Journals / Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2022 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2

AN EVALUATION ON THE CONCEPT OF PATIENT-FRIENDLY IN THE PROVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES

SAĞLIK HİZMETLERİNİN SUNUMUNDA HASTA DOSTU KAVRAMI ÜZERİNDE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Mustafa Filiz(ARTVİN ÇORUH ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7445-5361
Sümeyye Güngör(ARTVİN ÇORUH ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-6543-2467
Pages
657–674
Publication Date
2022-12-20
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering that individuals take into account certain criteria in choosing a hospital while receiving health care, it is concluded that their level of knowledge and awareness about health care has increased.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the perceptions of patients on the concept of patient-friendliness in the provision of health services in hospitals and some variables that affect it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The population of the study consists of individuals over the age of 18 who have benefited from health services from any health institution in the last year, and the sample consists of 386 participants who volunteered to participate in the survey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering that individuals take into account certain criteria in choosing a hospital while receiving health care, it is concluded that their level of knowledge and awareness about health care has increased.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Hasta Dostu · Şefkat · Güven

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the perceptions of patients on the concept of patient-friendliness in the provision of health services in hospitals and some variables that affect it. The population of the study consists of individuals over the age of 18 who have benefited from health services from any health institution in the last year, and the sample consists of 386 participants who volunteered to participate in the survey. Patient-Friendly Scale and Personal Information Form were used to collect the data of the study. T test and ANOVA test were used in the analysis of the data. There is a significant difference between the preferred hospital type in terms of trust and compassionate communication. There is a difference in the dimension of compassionate communication compared to the public hospital in individuals' preference for a private hospital. Individuals who prefer university hospitals have a higher level of trust than those who prefer public hospitals. The patient-friendliness of the hospitals in the provision of health services is significant in the hospital preference of the individuals. Considering that individuals take into account certain criteria in choosing a hospital while receiving health care, it is concluded that their level of knowledge and awareness about health care has increased. Although public hospitals are more preferred, it is seen that they do not meet the needs of individuals in terms of compassionate communication and trust. It can be concluded that patients focus more on the quality of health services rather than the duration of health care provided.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı hastanelerde sağlık hizmetleri sunumunda hastaların hasta dostu algısını ve bunu etkilen bir kısım değişkenlere göre incelemektir. Çalışmanın evrenini son bir yılda herhangi bir sağlık kurumundan sağlık hizmetinden faydalanmış, 18 yaş üstü Türkiye geneli bireyler, örneklemini ise, ankete katılmaya gönüllü olan 382 kişi oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmanın verilerinin toplanmasında Hasta Dostu Ölçeği ve Kişisel Bilgi Formu kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde t testi ve ANOVA testi kullanılmıştır. Elde edilen bulgulara göre tercih edilen hasta türü arasında güven ve şefkatli iletişim boyutunda anlamlı fark bulunmaktadır. Bireylerin özel hastaneyi tercih etmesinde kamu hastanesine göre şefkatli iletişim boyutunda farklılık vardır. Üniversite hastanelerini tercih eden bireyler kamu hastanesini tercih edenlere göre daha yüksek güven boyutuna sahiptir. Sağlık hizmeti sunumunda hastanelerin hasta dostu olması bireylerin hastane tercihinde etkilidir. Bireylerin sağlık hizmeti alırken hastane tercihinde belirli kriterleri dikkate aldıkları baz alındığında, sağlık hizmetine yönelik bilgi ve farkındalık düzeylerinin arttığı sonucuna ulaşılmaktadır. Kamu hastanelerinin daha çok tercih edilmesine rağmen şefkatli iletişim ve güven noktasında bireylerin ihtiyaçlarını karşılamadığı görülmektedir. Hastaların verilen sağlık hizmeti süresinden ziyade sağlık hizmetlerinin niteliğine daha çok odaklandıkları sonucuna varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Filiz, M., Güngör, S. (2022). AN EVALUATION ON THE CONCEPT OF PATIENT-FRIENDLY IN THE PROVISION OF HEALTH SERVICES. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 2, 657–674. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1058916

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Aiken, L., Clarke, P.S., Sloane, M.D., Lake, T.E., Cheney, T. (2009). Effects of hospital care environment on patient mortality and nurse outcomes. J Nurs Adm, 39, 45. Doi: 10.1097/01.NNA.0000312773.42352.d7
  2. Arslanoğlu, A., Kırılmaz, H. (2019). Hasta merkezli bakım yetkinliği ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması. Sağlık Akademisyenleri Dergisi, 6 (2), 158-166
  3. Ahlfeldt vd. (2006). Literature review on patient-friendly documentation systems. Researchgate, 1-127.
  4. Bryman, A., Cramer, D. (2001). Quantitative data analysis with SPSS release 10 for windows: A guide for social scientists. London: Routledge.
  5. Dooley S.K. (2006). The patient-friendly practice. J Med Pract Manage, 21(6), 358-61.
  6. Douglas, C.H., Douglas, M.R. (2004). Patient-friendly hospital environments: exploring the patients’ perspective. Health Expectations, 7(1), 61–73. Doi:10.1046/j.1369-6513.2003.00251.x
  7. Erenoğlu, S. A., Aytuğ, E.A. (2007). Sağlık kurumlarında değişen paradigmalar ve iyileştiren hastane kavramının mimari tasarım açısından irdelenmesi. Megaron, 2(1), 44- 63.
  8. Hong, Y., Ehlers, K., Gillis, R., Patrick, T., Zhang, J. (2010). A usability study of patient-friendly terminology in an EMR system. Stud Health Technol Inform, 136-140.
  9. Karagöz, Y. (2016). SPSS 23 ve AMOS 23 uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık
  10. Karagöz, Y. (2019). SPSS amos meta uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
  11. Kılıç, T., Bostan, S. (2021). Sağlık hizmetlerinin değerlendirilmesinde, hasta odaklı yaklaşım: hasta dostu ölçeği tasarımı. Hacettepe Sağlık İdaresi Dergisi, 24(3), 555-570
  12. Kılıç, T., Topuz, R. (2015). Hastalarla iletişimin, hasta memnuniyetine etkisi: özel, devlet ve üniversite hastanesi karşılaştırılması. Researchgate, 78-95.
  13. Kim, J., Gao, J., Amiri-Kordestani, L., Beaver, J.A., Kluetz, P. (2019). Patient-friendly language to facilitate treatment choice for patients with cancer. Oncologist, 24(8), 1011-1012. Doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0761
  14. Lasserre, C. (2010). Fostering a culture of service excellence. J Med Pract Manage, 26(3), 166-169
  15. Lerner, E.B., Jehle, D.V.K., Janicke, D. M., Moscati, R. M. (2000). Medical communication: Do our patients understand?. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine, 18(7), 764–766. Doi:10.1053/ajem.2000.18040
  16. Longtin, Y., Sax, H., Leape, L., Sheridan, S., Donaldson, L., Pittet, D. (2010). Patient participation: current knowledge and applicability to patient safety. Mayo Clinic. 85, 53-62. Doi: 10.4065/mcp.2009.0248.
  17. Mittal, A., Kaushal, G., Sabherwal, N., Pandey, N., Kaustav, P. (2015). A study of patient-physician communication and barriers in communication. Int J Res Found Hosp Healthc Admin, 3, 71-78
  18. Nal, M. (2021). Türkiye’de sağlık hizmetleri sistemine güven. Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3, 1-10. Doi: 10.46413/boneyusbad.863269.
  19. Reiling, J., Hughes, R.G., Murphy, M.R. (2008). The ımpact of facility design on patient safety. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 24(8), 1011-1012
  20. Relias Media. (2005). How to create a patient-friendly atmosphere, https://www.reliasmedia.com/articles/84886-how-to-create-a-patient-friendly-atmosphere, Erişim tarihi: 30.12.2021
  21. Romero, Y., Ma, L., Jiménez A., Vázquez, R., Dv. S., R, L., Jesus C., Toribio, J.J. (2018). Environmental health in hospital, a reflection by direct observation and areas of opportunity to stimulate in-hospital environmental quality. Ciência e Técnica Vitivinícola, 33, 72-79.
  22. Saha, S., Beach, M.C. (2011). The impact of patient-centered communication on patients' decision making and evaluations of physicians: a randomized study using video vignettes. Patient Educ Couns. 84(3), 386-92.
  23. Spath, P. (2007). Tips to make your hospital patient-friendly environment. Hospital Peer Review, 32(5), 60-62.
  24. Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. London: Pearson Education.
  25. Toffolutti, V., Stuckler, D. (2019). A culture of openness ıs associated with lower mortality rates among 137 english national health service acute trusts. Health Affairs, 38(5), 844–850. Doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2018.05303
  26. Yalçın, İ., Uka, S. (2020). Measurement of service quality in health sector: a comparison Between public and Turkish private hospitals in Kosovo. Hitit University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 13(2), 368-384. Doi: 10.17218/hititsosbil.801342
  27. Zaim, H., Tarım, M. (2011). hasta memnuniyeti: kamu hastaneleri üzerine bir alan araştırması. Journal Of Social Policy Conferences, 59, 1-24.