Journals / Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

SOCIAL MEDIA: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS, ONLINE RISKS, COPING STRATEGIES

SOSYAL AĞ SİTELERİ: ERGENLER, RİSKLER VE TEHDİTLERDEN KORUNMA STRATEJİLERİ

Pages
439–453
Publication Date
2020-03-06
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that Instagram and WhatsApp are the most popular social media sites among high schoolers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main goal of this study is to examine high school students’ online risky behaviors through social media sites and their coping strategies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To this end, 816 high school students were administered a questionnaire that consists of three sections.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that Instagram and WhatsApp are the most popular social media sites among high schoolers.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:lise öğrencileri · sosyal medya · çevrimiçi riskler

Abstract

The main goal of this study is to examine high school students’ online risky behaviors through social media sites and their coping strategies. To this end, 816 high school students were administered a questionnaire that consists of three sections. The questionnaire included demographic information form, online risks questionnaire, and coping strategies scale. The results showed that Instagram and WhatsApp are the most popular social media sites among high schoolers. Also, male students engage in risky behaviors more than female students. Also, female students employed protective strategies more than male students. Another important finding is the low rate of children asking for help from family and teacher in the face of any threat due to their risky behaviors in social media sites. In addition, it was found that the preventive behaviors requested from secondary people (such as telling the person (s) on the friend list to remove himself/herself from the friend list) are less used by high school students. The findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı lise öğrencilerinin sosyal medya kullanımları esnasında aldıkları çevrimiçi riskleri ve bu riskler sonucunda oluşabilecek tehdit ve tehlikelerin sonuçlarını ortadan kaldırmak ya da minimize etmek için kullandıkları stratejileri cinsiyet bağlamında incelemektir. Çalışmaya Elazığ ilinde öğrenim gören 816 lise öğrencisi (429 kız ve 387 erkek öğrenci) dâhil edilmiş ve çevrimiçi riskler ölçeği ve tehditlerden kurtulma stratejileri anketi uygulanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular ışığında, WhatsApp ve Instagram’ın öğrenciler arasında en popüler sosyal medya hesabı olduğu bulunmuştur. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin risk alma düzeylerinin düşük olduğunu; erkek öğrencilerin kız öğrencilere nazaran daha fazla risk aldığını; kız öğrencilerin erkek öğrencilere oranla daha fazla tedbir stratejisi kullandığı tespit edilmiştir. Bir başka önemli bulgu ise herhangi bir tehdit karşısında çocukların aile ve öğretmenden yardım istenme oranının düşük olmasıdır. Ayrıca, baş etme stratejilerinden ikincil kişilerden istenen tedbir davranışlarının (Arkadaş listendeki kişi/kişilere beni arkadaş listesinden çıkarmasını söylerim gibi) lise öğrencileri tarafından daha az kullanıldığı tespit edilmiştir. Bulgular ile birlikte gelecek çalışmalara yönelik öneriler tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELMALI, F. (2020). SOCIAL MEDIA: HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS, ONLINE RISKS, COPING STRATEGIES. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 439–453. https://ajindex.com/articles/112

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

↗New Tab

References (8)

  1. Acquisti, A., & Gross, R. (2006, June). Imagined communities: Awareness, information sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. Bildiri the 6thWorkshop on privacy enhancing technologies, Cambridge, UK. Şubat 3, 2019 tarihinde erişilmiştir, http://people.cs.pitt.edu/~chang/265/ proj10/zim/imaginedcom.pdf Agosto, D. E., & Abbas, J. (2010, October). High school seniors' social network and other ICT use preferences and concerns. In Proceedings of the 73rd ASIS&T Annual Meeting on Navigating Streams in an Information Ecosystem-Volume 47 (p. 65). American Society for Information Science. Arnett, J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: A developmental perspective. Developmental review, 12(4), 339-373.
  2. Barlett, C. P., & Coyne, S. M. (2014). Meta-analysis of sex differences in cyber-bullying behavior: The moderating role of age. Aggressive Behavior, 40, 474–488.
  3. Beale, A. V., & Hall, K. R. (2007). Cyberbullying: What school administrators (and parents) can do. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 81(1), 8-12.
  4. Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., & Ferron, J. M. (2002). Emerging risks of violence in the digital age: Lessons for educators from an online study of adolescent girls in the United States. Journal of School Violence, 1(2), 51-71.
  5. Bilge, L., Strufe, T., Balzarotti, D., & Kirda, E. (2009, April). All your contacts are belong to us: automated identity theft attacks on social networks. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on World wide web (pp. 551-560).
  6. ACM. Boies, S. C. (2002). University students’ uses of and reactions to online sexual information and entertainment: links to online and offline sexual behavior. Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 11(2). Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230.
  7. Boyd, D., & Heer, J. (2006). Profiles as conversation: Networked identity performance on Friendster. In Proceedings of the 39th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS'06) (Vol. 3, pp. 59c-59c). IEEE. Boyer, T. W. (2006). The development of risk-taking: A multi-perspective review. Developmental Review, 26, 291–345. Brandtzæg, P. B., Lüders, M., & Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many Facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26(11-12), 1006-1030.
  8. Chen, H., Beaudoin, C. E., & Hong, T.