SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikoloji Çalışmaları / 2026 / Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2

The Mediating Role of Social Creativity Strategies in the Relationship Between Identification with Female Identity and Collective Action

Kadın Kimliğiyle Özdeşleşme ve Kolektif Eylem Arasındaki İlişkide Sosyal Yaratıcılık Stratejilerinin Aracı Rolü

Nuri Akdoğan(Dicle Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi Psikoloji Bölümü)0000-0002-5518-9491
Kenan Alparslan(Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Psikoloji Bölümü)0000-0001-6701-355X
Deniz Bilger(Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi, Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Psikoloji Bölümü)0000-0002-0843-3164
Pages
203–234
Publication Date
2024-08-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, various findings indicate that this is not the case, at least for the strategy of “changing value of the in-group dimension”.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Social identity theory argues that social creativity strategies undermine tendencies that foster social change, such as collective action orientation, and provide continuity for the existing social status system by reinforcing it.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, various findings indicate that this is not the case, at least for the strategy of “changing value of the in-group dimension”.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the findings, it can be said that social creativity strategies are not only cognitive strategies affirming ingroup identity and enhancing self-esteem but also instruments that reinforce or weaken collective action motivation.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Sosyal yaratıcılık stratejileri · kolektif eylem yönelimi · özdeşleşme

Abstract

Social identity theory argues that social creativity strategies undermine tendencies that foster social change, such as collective action orientation, and provide continuity for the existing social status system by reinforcing it. However, various findings indicate that this is not the case, at least for the strategy of “changing value of the in-group dimension”. The findings suggest that as identification with the ingroup increases, this strategy motivates individuals to engage in social competition and thus bring about social change. This study, conducted with 219 female college students in Turkey, aims to examine the mediating role of social creativity strategies in the relationship between identification with female identity and participation in collective actions intended to improve women’s social status through structural equation modeling. Political view was included in the model as a control variable to ensure that the possible relationships were not due to political view. The present study is unique in that it examines the relationship between social creativity strategies and collective action orientation, on the one hand, and reveals a new mechanism that plays a mediating role in the relationship between identification and collective action orientation, on the other. The structural equation modeling results show that changing the out-group strategy negatively predicts collective action orientation, while the new dimension and changing the values strategies predict it positively. In addition, as participants’ political views shift to the left, their collective action orientation increases. In the relationship between identification with female identity and collective action orientation, changing the out-group has a negative mediating role, while the other two strategies play a positive mediating role. These findings indicate that social creativity strategies can have important implications for collective actions aimed at reducing social inequality and increasing social status. Based on the findings, it can be said that social creativity strategies are not only cognitive strategies affirming ingroup identity and enhancing self-esteem but also instruments that reinforce or weaken collective action motivation.

Özet

Sosyal kimlik kuramı, sosyal yaratıcılık stratejilerinin kolektif eylem yönelimi gibi sosyal değişime yönelik eğilimleri zayıflattığını ve mevcut sosyal statü sistemini pekiştirerek devamlılığını sağladığını öne sürmektedir. Ancak çeşitli bulgular, en azından “iç grubun niteliklerine yüklenen değerleri olumlu yönde değiştirme” stratejisi için durumun böyle olmadığını göstermektedir. Bulgular, iç grupla özdeşleşme arttıkça söz konusu stratejinin bireyleri sosyal rekabete girişmeye ve böylece sosyal değişimi gerçekleştirmeye motive ettiğine işaret etmektedir. Türkiye’de yaşayan 219 kadın üniversite öğrencisiyle yapılan bu araştırmanın temel amacı, özdeşleşme ile kadınların sosyal konumunu iyileştirmeye yönelik kolektif eylemlere katılma yönelimi arasındaki ilişkide sosyal yaratıcılık stratejilerinin aracı rolünü bir yapısal eşitlik modeli içinde incelemektir. Tespit edilebilecek ilişkilerin politik görüşten kaynaklanmadığından emin olmak amacıyla, politik görüş modele kontrol değişkeni olarak dâhil edilmiştir. Mevcut çalışma bir yandan yaratıcılık stratejilerinin kolektif eylem yönelimiyle ilişkisini sınaması diğer yandan özdeşleşme ve kolektif eylem yönelimi arasındaki ilişkide aracı rol oynayan yeni bir mekanizma ortaya koyması açısından özgün bir niteliğe sahiptir. Yapısal eşitlik modelinin sonuçları, kolektif eylem yönelimini karşılaştırma grubunu değiştirme stratejisinin negatif, yeni karşılaştırma boyutu ve kimliğe yüklenen değerleri olumlu yönde değiştirme stratejilerinin ise pozitif yönde yordadığını göstermektedir. Ayrıca, katılımcıların politik görüşleri sola kaydıkça kolektif eylem yönelimleri artmaktadır. Kadın kimliğiyle özdeşleşme ve kolektif eylem yönelimi arasındaki ilişkide karşılaştırma grubunu değiştirme negatif, diğer iki strateji pozitif yönde aracı rol oynamaktadır. Bu bulgular, sosyal yaratıcılık stratejilerinin, sosyal eşitsizliği azaltmaya ve statüyü yükseltmeye yönelik olan kolektif eylemler açısından önemli sonuçları olabileceğine işaret etmektedir. Bulgulardan hareketle sosyal yaratıcılık stratejilerinin sadece iç grup kimliğine olumlu bir içerik kazandırarak özsaygıyı arttıran, bütünüyle bilişsel nitelikte stratejiler değil, aynı zamanda kolektif eyleme yönelik motivasyonu güçlendiren veya zayıflatan araçlar olduğu söylenebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Akdoğan, N., Alparslan, K., Bilger, D. (2024). The Mediating Role of Social Creativity Strategies in the Relationship Between Identification with Female Identity and Collective Action. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, Cilt: 44 Sayı: 2, 203–234. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2021-941174

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (97)

  1. Abrams, D. ve Hogg, M. A. (1998). Prospects for research in group processes and intergroup relations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430298011002 google scholar
  2. Akdoğan, N. (2020). Kimlik yönetim stratejilerinin grup üyeliği kaynaklı belirleyicileri (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi. google scholar
  3. Akdoğan, N. ve Alparslan, K. (2020). Do members of disadvantaged groups possess a motivation of favouritism towards advantaged groups? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 11(4), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2020-0041 google scholar
  4. Alparslan, K. ve Kuşdil, M. E. (2020). Kürt üniversite öğrencilerinin kimlik yönetim stratejileri ve dış-grup tarafgirliğinin kimlikle ilgili eylem ve hedeflerle ilişkileri: Açık ve örtük ölçümlerle bir inceleme. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 35(Özel Sayı), 80-104. https://doi.org/10.31828/tpd1300443320200905x000040 google scholar
  5. Becker, J. C. (2012). The system-stabilizing role of identity management strategies: Social creativity can undermine collective action for social change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 647-662. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0029240 google scholar
  6. Becker, J. C. (2020). Ideology and the promotion of social change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 6-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.005 google scholar
  7. Becker, J. C. ve Tausch, N. (2015). A dynamic model of engagement in normative and non-normative collective action: Psychological antecedents, consequences, and barriers. European Review of Social Psychology, 26(1), 43-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2015.1094265 google scholar
  8. Bettencourt, B., Charlton, K., Dorr, N. ve Hume, D. L. (2001). Status differences and in-group bias: A meta-analytic examination of the effects of status stability, status legitimacy, and group permeability. Psychological Bulletin, 127(4), 520-542. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.127.4.520 google scholar
  9. Birleşmiş Milletler. (2023). Women of the world, unite! Explore women’s activism from generations past and present. https://interactive.unwomen.org/multimedia/timeline/womenunite/en/index.html#/ google scholar
  10. Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., Mielke, R. ve Klink, A. (1998). Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(5), 697-729. google scholar
  11. Bourguignon, D., Teixeira, C. P., Koc, Y., Outten, H. R., Faniko, K. ve Schmitt, M. T. (2020). On the protective role of identification with a stigmatized identity: Promoting engagement and discouraging disengagement coping strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1125-1142. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2703 google scholar
  12. Breinlinger, S. ve Kelly, C. (1994). Women’s responses to status inequality: A test of social identity theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18(1), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb00293.x google scholar
  13. Brunsting, S. ve Postmes, T. (2002). Social movement participation in the digital age: Predicting offline and online collective action. Small Group Research, 33(5), 525-554. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649602237169 google scholar
  14. Büyüköztürk, S. (2010). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Akademi. google scholar
  15. Caricati, L. (2012). Upward and downward comparison in the intermediate-status group: The role of social stratification stability. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 374—384. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02054.x google scholar
  16. Caricati, L. ve Owuamalam, C. K. (2020). System justification among the disadvantaged: A triadic social stratification perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(40). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00040 google scholar
  17. Choma, B., Hodson, G., Jagayat, A. ve Hoffarth, M. R. (2020). Right-wing ideology as a predictor of collective action: A test across four political issue domains. Political Psychology, 41(2), 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12615 google scholar
  18. Crocker, J. ve Major, B. (1989). Social stigma and self-esteem: The self-protective properties of stigma. Psychological Review, 96(4), 608-630. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.608 google scholar
  19. Croft, A., Schmader, T. ve Block, K. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 343-370. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868314564789 google scholar
  20. Çakal, H., Hewstone, M., Güler, M. ve Heath, A. (2016). Predicting support for collective action in the conflict between Turks and Kurds: Perceived threats as a mediator of intergroup contact and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(6), 732-752. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216641303 google scholar
  21. de Weerd, M. ve Klandermans, B. (1999). Group identification and political protest: Farmers’ protest in Netherlands. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(8), 1073-1095. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8 3.0.CO;2-K google scholar
  22. DeBlaere, C., Brewster, M. E., Bertsch, K. N., DeCarlo, A. L., Kegel, K. A. ve Presseau, C. D. (2014). The protective power of collective action for sexual minority women of color: An investigation of multiple discrimination experiences and psychological distress. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 38(1), 20-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684313493252 google scholar
  23. Derks, B., van Laar, C. ve Ellemers, N. (2007). Social creativity strikes back: Improving motivated performance of low status group members by valuing ingroup dimensions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 470-493. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.375 google scholar
  24. Derks, B., van Laar, C. ve Ellemers, N. (2009). Working for the self or working for the group: How self-versus group affirmation affects collective behavior in low-status groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(1), 183-202. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0013068 google scholar
  25. Douglas, K. M., McGarty, C., Bliuc, A. M. ve Lala, G. (2005). Understanding cyberhate: Social competition and social creativity in online white supremacist groups. Social Science Computer Review, 23(1), 68-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439304271538 google scholar
  26. Eccles, J. S., Wong, C. A. ve Peck, S. C. (2006). Ethnicity as a social context for the development of African-American adolescents. Journal of School Psychology, 44(5), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2006.04.001 google scholar
  27. Ellemers, N. ve Van Rijswijk, W. (1997). Identity needs versus social opportunities: The use of group-level and individual-level identity management strategies. Social Psychology Quarterly, 60(1), 52-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787011 google scholar
  28. Finkel, S. E. ve Opp, K. D. (1991). Party identification and participation in collective political action. The Journal of Politics, 53(2), 339-371. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131763 google scholar
  29. Galinsky, A. D., Hugenberg, K., Groom, C. ve Bodenhausen, G. V. (2003). The reappropriation of stigmatizing labels: Implications for social identity. J. T. Polzer (Ed.), Identity issues in groups içinde (ss. 221-256). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. google scholar
  30. Giguere, B. ve Lalonde, R. N. (2010). Why do students strike? Direct and indirect determinants of collective action participation. Political Psychology, 31(2), 227-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00750.x google scholar
  31. Greijdanus, H., de Matos Fernandes, C. A., Turner-Zwinkels, F., Honari, A., Roos, C. A., Rosenbusch, H. ve Postmes, T. (2020). The psychology of online activism and social movements: Relations between online and offline collective action. Current Opinion in Psychology, 35, 49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.03.003 google scholar
  32. Guimond, S., Chatard, A., Martinot, D., Crisp, R. J. ve Redersdorff, S. (2006). Social comparison, self-stereotyping, and gender differences in self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(2), 221-242. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.90.2.221 google scholar
  33. Gupta, A. ve Briscoe, F. (2020). Organizational political ideology and corporate openness to social activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 65(2), 524-563. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219852954 google scholar
  34. Haines, E. L., Deaux, K. ve Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing. or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983-2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081 google scholar
  35. Hasan-Aslih, S., Shuman, E., Pliskin, R., van Zomeren, M., Saguy, T. ve Halperin, E. (2020). With or without you: The paradoxical role of identification in predicting joint and ingroup collective action in intergroup conflict. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(6), 1334-1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2677 google scholar
  36. Heckathorn, D. D. (1998). Collective action, social dilemmas and ideology. Rationality and Society, 10(4), 451-479. https://doi.org/10.1177/104346398010004004 google scholar
  37. Hogg, M. A. ve Abrams, D. (1998). Social identifications: A social psychology of intergroup relations and group processes. Routledge. google scholar
  38. Hortaçsu, N. (2000). Intergroup relations in a changing political context: The case of veiled and unveiled university students in Turkey. European Journal of Social Psychology, 30(5), 733-744. google scholar
  39. Hoyt, C. L., Moss, A. J., Burnette, J. L., Schieffelin, A. ve Goethals, A. (2018). Wealth inequality and activism: Perceiving injustice galvanizes social change but perceptions depend on political ideologies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48(1), 81- 90. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2289 google scholar
  40. Iyer, A. ve Ryan, M. K. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and in-group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 791-814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01625.x google scholar
  41. Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D. ve Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99-108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633 google scholar
  42. Karelaia, N. ve Guillen, L. (2014). Me, a woman and a leader: Positive social identity and identity conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 125(2), 204-219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2014.08.002 google scholar
  43. Kay, A. C.,Czaplinski, S. ve Jost, J. T. (2009). Left-rightideologicaldifferencesinsystemjustification following exposure to complementary versus noncomplementary stereotype exemplars. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39(2), 290-298. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.500 google scholar
  44. Kelly, C., ve Breinlinger, S. (1995). Identity and injustice: Exploring women’s participation in collective action. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 5(1), 41-57. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2450050104 google scholar
  45. Khairullah, D. H. ve Khairullah, Z. Y. (2009). Cross-cultural analysis of gender roles: Indian and US advertisements. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 21(1), 58-75. https://doi.org/10.1108/13555850910926245 google scholar
  46. Kim, H. Y. (2018). Effects of social capital on collective action for community development. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(6), 1011-1028. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7082 google scholar
  47. Kirchler, E., Palmonari, A. ve Pombeni, M. L. (1994). Social categorization processes as dependent on status differences between groups: A step into adolescents’ peer-groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(5), 541-563. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420240503 google scholar
  48. Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansisons of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417 google scholar
  49. Klandermans, B. ve de Weerd, M. (2000). Group identification and political protest. S. Stryker, T. J. Owens ve R. W. White (Ed.), Self, identity, and social movements içinde (ss. 68-90). University of Minnesota Press. google scholar
  50. Lalonde, R. N. ve Cameron, J. E. (1993). An intergroup perspective on immigrant acculturation with a focus on collective strategies. International Journal of Psychology, 28(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599308246918 google scholar
  51. Lalonde, R. N., Cila, J. ve Yampolsky, M. (2016). Canada, a fertile ground for intergroup relations and social identity theory. S. McKeown, R. Haji ve N. Ferguson (Ed.), Understanding peace and conflict through social identity theory içinde (ss. 261-276). Springer. google scholar
  52. Laurin, R. (2017). Group and individual stereotype threat and identity management strategies: An investigation of rugby women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(10), 584-588. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12466 google scholar
  53. Leach, C. W., Ellemers, N. ve Barreto, M. (2007). Group virtue: The importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(2), 234-249. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.93.2.234 google scholar
  54. Liss, M., Crawford, M. ve Popp, D. (2004). Predictors and correlates of collective action. Sex Roles, 50, 771-779. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000029096.90835.3f google scholar
  55. Margolis, D. R. (1993). Women’s movements around the world: Cross-cultural comparisons. Gender & Society, 7(3), 379-399. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124393007003004 google scholar
  56. Mikolajczak, G. ve Becker, J. C. (2019). What is (un)fair? Political ideology and collective action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 7(2), 810-829. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v7i2.1230 google scholar
  57. Mikolajczak, G., Becker, J. C. ve lyer, A. (2022). Women who challenge or defend the status quo: Ingroup identities as predictors of progressive and reactionary collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 52(4), 626-641. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2842 google scholar
  58. Moreira, P. D. L., Neto, J., Sabucedo, J. M. ve Camino, C. P. D. S. (2018). Moral judgment, political ideology and collective action. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(6), 610-620. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12479 google scholar
  59. Mummendey, A., Kessler, T., Klink, A. ve Mielke, R. (1999). Strategies to cope with negative social identity: Predictions by social identity theory and relative deprivation theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 229-245. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.229 google scholar
  60. Nelson, J. A., Liss, M., Erchull, M. J., Hurt, M. M., Ramsey, L. R., Turner, D. L. ve Haines, M. E. (2008). Identity in action: Predictors of feminist self-identification and collective action. Sex Roles, 58(9), 721-728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-007-9384-0 google scholar
  61. Odağ, Ö., Uluğ, Ö. M. ve Solak, N. (2016). “Everyday I’m çapuling”: Identity and collective action through social network sites in the Gezi Park protests in Turkey. Journal of Media Psychology: Theories, Methods, and Applications, 28(3), 148-159. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000202 google scholar
  62. Orser, B. J., Elliott, C. ve Leck, J. (2011). Feminist attributes and entrepreneurial identity. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 26(8), 561-589. https://doi.org/10.1108/17542411111183884 google scholar
  63. Otjes, S., Stroebe, K. ve Postmes, T. (2020). When voting becomes protest: Mapping determinants of collective action onto voting behavior. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 11(4), 513-521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619872482 google scholar
  64. Özkan, K. (2014). Kadınların kolektif eylem yöneliminin yordayıcıları: Kültürel benlik kurguları, kadın kimliği ile özdeşleşme, kadınların sosyal baskınlık yönelimi ve sistemi meşrulaştırma eğilimi (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Bursa Uludağ Üniversitesi. google scholar
  65. Özkan, Z., Ünver, H., Kızık, B., Eraslan, E. G. ve Çakal, H. (2022). Sosyal psikoloji perspektifinden kolektif eylemlere katılmanın belirleyicileri üzerine bir derleme. Nesne, 10(24), 336-361. https://doi.org/10.7816/nesne-10-24-10 google scholar
  66. Pratto, F., Sidanius, J. ve Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and the dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772 google scholar
  67. Preacher, K. J. ve Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. https://doi.Org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 google scholar
  68. Proch, J., Elad-Strenger, J. ve Kessler, T. (2019). Liberalism and conservatism, for a change! Rethinking the association between political orientation and relation to societal change. Political Psychology, 40(4), 877-903. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12559 google scholar
  69. Radke, H. R., Hornsey, M. J. ve Barlow, F. K. (2016). Barriers to women engaging in collective action to overcome sexism. American Psychologist, 71(9), 863-874. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0040345 google scholar
  70. Rudman, L. A. ve Phelan, J. E. (2010). The effect of priming gender roles on women’s implicit gender beliefs and career aspirations. Social Psychology, 41(3), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000027 google scholar
  71. Sabucedo, J., Duran, M., Alzate, M. ve Barreto, I. (2011). Emotions, ideology and collective political action. Universitas Psychologica, 10(1), 27-34. google scholar
  72. Saeri, A. K., Iyer, A. ve Louis, W. R. (2015). Right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation predict outsiders’ responses to an external group conflict: Implications for identification, anger, and collective action. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 15(1), 303-332. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12081 google scholar
  73. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H. ve Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74. google scholar
  74. Schmader, T., Johns, M. ve Barquissau, M. (2004). The costs of accepting gender differences: The role of stereotype endorsement in women’s experience in the math domain. Sex Roles, 50(11), 835-850. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000029101.74557.a0 google scholar
  75. Settles, I. H. (2004). When multiple identities interfere: The role of identity centrality. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(4), 487-500. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203261885 google scholar
  76. Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C. ve Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective identification and social movement participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646-658. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.646 google scholar
  77. Stâhl, T., Eek, D. ve Kazemi, A. (2010). Rape victim blaming as system justification: The role of gender and activation of complementary stereotypes. Social Justice Research, 23(4), 239-258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-010-0117-0 google scholar
  78. Stewart, A. L., Pratto, F., Bou Zeineddine, F., Sweetman, J., Eicher, V., Licata, L., Morselli, D., Saab, R., Aiello, A., Chryssochoou, X., Cichocka, A., Cidam, A., Foels, R., Giguere, B., Liu, L., Prati, F. ve van Stekelenburg, J. (2016). International support for the Arab uprisings: Understanding sympathetic collective action using theories of social dominance and social identity. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 6-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430214558310 google scholar
  79. Stürmer, S. ve Simon, B. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 263-277. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256690 google scholar
  80. Tabachnick, B. G. ve Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6. Baskı). Pearson. google scholar
  81. Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 google scholar
  82. Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. W. G. Austin ve S. Worchel (Ed.), The social psychology of intergroup relations içinde (ss. 33-47). Brooks-Cole Publishing Company. google scholar
  83. Thomas, E. F. ve Louis, W. R. (2014). When will collective action be effective? Violent and non-violent protests differentially influence perceptions of legitimacy and efficacy among sympathizers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(2), 263-276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213510525 google scholar
  84. Turner-Zwinkels, F. M. ve van Zomeren, M. (2021). Identity expression through collective action: How identification with a politicized group and its identity contents differently motivated identity-expressive collective action in the US 2016 presidential elections. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(3), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220933406 google scholar
  85. Uluğ, Ö. M. ve Acar, Y. G. (2019). ‘Names will never hurt us’: A qualitative exploration of çapulcu identity through the eyes of Gezi Park protesters. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(3), 714-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12305 google scholar
  86. Uluğ, Ö. M., Odağ, Ö. ve Solak, N. (2020). Women’s rights and gender equality in Turkey| Voices against misogyny in Turkey: The case of a successful online collective action against a sexist commercial. International Journal of Communication, 14, 5575-5596. google scholar
  87. van Bezouw, M. J., van der Toorn, J. ve Becker, J. C. (2021) Social creativity: Reviving a social identity approach to social stability. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(2), 409-422. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2732 google scholar
  88. van Breen, J. A., Spears, R., Kuppens, T., ve de Lemus, S. (2017). A multiple identity approach to gender: Identification with women, identification with feminists, and their interaction. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01019 google scholar
  89. van Veelen, R., Otten, S., Cadinu, M. ve Hansen, N. (2016). An integrative model of social identification: Self-stereotyping and self-anchoring as two cognitive pathways. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315576642 google scholar
  90. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. ve Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504-535. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504 google scholar
  91. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T. ve Spears, R. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52-71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.x google scholar
  92. van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., Spears, R. ve Bettache, K. (2011). Can moral convictions motivate the advantaged to challenge social inequality? Extending the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(5), 735-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210395637 google scholar
  93. Veldman, J., Van Laar, C., Meeussen, L. ve Lo Bue, S. (2021). Daily coping with social identity threat in outgroup-dominated contexts: Self-group distancing among female soldiers. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 47(1), 118-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220921054 google scholar
  94. Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M. ve Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group: From acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994-1003. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994 google scholar
  95. Wright, S. C. ve Tropp, L. R. (2002). Collective action in response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification, and social change. I. Walker ve H. J. Smith (Ed.), Relative deprivation: Specification, development, and integration içinde (ss. 200-236). Cambridge University Press. google scholar
  96. Yoder, J. D., Tobias, A., ve Snell, A. F. (2011). When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9890-3 google scholar
  97. Haines, E. L., Deaux, K. ve Lofaro, N. (2016). The times they are a-changing. or are they not? A comparison of gender stereotypes, 1983-2014. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 40(3), 353-363. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081 google scholar