Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1

Characterization of silk sutures coated with propolis and biogenic silver nanoparticles AgNPs ; an eco-friendly solution with wound healing potential against surgical site infections SSIs

Pages
258–266
Publication Date
2020-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Coating the silk sutures with propolis and biogenic AgNPs gave an effective antibacterial capacity to surgical sutures besides providing biocompatibility and wound healing activity.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Bacterial adherence to a suture material is one of the main causes of surgical site infections.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The biocompatibility of the bioAgNP-propolis-coated sutures was evaluated using 3T3 fibroblast cells, and their wound-healing potential was also investigated.Results: BioAgNP-propolis-coated sutures displayed potent antibacterial activity against pathogenic gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Coating the silk sutures with propolis and biogenic AgNPs gave an effective antibacterial capacity to surgical sutures besides providing biocompatibility and wound healing activity.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Propolis · silver nanoparticle · suture

Abstract

Background/aim: Bacterial adherence to a suture material is one of the main causes of surgical site infections. An antibacterial suture material with enhanced wound healing function may protect the surgical site from infections. Thus, the present study aimed to investigate the synergistic effect of propolis and biogenic metallic nanoparticles when combined with silk sutures for biomedical use.Materials and methods: Silver nanoparticle AgNP synthesis was carried out via a microbial-mediated biological route and impregnated on propolis-loaded silk sutures using an in situ process. Silk sutures fabricated with propolis and biosynthesized AgNPs bioAgNP-propolis-coated sutures were intensively characterized using scanning electron microscopy SEM , energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy EDS , thermogravimetric analysis TGA , and differential scanning calorimetry DSC . The antibacterial characteristics of the bioAgNP-propolis-coated sutures were evaluated using the agar plate method. The biocompatibility of the bioAgNP-propolis-coated sutures was evaluated using 3T3 fibroblast cells, and their wound-healing potential was also investigated.Results: BioAgNP-propolis-coated sutures displayed potent antibacterial activity against pathogenic gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus, respectively. BioAgNP-propolis-coated silk sutures were found to be biocompatible with 3T3 fibroblast cell culture. In vitro wound healing scratch assay also demonstrated that the extract of bioAgNP-propolis-coated sutures stimulated the 3T3 fibroblasts' cell proliferation. Conclusion: Coating the silk sutures with propolis and biogenic AgNPs gave an effective antibacterial capacity to surgical sutures besides providing biocompatibility and wound healing activity.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYGAR, T. (2020). Characterization of silk sutures coated with propolis and biogenic silver nanoparticles AgNPs ; an eco-friendly solution with wound healing potential against surgical site infections SSIs. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 1, 258–266. https://ajindex.com/articles/113253

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Edmiston CE, Seabrook GR, Goheen MP, Krepel CJ, Johnson CP et al. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures: can antibacterial-coated sutures reduce the risk of microbial contamination?. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2006
  2. 203 (4): 481-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2006.06.026 2. Katz S, Izhar M, Mirelman D. Bacterial adherence to surgical sutures. A possible factor in suture induced infection. Annals of Surgery 1981
  3. Justinger C, Moussavian MR, Schlueter C, Kopp B, Kollmar O et al. Antibiotic coating of abdominal closure sutures and wound infection. Surgery 2009
  4. doi: 10.1016/j. surg.2008.11.007 4. Grigg TR, Liewehr FR, Patton WR, Buxton TB, McPherson JC. Effect of the wicking behavior of multifilament sutures. Journal of Endodontics 2004
  5. doi: 10.1097/01. DON.0000121617.67923.05 5. Mingmalairak C, Ungbhakorn P, Paocharoen V. Efficacy of antimicrobial coating suture coated polyglactin 910 with tricosan (Vicryl plus) compared with polyglactin 910 (Vicryl) in reduced surgical site infection of appendicitis, double blind randomized control trial, preliminary safety report. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand 2009
  6. 92 (6): 770-775. 6. van Duin D, Paterson DL. Multidrug-resistant bacteria in the community: trends and lessons learned. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America 2016
  7. 30 (2): 377-390. doi: 10.1016/j. idc.2016.02.004 7. Stepanović S, Antić N, Dakić I, Švabić-Vlahović M. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis and synergism between propolis and antimicrobial drugs. Microbiological Research 2003
  8. 158 (4): 353-357. doi: 10.1078/0944-5013- 00215 8. Ramos AFN, Miranda JD. Propolis: a review of its antiinflammatory and healing actions. Journal of Venomous Animals and Toxins including Tropical Diseases 2007
  9. 13 (4): 697-710. doi: 10.1590/S1678-91992007000400002 9. do Nascimento TG, Silva ADS, Lessa Constant PB, da Silva SAS, Fidelis de Moura MAB et al. Phytochemical screening, antioxidant and antibacterial activities of some commercial extract of propolis. Journal of Apicultural Research 2018
  10. 57 (2): 246-254. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2017.1412563 10. Airen B, Sarkar PA, Tomar U, Bishen KA. Antibacterial effect of propolis derived from tribal region on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus acidophilus: An in vitro study. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry 2018
  11. 36 (1): 48-52. doi: 10.4103/JISPPD.JISPPD_1128_17 11. Kim JS, Kuk E, Yu KN, Kim JH, Park SJ