Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

A CASE STUDY REGARDING THE APPLICATION PROCESS OF DELPHI TECHNIQUE: MULTI-FUNCTIONAL AGRICULTURE LITERACY

DELPHİ TEKNİĞİ UYGULAMA SÜRECİNE YÖNELİK ÖRNEK BİR ÇALIŞMA: ÇOK FONKSİYONLU TARIM OKURYAZARLIĞI

Pages
35–53
Publication Date
2021-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition to being important in respect of creating resources for researchers who want to use the Delphi Technique in the national and international literature, the problems faced in the process and proposing solutions to these problems, the study also offers a practical and systematic approach for the researchers who are going to use the technique.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of the study is i) to give general information about the brief history, areas of use, advantages and disadvantages of the Delphi technique, which is one of the data collection approaches that include experts from different fields in the process in harmony, and the purposes it serves, ii) to state the criteria to determine the experts who are included in the application process of the technique and the data collection process of the technique in stages, iii) to explain the data analyses to be performed in each Delphi round over the process experienced in the Multi-Functional Agricultural Literacy study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of the study is i) to give general information about the brief history, areas of use, advantages and disadvantages of the Delphi technique, which is one of the data collection approaches that include experts from different fields in the process in harmony, and the purposes it serves, ii) to state the criteria to determine the experts who are included in the application process of the technique and the data collection process of the technique in stages, iii) to explain the data analyses to be performed in each Delphi round over the process experienced in the Multi-Functional Agricultural Literacy study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition to being important in respect of creating resources for researchers who want to use the Delphi Technique in the national and international literature, the problems faced in the process and proposing solutions to these problems, the study also offers a practical and systematic approach for the researchers who are going to use the technique.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Delphi (Delfi) tekniği · metodoloji · konsensüs

Abstract

The purpose of the study is i) to give general information about the brief history, areas of use, advantages and disadvantages of the Delphi technique, which is one of the data collection approaches that include experts from different fields in the process in harmony, and the purposes it serves, ii) to state the criteria to determine the experts who are included in the application process of the technique and the data collection process of the technique in stages, iii) to explain the data analyses to be performed in each Delphi round over the process experienced in the Multi-Functional Agricultural Literacy study. In addition to being important in respect of creating resources for researchers who want to use the Delphi Technique in the national and international literature, the problems faced in the process and proposing solutions to these problems, the study also offers a practical and systematic approach for the researchers who are going to use the technique.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, farklı alanlardan uzmanların uyum içerisinde sürece dahil oldukları veri toplama yaklaşımlarından biri olan Delphi Tekniğinin i) kısa tarihçesi, kullanıldığı alanlar, avantaj ve dezavantajları ile hizmet ettiği amaçlar hakkında genel bilgi vermek, ii) uygulama sürecinde yer alan uzmanların oluşturulma kriterlerini ve veri toplama sürecini aşamalı bir şekilde aktarmak, iii) her bir Delphi turunda yapılabilecek veri analizlerini, Çok Fonksiyonlu Tarım Okuryazarlığı çalışmasında deneyimlenen süreç üzerinden açıklamaktır. Çalışma, ulusal ve uluslararası alanyazında Delphi Tekniğini kullanmak isteyen araştırmacılara kaynak oluşturması, süreçte karşılaşılan problemler ve bu problemlere çözüm önerileri sunması açısından önemli olmasının yanı sıra, tekniği kullanacak olan araştırmacılara pratik ve sistematik bir yaklaşım da sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAHAR, M., DEMİR, N. S. (2021). A CASE STUDY REGARDING THE APPLICATION PROCESS OF DELPHI TECHNIQUE: MULTI-FUNCTIONAL AGRICULTURE LITERACY. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 35–53. https://ajindex.com/articles/112630

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Armstrong, J. S. (2001). Principles of forecasting: A handbook for researchers andpractitioners. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  2. Belton, I., MacDonald, A., Wright, G., & Hamlin, I. (2019). Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 147, 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.07.002
  3. Bolger, F., & Wright, G. (2011). Improving the Delphi process: Lessons from social psychological research. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(9), 1500-1513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.07.007
  4. Brockhoff, K. (1975). The performance of forecasting groups in computer dialogue and face-to-face discussion. The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications, 68, 291-321.
  5. Cicchetti, D. V., Shoinralter, D., & Tyrer, P. J. (1985). The effect of number of rating scale categories on levels of interrater reliability: A Monte Carlo investigation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 9(1), 31-36. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168500900103
  6. Clayton, M. J. (1997). Delphi: A technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision‐making tasks in education. Educational Psychology, 17(4), 373-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341970170401
  7. Cochran, S. W. (1983). The Delphi method: Formulating and refining group judgments. Journal of Human Sciences, 11(2), 111-117.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications. Dalkey, N. C. (2002). Toward a theory of group estimation. In H. A. Linstone & M. Turoff (Eds.), The Delphi method: Techniques and applications (pp. 231-256). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.45
  9. Dalkey, N. C., & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458
  10. Delbecq, A. L., Van de Ven, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniques for program planning: A guide to nominal group and Delphi processes. Scott, Foresman & Company. Devaney, L., & Henchion, M. (2018). Consensus, caveats and conditions: International learnings for bioeconomy development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 1400-1411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.047
  11. Eggers, R. M., & Jones, C. M. (1998). Practical considerations for conducting Delp