SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering / 2017 / Volume: 59 Issue: 2

Entropy squeezing of a multi-photon Jaynes-Cummings atom in the presence of noise

Hünkar Kayhan0000-0001-6340-8933
Pages
—
Publication Date
2017-08-08
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It disappears in time quickly due to the strongly destructive effect of the noise.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this work, we study the entropy squeezing of a two-level atom interacting with a single-mode quantum field by a multi-photon Jaynes-Cummings Model in the presence of the two-state random phase telegraph noise.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We show that the entropy squeezing is very sensitive to the noise.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It disappears in time quickly due to the strongly destructive effect of the noise.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Entropy squeezing · noise · Jaynes-Cummings Model

Abstract

In this work, we study the entropy squeezing of a two-level atom interacting with a single-mode quantum field by a multi-photon Jaynes-Cummings Model in the presence of the two-state random phase telegraph noise. We show that the entropy squeezing is very sensitive to the noise. It disappears in time quickly due to the strongly destructive effect of the noise.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kayhan, H. (2017). Entropy squeezing of a multi-photon Jaynes-Cummings atom in the presence of noise. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering, Volume: 59 Issue: 2. https://ajindex.com/articles/1117310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (28)

  1. E. T. Jaynes and F. W. Cummings, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1963).
  2. H.-I. Yoo and J. H. Eberly, Phys. Rep. 118, 239 (1985).
  3. B. W. Shore and P. L. Knight, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1195 (1993).
  4. M. O. Scully and M. S. Zubairy, Quantum Optics (UK:Cambridge University Press), (1997).
  5. G. Rempe, H. Walther and N. Klein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 353 (1987).
  6. X. S. Li, D. L. Lin, T. F. George and Z. D. Liu, Phys. Rev. A 40, 228 (1989).
  7. X. S. Li, D. L. Lin and T. F. George, Phys. Rev. A 40, 2504 (1989).
  8. P. Zhou and J. S. Peng, Phys. Rev. A 44, 3331 (1991).
  9. M. M. Ashraf and M. S. K. Razmi, Phys. Rev. A 45, 8121 (1992).
  10. K. Wódkiewicz, P. L. Knight, S. J. Buckle and S. M. Barnett, Phys. Rev. A 35, 2567 (1987).
  11. I. I. Hirschman, Am. J. Math 79, 152 (1957).
  12. J. Sanchez-Ruiz, Phys. Lett. A 201, 125 (1995). J. Sanchez-Ruiz, Phys. Lett. A 244, 189 (1998).
  13. M.-F. Fang, P. Zhou and S. Swain, J. Mod. Opt. 47, 1043 (2000).
  14. M. Abdel-Aty, M. S. Abdalla and A.-S. F. Obada, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 34, 9129 (2001).
  15. T. M. El-Shahat, S. Abdel-Khalek, M. Abdel-Aty and A.-S. F. Obada, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 18, 289 (2003).
  16. T. M. El-Shahat, S. Abdel-Khalek and A.-S. F. Obada, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 26, 1293 (2005).
  17. X.-Q. Yan, B. Shao and J. Zou, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 40, 215 (2009).
  18. H. Kayhan, Phys. Scr. 84, 045401 (2011).
  19. S. V. Lawande, A. Joshi and Q. V. Lawande, Phys. Rev. A 52, 619 (1995).
  20. A. Joshi, J. Mod. Optics 42, 2561 (1995).
  21. B. Buck and C. V. Sukumar, Phys. Lett. A 81, 132 (1981).
  22. C. C. Gerry, Phys. Rev. A 37, 2683 (1988).
  23. V. Buzek et.al., Phys. Rev. A 56, 2352 (1997).
  24. A. I. Burshtein, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 49, 1362 (1965) [Sov. Phys.-JETP 22, 939 (1966)].
  25. A. I. Burshtein and Y. S. Oseledchilk, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 51, 1071 (1966) [Sov. Phys.-JETP 24, 716 (1967)].
  26. L. D. Zusman and A. I. Burshtein, Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 61, 976 (1971) [Sov. Phys.-JETP 34, 520 (1972)].
  27. H. Kayhan, Eur. Phys. J. D 48, 443 (2008).
  28. H. Kayhan, Int. J. Quantum Inform. 9, 1229 (2011).