SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 79

Development of the Empathy in Romantic Relationships Scale: Validity and Reliability Study

Şeyma Bilgiz Öztürk(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-6506-7236
Sümeyye Bilgiz Akbayır(ATATURK UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-5373-9712
Pınar Özdemir(Düzce Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1324-3426
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings indicated that the Empathy in Romantic Relationships Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring empathy in romantic relationships.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The present study aimed to develop the Empathy in Romantic Relationships Scale and to examine its psychometric properties to assess empathy skills within romantic relationships.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data were collected from 504 individuals (293 females, 58.1%; 211 males, 41.9%) who were married (60.1%), engaged (10.1%), or in a dating relationship (29.8%) to conduct an exploratory factor analysis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings indicated that the Empathy in Romantic Relationships Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring empathy in romantic relationships.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Empathy · romantic relationship · emotional empathy

Abstract

The present study aimed to develop the Empathy in Romantic Relationships Scale and to examine its psychometric properties to assess empathy skills within romantic relationships. To develop the scale, an extensive literature review was first conducted, resulting in a preliminary pool. Expert opinions were then obtained, and the items were revised accordingly. Data were collected from 504 individuals (293 females, 58.1%; 211 males, 41.9%) who were married (60.1%), engaged (10.1%), or in a dating relationship (29.8%) to conduct an exploratory factor analysis. The results revealed a two-dimensional structure consisting of nine items. These dimensions were identified as Emotional Empathy and Cognitive Empathy. In the second phase, data were gathered from 222 individuals (158 females, 71.2%; 64 males, 28.8%) who were married (34.7%), engaged (18%), or in a dating relationship (47.3%) to perform a confirmatory factor analysis based on the previously obtained structure. Reliability was examined through Cronbach’s alpha internal consistency coefficients and test–retest analyses. In the item analyses, correlations among the items were assessed, and the mean scores of the lower 27% and upper 27% groups were compared using independent samples t-tests. Criterion-related validity was evaluated by calculating Pearson’s product–moment correlation coefficients between the new scale and the Toronto Empathy Scale as well as the Tolerance Tendency Scale. The findings indicated that the Empathy in Romantic Relationships Scale is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring empathy in romantic relationships.

🔖

Cite This Article

Öztürk, Ş. B., Akbayır, S. B., Özdemir, P., *, P. Ö. (2025). Development of the Empathy in Romantic Relationships Scale: Validity and Reliability Study. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 79. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1556651

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (77)

  1. Abramson, L., Uzefovsky, F., Toccaceli, V., & Knafo-Noam, A. (2020). The genetic and environmental origins of emotional and cognitive empathy: Review and meta-analyses of twin studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 114, 113-133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.03.023.
  2. Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163-175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00
  3. Bierhoff, H. W. (2002). Prosocial behavior. Psychology Press.
  4. Bilen, M. (2009). Sağlıklı insan ilişkileri [Healthy human relationships]. Anı.
  5. Bora, E. & Baysan-Arabacı, L. (2009). Psychometric features of turkish version of empathy quotient in university students. Bulletin of Clinical Psychopharmacology, 19(1), 39-47.
  6. Boostani Kashani, A. A., Khodabakhshi-Koolaee, A., Davoodi, H., & Heidari, H. (2020). Effects of marriage preparation per Satir’s communication model and narrative therapy on empathy and emotional expression in single young adults. Journal of Client-Centered Nursing Care, 6(3), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.32598/JCCNC.6.3.33.10
  7. Brett, J. D., Becerra, R., Maybery, M. T., & Preece, D. A. (2023). The psychometric assessment of empathy: Development and validation of the Perth Empathy Scale. Assessment, 30(4), 1140-1156. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221086987
  8. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Factor analysis: Basic concepts and using to development scale. Educational Management, 8(4), 470-483.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi [The handbook of data analysis for social sciences]. Pegem.
  10. Carre`re, S., Buehlman, K. T., Gottman, J. M., Coan, J. A., & Ruckstuhl, L. (2000). Predicting marital stability and divorce in newlywed couples. Journal of Family Psychology, 14, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0893-3200.14.1.42.
  11. Chang, S. A. A., Tillem, S., Benson-Williams, C., & Baskin-Sommers, A. (2021). Cognitive empathy in subtypes of antisocial individuals. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, 1070. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.677975
  12. Cuff, B. M. P., Brown, S. J., Taylor, L., & Howat, D. J. (2016). Empathy: A Review of the concept. Emotion Review, 8(2), 144-153. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914558466
  13. Çalışkan, H., & Çavuş, M. (2020). Tolerance tendency scale form for adults: A study of reliability and validity. Journal of Values Education, 18(40), 181-205. https://doi.org/10.34234/ded.731250
  14. Çapık, C. (2014). Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliability studies. Journal of Anatolia Nursing and Health Sciences, 17(3), 196-205.
  15. Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Sosyal bilimler için çok değişkenli istatistik: SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları [Multivariate statistics for social sciences: SPSS and LISREL applications]. Pegem.
  16. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
  17. Davis, M. H. (2018). Empathy: A social psychological approach. Routledge.
  18. Decety, J., & Jackson, P. L. (2006). A social-neuroscience perspective on empathy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(2), 54-58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2006.00406.x
  19. Dijkstra, P., Barelds, D. P., Groothof, H. A., & Van Bruggen, M. (2014). Empathy in intimate relationships: The role of positive illusions. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55, 477–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12142
  20. Dinç Altun, Z., Değerli, F. İ., Bolat, N., & Kınık, Ö. (2018). Adaptation of the Empathy Section Scale for Children into Turkish. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of Education Faculty (45), 153-168. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.309234
  21. Dökmen, Ü. (1988). Measurement of empathy based on a new model and its development with psychodrama. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 2(1-2); 155-190.
  22. Dökmen, Ü. (1995). İletişim çatışmaları ve empati [Communication conflicts and empathy]. Sistem.
  23. Dökmen, Ü. (2003). Günlük yaşamda iletişim çatışmları ve empati [Communication conflicts and empathy in art and daily life]. Sistem.
  24. Dziobek, I., Rogers, K., Fleck, S., Bahnemann, M., Heekeren, H. R., Wolf, O. T., & Convit, A. (2008). Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 464-473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-007-0486-x
  25. Eklund, J. H., & Meranius, M. S. (2021). Toward a consensus on the nature of empathy: A review of reviews. Patient Education and Counseling, 104(2), 300-3007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.022
  26. Engeler, A., & Yargıç, L. İ. (2007). Engeler, A., & Yargıç, L. İ. (2007). Interpersonal reactivity index: Measurement of empathy multidimensionaly. New Symposium Journal, 45(3), 119-127.
  27. George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (10th ed.). Pearson.
  28. Gıca, Ş., Büyükavşar, A., İyisoy, M. S., & Güleç, H. (2020). Psychometric properties of questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy (QCAE): reliability and factor analysis study in Turkish sample. Archives of Neuropsychiatry, 58(3), 228. https://doi.org/10.29399/npa.27248
  29. Gökalp, A., & İnel, Y., (2021). Empathy scale: Validity and reliability study. Journal of Anatolian Cultural Research (JANCR), 5(1), 32-45. https://doi.org/10.15659/ankad.v5i1.137
  30. Gürtunca, A. (2013). Empathy scale for children and adolescents: Validity and reliability study in Turkey (Publication No. 358142) [Master’s thesis, Istanbul Arel University]. Council of Higher Education National Thesis Center.
  31. Güzel, H. Ş., Sevi Tok, E. S., & Güney, E. (2019). Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the cognitive, affective, and somatic empathy scales for Children. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 20(1), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.5455/apd.22991
  32. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Babin, B. J., & Black, W. C. (2010). Multivariate data analysis: A global perspective (Vol. 7). Prentice Hall.
  33. Hill, E. W. (2010). Discovering forgiveness through empathy: Implications for couple and family therapy. Journal of Family Therapy, 32, 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6427.2010.00492.x
  34. Hoffman, M. L. (2000). Empathy and moral development: Implications for caring and justice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511805851
  35. Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., & Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.21427/D7CF7R
  36. Jolliffe, D., & Farrington, D. P. (2006). Development and validation of the basic empathy scale. Journal of Adolescence, 29, 589-611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010
  37. Kaya, A., & Siyez, D. M. (2010). Child and adolescent KA-SI empathic tendency scale: Development, validity and reliability study. Education and Science, 35(156), 110.
  38. Kaya, B. & Çolakoğlu, Ö. M. (2015). Adaptation of Emphaty Quotient (EQ) Scale. Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 16(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.17679/iuefd.16127895
  39. Kaya, Ö. S. (2018). An analysis of the problem solving skills in the romantic relations in terms of empathy and mental well being. Journal of Higher Education and Science,, 8, 62-72. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2018.248
  40. Kışlak, Ş. T., & Çabukça, F. (2002). The relationship among empathy, demographic variables and marital adjustment. Journal of Social Policy Studies, 5(5), 1-7.
  41. Kimmes, J. G., Edwards, A. B., Wetchler, J. L., & Bercik, J. (2014). Self and other ratings of dyadic empathy as predictors of relationship satisfaction. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 42(5), 426-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/01926187.2014.925374
  42. Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications
  43. Loinaz, I., Sánchez, L. M., & Vilella, A. (2021). Understanding empathy, self-esteem, and adult attachment in sexual offenders and partner-violent men. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5-6), 2050-2073. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518759977.
  44. Long, E. C., Angera, J. J., Carter, S. J., Nakamoto, M., & Kalso, M. (1999). Understanding the one you love: A longitudinal assessment of an empathy training program for couples in romantic relationships. Family Relations, 48(3), 235-242. https://doi.org/10.2307/585632
  45. Martingano, A. J., & Konrath, S. (2022). How cognitive and emotional empathy relate to rational thinking: Empirical evidence and meta-analysis. The Journal of Social Psychology, 162(1), 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2021.1985415
  46. Muro, L., Holliman, R., & Luquet, W. (2016). Imago relationship therapy and accurate empathy development. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 15(3), 232-246. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2015.1024373
  47. Neumann, D. L., & Westbury, H. R. (2011). The psychophysiological measurement of empathy. In Danielle J. Scapaletti (Eds), Psychology of Empathy (pp. 119-142). Nova Publisher.
  48. Paulus, C. M., & Klopp, E. (2023). Development of the Jefferson scale of empathy for teachers (JSE-T) to measure empathy in educationally relevant situations. European Journal of Educational Sciences, (10)2, 169-187. https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v10no2a169
  49. Péloquin, K., & Lafontaine, M. F. (2010). Measuring empathy in couples: Validity and reliability of the interpersonal reactivity index for couples. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(2), 146-157.
  50. Rosen, N. O., Mooney, K., & Muise, A. (2017). Dyadic empathy predicts sexual and relationship well-being in couples transitioning to parenthood. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 43(6), 543-559.
  51. Riess, H., Kelley, J. M., Bailey, R. W., Dunn, E. J., & Phillips, M. (2012). Empathy training for resident physicians: A randomized controlled trial of a neuroscience-informed curriculum. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(10), 1280–1286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-012-2063-z
  52. Riess, H. (2022). Empathy can be taught and learned with evidence-based education. Emergency Medicine Journal, 39(6), 418-419. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2021-212078
  53. Schmidt, C. D., & Gelhert N. C. (2017). Couples therapy and empathy: An evaluation of the impact of imago relationship therapy on partner empathy levels. The Family Journal: Counseling and Therapy for Couples and Families 25(1), 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/106648071667862
  54. Singer, T., 2009. Understanding Others: Brain Mechanisms of Theory of Mind and Empathy, in Paul W. Glimcher, Colin F. Camerer, Ernst Fehr, Russell A. Poldrack (Eds.) Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain. Academic Press, pp. 251-268.
  55. Smith, A. (2006). Cognitive empathy and emotional empathy in human behavior and evolution. The Psychological Record, 56(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395534
  56. Spreng, R. N., McKinnon, M. C., Mar, R. A., & Levine, B. (2009). The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(1), 62-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802484381
  57. Şahin, Y., & Şirin, A. (2021). Development and validation of the empathy scale in marriage for Turkish cultural context. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 6(2), 63-72. https://doi.org/10.37898/spc.2021.6.2.136
  58. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using Multivariate Statistics (7th ed.). Pearson.
  59. Taşdemir, G., & Karaaslan, A. (1999). Assessment of the relationship between the empathic tendency and job satisfaction of nurses. Journal of Ege University Faculty of Nursing, 15(1), 1-12.
  60. Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi [Measurement of attitudes and data analysis with SPSS]. Nobel.
  61. Topçu, Ç., Baker, Ö. E., & Çapa-Aydın, Y. (2010). Turkish adaptation of basic empathy scale: Validity and reliability study. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(34), 174-180.
  62. Totan, T., Doğan, T. & Sapmaz, F. (2012). The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Evaluation of psychometric properties among Turkish university students. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 46, 179-198.
  63. Tutarel-Kışlak, Ş., & Göztepe, I. (2017) Emotion expression, empathy, depression and relationships between marital harmony. Ankara University Journal of Social Sciences, 3(2), 27-46. https://doi.org/10.1501/sbeder_0000000044
  64. Ulloa, E. C., Hammett, J. F., Meda, N. A., & Rubalcaba, S. J. (2017). Empathy and romantic relationship quality among cohabitating couples: An actor–partner interdependence model. The Family Journal, 25(3), 208-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480717710644
  65. Yakın, İ. (2015). Evlilik öncesi psikolojik danışma[Pre-marital counselling]. In M. Kalkan & Z. Hamamcı (Eds.), Evlilik öncesi psikolojik danışma [Pre-marital counselling]. (pp. 385-410). Anı.
  66. Yaşlıoğlu, M. M. (2017). Factor analysis and validity in social sciences: application of exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses. Istanbul University Journal of the School of Business, 46, 74-85.
  67. Yıldırım, A. (2005). The relationship between people's empathic tendencies and divorce analysing the relationship. Marmara University Atatürk Faculty of Education, 22(1), 233- 242.
  68. Yılmaz, B. (2021). Childhood invalidating environment, irrational beliefs, and empathy level as predictors of romantic relationship satisfaction (Publication No. 701180) [Master’s thesis, Marmara University]. Higher Education Council National Thesis Center.
  69. Yılmaz-Bingöl, T., & Uysal, R. (2015). The effect of empathy development program on emphaty levels of second grade elementary school students. Elementary Education Online, 14(2), 430-437.https://doi.org/10.17051/io.2015.90489
  70. Yu, C. L., & Chou, T. L. (2018). A dual route model of empathy: A neurobiological prospective. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 2212. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02212
  71. Yukay Yüksel, M., Okur, S., Akbulut, Z. & Kütük, H.(2020). Psychometric parameters of the Turkish version of the affective and cognitive measure of empathy (ACME). International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 11(3), 1-15.
  72. Yurdabakan, İ., & Çüm, S. (2017). Scale development in behavioral sciences (based on exploratory factor analysis). Turkish Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(2), 108-126. https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.317880
  73. Yüksel, A. (2004). Empathy training program in increasing the emphatic ability levels of primary school students. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, XVII (2), 341-354.
  74. Zengin, H, Yalnızoğlu Çaka, S. & Çınar, N. (2018). Adaptation of the adolescent measure of empathy and sympathy (AMES) to Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 19(2), 184-191.
  75. Zhan, S., Shrestha, S., & Zhong, N. (2022). Romantic relationship satisfaction and phubbing: The role of loneliness and empathy. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 967339. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.967339
  76. Zhou, Y. (2023). How empathy influences aggressive behaviors in early childhood. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences, 10, 176-181. https://doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v10i.6915
  77. Zurek, P. P., & Scheithauer, H. (2017). Towards a more precise conceptualization of empathy: An integrative review of literature on definitions, associated functions, and developmental trajectories. International Journal of Developmental Science, 11(3-4), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-16224