Journals / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Are clinicians successful in diagnosing cutaneous adnexal tumors? a retrospective, clinicopathological study

Pages
832–843
Publication Date
2020-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Due to difficulties in its clinical diagnosis, histopathological examination must be performed from suspicious lesions for definitive diagnosis.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background/aim: Cutaneous adnexal tumors CAT are rare tumors originating from the adnexal epithelial parts of the skin.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: The data of the last 5 years were scanned and patients with histopathological diagnosis of CAT were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Due to difficulties in its clinical diagnosis, histopathological examination must be performed from suspicious lesions for definitive diagnosis.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Cutaneous adnexal tumors · histopathology · sebaceous hyperplasia

Abstract

Background/aim: Cutaneous adnexal tumors CAT are rare tumors originating from the adnexal epithelial parts of the skin. Due to its clinical and histopathological characteristics comparable with other diseases, clinicians and pathologists experience difficulties in its diagnosis. We aimed to reveal the clinical and histopathological characteristics of the retrospectively screened cases and to compare the prediagnoses and histopathological diagnoses of clinicians. Materials and methods: The data of the last 5 years were scanned and patients with histopathological diagnosis of CAT were included in the study. Results: A total of 65 patients, including 39 female and 26 male patients aged between 8 and 88, were included in the study. The female to male ratio was 1.5, and the mean age of the patients was 46.15 ± 21.8 years. The benign tumor rate was 95.4%, whereas the malignant tumor rate was 4.6%. 38.5% of the tumors were presenting sebaceous, 35.4% of them were presenting follicular, and 18.5% of them were presenting eccrine differentiation. It was most commonly seen in the head-neck region with a rate of 66.1%. When clinical and histopathological prediagnoses were compared, prediagnoses and histopathological diagnoses were compatible in 45% of the cases. Most frequently, it was the basal cell carcinoma, epidermal cyst, and sebaceous hyperplasia identified in preliminary diagnoses. Conclusion: Cutaneous adnexal tumors are very important, as they can accompany different syndromes and may be malignant. Due to difficulties in its clinical diagnosis, histopathological examination must be performed from suspicious lesions for definitive diagnosis.

🔖

Cite This Article

KAYIRAN, M. A., KARADAĞ, A. S., KÜÇÜK, Y., ŞİMŞEK, B. Ç., ERDEMİR, V. A., AKDENİZ, N. (2020). Are clinicians successful in diagnosing cutaneous adnexal tumors? a retrospective, clinicopathological study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 832–843. https://ajindex.com/articles/113189

References (5)

  1. Ahmed TSS, Priore JD, Seykora JT. Tumors of epidermal appendages. In: Elder DE, Elenitsas R, Johnson BL, Murphy GF (editors). Lever’s Histopathology of the Skin. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2005. pp. 867-868
  2. Zaballos P, Gómez-Martín I, Martin JM, Bañuls J. Dermoscopy of adnexal tumors. Dermatologic Clinics 2018; 36 (4): 397-412 doi: 10.1016/j.det.2018.05.007 3. Massi D, Cree IA, Elder DE, Kazakov DV, Scolyer RA. Appendageal Tumours. In: Elder DE, Massi D, Scolyer RA, Willemze R. (editors). World Health Organization Classification of Skin Tumors. 4th ed. Argonay, France: IARC; 2018. pp.154-222
  3. Güler Şimşek G, Yalçın GŞ. The World Health Organization Classification of Skin Appendageal Tumors: A Summary of the Changes of the 2018 (4th) Edition in Turkish: Deri Eki TümörlerinDünya Sağlık Örgütü Sınıflandırması:2018 (4.) Basım Değişikliklerinin Özeti. Journal of Current Pathology 2019; 1 (3): 15-20 doi: 10.5146/jcpath.2019.38 5. Shrivastava V, Tangde A, Joshi A, Bindu R. Clinicopathological study of skin tumours. International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 2019; 7 (5): 1712-1719 doi: 10.18203/2320- 6012.ijrms20191664 6. Suri J, Mahajan D, Koul KK, Kumari R. A Clinicopathological analysis of skin adnexal tumours: four year retrospective study. Journal of Medical Education & Research 2016; 18 (4): 248- 251
  4. Sharma A, Paricharak DG, Nigam JS, Rewri S, Soni PH et al. Histopathological study of skin adnexal tumours—institutional study in South India. Journal of Skin Cancer 2014; 2014: 543756. doi: 10.1155/2014/543756 8. Radhika K, Phaneendra BV, Rukmangadha N, Reddy MK. A study of biopsy confirmed skin adnexal tumors: experience at a tertiary care teaching hospital. Journal of Clinical and Scientific Research 2013; 2 (3): 132-138
  5. Samaila MOA. Adnexal skin tumors in Zaria, Nigeria. Annals of African Medicine 2008; 7 (1): 6-10. doi: 10.4103/1596- 3519.55691 10. Rajalakshmi V, Selvakumar S, Rajeswari K, Meenakshisundaram K, Veena G et al.Case series of skin adnexal tumours. Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research 2014; 8 (9): FC07- 10. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/8710.4844 11. Nair PS. A clinico-histopathologicalstudy of skin appendageal tumors. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology 2008; 74 (5): 550. doi: 10.4103/03786323.44339 12. Kaur K, Gupta K, Hemrajani D, Yadav A, Mangal K. Histopathological analysis of skin adnexal tumors: a three year study of 110 cases at a tertiary care cen