SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kader / 2013 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

-

Kur'an'da İtaat Kavramı ve Peygambere İtaatin Mahiyeti

Furat AKDEMİR
Journal
Kader
Pages
425–442
Publication Date
2013-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Accordingly, our paper examines first semantic structure of this term lik e doing something voluntarily, obeying etc. and then move on scrutinizing its terminological meaning, i.e one that is related to the prophet which is most discussed one in theological context

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Two terms are directly related our subject: tav‟ o r tav‟an in the Qur‟an refers to submission while ita‟at/obey refers to following a command .
📊
Key Findings & Data:It seems this term has a doubl facets in the Qur‟an.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Accordingly, our paper examines first semantic structure of this term lik e doing something voluntarily, obeying etc. and then move on scrutinizing its terminological meaning, i.e one that is related to the prophet which is most discussed one in theological context
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Two terms are directly related our subject: tav‟ o r tav‟an in the Qur‟an refers to submission while ita‟at/obey refers to following a command . It seems this term has a doubl facets in the Qur‟an. The first face represents those who are to be obeyed lik e prophets, parents, etc. the other one represents the second face which prohibits muslims from obeying lik e atheists, pagans, etc. Accordingly, our paper examines first semantic structure of this term lik e doing something voluntarily, obeying etc. and then move on scrutinizing its terminological meaning, i.e one that is related to the prophet which is most discussed one in theological context

Özet

- The Term Itâat / obey in the Qur?an and the Nature of Obeying the Prophet - Two terms are directly related our subject: tav? or tav?an in the Qur?an refers to submission while ita?at/obey refers to following a command. It seems this term has a doubl facets in the Qur?an. The first face represents those who are to be obeyed like prophets, parents, etc. the other one represents the second face which prohibits muslims from obeying like atheists, pagans, etc. Accordingly, our paper examines first semantic structure of this term like doing something voluntarily, obeying etc. and then move on scrutinizing its terminological meaning, i.e one that is related to the prophet which is most discussed one in theological context.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKDEMİR, F. (2013). -. Kader, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 425–442. https://ajindex.com/articles/111379

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Abdulbâki, Muhammed Fuad, el- Mu‟cemu‟l-müfehres li elfazi‟l-Kur‟an, Daru‟l- Hadîs, 2. Baskı, Kahire1988. Ahmed b. Hambel, el-Müsned, İstanbul 1982,
  2. I-VI. Akbulut, Ahmet, Nübüvvet meselesi üzerine, Ankara 1992. _____, Kelam‟da vahiy, makale, İslam ve Hıristiyanlıkta Vahiy (Offenbarung in Christentum und İslam), Verlag: W.Kohlhammer, c.5,2011
  3. Stuttgart, Almanya, s.144-165.
  4. Ateş, Süleyman, Yüce Kur‟ân‟ın çağdaş tefsiri. Buhârî, Ebû Abdullah Muhammed b. İsmail, el-Camiu‟s-sahih, İstanbul 1996. el-Cessas, Ahk amul Kur‟an, Beyrut, 1993.
  5. Demirci, Muhsin, Kur‟an ve yorum, Ensar Neşriyat, 1. Baskı İst.2006 18/ Kehf,110. 5/M aide,73,75. 98/Beyyine,5. 1/Fatiha, 5. 3/Âl-i İmran,144; 48/Fetih,29; 18/Kehf,110. Develioğlu,Ferit, Osmanlıca-Türkçe lugat, Ankara 1962.
  6. Doğan, Mehmet, Büyük Türkçe sözlük, Ankara, 1982. Fîruzâbadî, Meciduddîn Muhammed b. Yakûp, Kamûsu‟l-muhît, 1375/1925.
  7. Hançerlioğlu, Orhan, İslam inançları sözlüğü, 1. Baskı İst.1984
  8. İbn Hişam, Ebû Muhammed Abdu‟l-Melik, es-Siretü‟n-nebeviyye, Thk. Mustafa es- Saka, İbrahim el Ebyârî, Abdulhafîz Şelebi, Kahire 1995.
  9. İbn Manzur, Lisanu‟l-arab 3. Baskı, Beyrut, 1993/1413. İbnu‟l-Esir, en-Nihâye fi ğarîbi‟l-hadîs ve‟l-eser, Beyrut, Tsz. İsfahanî, Ebu‟l-Kasım el-Hüseyin b. Muhammed, el-Müfredat fi ğarîbi‟l-Kur‟an, 4. Baskı, Beyrut 2005. İslâmoğlu, Mustafa, Hayat Kitabı Kur‟an Gerekçeli Meâl Tefsir, Düşün Yayıncılık, Baskı, İst.2010. Larus, el-Mu‟cemu‟l-arabiyyu‟l-esasi, Komisyon, Alesco 1989.
  10. Meydan Larouse, Büyük lugat ve ansik lopedi, İst.1971.
  11. Muhammed Ali, Mevlana, Peygamberimiz, Çev. Ömer Rıza, İstanbul, Hicri 1342. el-Muncid fi lüğati‟l-arabiyye, Komisyon, 2. Baskı Beyrut 2001. Sami,Şemseddin, Kamusu Türki,H.1317. es-Serahs‟i, Usûlu‟s-Serahsî, İstanbul 1990.
  12. T.D.K. Türk çe sözlük, Ankara 1988. Vakidî, Muhammed b. Ömer, Kitabu‟l-megazî li‟l-vakidî, Tahkik: Dr.Marsden Jones, Beyrut. 1989. ez-Zemahşeri, Keşşaf, Beyrut 1995.