Journals / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3

IDENTIFICATION OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICES THAT PROMOTING SOCIAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM: A META-ANALYSIS SAMPLE

OTİZMDEN ETKİLENMİŞ BİREYLERDE SOSYAL VE İLETİŞİM BECERİLERİNİ ARTTIRAN YÖNTEMLERİN DELİLE DAYALI YÖNTEM OLARAK BELĐRLENMESİ: BİR META-ANALİZ ÖRNEĞİ

Pages
713–739
Publication Date
2009-09-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Use of social stories yielded the highest value in overall means, and only peer-mediated interventions yielded consistent values for all three age groups.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Difficulties in social and communication skills of children and youth with autism spectrum disorders are a common characteristic which makes the area primary examination topic for educational researchers.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Use of social stories yielded the highest value in overall means, and only peer-mediated interventions yielded consistent values for all three age groups.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to those methods, promising methods also were named in developing social and communicational skills of children and youth with disabilities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Meta-analiz · otizm · sosyal ve iletişim becerileri

Abstract

Difficulties in social and communication skills of children and youth with autism spectrum disorders are a common characteristic which makes the area primary examination topic for educational researchers. In order to determine whether tested methods improving social and communicational skills of children with ASD by using single subject design studies can be named as evidence based method or not, this meta-analysis was conducted. ITSACORR was used to calculate effect-size values. Use of social stories yielded the highest value in overall means, and only peer-mediated interventions yielded consistent values for all three age groups. In addition to those methods, promising methods also were named in developing social and communicational skills of children and youth with disabilities.

Özet

Otizm ve türevleri ile tanılanmış çocuk ve gençlerin ortak özelliği olarak belirtilen sosyal ve iletişim becerilerindeki zorlukları bilimadamları için öncelikli inceleme konusu olarak alanyazınında yer almaktadır. Bu becerileri geliştirmek amacıyla tek denekli çalışmalarla test edilen eğitim yöntemlerinin etkililiklerini ve test edilen yöntemlerin delile dayalı yöntem olarak kabul edilip edilemeyeceğini inceleme amacıyla yapılan bu meta-analiz çalışması, dikkate değer sonuçlar üretmiştir. Etki-düzeyi hesaplamalarının ITSACORR yardımı ile yapıldığı bu çalışmada genel olarak sosyal hikâye kullanımı en yüksek değeri oluşturmuş olsa bile yaş gruplarına göre dağılımda en tutarlı yöntem akran öğretimi olarak ön plana çıkmıştır. Bunun yanında, yöntemlerin etkililiği için ipuçları veren yöntemler de belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARASU, N. (2009). IDENTIFICATION OF EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICES THAT PROMOTING SOCIAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS OF CHILDREN WITH AUTISM: A META-ANALYSIS SAMPLE. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 3, 713–739. https://ajindex.com/articles/112847

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Campbel, P., Milbourne, S., Dugan, L., ve Wilcox, M. (2006). A review of evidence on practices for teaching young children to use assistive technology devices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26(1), 3-13.
  2. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates. Crosbie, J. (1993). Interrupted time-series analysis with brief single-subject data. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 966-974.
  3. Elbaum, B. (2002). The self-concept of students with learning disabilities: A meta- analysis of comparisons across different placements. Learning Disabilities:Research & Practice, 17, 216-226.
  4. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. ve Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Gersten, R. ve Baker, S. (2001). Teaching expressive writing to students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Elementary School Journal, 101, 251- 273. Guralnick, M. J. ve Weinhouse, E. (1984). Peer-related social interactions of developmentally delayed young children: Development and characteristics. Developmental Psychology, 20, 815-827.
  5. Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, S.L. ve Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to Identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165-180.
  6. Johnson, L. ve LaMontagne, M. (1993). Research methods: Using content analysis to examine the verbal or written communication of stakeholders within early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 73-79.
  7. Karasu, N. ve Odom, S.L.(değerlendirme). Comparison of three methods for comparing effect sizes in single-subject design. Submitted to Journal of Special Education. Karasu, N. (Baskıda). Özel eğitimde kanıta dayalı yöntemlerin belirlenmesi: Tek denekli çalışma analizleri ve karşılaştırmaları. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi. Kratochwill, T.R. (2002). Evidence-based interventions in school psychology: Thoughts on thoughtful commentary. School Psychology Quarterly, 17, 518- 532. Kavale, K. A. (1984). Potential advantages of the meta-analysis technique for research in special education. The Journal of Special Education, 18, 61-72.
  8. Kroesbergen, E.H. ve Van Luit, J.E. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special education needs. Remedial & Special Education, 24, 97-115.
  9. Lorimer, P.A., Simpson, R. L., Myles, B.S. ve Ganz, J. B. (2002). The use of social stories as a preventative behavioral intervention in a home settin