SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikoloji Çalışmaları / 2022 / Cilt: 42 Sayı: 3

Regulation of Positive and Negative Emotions: The Turkish Adaptation Study of the Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI)

Pozitif ve Negatif Duyguları Düzenleme: Perth Duygu Düzenlemede Yetkinlik Envanterinin Türkçe Uyarlama Çalışması

Derya Akbaş(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-9852-4782
Yasemin Kahya(ANKARA SOSYAL BİLİMLER ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3034-0527
Pages
699–736
Publication Date
2022-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, these findings provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the scores obtained from the Turkish version of PERCI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The current literature suggests that emotion regulation, the mechanism of change in treatment, is the common etiological and maintenance factor for different psychopathologies.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study aims to conduct an adaptation study of the Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI; Preece et al., 2018) into Turkish and to examine the scale’s psychometric properties.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, these findings provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the scores obtained from the Turkish version of PERCI.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Perth Duygu Düzenlemede Yetkinlik Envanteri · duygu · duygu düzenleme

Abstract

The current literature suggests that emotion regulation, the mechanism of change in treatment, is the common etiological and maintenance factor for different psychopathologies. This study aims to conduct an adaptation study of the Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI; Preece et al., 2018) into Turkish and to examine the scale’s psychometric properties. The study sample consists of 461 participants, of whom 77.4% are female and 22.3% male with a mean age of 21.49 years old. The study first adapted PERCI from English to Turkish using the back translation method. Next, the participants completed a demographic information form, the Turkish version of PERCI; the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ); and the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). The measurement set was applied to the participants using an online platform. The study then conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and compared the generated groups using cluster analysis, with the Pearson correlation coefficients being calculated for scores from the PERCI, the ERQ, and the DASS-21 within the scope of examining the validity of the Turkish version of PERCI. The study also calculated Cronbach’s α and McDonald’s ω for the reliability examination. The CFA findings for the factor structure of PERCI have revealed the scale to have eight first-order factors, each factor consisting of four items (i.e., controlling experience, inhibiting behavior, activating behavior, and tolerating emotions for both negative and positive emotions) being loaded onto two second-order factors (i.e., negative and positive emotion regulation). The negative, positive, and general emotion regulation scores showed expected correlations with the variables of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms and also indicated significant differences among the high, medium, and low symptom groups. High reliability coefficients were obtained for all of PERCI’s subscale scores. In conclusion, these findings provide evidence for the validity and reliability of the scores obtained from the Turkish version of PERCI. For future emotion regulation research, a measure that enables a more detailed examination of the relationships involved in emotion regulation in the context of positive and negative emotions and other structures has been brought to Türkiye’s national literature.

Özet

Güncel alanyazına göre, farklı psikopatolojilerin etiyolojik ve sürdürücü faktörlerinden birinin tanılar üstü olarak değerlendirilen duygu düzenleme yapısı olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Perth Duygu Düzenlemede Yetkinlik Envanterinin (Perth DDYE; Preece ve ark., 2018) Türkçe formunun ulusal alanyazına kazandırılması ve psikometrik özelliklerinin incelenmesidir. Çalışma örneklemi, 461 katılımcıdan oluşmaktadır. Katılımcıların %77.4’ü kadın, %22.3’ü erkek olup yaş ortalaması 21.49’dur.Çalışma kapsamında ilk olarak, Perth DDYE çeviri-geri çeviri yöntemiyle İngilizceden Türkçeye uyarlanmıştır. Katılımcılar, demografik bilgi formunu, Perth DDYE’yi, Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeğini ve Depresyon, Anksiyete ve Stres Ölçeği-21’i doldurmuştur. Ölçek seti, katılımcılara online bir platform aracılığıyla uygulanmıştır.Geçerlik incelemeleri kapsamında, Doğrulayıcı Faktör Analizi (DFA) yapılmış, kümeleme analizi ile elde edilen gruplar arası karşılaştırmayapılmış ve Perth DDYE puanları ile duygu düzenleme ve depresyon, anksiyete ve stres puanları arasındaki Pearson korelasyon katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Ölçekten alınan puanların güvenirlik incelemesi için, Cronbach α ve McDonald ω güvenirlik katsayıları hesaplanmıştır. Perth DDYE’nin faktör yapısına yönelik DFA bulguları, her biri dört maddeden oluşan sekiz birinci-düzey faktörün (negatif ve pozitif duygular içindeneyimi kontrol etme, davranışı engelleme, davranışı harekete geçirme, duyguları tolere etme), iki ikinci-düzey faktöre (negatif ve pozitif duyguları düzenleme) yüklendiğini göstermiştir. Negatif, pozitif ve genel duygu düzenleme puanları depresyon, anksiyete ve stres belirti değişkenleri ile beklendik yönde ilişkiler göstermiş ve yüksek, orta, düşük belirti grupları arasında anlamlı şekilde farklılaşmıştır. Tüm alt-ölçek puanları için yüksek güvenirlik katsayıları elde edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak bu bulgular, Perth DDYE’nin Türkçe formundan elde edilen puanların güvenirlik ve geçerliğine ilişkin kanıtlar sunmaktadır. Mevcut araştırma, ileride yürütülecek olan duygu düzenleme araştırmalarında duygu düzenleme ve diğer yapılar arasındaki ilişkileri pozitif ve negatif duygular bağlamında daha ayrıntılı bir bakış açısıyla incelemeyi mümkün kılan bir ölçme aracını ulusal alanyazına kazandırmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

Akbaş, D., Kahya, Y. (2022). Regulation of Positive and Negative Emotions: The Turkish Adaptation Study of the Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI). Psikoloji Çalışmaları, Cilt: 42 Sayı: 3, 699–736. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-955782

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (86)

  1. Agargün, M. Y., Beşiroğlu, L., Kıran, Ü. K., Özer, Ö. A. ve Kara, H. (2005). The psychometric properties of the COPE inventory in Turkish sample: A preliminary research. Anadolu Psikiyatri Dergisi, 6, 221-226. google scholar
  2. Aksöz, İ., Bugay, A. ve Erdur-Baker, Ö. (2010). Turkish adaptation of the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2642-2646. google scholar
  3. Aldao, A. ve Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2012). When are adaptive strategies most predictive of psychopathology?. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121(1), 276-281. doi: 10.1037/a0023598 google scholar
  4. Aldao, A., Nolen-Hoeksema, S. ve Schweizer, S. (2010). Emotion-regulation strategies across psychopathology: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 217-237. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2009.11.004 google scholar
  5. Aldao, A., Sheppes, G. ve Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation flexibility. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 39(3), 263-278. doi: 10.1007/s10608-014-9662-4 google scholar
  6. American Psychiatric Association. (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4. baskı). American Psychiatric Association. google scholar
  7. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5. baskı). American Psychiatric Association. google scholar
  8. Asıcı, E., Ekiz, F. E. ve Karaca, R. (2018). Olumlu Duyguyu Düzenlemede Güçlükler Ölçeği (O-DDGÖ): Türkçeye uyarlama, geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 26(5), 15891600. doi: 10.24106/kefdergi.2165 google scholar
  9. Berking, M. ve Znoj, H. (2008). Development and validation of a self-report measure for the assessment of emotion-regulation skills. Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie, Psychologie und Psychotherapie, 56(2), 141-153. google scholar
  10. Blanca, M. J., Alarcon, R., Arnau, J., Bono, R. ve Bendayan, R. (2017). Non-normal data: Is ANOVA still a valid option?. Psicothema, 29(4), 552-557. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2016.383 google scholar
  11. Blanchard-Fields, F., Stein, R. ve Watson, T. L. (2004). Age differences in emotion regulation strategies in handling everyday problems. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 59, 261-269. doi: 10.1093/geronb/59.6.p261 google scholar
  12. Bonanno, G. A. ve Burton, C. L. (2013). Regulatory flexibility: An individual differences perspective on coping and emotion regulation. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(6), 591-612. doi: 10.1177/1745691613504116 google scholar
  13. Carl, J. R., Soskin, D. P., Kerns, C. ve Barlow, D. H. (2013). Positive emotion regulation in emotional disorders: A theoretical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(3), 343-360. doi: 10.1016/j. cpr.2013.01.003 google scholar
  14. Carstensen, L. L., Fung, H. ve Charles, S. (2003). Socioemotional selectivity theory and the regulation of emotion in the second half of life. Motivation and Emotion, 27, 103-123. doi: 10.1023/A:1024569803230 google scholar
  15. Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F. ve Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal ofPersonality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267-283. doi: 10.1037/00223514.56.2.267 google scholar
  16. Catanzaro, S. J. ve Mearns, J. (1990). Measuring generalized expectancies for negative mood regulation: Initial scale development and implications. Journal ofPersonality Assessment, 54, 546-563. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1990.9674019 google scholar
  17. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297334. doi: 10.1007/BF02310555 google scholar
  18. De France, K. ve Hollenstein, T. (2017). Assessing emotion regulation repertoires: The regulation of emotion systems survey. Personality and Individual Differences, 119, 204-215. doi: 10.1016/j. paid.2017.07.018 google scholar
  19. Eldeleklioğlu, J. ve Eroğlu, Y. (2015). A Turkish adaptation of the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire. Journal ofHuman Sciences, 12(1), 1157-1168. doi: 10.14687/ijhs.v12i1.3144 google scholar
  20. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using SPSS (4. baskı). Sage Publications. google scholar
  21. Folkman, S. ve Lazarus, R. S. (1980). An analysis of coping in a middle-aged community sample. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 21(3), 219-239. doi: 10.2307/2136617 google scholar
  22. Ford, B. Q., Lam, P., John, O. P. ve Mauss, I. B. (2018). The psychological health benefits of accepting negative emotions and thoughts: Laboratory, diary, and longitudinal evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115, 1075-1092. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000157 google scholar
  23. Garland, E. L., Fredrickson, B., Kring, A.M., Johnson, D. P., Meyer, P. S. ve Penn, D. L. (2010). Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: Insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(7), 849-864. doi: 10.1016/j. cpr.2010.03.002 google scholar
  24. Garnefski, N. ve Kraaij, V. (2007). The cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 141-149. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759.23.3.141 google scholar
  25. Gratz, K. L. ve Roemer, L. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation and dysregulation: Development, factor structure, and initial validation of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 26, 41-54. doi: 10.1023/B:JOBA.0000007455.08539.94 google scholar
  26. Green, S. B. ve Yang, Y. (2009). Commentary on coefficient alpha: A cautionary tale. Psychometrika, 74(1), 121-135. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9098-4 google scholar
  27. Greenberg, L. S. (2002). Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through their feelings. American Psychological Association. google scholar
  28. Gross, J. J. (2014). Emotion regulation: Conceptual and empirical foundations. J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation içinde (s. 3-20). Guilford Press. google scholar
  29. Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation: Current status and future prospects. Psychological Inquiry, 26, 1-26. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2014.940781 google scholar
  30. Gross, J. J. ve Jazaieri, H. (2014). Emotion, emotion regulation, and psychopathology: An affective science perspective. Clinical Psychological Science, 2, 387-401. doi: 10.1177/2167702614536164 google scholar
  31. Gross, J. J. ve John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348362. doi: 10.1037/00223514.85.2.348 google scholar
  32. Gross, J. J., Richards, J. M. ve John, O. P. (2006). Emotion regulation in everyday life. D. K. Snyder, J. A. Simpson ve J. N. Hughes (Ed.), Emotion regulation in couples and families: Pathways to dysfunction and health içinde (s. 13-35). American Psychological Association. google scholar
  33. Gross, J. J., Sheppes, G. ve Urry, H. L. (2011). Emotion generation and emotion regulation:A distinction we should make (carefully). Cognition and Emotion, 25, 765-781. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.555753 google scholar
  34. Gruber, J., Kogan, A., Quoidbach, J. ve Mauss, I. B. (2013). Happiness is best kept stable: Positive emotion variability is associated with poorer psychological health. Emotion, 13(1), 1-6. doi: 10.1037/a0030262 google scholar
  35. Gullone, E. ve Taffe, J. (2012). The Emotion Regulation Questionnaire for Children and Adolescents (ERQ-CA): A psychometric evaluation. Psychological Assessment, 24, 409-417. doi: 10.1037/ a0025777 google scholar
  36. Izadpanah, S., Barnow, S., Neubauer, A. B. ve Holl, J. (2017). Development and validation of the Heidelberg Form for Emotion Regulation Strategies (HFERST): Factor structure, reliability, and validity. Assessment, 1-27. doi: 1073191117720283 google scholar
  37. Hayes, A. F. ve Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But. Communication Methods andMeasures, 14 (1), 1-24. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629 google scholar
  38. Henry, J. D. ve Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short-form version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44(2), 227-239. doi: 10.1348/014466505X29657 google scholar
  39. Kring, A. M. ve Bachorowski, J. A. (1999). Emotions and psychopathology. Cognition and Emotion, 13, 575-599. doi: 10.1080/026999399379195 google scholar
  40. Kring, A. M. ve Sloan, D. M. (2010). Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A transdiagnostic approach to etiology and treatment. Guilford Press. google scholar
  41. Lang, P. J. ve Bradley, M. M. (2010). Emotion and the motivational brain. Biological Psychology, 84, 437-450. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.10.007 google scholar
  42. Lovibond, P. F. ve Lovibond, S. H. (1995). The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 33(3), 335-343. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U google scholar
  43. Mak, A. K., Hu, Z. G., Zhang, J. X., Xiao, Z. W. ve Lee, T. M. (2009). Neural correlates of regulation of positive and negative emotions: An fMRI study. Neuroscience Letters, 457(2), 101-106. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.094 google scholar
  44. Mauss, I. B., Levenson, R. W., McCarter, L., Wilhelm, F. H. ve Gross, J. J. (2005). The tie that binds? Coherence among emotion experience, behavior, and physiology. Emotion, 5, 175-190. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.5.2.175 google scholar
  45. Mauss, I. B. ve Tamir, M. (2014). Emotion goals: How their content, structure, and operation shape emotion regulation. J. J. Gross (Ed.), The handbook of emotion regulation içinde (2. baskı, s. 361-375). Guilford Press. google scholar
  46. McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum. google scholar
  47. McLaughlin, K. A., Hatzenbuehler, M. L., Mennin, D. S. ve Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (2011). Emotion dysregulation and adolescent psychopathology: A prospective study. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 49(9), 544-554. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.06.003 google scholar
  48. McRae, K., Ciesielski, B. ve Gross, J. J. (2012). Unpacking cognitive reappraisal: Goals, tactics, and outcomes. Emotion, 12, 250-255. doi: 10.1037/a0026351 google scholar
  49. McRae, K. ve Mauss, I. B. (2016). Increasing positive emotion in negative contexts: Emotional consequences, neural correlates, and implications for resilience. J. D. Greene, I. Morrison ve M. E. P. Seligman (Ed.), Positive neuroscience içinde (s. 159-174). Oxford University Press. google scholar
  50. Mennin, D. S. ve Farach, F. J. (2007). Emotion and evolving treatments for adult psychopathology. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 14, 329-352. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2007.00094.x google scholar
  51. Mennin, D. S., Holoway, R. M., Fresco, D. M., Moore, M. T. ve Heimberg, R. G. (2007). Delineating components of emotion and its dysregulation in anxiety and mood psychopathology. Behavior Therapy, 38, 284-302. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2006.09.001 google scholar
  52. Miguel, F. K., Giromini, L., Colombarolli, M. S., Zuanazzi, A. C. ve Zennaro, A. (2017). A Brazilian investigation of the 36- and 16-Item Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scales. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 73(9), 1146-1159. doi: 10.1002/jclp.22404 google scholar
  53. Millgram,Y., Joormann, J., Huppert, J. D. veTamir, M. (2015). Sadas amatter ofchoice?Emotionregulation goals in depression. Psychological Science, 26, 1216-1228. doi:10.1177/0956797615583295 google scholar
  54. Nelis, D., Quoidbach, J., Hansenne, M. and Mikolajczak, M., 2011. Measuring individual differences in emotion regulation: The emotion regulation profile-revised (ERP-R). Psychologica Belgica, 51(1), 49-91. doi: 10.5334/pb-51-1-49 google scholar
  55. Neumann, A., van Lier, P. A., Gratz, K. L. ve Koot, H. M. (2010). Multidimensional assessment of emotion regulation difficulties in adolescents using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Assessment, 17(1), 138-149. doi: 10.1177/1073191109349579 google scholar
  56. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. ve Aldao, A. (2011). Gender and age differences in emotion regulation strategies and their relationship to depressive symptoms. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(6), 704708. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.012 google scholar
  57. Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Wisco, B. E. ve Lyubomirsky, S. (2008). Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 400-424. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x google scholar
  58. Onat, O. ve Otrar, M. (2010). Bilişsel Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışmaları. MÜ Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 31, 123-143. google scholar
  59. Orgeta, V. (2009). Specificity of age differences in emotion regulation. Aging and Mental Health, 13(6), 818-826. doi: 10.1080/13607860902989661 google scholar
  60. Preece, D. A., Becerra, R., Robinson, K., Dandy, J. ve Allan, A. (2018). Measuring emotion regulation ability across negative and positive emotions: The Perth Emotion Regulation Competency Inventory (PERCI). Personality and Individual Differences, 135, 229-241. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2018.07.025 google scholar
  61. Rugancı, R. N. ve Gençöz, T. (2010). Psychometric properties of a Turkish version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 442-455. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20665 google scholar
  62. Saarni, C., Campos, J. J., Camras, L. A. ve Witherington, D. (2006). Emotional development: Action, communication, and understanding. N. Eisenberg, W. Damon ve R. M. Lerner (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development içinde (s. 226-299). John Wiley & Sons, Inc. google scholar
  63. Salovey, P., Mayer, J. D., Goldman, S. L., Turvey, C. ve Palfai, T. P. (1995). Emotional attention, clarity, and repair: Exploring emotional intelligence using the Trait Meta-Mood Scale. J. W. Pennebaker (Ed.). Emotion, disclosure, and health içinde (s. 125-154). American Psychological Association. google scholar
  64. Senol-Durak, E., Durak, M. ve Elagöz, F. Ö. (2011). Testing the psychometric properties of the Ways of Coping Questionnaire (WCQ) in Turkish university students and community samples. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 18(2), 172-185. doi: 10.1002/cpp.677 google scholar
  65. Schirda, B., Valentine, T. R., Aldao, A. ve Prakash, R. S. (2016). Age-related differences in emotion regulation strategies: Examining the role of contextual factors. Developmental Psychology, 52(9), 1370-1380.doi: 10.1037/dev0000194 google scholar
  66. Schminder, E., Ziegler, M., Danay, E., Beyer, L. Ve Bühner, M. (2010). Is it really robust? Reinvestigating the robustness of ANOVA against violations of the normal distribution. European Research Journal of Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6(4), 147-151. doi: 10.1027/1614-2241/a000016 google scholar
  67. Sheppes, G., Suri, G. Ve Gross, J. J. (2015). Emotion regulation and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 11, 379-405. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032814-112739 google scholar
  68. Stanton, K. ve Watson, D. (2014). Positive and negative affective dysfunction in psychopathology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 555-567. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12132 google scholar
  69. Tamir, M. (2009). What do people want to feel and why?: Pleasure and utility in emotion regulation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 101-105. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01617.x google scholar
  70. Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20, 199-222. doi: 10.1177/1088868315586325 google scholar
  71. Tamir, M., Vishkin ve Gutentag, T. (2020). Emotion regulation is motivated. Emotion, 20(1), 115-119. doi: 10.1037/emo0000635 google scholar
  72. Tetik, S. ve Cenkseven Önder, F. (2021). Çocuk ve Ergenlerde Duygu Düzenleme Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30(2), 87-100. doi: 10.35379/cusosbil.942135 google scholar
  73. Tugade, M. M. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (2007). Regulation of positive emotions: Emotion regulation strategies that promote resilience. Journal of Happiness Studies, 8(3), 311-333. doi:10.1007/ s10902-006-9015-4 google scholar
  74. Y ıldırım, A., Boysan, M. ve Kefeli, M. C. (2018). Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21). British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 46(5), 582-595. doi:10.1080/03069885.2018.1442558 google scholar
  75. Y iğit, İ. ve Guzey Yiğit, M. (2019). Psychometric properties of Turkish version of Diffuculties in Emotion Regulation Scale-Brief Form (DERS-16). Current Psychology, 38, 1503-1511. doi: 10.1007/s12144-017-9712-7 google scholar
  76. V atan, S. ve Oruçlular Kahya, Y. (2018). Duygu Düzenleme Becerileri Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlilik ve güvenilirlik çalışması. Anatolian Journal of Psychiatry, 19(2), 192-201. doi: 10.5455/ apd.260322 google scholar
  77. Velotti, P., Rogier, G., Civilla, C., Garofalo, C., Serafini, G. ve Amore, M. (2020). Dysregulation of positive emotions across community, clinical and forensic samples using the Italian version of the difficulties in emotion regulation scale-positive (DERS-positive). The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 31(4), 555-570. doi: 10.1080/14789949.2020.1776374 google scholar
  78. Waugh, C. E. (2020). The roles of positive emotion in the regulation of emotional responses to negative events. Emotion, 20(1), 54-58. doi: 10.1037/emo0000625 google scholar
  79. Waugh, C. E., Zarolia, P., Mauss, I. B., Luman, D. S., Ford, B. Q., Davis, T. S., Ciesielski, B. G., Sams, K. V. ve McRae, K. (2016). Emotion regulation changes the duration of the BOLD response to emotional stimuli. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(10), 1550-1559. doi: 10.1093/ scan/nsw067 google scholar
  80. Webb, T. L., Miles, E. ve Sheeran, P. (2012). Dealing with feeling: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of strategies derived from the process model of emotion regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 775-808. doi: 10.1037/a0027600 google scholar
  81. Weiss, N. H., Dixon-Gordon, K. L., Peasant, C. ve Sullivan, T. P. (2018). An examination of the role of difficulties regulating positive emotions in posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 31(5), 775-780. doi: 10.1002/jts.22330 google scholar
  82. Weiss, N. H., Gratz, K. L. ve Lavender, J. M. (2015). Factor structure and initial validation of a multidimensional measure of difficulties in the regulation of positive emotions: The DERS-positive. Behavior Modification, 39, 431-453. doi: 10.1177/0145445514566504 google scholar
  83. Werner, K. ve Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotion regulation and psychopathology: A conceptual framework. A. M. Kring ve D. M. Sloan (Ed.), Emotion regulation and psychopathology içinde (s. 13-32). Guilford Press. google scholar
  84. Zimmermann, P. ve Iwanski, A. (2014). Emotion regulation from early adolescence to emerging adulthood and middle adulthood: Age differences, gender differences, and emotion-specific developmental variations. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 38(2), 182-194. doi: 10.1177/0165025413515 google scholar
  85. Zou, C., Plaks, J. E. ve Peterson, J. B. (2017). Don’t get too excited: Assessing individual differences in the down-regulation of positive emotions. Journal of Personality Assessment, 101(1) 1-11. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1339711 google scholar
  86. Hayes, A. F. ve Coutts, J. J. (2020). Use omega rather than Cronbach’s alpha for estimating reliability. But. Communication Methods andMeasures, 14 (1), 1-24. doi: 10.1080/19312458.2020.1718629 google scholar