Journals / Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1

A STUDY ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN MANAGEMENT PROCESSES AND SUPERVISION PRACTICES IN EDUCATION

EĞİTİMDE YÖNETİM SÜREÇLERİ VE DENETİM UYGULAMALARI ARASINDAKİ ETKİLEŞİME İLİŞKİN BİR ÇALIŞMA

Münir Şahin(Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa Üniversitesi)0000-0001-5722-496X
Pages
89–108
Publication Date
2026-06-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In conclusion, sustainable and effective educational management can only be achieved through a supervision approach that is developmental, guidance-oriented, and fully integrated with management processes.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between management and supervision based on theoretical approaches and findings from the literature, and to reveal the integrated structure of these two processes in educational organizations.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Management is discussed through the functions of planning, organizing, directing, coordinating, and controlling, while supervision is evaluated as a strategic mechanism that ensures continuity and effectiveness within the management process.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In conclusion, sustainable and effective educational management can only be achieved through a supervision approach that is developmental, guidance-oriented, and fully integrated with management processes.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yönetim · Denetim · Eğitim Yönetimi

Abstract

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between management and supervision based on theoretical approaches and findings from the literature, and to reveal the integrated structure of these two processes in educational organizations. The study adopts a qualitative design based on a systematic literature review. Management is discussed through the functions of planning, organizing, directing, coordinating, and controlling, while supervision is evaluated as a strategic mechanism that ensures continuity and effectiveness within the management process. The findings of the literature indicate that control-oriented supervision reduces management effectiveness, whereas guidance-based and developmental supervision significantly enhances instructional leadership, teacher commitment, and school performance. The relationship between management and supervision is not linear but cyclical and interactive. In the context of educational organizations, supervision emerges as a managerial tool that improves teaching processes, supports organizational learning, and transforms school culture. Supervision should therefore be considered not merely as a control mechanism but as a developmental process that strengthens management quality. In conclusion, sustainable and effective educational management can only be achieved through a supervision approach that is developmental, guidance-oriented, and fully integrated with management processes.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, yönetim ile denetim arasındaki ilişkiyi kuramsal yaklaşımlar ve literatür bulguları doğrultusunda incelemek ve bu iki sürecin eğitim örgütleri bağlamındaki bütüncül yapısını ortaya koymaktır. Çalışma, literatür taramasına dayalı nitel bir araştırma niteliği taşımaktadır. Yönetim süreci; planlama, örgütleme, yöneltme, koordinasyon ve kontrol işlevleri çerçevesinde ele alınmış, denetim ise bu sürecin tamamlayıcısı ve sürekliliğini sağlayan stratejik bir mekanizma olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Literatür bulguları, denetimin yalnızca kontrol odaklı yürütüldüğü durumlarda yönetim etkililiğinin azaldığını; buna karşılık rehberlik temelli ve gelişim odaklı denetim anlayışının öğretim liderliğini, öğretmen bağlılığını ve okul performansını anlamlı biçimde artırdığını göstermektedir. Yönetim ile denetim arasındaki ilişkinin doğrusal değil, döngüsel ve karşılıklı etkileşim içinde olduğu belirlenmiştir. Eğitim örgütleri bağlamında denetim, öğretim süreçlerini geliştiren, örgütsel öğrenmeyi destekleyen ve okul kültürünü dönüştüren bir yönetim aracı olarak öne çıkmaktadır. Sonuç olarak etkili bir eğitim yönetiminin, ancak gelişim odaklı ve yönetimle bütünleşmiş bir denetim anlayışıyla sürdürülebilir hale gelebileceği sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Şahin, M. (2026). A STUDY ON THE INTERACTION BETWEEN MANAGEMENT PROCESSES AND SUPERVISION PRACTICES IN EDUCATION. Beykent Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 89–108. https://doi.org/10.18221/bujss.1891545

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Aydın, İ. (2014). Eğitim ve öğretimde denetim: Durum saptama, değerlendirme ve geliştirme. Pegem Akademi.
  2. Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy, and practice. South African Journal of Education, 27(3), 391–406.
  3. Bush, T. and Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553–571.
  4. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2014.928680
  5. Ehren, M. C. M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., and O’Hara, J. (2013). Impact of school inspections on improvement of schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 24(2), 252–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-012-9156-4
  6. Ehren, M. C. M. and Visscher, A. J. (2006). Towards a theory on the impact of school inspections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 51–72.
  7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00333.x
  8. Fayol, H. (1916). Administration industrielle et générale. Dunod.
  9. Fullan, M. (2007). The new meaning of educational change (4th ed.). Teachers College Press.
  10. Glickman, C. D., Gordon, S. P., and Ross-Gordon, J. M. (2014). SuperVision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (9th ed.). Pearson.
  11. Hallinger, P. and Heck, R. H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 21(2), 95–122.
  12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632431003663214
  13. Hoy, W. K. and Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  14. Karaca, M. F. and Şahin, M. (2024). Readability Of Higher Education Institutions Exam Basic Proficiency Test Turkish Questions. Dil Eğitimi Ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(2), 662-683. https://doi.org/10.31464/jlere.1530086.
  15. Koontz, H. and Weihrich, H. (2010). Essentials of management: An international perspective (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  16. Korkmaz, C. and Şahin, M. (2019). Liselere kayıt sistemine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(4), 9-20.
  17. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., and Hopkins, D. (2008). Seven strong claims about successful school leadership. School Leadership & Management, 28(1), 27–42.
  18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632430701800060
  19. Marzano, R. J., Waters, T., and McNulty, B. A. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. ASCD.
  20. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations. Prentice Hall.
  21. Robbins, S. P. and Coulter, M. (2018). Management (14th ed.). Pearson.
  22. Robinson, V. M. J., Lloyd, C. A., and Rowe, K. J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: An analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
  23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X08321509
  24. Sergiovanni, T. J. and Starratt, R. J. (2007). Supervision: A redefinition (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  25. Şahin, M. (2023). Okullarda örgüt kültürü. Örgütsel Davranış Çalışmaları Dergisi 3 (1), 73-90
  26. Şahin, M. and Şahin, T. (2024). Eğitimde Damgalama. UMAY Sanat ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 2 (1), 5-20.
  27. Şahin, M. (2025). Eğitim yönetiminde dijital liderlik. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 9(16), 129-154. https://doi.org/10.56677/mkuefder.1756295