SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2

VIEW OF THE SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE’S EXISTENCE DOMAIN THROUGH MODEL BASED INSTRUCTION

BİLİMSEL BİLGİNİN VARLIK ALANINA MODELLEMEYE DAYALI ÖĞRETİMLE BAKIŞ

Gül ÜNAL ÇOBAN
Ömer ERGİN
Pages
211–254
Publication Date
2011-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the reserach, it was found that there is not a significantly difference between two groups quantitavely despite the improvement of the experimental group qualitatively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study the effects of science and technlogy course carried by model based activities on students’ views about the existance domain of scientific knowlegde were examined.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The study was conducted by 7th graders with experimental and contol groups in a primary school in one of the central towns of Izmir for about six weeks.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the reserach, it was found that there is not a significantly difference between two groups quantitavely despite the improvement of the experimental group qualitatively.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Modele dayalı eğitim · fen eğitimi · bilimsel bilgi (epistemoloji)

Abstract

In this study the effects of science and technlogy course carried by model based activities on students’ views about the existance domain of scientific knowlegde were examined. The study was conducted by 7th graders with experimental and contol groups in a primary school in one of the central towns of Izmir for about six weeks. While the courses in experimental group was conducted by modelling, the courses in the control group was conducted according to the current scinece and technology curriculum. The scale for existance domanin of scientific knowledge was given to both groups besides interviweing five students from each group before and after the instruction. At the end of the reserach, it was found that there is not a significantly difference between two groups quantitavely despite the improvement of the experimental group qualitatively.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, modellemeye dayalı etkinliklerle yürütülen fen ve teknoloji dersinin öğrencilerin bilimsel bilginin varlık alanına yönelik düşüncelerine etkisi incelenmiştir. İzmir iline bağlı merkez ilçelerden birindeki bir ilköğretim okulunun 7. sınıflarıyla gerçekleştirilen ve yaklaşık 6 hafta süren uygulamada deney ve kontrol grupları ile çalışılmıştır. Fen dersi deney sınıfında modellemeye dayalı olarak işlenirken, kontrol sınıfında ise mevcut Fen ve Teknoloji programına uygun olarak işlenmiştir. Uygulama öncesinde ve sonrasında her iki sınıfa da bilimsel bilginin varlık alanına yönelik görüş ölçekleri uygulanmış ayrıca her iki sınıftan 5'er öğrenci ile görüşülmüştür. Araştırma sonunda her iki grup arasında nicel olarak anlamlı fark görülürken aynı zamanda nitel olarak da deney grubu lehine gelişme izlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇOBAN, G. Ü., ERGİN, Ö. (2011). VIEW OF THE SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE’S EXISTENCE DOMAIN THROUGH MODEL BASED INSTRUCTION. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 2, 211–254. https://ajindex.com/articles/113022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Açıkgöz, K. Ü. (2003). Aktif öğrenme (3. Baskı). İzmir:
  2. Eğitim Dünyası Yayınları.
  3. Aslan, H. (1993a). Gerçekçilik biçimleri. Felsefe Dünyası, 10, 69–73.
  4. Baç, M. (1995). Felsefe ve felsefeci üzerine. Tübitak Bilim ve Teknik Dergisi, 329, Nisan, 54. Barab, S. A.; Hay, K. E.; Barnett, M.; Keating, T. (2000) Virtual solar sysytem project: Building understanding through model building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37 (7), 719–756.
  5. Besson, U. & Viennot, L. (2004) Using models at the mesoscopic scale in teaching physics: two experimental interventions in solid friction and fluid statics. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (9), 1083–1110.
  6. Carey, S.; Evans, R.; Honda, M.; Jay, E.; Unger, C. (1989). An experiment is when you try it and see if ıt works: A study of grade 7 students’ understanding of the construction of scientific knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 11 (5), 514-529.
  7. Chi, M., T. ve Slotta, J.D. (1993). The ontological coherence of ıntuitive physics. Cognition and Instruction, 10 (2-3), 249–260.
  8. Coll, R. K.; France, B.; Taylor, I. (2005).The role of models/and analogies in science education: Implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27:2,183-198.
  9. Çalışkan, İ. S. (2004). The effect of ınquiry-based chemistry course on students' understanding of atom concept, learning approaches, motivation, self- efficacy and epistemological beliefs. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Orta Doğu Teknik Üniversitesi,
  10. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
  11. Çepni, S., Ayas, A., Johnson, D., Turgut, M. F. (1996). Fizik Öğretimi. Ankara: Milli Eğitimi Geliştirme Projesi Hizmet Öncesi Öğretmen Eğitimi Deneme Basımı. de Kleer, J. ve Brown, J. S. (1983). Assumptions and Ambiguities in Mechanistic Mental Models, İçinde: D. Gentner ve A. Steven (ed.). Mental models. Hillside, NewJersey. Devitt, M. (1997) Realism and Truth (2nd Edition). Princeton University Pres. Direk, N. (2006) Filozof Çocuk. Pan Yayıncılık. İstanbul.
  12. Driver, R., Leach, J., Scott, P. & Wood-Robinson, C. (1995). Young People's Understanding of Science Concepts. İçinde: P. Murphy, M. Selingre, J. Bourne ve M. Briggs. (Ed.) Subject Learning in The Primary Curriculum. The Open University, UK. Eaton, J. F; Anderson, C. W.; Smith, E., L.(1984) Students’ Misconceptiona Interfere With Science Learning: Case Studies of Fifth-Grade Students. The Elementary School Journal, 84, 4, 365-379.
  13. Edmondson, K. M. (1989). The influence of students’ conceptions of scie