Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 78

Turkish adaptation of the Dark Future Scale: Longitudinal associations between future anxiety, self-compassion, academic self-efficacy, and test anxiety among college students

Osman Hatun(SİNOP ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8408-7286
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-09-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that the Dark Future Scale met the criteria for validity and reliability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Studies on test anxiety frequently focus on risk factors, whereas the relationships between future anxiety, test anxiety, and the protective factors that may mediate this relationship have rarely been studied.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this research was to examine the psychometric properties of the Dark Future Scale (Study 1), and to examine whether self-compassion and academic self-efficacy mediate the longitudinal relationship between future anxiety and test anxiety among college students (Study 2).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that the Dark Future Scale met the criteria for validity and reliability.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Future anxiety · Self-compassion · Academic self-efficacy

Abstract

Studies on test anxiety frequently focus on risk factors, whereas the relationships between future anxiety, test anxiety, and the protective factors that may mediate this relationship have rarely been studied. While cross-sectional studies have explored the connections between these variables, the lack of their simultaneous consideration in longitudinal research has left a gap in the existing literature. The aim of this research was to examine the psychometric properties of the Dark Future Scale (Study 1), and to examine whether self-compassion and academic self-efficacy mediate the longitudinal relationship between future anxiety and test anxiety among college students (Study 2). The Study 1 participants were 393 (Mean = 22.25, SD = 3.43) and Study 2 participants were 169 (Mean = 20.84, SD = 2.31) college students. The results showed that the Dark Future Scale met the criteria for validity and reliability. Structural equation modelling (SEM) was used to examine the longitudinal mediation at two waves. The results indicated that self-compassion and academic self-efficacy have a longitudinal mediating role in the association between future anxiety and test anxiety. In conclusion, self-compassion and academic self-efficacy may reduce the negative effect of future anxiety on test anxiety.

🔖

Cite This Article

Hatun, O., Demirci, İ., *, İ. D. (2025). Turkish adaptation of the Dark Future Scale: Longitudinal associations between future anxiety, self-compassion, academic self-efficacy, and test anxiety among college students. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 78. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1561131

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (77)

  1. Aiken, L., & Groth-Marnat, G. (2006). Psychological testing and assessment. Allyn and Bacon.
  2. Akça, E. (2014). Personality and cultural predictors of the Quiet Ego: Comparing Turkey and the United States. (Unpublished Master Thesis). Middle East Technical University, Social Sciences Institute.
  3. Bagana, E., Raciu, A., & Lupu, L. (2011). Self esteem, optimism and exams’ anxiety among high school students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1331–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.258
  4. Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02723327
  5. Baker, F. B. (2001). The basics of item response theory. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED458219
  6. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802 3
  7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.
  8. Bandura, A. (2006). Adolescent development from an agentic perspective. In T. Urdan & F. Pajares (Eds.), Self-Efficacy Beliefs of Adolescents, (pp. 1-43.). Greenwich, Connecticut: IAP. https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/001-BanduraAdoEd2006.pdf
  9. Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588–606. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
  10. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen, & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Sage.
  11. Brumariu, L. E., Waslin, S. M., Gastelle, M., Kochendorfer, L. B., & Kerns, K. A. (2023). Anxiety, academic achievement, and academic self-concept: Meta-analytic syntheses of their relations across developmental periods. Development and Psychopathology, 35(4), 1597–1613. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954579422000323
  12. Chankseliani, M., Qoraboyev, I., & Gimranova, D. (2021). Higher education contributing to local, national, and global development: new empirical and conceptual insights. Higher Education, 81, 109-127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-020-00565-8
  13. Cizek, G. J., & Burg, S. S. (2006). Addressing test anxiety in a high-stakes environment: Strategies for classroom and schools. Corwin Press.
  14. Driscoll, R. (2007). Westside Test Anxiety Scale validation. (ERIC database ED495968). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED495968.pdf
  15. Enns, M. W., & Cox, B. J. (2002). The nature and assessment of perfectionism: A critical analysis. In G. L. Flett & P. L. Hewitt (Eds.), Perfectionism: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 33–62). American Psychological Association.
  16. Ergün, M., Sürücü, L., Maslakçı, A., & Turan, İ. B. (2024). Reliability and Validity of a Turkish Version of the 5-Item Future Anxiety Scale. Alpha Psychiatry, 25(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231243
  17. Fast, L. A., Lewis, J. L., Bryant, M. J., Bocian, K. A., Cardullo, R. A., Rettig, M., & Hammond, K. A. (2010). Does math self-efficacy mediate the effect of the perceived classroom environment on standardized math test performance? Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 729–740. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018863
  18. Ferguson, E., & Cox, T. (1993). Exploratory factor analysis: A users’ guide. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 1(2), 84-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2389.1993.tb00092.x
  19. Fong, R. W., & Cai, Y. (2019). Perfectionism, self-compassion and test-related hope in Chinese primary school students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 28(4), 293–302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-019-00466-0
  20. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: what, when, and why. Psychological review, 102(2), 379.
  21. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2013). Multivariate data analysis. Pearson Education Limited.
  22. Haukaas, R. B., Gjerde, I. B., Varting, G., Hallan, H. E., & Solem, S. (2018). A Randomized controlled trial comparing the attention training technique and mindful self-compassion for students with symptoms of depression and anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 827. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00827
  23. Hoffman, B. (2010). “I think I can, but I'm afraid to try”: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and mathematics anxiety in mathematics problem-solving efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(3), 276–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2010.02.001
  24. Hyseni Duraku, Z., & Hoxha, L. (2018). Self-esteem, study skills, self-concept, social support, psychological distress, and coping mechanism effects on test anxiety and academic performance. Health psychology open, 5(2), 2055102918799963.
  25. Iacobucci, D. (2010). Structural equations modeling: Fit indices, sample size, and advanced topics. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.09.003
  26. Jamshidi, M. A.; Moghadam, M. F.; Ghorbani, S.; & Farhoush, M. (2017). Self-efficacy and resilience as mediators in the relationship between test anxiety and spiritual ıntelligence among high school students in Qom. Journal of Research on Religion & Health 4, 7–21. https://journals.sbmu.ac.ir/en-jrrh/article/view/19634
  27. Jannini, T. B., Rossi, R., Socci, V., & Di Lorenzo, G. (2022). Validation of the Dark Future Scale (DFS) for future anxiety on an Italian sample. Journal of Psychopathology. https://doi.org/10.36148/2284-0249-457
  28. Jansen, P., Siebertz, M., Hofmann, P., Zayed, K., Zayed, D., Abdelfattah, F.,. & Meneghetti, C. (2021). Does self-compassion relate to the fear of the future during the 2020 coronavirus pandemic? A cross-cultural study.
  29. Cogent Psychology, 8(1), 1976438. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2021.1976438 Jerusalem, M., & Schwarzer, R. (1981). Fragebogen zur Erfassung von "Selbstwirksamkeit". In R. Schwarzer (Hrsg.), Skalen zur Befindlichkeit und Persoenlichkeit (Forschungsbericht 5) (pp. 15-28). Berlin: Freie Universitaet, Institut fuer Psychologie.
  30. Jöreskog, K. G. (1996). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Scientific Software International.
  31. Karam, J. M., Malaeb, D., Hallit, R., Fekih-Romdhane, F., Obeid, S., & Hallit, S. (2024). Psychometric properties of the Arabic translation of the Dark Future Scale questionnaire in a non-clinical sample of Arabic-speaking young adults. BMC psychiatry, 24(1), 456. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-05822-z
  32. King, R. B., Cai, Y., & Elliot, A. J. (2024). Income inequality is associated with heightened test anxiety and lower academic achievement: A cross-national study in 51 countries. Learning and Instruction, 89, 101825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2023.101825
  33. Kline, P. (2014). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Publications.
  34. Lee, J. (2009). Universals and specifics of math self-concept, math self-efficacy, and math anxiety across 41 PISA 2003 participating countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(3), 355-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.10.009
  35. Leppma, M., & Darrah, M. (2024). Self-efficacy, mindfulness, and self-compassion as predictors of math anxiety in undergraduate students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 55(4), 883-898. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2022.2054740
  36. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
  37. Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Schoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18(3), 285. https://doi.org/10.1037%2Fa0033266
  38. MacBeth, A., & Gumley, A. (2012). Exploring compassion: A meta-analysis of the association between self-compassion and psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 32(6), 545-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.06.003
  39. McDonald, A. S. (2001). The prevalence and effects of test anxiety in school children. Educational Psychology, 21(1), 89-101. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410020019867
  40. Neff, K. (2011). Self-compassion: The proven power of being kind to yourself. Hachette UK.
  41. Neff, K. D. (2003a). Self-compassion: An alternative conceptualization of a healthy attitude toward oneself. Self and Identity, 2(2), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309032
  42. Neff, K. D. (2003b). The development and validation of a scale to measure self-compassion. Self and identity, 2(3), 223-250. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298860309027
  43. Neff, K. D., & Dahm, K. A. (2015). Self-compassion: What it is, what it does, and how it relates to mindfulness. In B. D. Ostafin, M. D. Robinson & B. P. Meier (Eds.), Handbook of Mindfulness and Self-Regulation (pp. 121–137). NY: Springer.
  44. Neff, K. D., & Faso, D. J. (2015). Self-compassion and well-being in parents of children with autism. Mindfulness, 6(4), 938-947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-014-0359-2
  45. Neff, K. D., Hsieh, Y.-P., & Dejitterat, K. (2005). Self-compassion, achievement goals, and coping with academic failure. Self and Identity, 4(3), 263–287. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500444000317
  46. Neff, K. D., Rude, S. S., & Kirkpatrick, K. L. (2007). An examination of self-compassion in relation to positive psychological functioning and personality traits. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 908–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.08.002
  47. Nie, Y., Lau, S., & Liau, A. K. (2011). Role of academic self-efficacy in moderating the relation between task importance and test anxiety. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(6), 736–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2011.09.005
  48. Onwayed, E. F. (2005). Academic achievement and its relationship with anxiety, self esteem, optimism and pessimism in Kuwaiti students. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 33(1), 95-104. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2005.33.1.95
  49. Onyeizugbo, E. U. (2010). Self-efficacy, gender and trait anxiety as moderators of test anxiety. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(1), 299-312. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2931/293121995014.pdf
  50. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  51. Pullant, J. (2001). SPSS survival manual: a step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS for Windows. Open University Pres.
  52. Rabei, S., Ramadan, S., & Abdallah, N. (2020). Self-efficacy and future anxiety among students of nursing and education colleges of Helwan University. Middle East Current Psychiatry, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s43045-020-00049-6
  53. Raes, F., Pommier, E., Neff, K. D., & Van Gucht, D. (2011). Construction and factorial validation of a short form of the Self-Compassion Scale. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 18, 250-255. https://doi.org/10.1002/cpp.702
  54. Roick, J., & Ringeisen, T. (2017). Self-efficacy, test anxiety, and academic success: A longitudinal validation. International Journal of Educational Research, 83, 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.006
  55. Sarı, S. A., Bilek, G., & Çelik, E. (2018). Test anxiety and self-esteem in senior high school students: A cross-sectional study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 72(2), 84–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/08039488.2017.1389986
  56. Schnell, K., Ringeisen, T., Raufelder, D., & Rohrmann, S. (2015). The impact of adolescents' self-efficacy and self-regulated goal attainment processes on school performance — Do gender and test anxiety matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2014.12.008
  57. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling. Lawrence Erlbaum.
  58. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2022). Academic self-efficacy. In Allen, K. A., Furlong, M. J., Vella-Brodrick, D., & Suldo, S. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (pp. 268-282). Routledge.
  59. Sideeg, A. (2015). Test anxiety, self-esteem, gender difference, and academic achievement: The case of the students of medical sciences at Sudanese uiversities: a mixed methods approach. British Journal of Arts and
  60. Social Sciences, 19(2), 39–59. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Abdunasir-Sideeg/publication/276060435
  61. Soysa, C. K., & Wilcomb, C. J. (2015). Mindfulness, self-compassion, self-efficacy, and gender as predictors of depression, Anxiety, Stress, and Well-being. Mindfulness, 6(2), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-013-0247-1
  62. Sujadi, E. (2022). Mindfulness, Self-Compassion, Resilience, and Academic Anxiety among College Students: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. Tarbawi: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 18(2), 122-139. https://doi.org/10.32939/tarbawi.v18i2.2460
  63. Szota, M., Rogowska, A. M., Kwaśnicka, A., & Chilicka-Hebel, K. (2024). The indirect effect of future anxiety on the relationship between self-efficacy and depression in a convenience sample of adults: revisiting social cognitive theory. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(16), 4897. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13164897
  64. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Pearson Education.
  65. Tang, W. K. (2019). Resilience and self-compassion related with achievement emotions, test anxiety, intolerance of uncertainty, and academic achievement. Psychological Studies 64 (1), pp. 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-019-00482-6
  66. Thomas, C. L., Cassady, J. C., & Finch, W. H. (2018). Identifying severity standards on the cognitive test anxiety scale: Cut score determination using latent class and cluster analysis. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 36(5), 492-508. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282916686004
  67. Torfayeh, M., Ghamarani, A., & Bagherzadeh, S. (2020). Investigation of the validity and reliability of the Dark Future Scale in mothers of children with intellectual disability. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health, 22(5), 333-340. https://doi.org/10.22038/jfmh.2020.17507
  68. Totan, T., & Yavuz, Y. (2009). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of Westside Test Anxiety Scale. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(17), 95–109. https://toad.halileksi.net/sites/default/files/pdf/westside-sinav-kaygisi-olcegi-toad.pdf
  69. Yakın, İ., & Şen, E. T. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Dark Future Scale. Alpha Psychiatry, 24(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.5152%2Falphapsychiatry.2023.22972
  70. Yang, C., Nay, S., & Hoyle, R. H. (2010). Three approaches to using lengthy ordinal scales in structural equation models: Parceling, latent scoring, and shortening scales. Applied Psychological Measurement, 34, 122–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621609338592
  71. Yıldırım, F., & İlhan, İ. Ö. (2010). The validity and reliability of the General Self-efficacy Scale-Turkish Form. Turkish Journal of Psychiatry, 21(4), 301–308. http://www.turkpsikiyatri.com/pdf/c21s4/301-308.pdf
  72. Yıldırım, M., Kaynar, Ö., Arslan, G., & Chirico, F. (2023). Fear of COVID-19, resilience, and future anxiety: psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the dark future scale. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(4), 597. https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13040597
  73. Yılmaz, M., Gürçay, D., & Ekici, G. (2007). Akademik Özyeterlik Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması [Adaptatıon of the Academıc Self-effıcacy Scale to Turkish]. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(33), 253–259. http://efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/yonetim/icerik/makaleler/1047-published.pdf
  74. Zaleski, Z. (1996). Future anxiety: Concept, measurement, and preliminary research. Personality and Individual Differences, 21(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(96)00070-0
  75. Zaleski, Z., Sobol-Kwapinska, M., Przepiorka, A., & Meisner, M. (2019). Development and validation of the Dark Future scale. Time & Society, 28(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F0961463X16678257
  76. Zeidner, M. (2007). Test anxiety in educational contexts: Concepts, findings, and future directions. In Emotion in Education (A. Schutz, & R. Pekrun Eds.). Academic Press.
  77. Zeidner, M., & Matthews, G. (2010). Anxiety 101. Springer Publishing Company.