SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 15 Issue: 79

Alchemists on Screen: Crafting Creative Practices in Online Counseling

Funda Barutçu Yıldırım(ORTA DOĞU TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3630-1019
Metin Pulat(MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-3547-3612
Gizem Ekici(TRAKYA UNIVERSITY)0009-0005-4556-2431
Pages
—
Publication Date
2025-12-29
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, emerging themes included fostering creativity, barriers to creativity, advantages of OC, disadvantages of OC, recommendations, and potential creative interventions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Online counseling (OC), which had existed for years but was not widely trusted by mental health professionals and clients, gained widespread acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the necessity of remote services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Now, it has become indispensable due to its advantages despite its limitations.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, emerging themes included fostering creativity, barriers to creativity, advantages of OC, disadvantages of OC, recommendations, and potential creative interventions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:online counseling · creativity · phenomenological study

Abstract

Online counseling (OC), which had existed for years but was not widely trusted by mental health professionals and clients, gained widespread acceptance during the COVID-19 pandemic due to the necessity of remote services. Now, it has become indispensable due to its advantages despite its limitations. OC has yet to be studied much and is a phenomenon that can be investigated from different perspectives. This phenomenological study aimed to examine the dynamics of creativity and OC comprehensively. The sample, recruited by purposive sampling, included five female and four male counselors highly experienced in face-to-face and OC. Data were collected with semi-structured interviews recorded with the permission of the participants. After the verbatim transcription, data were analyzed using content analysis. According to the results, emerging themes included fostering creativity, barriers to creativity, advantages of OC, disadvantages of OC, recommendations, and potential creative interventions. These themes indicate that counselors face both challenges and chances to be creative in OC, where the technological environment can restrict but also inspire innovative practices. Findings incorporating the fundamental principles of creativity with the changing dynamics of OC were discussed. This research serves as a valuable resource for mental health professionals seeking to improve their strategies for promoting creativity and optimizing the efficacy of online therapeutic practices.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldırım, F. B., Pulat, M., Ekici, G., *, F. B. Y. (2025). Alchemists on Screen: Crafting Creative Practices in Online Counseling. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 15 Issue: 79. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1587090

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (45)

  1. Alleman, J. R. (2002). Online counseling: The internet and mental health treatment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 39(2), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.39.2.199
  2. Amabile, T. (2011). Componential theory of creativity (pp. 538–559). Harvard Business School.
  3. Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012). Perspectives on the social psychology of creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(1), 3–15.
  4. Bolton, C. A., Thompson, H., Spring, J. A., & Frick, M. H. (2021). Innovative play-based strategies for teletherapy. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2021.2011814
  5. Buyruk Genç, A., Amanvermez, Y., Zeren, Ş. G., & Erus, S. M. (2019). Early separations: Dropout from online and face-to-face counseling. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 9(4), 1001-1030. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2019.032
  6. Carson, D. K., & Becker, K. W. (2004). When lightning strikes: Reexamining creativity in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling & Development, 82(1), 111–115. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2004.tb00292.x
  7. Carson, D. K., Becker, K. W., Vance, K. E., & Forth, N. L. (2003). The role of creativity in marriage and family therapy practice: A national online study. Contemporary Family Therapy, 25(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022562122420
  8. Centore, A. J., & Milacci, F. (2008). A study of mental health counselors' use of and perspectives on distance counseling. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 30(3), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.30.3.q871r684n863u75r
  9. Chester, A., & Glass, C. A. (2006). Online counselling: A descriptive analysis of therapy services on the internet. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 34(2), 145–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880600583170
  10. Davis, G. A. (1999). Barriers to creativity and creative attitudes. Encyclopedia of Creativity, 1, 165–174.
  11. Duffey, T., Haberstroh, S., & Trepal, H. (2009). A grounded theory of relational competencies and creativity in counseling: Beginning the dialogue. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 4(2), 89–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401380902951911
  12. Gladding, S. T. (2011). Using creativity and the creative arts in counseling: An international approach. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 4(35), 1–7. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/tpdrd/issue/21455/229785
  13. Gladding, S. T. (2008). The impact of creativity in counseling. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 3(2), 97–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401380802226679
  14. Glaveanu, V. P., Hanchett Hanson, M., Baer, J., Barbot, B., Clapp, E. P., Corazza, G. E.,. & Sternberg, R. J. (2020). Advancing creativity theory and research: A socio‐cultural manifesto. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(3), 741–745. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.395
  15. Gutterman, D., & Aafjes-Van Doorn, K. (2022). An exploration of the intersection between creativity and psychotherapy. Creativity Research Journal, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2022.2127566
  16. Hecker, L. L., & Kottler, J. A. (2002). Growing creative therapists: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Clinical Activities, Assignments & Handouts in Psychotherapy Practice, 2(2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1300/J182v02n02_01
  17. Heiden‐Rootes, K., Ferber, M., Meyer, D., Zubatsky, M., & Wittenborn, A. (2021). Relational teletherapy experiences of couple and family therapy trainees: “Reading the room,” exhaustion, and the comforts of home. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 47(2), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12486
  18. Khan, S., Shapka, J. D., & Domene, J. F. (2022). Counsellors’ experiences of online therapy. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 50(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2021.1885009
  19. Knott, V., Habota, T., & Mallan, K. (2020). Attitudes of Australian psychologists towards the delivery of therapy via video conferencing technology. Australian Psychologist, 55(6), 606–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12464
  20. Koçyiğit Özyiğit, M., & Erkan Atik, Z. (2021). Covid-19 sürecinde psikolojik danışma ve süpervizyon:# evdekal deneyimi. Başkent University Journal of Education, 8 (1), 253-274.
  21. Koltz, R. L., & Tarabochia, D. S. (2014). Technology: Using it as a means to creatively connect with adolescents. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 9(3), 380–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2014.899481
  22. Korkmaz, B., & Şen, G. (2018). Psikoterapistlerin çevrimiçi yürütülen psikoterapilere yönelik algılarına ilişkin bir tematik analiz çalışması [A thematic analysis study on psychotherapists’ perceptions of online psychotherapies]. Klinik Psikoloji Dergisi, 2(3), 140-152. http://doi.org/10.31828/kpd2602443829092018m000004
  23. Lawrence, C., Foster, V. A., & Tieso, C. L. (2015). Creating creative clinicians: Incorporating creativity into counselor education. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 10(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/15401383.2014.963188
  24. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.
  25. Mallen, M. J., & Vogel, D. L. (2005). Introduction to the major contribution: Counseling psychology and online counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(6), 761-775. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000005278623
  26. Mallen, M., J., Jenkins, I. M., Vogel, D. L., & Day, S. X. (2011). Online counselling: An initial examination of the process in a synchronous chat environment. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 11(3), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/14733145.2010.486865
  27. McGhee, C., Baltrinic, E. R., Laux, J., Clark, M., Liu, Y., & Harmening, D. (2019). A phenomenological investigation of creative teaching in counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision, 58(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12136
  28. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
  29. Nagarajan, M., & Yuvaraj S. (2021). Mental health counsellors’ perceptions on use of technology in counselling. Current Psychology, 40(4), 1760–1766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0104-4
  30. O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder reliability in qualitative research: debates and practical guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
  31. Ong, T., Wilczewski, H., Soni, H., Nisbet, Q., Paige, S. R., Barrera, J. F.,. & Bunnell, B. E. (2022). The symbiosis of virtual reality exposure therapy and telemental health: A review. Frontiers in Virtual Reality, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/frvir.2022.848066
  32. Özcan, G., & Ümmet, D. (2023). A phenomenological research on creativity in the psychological counseling process. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 13(68), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1272467g
  33. Richards, D., & Viganó, N. (2013). Online counseling: A narrative and critical review of the literature. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 69(9), 994–1011. http://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.21974.
  34. Rouse, A., Armstrong, J., & McLeod, J. (2015). Enabling connections: Counsellor creativity and therapeutic practice. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 15(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12019
  35. Smith, J., & Gillon, E. (2021). Therapists’ experiences of providing online counselling: A qualitative study. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 21(3), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.1002/capr.12408
  36. Tanrıkulu, İ. (2009). Counselors-in-training students’ attitudes towards online counseling. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 785–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.140
  37. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Association. (2021). Turkish psychological counseling ethical codes. In İkiz, F. E., Baş A. U., Arslan Ü. (Eds.). (1st Ed.). Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Association Press.
  38. Vermeire, S., & Van Den Berge, L. (2021). Widening the screen: Playful responses to challenges in online therapy with children and families. Journal of Family Therapy, 43(2), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6427.12326
  39. Walia, C. (2019). A dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 31(3), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1641787
  40. Woo, H., Dondanville, A., Jang, H., Na, G., & Jang, Y. (2020). A content analysis of the counseling literature on technology integration: American Counseling Association (ACA) counseling journals between 2000 and 2018. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 42(3), 319- 333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-020-09406-w
  41. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in social sciences]. (11th Ed.). Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  42. Yıldırım, F. B., Onaylı S., Taşkesen, N. (2022). Online Counseling through the eyes of university students. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 36, 86-106. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.36.1694
  43. Zack, J.S. (2008). How sturdy is that digital couch? Legal considerations for mental health professionals who deliver clinical services via the internet. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26(2/4), 333-359. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228830802097083
  44. Zeren, Ş. G. (2015). Yüz yüze ve çevrimiçi psikolojik danışma: Danışanların sorunları ve memnuniyetleri. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(182), 127-141. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2015.4696
  45. Zeren, Ş. G. (2017). Therapeutic alliance in face-to-face and online counseling: Opinions of counselor candidates. Journal of Human Sciences, 14(3), 2278-2307. https://www.jhumansciences.com/ojs/index.php/IJHS/article/view/4203