SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Psikoloji Çalışmaları / 2026 / Cilt: 45 Sayı: 1

Older Adults’ Cognitive Performance: Effects of Stereotype Threat and Positively Valenced Information

İleri Yetişkinlerde Bellek Performansı: Kalıp Yargı Tehdidinin ve Pozitif Duygu Değerine Sahip Bilginin Etkisi

Simay İkier(Marmara Üniversitesi, İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Fakültesi Psikoloji Bölümü)0000-0003-3810-0958
Pages
1–13
Publication Date
2025-05-07
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

To overcome the biased views of cognitive aging that can contribute to ageism, unbiased scientific findings can be communicated to the public by using language that does not trigger prejudice and discrimination.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Scientific study of aging was ignored for a long time, but with the aging of the world population, understanding all the dimensions of the aging process has become important.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The present article focuses on the cognitive aging dimension and specifically on the effects of stereotype threat and the emotional valence of the information on memory performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:To overcome the biased views of cognitive aging that can contribute to ageism, unbiased scientific findings can be communicated to the public by using language that does not trigger prejudice and discrimination.
🔬Design:Derleme
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Bilişsel yaşlanma · yaşlanma · yaşa bağlı ayrımcılık

Abstract

Scientific study of aging was ignored for a long time, but with the aging of the world population, understanding all the dimensions of the aging process has become important. The present article focuses on the cognitive aging dimension and specifically on the effects of stereotype threat and the emotional valence of the information on memory performance. Society’s prejudiced and discriminatory attitudes toward aging, characterized as ageism, can lead to a decrease in the self-efficacy of older adults and lower their memory performance. Scientific findings showed that older adults’ memory performance decreases in a condition in which stereotype threat is created, compared to a condition in which it is reduced. The effects of stereotype threat on memory are observed even on tests that are often used to screen for predementia. Reducing threat by emphasizing that the tests are age-fair decreases both the probability of a predementia diagnosis and the age differences in test results. In addition to the effects of stereotype threat, the emotional valence of the measurement materials also affects the memory performance of older adults. Older adults’ attention is directed toward positive information. On memory tests that are expected to show age differences, older adults’ memory performance increases when the information is positive, compared to conditions in which it is neutral or negative. These findings show that older adults’ memory performance can change from one condition to another when social and emotional factors are controlled and that memory measurements do not solely reflect the underlying neural changes. Without considering the social, emotional, biological, and physical changes that occur with aging, cognitive aging findings can be biased. To overcome the biased views of cognitive aging that can contribute to ageism, unbiased scientific findings can be communicated to the public by using language that does not trigger prejudice and discrimination.

Özet

Yaşlanmanın bilimsel olarak çalışılması uzun süre göz ardı edilmiş olsa da dünya nüfusunun yaşlanmasıyla birlikte artık yaşlanma sürecini tüm boyutları ile anlamak önem kazanmıştır. Yaşlanma çok boyutlu bir değişim sürecidir. Bu makalede bilişsel yaşlanma boyutuna odaklanılmış, bellek performansı ölçümlerinde kalıp yargı tehdidinin ve bilginin duygu değerinin etkisi vurgulanmıştır. Yaşa bağlı ayrımcılık olarak nitelendirilen toplumun yaşlanmaya karşı önyargılı ve ayrımcı tutumu, ileri yetişkinlerin öz yeterliklerinin düşmesine ve bellek performanslarının olabileceğinden daha düşük olarak ölçülmesine sebep olmaktadır. Bilimsel bulgular, ileri yetişkinlerin bellek performansının, ölçüm esnasında sosyal açıdan tehditkâr bir ortamın yaratıldığı koşullarda, tehdidin azaltıldığı koşullara kıyasla daha düşük olduğunu göstermiştir. Kalıp yargı tehdidinin bellek performansı üzerindeki olumsuz etkisi, nöral bozulma tanısı koymakta sıkça kullanılan testlerde dahi görülmektedir. Testlerin yaş farkı göstermediğinin vurgulanarak tehdidin azaltılması, ileri yetişkinlerin predemans tanısı alma olasılığını ve test sonuçlarında gözlemlenen yaş farklarını azaltmaktadır. Kalıp yargı tehdidinin yanında, ölçüm araçlarının duygu değeri de ileri yetişkinlerin bellek performansını etkilemektedir. İleri yetişkinlerin dikkati pozitif duygu değeri olan bilgiye doğru yönelmektedir. Yaşlanmaya bağlı performans düşüşlerinin beklenebileceği bellek ölçümlerinde pozitif duygu değeri olan bilgilerin kullanılması, nötr veya negatif duygu değeri olan bilgilerin kullanıldığı koşullara kıyasla ileri yetişkinlerin bellek performansını artırmaktadır. Bellek performansının bir durumdan diğerine sosyal ve duygusal faktörlerin kontrolü ile değişebiliyor olması, bellek ölçümlerinin sadece nöral temeldeki değişimleri yansıtmadığını ortaya koymaktadır. Yaşlanma ile gerçekleşen sosyal, duygusal, biyolojik ve fiziksel değişimler dikkate alınmadığında, bilişsel yaşlanma bulguları yanlı olmaya açıktır. Yaşa bağlı ayrımcılığa sebebiyet verebilen bilişsel yaşlanma ile ilgili yanlı bakış açılarının üstesinden gelmek, yansız bilimsel bulguların topluma aktarılması ve bu aktarımlarda önyargıyı tetiklemeyen dil kullanımı ile sağlanabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

İkier, S. (2025). Older Adults’ Cognitive Performance: Effects of Stereotype Threat and Positively Valenced Information. Psikoloji Çalışmaları, Cilt: 45 Sayı: 1, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2024-1418585

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (56)

  1. Armstrong, B., Gallant, S. N., Li, L., Patel, K. ve Wong, B. I. (2017). StereotYpe threat effects on older adults’ episodic and working memorY: A meta-analYsis. The Gerontologist, 57, 193-205. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx056 google scholar
  2. AYalon, L. (2013). Feelings towards older vs. Younger adults: Results from the European Social SurveY. Educational Gerontology, 39(12), 888-901. https://psYcnet.apa.org/doi/l0.1080/03601277.2013.767620 google scholar
  3. Balota, D. A., Dolan, P. O. ve Duchek, J. M. (2000). MemorY changes in healthY older adults. E. Tulving ve F. I. M. Craik (Ed.), The Oxford handbooK of memory içinde (s. 395-409). Oxford UniversitY Press. google scholar
  4. Barber, S. J. ve Kim, H. (2021). The positivitY effect. G. Sedek, T. M. Hess ve D. R. Touron (Ed.), Multiple pathways of cognitive aging: Motivational and contextual influences içinde (s. 84-104). Oxford UniversitY Press. google scholar
  5. Barber, S. J., Opitz, P. C., Martins, B., Sakaki, M. ve Mather, M. (2016). Thinking about a limited future enhances the positivitY of Younger and older adults’ recall: Support for socioemotional selectivitY theoıy Memory & Cognition, 44(6), 869-882. https://doi.org/10. 3758/s13421-016-0612-0 google scholar
  6. Blair, I. V., Ma, J. E. ve Lenton, A. P. (2001). Imagining stereotYpes away: The moderation of implicit stereotYpes through mental imagerY. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 828-841. https://psYcnet.apa.Org/doi/l0.1037/0022-3514.81.5.828 google scholar
  7. Boğa, M., GünaY, B. ve Kapucu, A. (2021). The influence of discrete negative and positive stimuli on recognition memorY of Younger vs. older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 47(i), 21-39. https://doi.org/l0.1080/0361073X.2020.1843894 google scholar
  8. Bowman, C. R., Chamberlain, J. D. ve Dennis, N. A. (2019). Sensory representations supporting memorY specificitY: Age effects on behavioral and neural discriminabilitY. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(12), 2265-2275. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.2022-18.2019 google scholar
  9. Brannon, T. N. ve Walton, G. M. (2013). Enacting cultural interests: How intergroup contact reduces prejudice bY sparking interest in an out-group’s culture. Psychological Science, 24(10), 1947-1957. https://doi.org/l0.1177/0956797613481607 google scholar
  10. Brubaker, M. S. ve Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2018). The effects of stereotYpe threat on the associative memorY deficit of older adults. Psychology and Aging, 33(i), 17-29. https://doi.org/l0.1037/pag0000194 google scholar
  11. Cabeza, R., Albert, M., Belleville, S., Craik, F. I. M., Duarte, A., GradY, C. L., Lindenberger, U., NYberg, L., Park, D. C., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., Rugg, M. D., Steffener, J. ve Rajah, M. N. (2018). Maintenance, reserve and compensation: The cognitive neuroscience of healthY ageing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 19(il), 701-710. https://doi.org/l0.1038/s41583-018-0068-2 google scholar
  12. Carstensen, L. L. (2021). Socioemotional selectivitY theorY: The role of perceived endings in human motivation. The Gerontologist, 61(8), 1188-1196. https://doi.org/l0.1093/geront/gnab116 google scholar
  13. Carstensen, L. L. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). Influence of HIV status and age on cognitive representations of others. Health Psychology, 17(6), 494-503. https://doi.Org/l0.1037//0278-6133.17.6.494 google scholar
  14. Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M. ve Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriouslY: A theorY of socioemotional selectivitY. American Psychologist, 54(3), 165-181. https://doi.Org/l0.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165 google scholar
  15. Carstensen, L. L. ve Mikels, J. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 117-121. https://doi.Org/l0.111l/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x google scholar
  16. Chasteen, A. L., Bhattacharyya, S., Horhota, M., Tam, R. ve Hasher, L. (2005). How feeLings of stereotype threat influence oLder aduLts' memorY performance. Experimental Aging Research, 31(3), 235-260. https://doi.org/l0.1080%2F03610730590948177 google scholar
  17. Chasteen, A. L. ve Cary, L. A. (2015). Age stereotypes and age stigma: Connections to research on subjective aging. Annual Review of Gerontology and Geriatrics, 35(i), 99-119. http://dx.doi.org/l0.189l/0198-8794.35.99 google scholar
  18. Craik, F. I. (2020). Remembering: An activitY of mind and brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 71, 1-24. https://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psYch-010419-051027 google scholar
  19. Craik, F. I. M. ve Rose, N. S. (2012). MemorY encoding and aging: A neurocognitive perspective. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(7), 1729-1739. https://doi.Org/l0.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.11.007 google scholar
  20. DünYa Sağlık Örgütü. (2023, Ekim i). Ageing and health. WorLd Health Organization. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/ detaiL/ageing-and-heaLth google scholar
  21. FLeischman, D. A., WiLson, R. S., GabrieLi, J. D. E., Bienias, J. L. ve Bennett, D. A. (2004). A LongitudinaL studY of impLicit and expLicit memorY in oLd persons. Psychology and Aging, 19(4), 617-625. https://doi.Org/l0.1037/0882-7974.19.4.617 google scholar
  22. FoLstein, M. F., Robins, L. N. ve HeLzer, J. E. (1983). The mini-mentaL state examination. Archives of General Psychiatry, 40(7), 812-812. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsYc.1983.01790060110016 google scholar
  23. Ford, J. H., Gaesser, B., DiBiase, H., Berro, T., Young, L. ve Kensinger, E. (2018). Heroic memorY: Remembering the detaiLs of others' heroism in the aftermath of a traumatic pubLic event can foster our own prosociaL response. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(i), 47-54. https://psYcnet.apa.org/doi/10.1002/acp.3377 google scholar
  24. FroLov, N. S., Pitsik, E. N., Maksimenko, V. A., Grubov, V. V., KiseLev, A. R., Wang, Z. ve Hramov, A. E. (2020). Age-reLated sLowing down in the motor initiation in eLderLY aduLts. Plos One, 15(9), e0233942. https://doi.org/10.1371%2FjournaL.pone.0233942 google scholar
  25. Fung, H. H. ve Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Sending memorabLe messages to the oLd: age differences in preferences and memorY for advertisements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(i), 163-178. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1163 google scholar
  26. Fung, H. H., Carstensen, L. L. ve Lutz, A. M. (1999). Influence of time on social preferences: ImpLications for Life-span deveLopment. google scholar
  27. Psychology and Aging, 14(4), 595-604. https://doi.Org/l0.1037//0882-7974.14.4.595 google scholar
  28. GaLLo, D. A., Korthauer, L. E., McDonough, I. M., TeshaLe, S. ve Johnson, E. L. (2011). Age-reLated positivity effects and autobiographicaL memory detaiL: Evidence from a past/future source memory task. Memory, 19(6), 641-652. https://doi.org/10.1080%2F09658211. 2011.595723 google scholar
  29. GiL, S. ve GiLbar, O. (2001). HopeLessness among cancer patients. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, 19(1), 21-33. https://psYcnet.apa.org/ doi/10.1300/J077v19n01_02 google scholar
  30. Hess, T. M., Auman, C., CoLcombe, S. J. ve RahhaL, T. A. (2003). The impact of stereotYpe threat on age differences in memorY performance. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences andSocial Sciences, 58(i), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/ geronb/58.1.P3 google scholar
  31. Hess, T. M., Hinson, J. T. ve Statham, J. A. (2004). ExpLicit and impLicit stereotYpe activation effects on memorY: Do age and awareness moderate the impact of priming?. Psychology and Aging, 19(3), 495. https://doi.Org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.3.495 google scholar
  32. KennedY, B. L., Huang, R. ve Mather, M. (2020). Age differences in emotion-induced bLindness: PositivitY effects in earlY attention. Emo-tion, 20(7), 1266-1278. https://doi.org/l0.1037/emo0000643 google scholar
  33. LevY, B. R. (1996). Improving memorY in oLd age through impLicit self-stereotYping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71 (6), 1092-1107. https://psYcnet.apa.Org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1092 google scholar
  34. LevY, B. R. ve Leifheit-Limson, E. (2009). The stereotYpe-matching effect: Greater influence on functioning when age stereotYpes correspond to outcomes. Psychology and Aging, 24(i), 230-233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014563 google scholar
  35. Ma, Y., Zhang, B., Zhang, X. ve Hu, Y. (2023). Experiencing dailY negative aging stereotYpes and reaL-Life cognitive functioning in oLder aduLts: A diarY study Psychology and Aging, 38(7), 725-739. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000774 google scholar
  36. Mather, M. (2012). The emotion paradox in the aging brain. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1251 (i), 33-49. https://doi.org/ 10.111l/j.1749-6632.2012.06471.x google scholar
  37. Mather, M., CanLi, T., EngLish, T., WhitfieLd, S., Wais, P., Ochsner, K., GabrieLi, J. D. ve Carstensen, L. L. (2004). AmYgdaLa responses to emotionaLLY vaLenced stimuLi in oLder and Younger aduLts. Psychological Science, 15(4), 259-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00662.x google scholar
  38. Mather, M. ve Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and attentionaL biases for emotionaL faces. Psychological Science, 14(5), 409-415. google scholar
  39. MaY, C. P., Hasher, L. ve HeaLeY, K. (2023). For whom (and when) the time beLL toLLs: ChronotYpes and the sYnchronY effect. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(6), 1520-1536. google scholar
  40. MazeroLLe, M., Regner, I., Morisset, P., PaccaLin, M., MiazoLa, A., Huguet, P. ve RigaLLeau, F. (2017). Negative aging stereotYpes impair performance on brief cognitive tests used to screen for predementia. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 72(6), 932-936. https://doi.org/ 10.1093/geronb/gbw083 google scholar
  41. MazeroLLe, M., Regner, I., RigaLLeau, F. ve Huguet, P. (2020). HighLighting and reducing the impact of negative aging stereotYpes during oLder aduLts' cognitive testing. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments), 155, e59922. https://dx.doi.org/10.3791/59922 google scholar
  42. Nasreddine, Z. S., PhiLLips, N. A., Bedirian, V., Charbonneau, S., Whitehead, V., CoLLin, I., J. L. Cummings ve Chertkow, H. (2005). The MontreaL Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tooL for miLd cognitive impairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53(4), 695-699. https://doi.Org/l0.111l/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x google scholar
  43. Neuberg, S. L. (1989). The goaL of forming accurate impressions during sociaL interactions: Attenuating the impact of negative expectan-cies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(3), 374. https://doi.Org/l0.1037//0022-3514.56.3.374 google scholar
  44. Niu, X., UtaYde, M. F., Sanders, K. E., Denis, D., Kensinger, E. A. ve PaYne, J. D. (2024). Age-reLated positivitY effect in emotionaL memorY consoLidation from middLe age to Late aduLthood. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 18, 1342589. google scholar
  45. Park, D. C., LautenschLager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D. ve Smith, P. K. (2002). ModeLs of visuospatiaL and verbaL memorY across the aduLt Life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 299-320. https://doi.Org/l0.1037/0882-7974.17.2.299 google scholar
  46. Park, J., FeLix, K. ve Lee, G. (2007). ImpLicit attitudes towards Arab-MusLims and the moderating effects of sociaL Information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 29(i), 35-45. https://doi.org/l0.1080/01973530701330942 google scholar
  47. RahhaL, T. A., Hasher, L. ve CoLcombe, S. J. (2001). InstructionaL manipuLations and age differences in memorY: Now You see them, now You don't. Psychology and Aging, 16(4), 697-706. https://doi.Org/l0.1037//0882-7974.16.4.697 google scholar
  48. Raz, N., Gunning-Dixon, F., Head, D., Rodrigue, K. M., WiLLiamson, A. ve Acker, J. D. (2004). Aging, sexuaL dimorphism, and hemispheric asYmmetrY of the cerebraL cortex: RepLicabiLitY of regionaL differences in volüme. Neurobiology of Aging, 25(3), 377-396. https:// doi.org/l0.1016/s0197-4580(03)00118-0 google scholar
  49. Raz, N., Rodrigue, K. M., Head, D., KennedY, K. M. ve Acker, J. D (2004). DifferentiaL aging of the mediaL temporaL Lobe: A studY of five-Year change. Neurology, 62(3), 433-438. https://doi.org/l0.1212/01.wnL.0000106466.09835.46 google scholar
  50. Robertson, S. M. ve Hopko, D. R. (2013). EmotionaL expression during autobiographicaL narratives as a function of aging: Support for the socioemotionaL selectivitY theorY. Journal of Adult Development, 20, 76-86. https://psYcnet.apa.org/doi/10.1007/s10804-013-9158-6 google scholar
  51. Sakaki, M., Raw, J. A., FindLaY, J. ve Thottam, M. (2019). Advanced aging enhances the positivitY effect in memorY: Due to cognitive controL or age-reLated decLine in emotionaL processing?. Collabra: Psychology, 5(i), 49. https://psYcnet.apa.org/doi/10.1525/coLLabra.222 google scholar
  52. Scheibe, S. ve Carstensen, L. L. (2010). EmotionaL aging: Recent findings and future trends. Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 65(2), 135-144. https://doi.org/10.1093%2Fgeronb%2Fgbp132 google scholar
  53. Stein, R., BLanchard-FieLds, F. ve Hertzog, C. (2002). The effects of age-stereotYpe primingon the memorY performance of oLder aduLts. Experimental Aging Research, 28, 169-181. https://doi.org/l0.1080/03610730252800184 google scholar
  54. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu (2021, Aralık 19). Nüfus ve konut sayım, 45866. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/BuLten/Index?p=PopuLation-and-Housing-Census-2021-45866 google scholar
  55. Zhang, W., Gross, J. ve HaYne, H. (2021). An age-reLated positivitY effect in semantic true memorY but not faLse memorY. Emotion, 21 (3), 526-535. https://doi.org/l0.1037/emo0000715 google scholar
  56. Carstensen, L. L. ve Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). Influence of HIV status and age on cognitive representations of others. Health Psychology, 17(6), 494-503. https://doi.Org/l0.1037//0278-6133.17.6.494 google scholar