SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 75

Psychometric Properties of the Three Dimensional Meaning in Life Scale (3DM) among Turkish-Speaking Adults

Mustafa Subaşı(HSE University)0000-0003-4170-6280
Pages
—
Publication Date
2024-12-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the findings, the Turkish version of the 3DM is a valid and reliable scale when administered among adult Turkish-speaking individuals.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Previous research supports the tripartite framework of meaning in life (MiL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The Three Dimensional Meaning in Life Scale (3DM) is a self-report measure drawing upon the tripartite framework, comprising of coherence, purpose, and significance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the findings, the Turkish version of the 3DM is a valid and reliable scale when administered among adult Turkish-speaking individuals.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:meaning in life · coherence · purpose

Abstract

Previous research supports the tripartite framework of meaning in life (MiL). The Three Dimensional Meaning in Life Scale (3DM) is a self-report measure drawing upon the tripartite framework, comprising of coherence, purpose, and significance. The primary goal of the present research is to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the 3DM, and to assess how 3DM and its subscales relate to mental health and psychopathology indicators in a Turkish-speaking adult sample. The study employs a sample of 702 participants of which 540 are female. The methods employed include confirmatory factor analysis, measurement invariance analyses, Pearson’s correlation tests, reliability analyses, regression analyses, and independent samples t-tests. The 11-item, three-factor structure of the 3DM was verified to be replicated in the Turkish version by the first-order confirmatory factor analysis: [(χ2 = 181, df = 40, p = .00)], CFI = .98, TLI = .97, RMSEA = .071, 90%CI[.060, .081], SRMR = .03. Internal consistency coefficients of the subscales and the 3DM total demonstrated strong reliability with strong item-total correlations. The correlation coefficients of the 3DM supported concurrent and divergent validity. Additionally, the 3DM predicted well-being and psychopathology indicators. Measurement invariance analyses of the subscales revealed that coherence, purpose, and significance scales were consistent and equivalent across gender. According to the findings, the Turkish version of the 3DM is a valid and reliable scale when administered among adult Turkish-speaking individuals.

🔖

Cite This Article

Subaşı, M., *, M. S. (2024). Psychometric Properties of the Three Dimensional Meaning in Life Scale (3DM) among Turkish-Speaking Adults. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 14 Issue: 75. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1409199

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (50)

  1. Akın, A., & Taş, I. (2015). Yaşam Anlamı Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Turkish Studies-International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(3), 27-36.
  2. Beyer, S. L. (2023). Validation of a German-translated version of the three dimensional meaning in life scale [Bachelor’s thesis, University of Twente]. University of Twente.
  3. Boreham, I. D., & Schutte, N. S. (2023). The relationship between purpose in life and depression and anxiety: A meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 79(12), 2736-2767. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.23576
  4. Bulut, S., & Subaşı, M. (2020). Pozitif psikolojiye giriş. In S. Bulut (Ed.), Pozitif psikoloji (s. 1–15). Nobel.
  5. Byrne, B. M. (1994). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows. Sage Publications.
  6. Cohen, R., Bavishi, C., & Rozanski, A. (2016). Purpose in life and its relationship to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events: A meta-analysis. Psychosomatic Medicine, 78(2), 122-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0000000000000274
  7. Davies, G., Klaassen, D., & Längle, A. (2014). Purpose in life test. In M. A. C (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life Research. Springer.
  8. Demirci, İ. ve Akın, A. (2015). Ruh Sağlığı Sürekliliği Kısa Formu’nun geçerliği ve güvenirliği [The Validity and Reliability of the Mental Health Continuum Short Form]. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 48(1), 49-64. http://dergiler.ankara.edu.tr/dergiler/40/2076/21501.pdf
  9. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
  10. Diener, E., Wirtz, D., Biswas-Diener, R., Tov, W., Kim-Prieto, C., Choi, D.-w., & Oishi, S. (2009). New measures of well-being. In E. Diener (Ed.), Assessing well-being: The collected works of Ed Diener (pp. 247–266). Springer Science + Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4_12
  11. Emmons, R. A. (1986). Personal strivings: An approach to personality and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 1058-1068. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.5.1058
  12. Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., & Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
  13. George, L. S., & Park, C. L. (2016). Meaning in life as comprehension, purpose, and mattering: Toward integration and new research questions. Review of General Psychology, 20(3), 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000077
  14. George, L. S., & Park, C. L. (2017). The multidimensional existential meaning scale: A tripartite approach to measuring meaning in life. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(6), 613-627. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1209546
  15. Gerymski, R., & Krok, D. (2020). A Polish adaptation of the Multidimensional Existential Meaning Scale: Internal structure, reliability, and validity. Roczniki Psychologiczne, 23(2), 173-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rpsych20232-4
  16. Graci, M. E., & Fivush, R. (2017). Narrative meaning making, attachment, and psychological growth and stress. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34(4), 486-509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407516644066
  17. Heintzelman, S. J., & King, L. A. (2014). (The feeling of) meaning-as-information. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(2), 153-167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313518487
  18. Hill, P. L., & Turiano, N. A. (2014). Purpose in life as a predictor of mortality across adulthood. Psychological Science, 25(7), 1482-1486. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614531799
  19. Huta, V., & Ryan, R. M. (2010). Pursuing pleasure or virtue: The differential and overlapping well-being benefits of hedonic and eudaimonic motives. Journal of Happiness Studies, 11, 735-762. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-009-9171-4
  20. Kardas, F., & Yalcin, I. (2018). An Adaptation Study of the Balanced Measure of Psychological Needs (BMPN) Scale to Turkish Culture. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 47(2). https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.408515
  21. Keyes, C. L., Wissing, M., Potgieter, J. P., Temane, M., Kruger, A., & Van Rooy, S. (2008). Evaluation of the mental health continuum–short form (MHC–SF) in setswana‐speaking South Africans. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 15(3), 181-192. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.572
  22. King, L. A., & Hicks, J. A. (2021). The science of meaning in life. Annual Review of Psychology, 72, 561-584. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-072420-122921
  23. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press.
  24. Köker, S. (1991). Normal ve sorunlu ergenlerin yaşam doyumu düzeyinin karşılaştırılması [Master Dissertation, Ankara University]. Council of Higher Education Thesis Center.
  25. Leontiev, D. A. (2013). Personal meaning: A challenge for psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 8(6), 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2013.830767
  26. Lovibond, P. F., & Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335-343. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U
  27. Marco, J. H., Cañabate, M., Llorca, G., & Pérez, S. (2020). Meaning in life moderates hopelessness, suicide ideation, and borderline psychopathology in participants with eating disorders: A longitudinal study. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 27(2), 146-158. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.2414
  28. Marco, J. H., García-Alandete, J., Perez Rodriguez, S., Guillén, V., Baños, R. M., & Tormo-Irun, M. P. (2022). Spanish Validation of the Multidimensional Existential Meaning Scale: Which Dimension of Meaning in Life Is More Associated With Psychopathology in People With Mental Disorders?. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13, 832934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.832934
  29. Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2016). The three meanings of meaning in life: Distinguishing coherence, purpose, and significance. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(5), 531-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2015.1137623
  30. Martela, F., & Steger, M. F. (2023). The role of significance relative to the other dimensions of meaning in life–an examination utilizing the three dimensional meaning in life scale (3DM). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 18(4), 606-626. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2022.2070528
  31. McKnight, P. E., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and well-being: An integrative, testable theory. Review of General Psychology, 13(3), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017152
  32. Park, C. L. (2010). Making sense of the meaning literature: An integrative review of meaning making and its effects on adjustment to stressful life events. Psychological Bulletin, 136(2), 257–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018301
  33. Park, C. L. (2016). Meaning making in the context of disasters. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 72(12), 1234-1246. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22270
  34. Reker, G. T., & Wong, P. T. P. (2012). Personal meaning in life and psychosocial adaptation in the later years. In P. T. P. Wong (Ed.), The Human Quest for Meaning: Theories, Research, and Applications (2nd ed.) (pp. 433–456). Routledge.
  35. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069
  36. Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: The self-concordance model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(3), 482–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.3.482
  37. Sheldon, K. M., & Hilpert, J. C. (2012). The balanced measure of psychological needs (BMPN) scale: An alternative domain general measure of need satisfaction. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 439-451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9279-4
  38. Steger, M. F. (2012). Experiencing meaning in life: Optimal functioning at the nexus of well-being, psychopathology, and spirituality. In P. T. Wong (Ed.) The Human Quest for Meaning: Theories, Research, and Applications (pp. 165-184). Routledge.
  39. Steger, M. F., Frazier, P., Oishi, S., & Kaler, M. (2006). The meaning in life questionnaire: Assessing the presence of and search for meaning in life. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1), 80–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.53.1.80
  40. Steger, M. F., Oishi, S., & Kashdan, T. B. (2009). Meaning in life across the life span: Levels and correlates of meaning in life from emerging adulthood to older adulthood. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 4(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760802303127
  41. Subasi, M., & Bulut, S. (2023). Na de ramp. In L. Bormans (Ed.) Geluk: The New World Book of Happiness. Lannoo.
  42. Subasi, M., Bulut, S., & Osin, E. N. (2024c). Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Three Dimensional Meaning in Life Scale (3DM). [Manuscript in preparation].
  43. Subasi, M., Karaman, H., & Bulut, S. (2024a). Psychometric Properties of the Turkish Version of the Multidimensional Existential Meaning Scale among Turkish University Students (3DM). [Manuscript in preparation].
  44. Subasi, M., Karaman, H., Bulut, S., & Osin, E. N. (2024b). Turkish Validation of the Multidimensional Existential Meaning Scale (MEMS). [Manuscript in preparation].
  45. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics. Pearson.
  46. Telef, B. B. (2015). The positive and negative experience scale adaptation for Turkish university students. European Scientific Journal, 11(14), 49-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.3987.3124
  47. Updegraff, J. A., Silver, R. C., & Holman, E. A. (2008). Searching for and finding meaning in collective trauma: Results from a national longitudinal study of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 709–722. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.709
  48. Valdivia, D. S., & Li, P. J. (2022). Psychometric Properties and Internal Validity of the Multidimensional Existential Meaning Scale. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 55(3), 166-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481756.2021.1998779
  49. Wong, P. T. P. (1998). Implicit theories of meaningful life and the development of the Personal Meaning Profile (PMP). In P. T. P Wong & P. Fry (Eds.), Handbook of Personal Meaning: Theory, Research, and Practice (pp. 111–140). Lawrence Erlbaum.
  50. Yildirim, A., Boysan, M., & Kefeli, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 46(5), 582-595. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2018.1442558