption, and Oil Prices. Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 (2), 757–776. https://doi.org/10.26745/ahbvuibfd.1055390
  8. Cheng, K., Hsueh, H.-P., Ranjbar, O., Wang, M.-C., & Chang, T. (2021). Urbanization, coal consumption and CO2 emissions nexus in China using bootstrap Fourier Granger causality test in quantiles. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 14 (1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-020-00263-0
  9. Choi, Y., & Lee, S. (2020). The impact of urban physical environments on cooling rates in summer: Focusing on interaction effects with a kernel-based regularized least squares (KRLS) model. Renewable Energy, 149, 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.12.021
  10. Christopoulos, D. K., & León-Ledesma, M. A. (2010). Smooth breaks and non-linear mean reversion: Post-Bretton Woods real exchange rates. Journal of International Money and Finance, 29 (6), 1076–1093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2010.02.003
  11. Dong, X., Jiang, Z., & Yoon, S.-M. (2024). Impact of global financial and energy markets, uncertainty, and climate change attention on Bitcoin carbon footprint. Finance Research Letters, 70, 106254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106254
  12. Du, Y., & Guo, Q. (2023). Green credit policy and green innovation in green industries: Does climate policy uncertainty matter? Finance Research Letters, 58, 104512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104512
  13. Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). A unit root test using a Fourier series to approximate smooth breaks*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 74 (4), 574–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2011.00662.x
  14. Faccini, R., Matin, R., & Skiadopoulos, G. (2023). Dissecting climate risks: Are they reflected in stock prices? Journal of Banking & Finance, 155, 106948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106948
  15. Fareed, Z., Salem, S., Adebayo, T. S., Pata, U. K., & Shahzad, F. (2021). Role of export diversification and renewable energy on the load capacity factor in Indonesia: A Fourier quantile causality approach. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fenvs.2021.770152
  16. Fendoğlu, E., & Gökçe, E. C. (2021). Türkiye’de eğitim ve sağlık harcamaları ile ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişki: Fourier yaklaşımı. Ekonomi İşletme ve Maliye Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3 (2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.38009/ekimad.970527
  17. Gavriilidis, K. (2021). Measuring climate policy uncertainty [SSRN Scholarly Paper]. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3847388
  18. Ghani, U., Zhu, B., Qin, Q., & Ghani, M. (2024). Forecasting US stock market volatility: Evidence from ESG and CPU indices. Finance Research Letters, 59, 104811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104811
  19. Guesmi, K., Makrychoriti, P., & Spyrou, S. (2023). The relationship between climate risk, climate policy uncertainty, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from the US. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 212, 610–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2023.06.015
  20. Gürsoy, S., Jóźwik, B., Dogan, M., Zeren, F., & Gulcan, N. (2024). Impact of climate policy uncertainty, clean energy index, and carbon emission allowance prices on bitcoin returns. Sustainability, 16 (9), 3822. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16093822
  21. Hainmueller, J., & Hazlett, C. (2014). Kernel regularized least squares: Reducing misspecification bias with a flexible and interpretable machine learning approach. Political Analysis, 22 (2), 143–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpt019
  22. Hatemi-J, A., & Uddin, G. S. (2012). Is the causal nexus of energy utilization and economic growth asymmetric in the US? Economic Systems, 36 (3), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2011.10.005
  23. Hoang, K. (2022). How does corporate R&D investment respond to climate policy uncertainty? Evidence from heavy emitter firms in the United States. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29 (4), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2246
  24. Hoque, M. E., & Azlan Shah Zaidi, M. (2020). Impacts of global-economic-policy uncertainty on emerging stock market: Evidence from linear and non-linear models. Prague Economic Papers, 29 (1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.pep.725
  25. Huang, W. (2023). Climate policy uncertainty and green innovation. Economics Letters, 233, 111423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111423
  26. Husain, S., Sohag, K., & Wu, Y. (2022). The response of green energy and technology investment to climate policy uncertainty: An application of twin transitions strategy. Technology in Society, 71, 102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102132
  27. Işık, C., Ongan, S., Ozdemir, D., Jabeen, G., Sharif, A., Alvarado, R., & Rehman, A. (2024). Renewable energy, climate policy uncertainty, industrial production, domestic exports/re-exports, and CO2 emissions in the USA: A SVAR approach. Gondwana Research, 127, 156–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gr.2023.08.019
  28. Kartal, M. T., Pata, U. K., Kılıç Depren, S., & Depren, Ö. (2023). Effects of possible changes in natural gas, nuclear, and coal energy consumption on CO2 emissions: Evidence from France under Russia’s gas supply cuts by dynamic ARDL simulations approach. Applied Energy, 339, 120983. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120983
  29. Li, M., Han, X., & Li, Y. (2024). The impact of climate policy uncertainty on stock price synchronicity: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters, 69, 106166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106166
  30. Liang, C., Umar, M., Ma, F., & Huynh, T. L. D. (2022). Climate policy uncertainty and world renewable energy index volatility forecasting. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 182, 121810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121810
  31. Ludlow, J., & Enders, W. (2000). Estimating non-linear ARMA models using Fourier coefficients. International Journal of Forecasting, 16 (3), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2070(00)00048-0
  32. Lv, W., & Li, B. (2023). Climate policy uncertainty and stock market volatility: Evidence from different sectors. Finance Research Letters, 51, 103506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.103506
  33. Mao, K., & Huang, J. (2022). How does climate policy uncertainty affect green innovation? Evidence from China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19 (23), 15745. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192315745
  34. McNown, R., Sam, C. Y., & Goh, S. K. (2018). Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration. Applied Economics, 50 (13), 1509–1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1366643
  35. Nazlioglu, S., Gormus, N. A., & Soytas, U. (2016). Oil prices and real estate investment trusts (REITs): Gradual-shift causality and volatility transmission analysis. Energy Economics, 60, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2016.09.009
  36. Ozkan, O., Sunday Adebayo, T., & Usman, O. (2024). Dynamic connectedness of clean energy markets, green markets, and sustainable markets: The role of climate policy uncertainty. Energy, 303, 131957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2024.131957
  37. Pástor, Ľ., Stambaugh, R. F., & Taylor, L. A. (2021). Sustainable investing in equilibrium. Journal of Financial Economics, 142 (2), 550–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.12.011
  38. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16 (3), 289–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
  39. Ren, X., Zhang, X., Yan, C., & Gozgor, G. (2022). Climate policy uncertainty and firm-level total factor productivity: Evidence from China. Energy Economics, 113, 106209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.106209
  40. Sarker, P. K., Bouri, E., & Marco, C. K. L. (2023). Asymmetric effects of climate policy uncertainty, geopolitical risk, and crude oil prices on clean energy prices. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (6), 15797–15807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23020-w
  41. Sautner, Z., Van Lent, L., Vilkov, G., & Zhang, R. (2023). Firm-level climate change exposure. The Journal of Finance, 78 (3), 1449–1498. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13219
  42. Su, C. W., Wei, S., Wang, Y., & Tao, R. (2024). How does climate policy uncertainty affect the carbon market? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 200, 123155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123155
  43. Syed, Q. R., Goh, S. K., & Apergis, N. (2024). Modeling the impact of climate policy uncertainty on energy production. Applied Economics Letters, 0 (0), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2024.2415322
  44. Tedeschi, M., Foglia, M., Bouri, E., & Dai, P.-F. (2024). How does climate policy uncertainty affect financial markets? Evidence from Europe. Economics Letters, 234, 111443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2023.111443
  45. Tian, L., Li, X., Lee, C.-W., & Spulbăr, C. (2024). Investigating the asymmetric impact of artificial intelligence on renewable energy under climate policy uncertainty. Energy Economics, 137, 107809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2024.107809
  46. Tommaso, C. D., Foglia, M., & Pacelli, V. (2024). The impact of climate policy uncertainty on the Italian financial market. Finance Research Letters, 69, 106094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106094
  47. Treepongkaruna, S., Chan, K. F., & Malik, I. (2023). Climate policy uncertainty and the cross-section of stock returns. Finance Research Letters, 55, 103837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.103837
  48. Vo, H., Nguyen, T., & Phan, H. V. (2024). Building a sustainable future: The role of corporate social responsibility in climate policy uncertainty management. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104831
  49. Wu, R., & Liu, B.-Y. (2023). Do climate policy uncertainty and investor sentiment drive the dynamic spillovers among green finance markets? Journal of Environmental Management, 347, 119008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119008
  50. Wu, X., Yin, X., & Mei, X. (2022). Forecasting the volatility of European Union allowance futures with climate policy uncertainty using the EGARCH-MIDAS model. Sustainability, 14(7), 4306. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074306
  51. Xu, X., Huang, S., Lucey, B. M., & An, H. (2023). The impacts of climate policy uncertainty on stock markets: Comparison between China and the US. International Review of Financial Analysis, 88, 102671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2023.102671
  52. Xu, Y., Li, M., Yan, W., & Bai, J. (2022). Predictability of the renewable energy market returns: The informational gains from the climate policy uncertainty. Resources Policy, 79, 103141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103141
  53. Yilanci, V., Bozoklu, S., & Gorus, M. S. (2020). Are BRICS countries pollution havens? Evidence from a bootstrap ARDL bounds testing approach with a Fourier function. Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102035
  54. Yilanci, V., & Eris, Z. A. (2013). Purchasing power parity in African countries: Further evidence from Fourier unit root tests based on linear and nonlinear models. South African Journal of Economics, 81(1), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1813-6982.2012.01326.x
  55. Yousfi, M., Brahim, M., Farhani, S., & Bouzgarrou, H. (2023). Revisiting the relationship between business conditions, climate policy uncertainty, and environmental pollution: Evidence from the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30 (41), 94334–94346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28869-z
  56. Zhang, Z., Cheng, S., Wang, C., Song, S., & Feng, Y. (2023). Climate policy uncertainty and corporate investment efficiency: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 0 (0), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2276062
  57. Zhao, H., & Luo, N. (2024). Climate uncertainty and green index volatility: Empirical insights from Chinese financial markets. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104857
  58. Zhou, D., Siddik, A. B., Guo, L., & Li, H. (2023). Dynamic relationship among climate policy uncertainty, oil price and renewable energy consumption—Findings from TVP-SV-VAR approach. Renewable Energy, 204, 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.01.018
  59. Zhou, S., & Kutan, A. M. (2014). Smooth structural breaks and the stationarity of the yen real exchange rates. Applied Economics, 46 (10), 1150–1159. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2013.868587