SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Kader / 2013 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

-

Tanrı'nın Cüz'ilere Dair Bilgisi Tartışmasında Gazzali'ye Felsefe Cephesinden Bir Destek

Tuna TUNAGÖZ
Journal
Kader
Pages
393–424
Publication Date
2013-01-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

That opinion is only one of the comments of the philosopher influenced considerably by al- z ’ , ‘ Muslim Peripatetism

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:problem whether God knows particulars or not, essentially depends on a discussion based al- z -Avice relevant discussion in his dealing with that problem.
📊
Key Findings & Data:He completes his analysis in such a way that God knows everything, universal or particular, in his encyclopaedical work a - -Muʿ abar, in which he criticizes both Aristotle and Avicenna.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:That opinion is only one of the comments of the philosopher influenced considerably by al- z ’ , ‘ Muslim Peripatetism
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:God · divine knowledge · universals

Abstract

problem whether God knows particulars or not, essentially depends on a discussion based al- z -Avice relevant discussion in his dealing with that problem. He completes his analysis in such a way that God knows everything, universal or particular, in his encyclopaedical work a - -Muʿ abar, in which he criticizes both Aristotle and Avicenna. That opinion is only one of the comments of the philosopher influenced considerably by al- z ’ , ‘ Muslim Peripatetism

Özet

-A support to el-Ghaz?l? From the Philosophical Front on the Discussion of God's Knowledge of Particulars This study examines the opinions of the independent philosopher Abu? al-Baraka?t al-Baghda?di? on his discussion of God's Knowledge of Particulars. The problem whether God knows particulars or not, essentially depends on a discussion based al-Ghaz?l?-Avicenna. It is clear that Abu? al-Baraka?t is under the influence of the relevant discussion in his dealing with that problem. He completes his analysis in such a way that God knows everything, universal or particular, in his encyclopaedical work al-Kita?b al-Mu’tabar, in which he criticizes both Aristotle and Avicenna. That opinion is only one of the comments of the philosopher influenced considerably by al-Ghaz?l?’s theology, which is closer to Ash‘arism rather than Peripatetism.

🔖

Cite This Article

TUNAGÖZ, T. (2013). -. Kader, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 393–424. https://ajindex.com/articles/111378

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (2)

  1. Al ş, Eşref, Fahreddin er-Râzî’ İ Sînâ Yorumu ve E ş, İstanbul: İz Yayıncılık, 2009. el-Âmidî, Seyfuddîn, â ’ -merâm fî ʿı ’ -kelâm, thk. H. Ma mûd ʿAbdulla îf, Kahire: el-Meclisu’l-Aʿlâ li’ş-Şuûni’l-İslâmiyye, 1391. Aristotelês, Metafizik, çev. Ahmet Arslan, İstanbul: Sosyal Yayınlar, 1996. --------, Kategoriler, çev. Saffet Babür, Ankara: İmge itabevi, 1996. --------, Gökyüzü Üzerine, çev. Saffet Babür, Ankara: Dost Kitabevi, 1997. --------, Kitâ ’ - ûlât, çev. İs â b. uneyn, ı û içerisinde, nşr. ʿAbdurra mân Bedevî, I-II, Kuveyt: Vekâletu’l-Ma bû’ât, 1978. --------, â ’ -lâm min kitâbi mâbaʿ îʿ û, çev. İs â b. uneyn, û ʿı -’Arab içerisinde, nşr. ʿAbdurra mân Bedevî, Kuveyt: Vekâletu’l-Ma bû’ât, 1978. l-B âdî, Ebû'l-Berakât, el-Kitâ ’ -muʿteber fî’ - ı ’ -ilâhiyye, nşr., Suleym n en-Nedv, Şerafettin Yaltkaya, I-III, Lübnan: Dâru ve Mektebetu Bibylon, 2007. --------, Kitâ î ’ - î mâ ’ -ʿ, nşr. A med e - ayyib, Annales Islamologiques içerisinde, Kahire 1980, c. XVI, s. 127-147. el-Curcânî, es-Seyyid eş-Şerîf, Ş ’ -mevâ ı ve meʿahû âş â esSeyâlkûtî ’ -Çelebî ʿalâ ş ’ -mevâ ı, thk. Ma mûd ʿUmer ed-Dimyâ î, I-VIII, Beyrut: Dâru’l- utubi’l-ʿIlmiyye, 1998. Ebû Rayyân, Mu ammed ʿAlî, “Na du Ebî’l-Berakât el-Ba dâdî li felsefeti İbn Sînâ”, ’ -Âdâb, Câmiʿatu’l-İskenderiyye, İskenderiye 1 5, c. XII, s. 19–46. --------, “Ebû’l-Berakât el-Ba dâdî”, Mevsûʿ ’ - â ’ -İ âmiyye, Amman 1993, c. I, s. 42-45. --------, Târî ’ - ’ -felsefî fî’ -İ âm, İskenderiye: Dâru’l-Maʿrifeti’lCâmiʿıyye, 1990. el-Fârâbî, Ebû Na r, Kitâ ’l-cemʿ beyne raʾ ’ - îmeyn, -S ’ - ı î baʿ ’ -risâlâ ’ -Fârâbiyye içerisinde, nşr. Friedrich Dieterici, Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1890. el- zzâlî, Ebû âmid, Kitâ ’ - ı ’ - âl, Mecmû’atu rasâ ’ - imâ - zzâlî içerisinde, thk. İbrâhîm Emîn Mu ammed, Kahire: el-Mektebetu’tTevfî ıyye, t.y. --------, Tehâ ’ -felâsife, thk. Suleymân Dunyâ, Kahire: Dâru’l-Ma’ârif, t.y. İbn M n ûr, Cemâluddîn, Lisâ ’ -ʿArab, I-XV, Beyrut: Dâru âdır, t.y. İbn Sînâ, Ebû ‘Alî, ş-Ş âʾ: el-İ âhiyyât, II, thk. Yûsuf Mûsâ, Suleymân Dunyâ, Sa’îd Zâyid, Kahire: Vezâretu’s-Se âfe ve’l-İrşâdi’l- avmî, 1960. --------, Kitâ ’ -necât fî’ - ı ’ - ı ı ’ - îʿı ’ -ilâhiyye, thk. Mâcid Fahrî, Beyrut: Dâru’l-Âfâ i’l-Cedîde, t.y. --------, Ş â ’ -lâm, û ʿı ’ -ʿArab içerisinde, nşr. ʿAbdurra mân Bedevî, Kuveyt: Vekâletu’l-Ma bû’ât, 1978. --------, er-Risâ ’ -ʿ ş, thk. İbrâhîm Hilâl, Mecelletu Maʿ ’ - M û â ’ -ʿArabiyye içerisinde, 1980, cilt: XXVI, sayı: 1, s. 65-106.
  2. İbn T ymiyy, Ta ıyyuddîn, D ʾ ʿâ