Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 73

Failure as an Obstacle or a Support: The Failure Beliefs Scale Development Study

Galip Yüksel(GAZİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6840-8462
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-06-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The use of the scale in studies related to failure in different fields such as education and work will contribute to future studies in Türkiye.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This scale development study aims to measure the failure beliefs of adults in Turkish culture by addressing the concept of failure based on Carol Dweck's implicit theories.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Firstly, qualitative data was gathered through literature review and focus groups and later the scale was tested by conducting exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on quantitative data gained from totally 887 adults.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The use of the scale in studies related to failure in different fields such as education and work will contribute to future studies in Türkiye.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Failure Beliefs · Implicit Theory · Scale Development.

Abstract

This scale development study aims to measure the failure beliefs of adults in Turkish culture by addressing the concept of failure based on Carol Dweck's implicit theories. In the study, the stages of the scale development process were followed with a mixed method approach. Firstly, qualitative data was gathered through literature review and focus groups and later the scale was tested by conducting exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses on quantitative data gained from totally 887 adults. As a result of the analyses, the Failure Beliefs Scale was developed consisting of a total of eight items and two factors, one of which measures the beliefs that failure is debilitating, and the other factor measures the beliefs that failure is enhancing. The measurement invariance of the scale across gender was examined and to ensure the reliability of the scale, internal consistency and stability coefficients were calculated. The scale was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool for measuring adults' failure beliefs. The use of the scale in studies related to failure in different fields such as education and work will contribute to future studies in Türkiye.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kılıç, S., Yüksel, G., *, S. K. (2024). Failure as an Obstacle or a Support: The Failure Beliefs Scale Development Study. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 14 Issue: 73. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1342724_8

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (81)

  1. Anderson, C. A. (1995). Implicit theories in broad perspective. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 286–290. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1448941
  2. Atkinson, J. W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(1), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445
  3. Berger, S., & Freud, A. M. (2012). Fear of failure, disorganization, and subjective well-being in the context of preparing for an exam. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 71(2), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000074.
  4. Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.14678624.2007.00995.x
  5. Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. (2001). Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.85.
  6. Caraway K., Tucker C. M., Reinke W. M.& Hall C. (2003). Self-efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40(1), 417–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.10092
  7. Cattell, R. B. (1966). The screen test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
  8. Chiu, C.Y., Hong, Y.Y. & Dweck, C.S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1037/00223514.73.1.19
  9. Choi, I., & Nisbett. R. E. (2000). Cultural psychology of surprise: Holistic theories and recognition of contradiction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 890–905. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.79.6.890
  10. Conroy, D. E., & Elliot, A. J. (2004). Fear of failure and achievement goals in sport: Addressing the issue of the chicken and the egg. Anxiety Stress and Coping, 17(3), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800412336427
  11. Conroy, D.E., (2001). Progress in the development of a multidimensional measure of fear of failure: The performance failure appraisal inventory (PFAI). Anxiety, Stress, and Coping, 14(1), 431-452. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615800108248365
  12. Conroy, D.E., Willow, J.P., & Metzler, J.N. (2002). Multidimensional measurement of fear of failure: The Performance Failure Appraisal Inventory (PFAI). Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 14, 431-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413200252907752
  13. Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark. V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. (3. Ed.) Sage
  14. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Pearson.
  15. Creswell., J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquary and research design: Choosing among five approaches. (2 Ed.). Sage.
  16. Creswell., J. W. (2017). Araştırma deseni: Nitel, nicel ve karma yöntem yaklaşımları. (S. B. Demir, Trans. Edt.). Eğiten Kitap.
  17. Crocker, J., Brook, A. T., Niiya, Y., & Villacorta, M. (2006). The pursuit of self-esteem: Contingencies of self-worth and self-regulation. Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1749–1772. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00427.x.
  18. Crum, A. J., Salovey, P., & Achor, S. (2013). Rethinking stress: The role of mindsets in determining the stress response. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(4), 716. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0031201
  19. De Castella, K., & Byrne, D. (2015). My intelligence may be more malleable than yours: the revised implicit theories of intelligence (self-theory) scale is a better predictor of achievement, motivation, and student disengagement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(3), 245–267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-015-0244-y
  20. De Castella, K., Byrne, D., & Covington, M. (2013). Unmotivated or motivated to fail: A cross-cultural study of achievement motivation, fear of failure, and student disengagement. Journal of Educational Psychology,105(3), 861–880. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032 464.
  21. DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (27.Eds.). Sage.
  22. Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., & Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 1087–1101. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087
  23. Dupeyrat, C., & Mariné, C. (2005). Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.007
  24. Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040-1048. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
  25. Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. Psychology Press.
  26. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House.
  27. Dweck, C. S. (2008). Can personality be changed? The role of beliefs in personality and change. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00612.x
  28. Dweck, C. S., & Master, A. (2009). Self-theories and motivation: Students’ beliefs about intelligence. In K.R. Wentzel and A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 123-140). Routledge.
  29. Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: a world from two perspectives. Psychological lnquiry, 6(4), 267-285. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/1448940
  30. Dweck, C.S. & Leggett, E.L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033295X.95.2.256
  31. Dweck, C.S. & Master, A. (2008). Self-theories Motivate Self-Regulated Learning. In D. Schunk & B. Zimmerman (Eds). Motivation and Self-Regulated Learning: Theory, Research, and Applications (pp. 31-51). Erlbaum.
  32. Dweck, C.S. & Molden, D. (2006). Self-theories: their impact on competence motivation and acquisition. In A. Eliot and C. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 122-140). The Guilford Press.
  33. Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169-189. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
  34. Elliot, A. J., & Covington, M. V. (2001). Approach and avoidance motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009009018235
  35. Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal Of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 804-818. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.804
  36. Elliot, A.J., & Thrash, T.M. (2004). The intergenerational transmission of fear of failure. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(1), 957-971. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203262024
  37. Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: an approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
  38. Erkuş, A. (2011). Davranış bilimleri için bilimsel araştırma süreci. Seçkin.
  39. Erkuş, A. (2012). Psikolojide ölçme ve ölçek geliştirme. Pegem.
  40. Güneş, Ö. (2022). Failure attributions and metacognitive awareness of EFL learners. Language Awareness, 31(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1960538
  41. Güneş, Ö. (2022). Failure attributions and metacognitive awareness of EFL learners, Language Awareness, 31(1), 53-72, https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2021.1960538
  42. Haimovitz, K., & Dweck, C. S. (2016). What predicts children’s fixed and growth intelligence mindsets? Not their parents’ views of intelligence but their parents’ views of failure. Psychological Science, 27(1), 859–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616639727cle2017.
  43. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2014). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Sage Publications.
  44. Hayes, A. F., & Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach's alpha for estimating reliability. But. Communication Methods and Measures, 14(1) 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629
  45. Hayton, J. C., Allen, D. G & Scarpello, V. (2004). Factor retention decisions in exploratory factor analysis: A tutorial on parallel analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 7(2), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104263675
  46. Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., Dweck, C. S., Lin, D. M. S., & Wan, W. (1999). Implicit theories, attributions, and coping: A meaning system approach. Journal of Personality and Social psychology, 77(3), 588-599. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.588
  47. Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrica, 30(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
  48. Ikeda, M., & Misawa, R. (2012). Conceptualization and measurement of beliefs about failure. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 60(4), 367–379. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep.60.367.
  49. Ji, L.-J., Peng, K., & Nisbett, R. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.943
  50. Kahraman, N., & Sungur, S. (2016). Adaptation of the Performance Failure Appraisal Inventory (PFAI) into Turkish. Journal of Kirsehir Education Faculty, 17(3), 223-239. https://doi.org/10.1080/1750984X.2021.1901299
  51. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446002000116
  52. Kelley T. L. (1939). The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. Journal of Educational Psychology, 30(1), 17-24. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/h0057123
  53. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (4th Ed.) Guilford.
  54. Lee, K. (1996). A study of teacher responses based on their conceptions of intelligence. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 31(2), 1-12. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23870415
  55. Lüftenegger, M., & Chen, J. A. (2017). Conceptual issues and assessment of implicit theories. Zeitschrift fur Psychologie, 225(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000286
  56. MacCallum, R. C., Zhang, S., Preacher, K. J., & Rucker, D. D. (2002). On the practice of dichotomization of quantitative variables. Psychological Methods, 7(1), 19–40. https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.19
  57. Marcoulides G., Schumacher R. (2001). New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  58. Martignoni, D., & Keil, T. (2021). It did not work? Unlearn and try again—Unlearning success and failure beliefs in changing environments. Strategic Management Journal, 42(6), 1057-1082. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.v42.610.1002/smj.3261
  59. Martin, A. J. & Marsh, H. W. (2003) Fear of failure: Friend or foe?, Australian Psychologist, 38(1), 31-38, https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060310001706997
  60. Martin, A. J. (2002). Motivation and academic resilience: Developing a model of student enhancement. Australian Journal of Education, 46(1), 34-49.
  61. McClelland, D. C. (1965). Toward a theory of motive acquisition. American Psychologist, 20(1), 321–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0022225
  62. Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y.-P., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4(3), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000317
  63. Nisbett, R. E., Peng, K., Choi, I., & Norenzayan, A. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108(2), 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.108.2.291
  64. Nishimura, T., Seo, M., Uesaka, Y., Manalo, E., Tanaka, E., & Ichikawa, S. (2017). Development of a scale about failure beliefs in academic activities. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.5926/jjep.65.197.
  65. O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using paralel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavior Research Methods, Instrumentsand Computers, 32(3), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200807
  66. Osborne, J. W. (2015). What is rotating in exploratory factor analysis?. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 20(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.7275/hb2g-m060
  67. Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41(2016), 71-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
  68. Robins, R. W. & Pals, J. L. (2002). Implicit Self-Theories in the academic domain: implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1(4), 313-336. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860290106805
  69. Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R. ve Wrightsman, L. S. (1991). Criteria for scale selection and evaluation, in measures of personality and social psychological attitude. Academic Press.
  70. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.
  71. Schumacher, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2010). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Routledge.
  72. Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Riemann, R., & Angleitner, A. (2003). Implicit theories about personality and intelligence and their relationship to actual personality and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 35(4), 939-951. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(02)00310-
  73. Sucuoglu, H. (2014). Construct validity of success/failure attribution scale among Turkish university students. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(11), 326-339. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2014.1768
  74. Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon.
  75. Tavşancıl, E. (2005). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. (2. baskı) Nobel.
  76. Tempelaar, D. T., Rienties, B., Giesbers, B., & Gijselaers, W. H. (2014). The Pivotal role of effort beliefs in mediating implicit theories of intelligence and achievement goals and academic motivations. Social Psychology of Education, 18(1), 101-120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-014-9281-7
  77. Todd, F. L. (2017). Evidence regarding the internal structure: Confirmatory factor analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 50(4), 239-247, https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2017.1336929
  78. Weiner, B. (1972). Theories of motivation: From mechanisms to cognition. Markham.
  79. Weiner, B. (2010). The development of an attribution-based theory of motivation: A history of ideas, Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 28-36, https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903433596
  80. Worthington R. L., Whittaker T. A. (2006). Scale development research: A content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(1), 806 – 838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127
  81. Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47(4), 302-314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2012.722805