SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering / 2026 / Volume: 60 Issue: 1

Entropy exchange and entanglement in the Jaynes-Cummings model with transient effects

Hünkar Kayhan0000-0001-6340-8933
Pages
—
Publication Date
2018-07-31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The entanglement behaves chaotically as the transient effects become stronger

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of entropy exchange and entanglement in the atom-field interaction by the Jaynes-Cummings model in the presence of the transient effects considered for the case of linear sweep.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As the strength of these effects increases, the oscillations of the entropy change and entanglement speed up.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The entanglement behaves chaotically as the transient effects become stronger
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:entropy exchange · entanglement · transient effects

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of entropy exchange and entanglement in the atom-field interaction by the Jaynes-Cummings model in the presence of the transient effects considered for the case of linear sweep. We find that the transient effects do not influence the entropy exchange between the atom and the field. As the strength of these effects increases, the oscillations of the entropy change and entanglement speed up. The entanglement behaves chaotically as the transient effects become stronger

🔖

Cite This Article

Kayhan, H. (2018). Entropy exchange and entanglement in the Jaynes-Cummings model with transient effects. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series A2-A3 Physical Sciences and Engineering, Volume: 60 Issue: 1. https://ajindex.com/articles/1117305

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (26)

  1. Eberly, J. H., N. B. Narozhny, J. J. Sanchez-Mondragon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1323 (1980).
  2. Wu, Y., X. X. Yang, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3086 (1997).
  3. İmamoglu, A., S. E. Harris, Opt. Lett. 14, 1344 (1989).
  4. Jaynes, E. T., F. W. Cummings, Proc. IEEE 51, 89 (1962).
  5. Cummings, F. W., Phys. Rev. 140, A1051 (1965).
  6. Kuklinski J. R. and J. L. Madajczyk, Phys. Rev. A 37, 3175 (1988).
  7. Gea-Banacloche, J., Phys. Rev. A 47, 2221 (1993).
  8. Rodriguez-Lara B. M. and H. Moya Cessa, Phys. Rev. A 71, 023811 (2005).
  9. Kundu, A., Theor. Math. Phys 144, 975 (2005).
  10. Hussin V. and L. M. Nieto, J. Math. Phys. 46, 122102 (2005).
  11. Shore B. W., and P. L. Knight, J. Mod. Opt. 40, 1195 (1993).
  12. Joshi, A., S. V. Lawande, Phys. Rev. A 48, 2276 (1993). Agarwal G. S., and S. Arun Kumar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3665 (1991).
  13. Graham, R., J. Mod. Opt. 34, 873 (1987).
  14. Kayhan, H., Commun. Theor. Phys. 56, 487 (2011).
  15. Hu Y.-H. and Y.-G. Tan, Phys. Scr. 89, 075103 (2014).
  16. Hu Y.-H. and Y.-G. Tan, Commun. Theor. Phys. 62, 49 (2014).
  17. Boukobza, E., D. J. Tannor, Phys. Rev. A 71, 063821 (2005).
  18. Yan, X.-Q., B. Shao, J. Zou, Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 37, 835 (2008).
  19. Zhang, J., B. Shao, J. Zou, Commun. Theor. Phys. 49, 1463 (2008).
  20. Zhang, Y.-Q., L. Tan, Z.-H. Zhu, Z.-Z. Xiong, L.-W. Liu, Chin. Phys. B 19, 024210 (2010).
  21. Guo, J.-L. Y.-B. Sun, Z.-D. Li, Opt. Commun. 284, 896 (2011).
  22. Yan X.-Q. and Y.-G. Lü, Commun. Theor. Phys. 57, 209 (2012).
  23. Yan, X.-Q., Chaos, Solitons & Fractals 45, 1309 (2012).
  24. Wootters, W. K., Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2245 (1998).
  25. Rendell R. W. and A. K. Rajagopal, Phys. Rev. A 67, 062110 (2003).
  26. Eberly, J. H., N. B. Narozhny, J. J. Sanchez-Mondragon, Phys. Rev. Lett. 44, 1323 (1980).