SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Öneri Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 20 Sayı: MX Yaratıcı Endüstriler Çalıştayı 2024: Yapay Zeka Çağında Yaratıcı Endüstriler Özel Sayısı Özel Sayı

Creative Culture Industries, Artificial Intelligence and Society

Yaratıcı Kültür Endüstrileri, Yapay Zeka ve Toplum

Mehmet Fatih Aysan(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8311-8551
Şevki Işıklı(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8075-9177
M. Fuat Kına(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-1230-2511
Ezgi Şen Atiker(ÜSKÜDAR ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-2886-7098
Merve Taşcıoğulları(MARMARA UNIVERSITY)0009-0008-3209-9515
Ayla Torun(İstanbul Atlas Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1675-6366
Yunus Uğur(MARMARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4478-3441
Pages
189–218
Publication Date
2025-04-24
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This challenging process is only possible with responsible AI.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the transformative impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) on creative cultural industries and society.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The growing share of creative industries in the global economy, their employment potential, and the economic and social impacts of human-AI collaboration in creative processes are examined, with a particular focus on development strategies specific to Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This challenging process is only possible with responsible AI.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yaratıcı kültür endüstrileri · Yapay zeka · Dijital dönüşüm

Abstract

This article provides a comprehensive analysis of the transformative impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) on creative cultural industries and society. Beginning with the historical development of the concept of cultural industries, this article examine the definitions and classifications of creative industries, specifically evaluating the role of AI in these industries within the context of digital transformation. It highlights AI’s potential to enhance inclusivity in creative processes and create new opportunities, while also discussing challenges such as data privacy, intellectual property rights, and algorithmic bias. The growing share of creative industries in the global economy, their employment potential, and the economic and social impacts of human-AI collaboration in creative processes are examined, with a particular focus on development strategies specific to Turkey. The study evaluates AI’s contributions to the creative economy and potential future developments, offering recommendations for the sustainable growth of creative cultural industries. While AI becomes more involved in creative research, the features of models that are sensitive to cultural differences are very important. Considering the relationship between creativity and AI is constantly evolving, the basic policy of AI should be revised on a daily basis. This challenging process is only possible with responsible AI.

Özet

Bu makale, yapay zekanın (YZ) yaratıcı kültür endüstrileri ve toplum üzerindeki dönüştürücü etkilerini analiz etmektedir. Kültür endüstrisi kavramının tarihsel gelişimi ile başlayan makalede, yaratıcı endüstri kavramına ilişkin tanımlamalar ve sınıflandırmalar ele alınmakta ve dijital dönüşüm sürecinde özellikle YZ’nin yaratıcı endüstrilerdeki rolü değerlendirilmektedir. YZ’nin yaratıcı süreçlerde kapsayıcılığı artırma ve yeni fırsatlar oluşturma potansiyeli vurgulanmakta; aynı zamanda veri gizliliği, fikri mülkiyet hakları ve algoritmik önyargı gibi zorluklar tartışılmaktadır. Yaratıcı endüstrilerin küresel ekonomi içinde büyüyen payı, istihdam potansiyeli, yaratıcı süreçlerde insan ve YZ işbirliğinin ekonomik ve sosyal kalkınmaya etkileri ve Türkiye özelinde gelişim stratejileri bu çalışmada ele alınmaktadır. Makale ayrıca YZ’nin yaratıcı ekonomiye katkılarını ve sektördeki muhtemel gelişmeleri değerlendirerek, yaratıcı kültür endüstrilerinin sürdürülebilir büyümesine dair öneriler sunmaktadır. YZ yaratıcı arayışlara daha fazla dahil edilirken kültürel farklılıklara duyarlı modeller üretilmesi oldukça önemlidir. Yaratıcılık ve YZ arasındaki ilişki sürekli gelişirken YZ’nin temel ilkeleri günün ihtiyaçlarına uygun olarak revize edilmelidir. Bu meydan okuyucu süreç ise ancak sorumlu YZ ile mümkündür.

🔖

Cite This Article

Aysan, M. F., Işıklı, Ş., Kına, M. F., Atiker, E. Ş., Taşcıoğulları, M., Torun, A., Uğur, Y. (2025). Creative Culture Industries, Artificial Intelligence and Society. Öneri Dergisi, Cilt: 20 Sayı: MX Yaratıcı Endüstriler Çalıştayı 2024: Yapay Zeka Çağında Yaratıcı Endüstriler Özel Sayısı Özel Sayı, 189–218. https://doi.org/10.14783/maruoneri.1542956

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (75)

  1. ADBI. (2022). CREATIVE ECONOMY 2030: Imagining and Delivering a Robust, Creative, Inclusive, and Sustainable Recovery. Asian Development Bank Institute.
  2. Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1944). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. Enlighment as Mass Deception. https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/adorno/1944/culture-industry.htm
  3. Adorno, T. (1991). The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture. London: Routledge.
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. S. Cummings (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  5. Amato, G., & Behrmann, M., vd. (2019). AI in the media and creative industries. [Research Report]. New European Media (NEM), 1-35.
  6. Arches, https://www.archesproject.org.
  7. Binsted, K. (1996). Machine humour: an implemented model of puns (Published PhD thesis). Edinburgh University.
  8. Boden, M. (1998). Creativity and Artificial Intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 1(103), 347-356.
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press. Buchanan, B. G. (2005). A (very) brief history of artificial intelligence. Ai Magazine, 26(4), 53-53.
  10. Cao, Y., Li, S., Liu, Y., Yan, Z., Dai, Y., Yu, P. S., & Sun, L. (2023). A comprehensive survey of ai-generated content (aigc): A history of generative ai from gan to chatgpt. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04226.
  11. Caramioux, B., Lotte, F., Geurts, J., Amato, G., Behrmann, M., Bimbot, F., & Gravier, G. (2019). AI in the media and creative industries. HAL Open Science.
  12. CreaPost. (2024). OpenAI’s Sora ushers in a new wave of AI-driven filmmaking with “Air Head” https://tbmag.co.uk/2024/03/openais-sora-ushers-in-a-new-wave-of-ai-driven-filmmaking-with-air-head/
  13. Crevier, D. (1993). AI: The Tumultuous History of the Search for Artificial Intelligence. Basic Books.
  14. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.
  15. DCMS. (1998). Creative Industries Mapping Document 1998. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-mapping-documents-1998
  16. DCMS. (2001). Creative Industries Mapping Document 2001 (2nd ed.). London, UK: Department of Culture, Media and Sport.
  17. DCMS. (2023). Creative Industries Sector Vision: A joint plan to drive growth, build talent and develop skills. Retrieved June 28, 2024, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-sector-vision/creative-industries-sector-vision-a-joint-plan-to-drive-growth-build-talent-and-develop-skills
  18. Demir, E. (2022). On the Current Situation of Creative Industries in Turkey. Etkileşim.
  19. Deng, L. (2018). Artificial intelligence in the rising wave of deep learning: The historical path and future outlook. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 35(1), 180-177.
  20. Deloitte. (2021). The Future of the Creative Economy. Deloitte.
  21. European Commission. (2021). European Commission Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs. Retrieved May 13, 2024, from https://single-market-economy.ec.europa.eu/sectors/cultural-and-creative-industries_en
  22. Flew, T. (2017). Cultural and Creative Industries. In Oxford Bibliographies. Retrieved May 12, 2024, from https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/display/document/obo-9780199756841/obo-9780199756841-0188.xml. DOI: 10.1093/OBO/9780199756841-0188
  23. Foster, M. D., & Gilman, L. (Eds). (2015). UNESCO on the Ground: Local Perspectives on Intangible Cultural Heritage. Indiana: Indiana University Press.
  24. Gondola, J. (2024, April 9). AI, ethics, and the preservation of cultural heritage. Retrieved May 25, 2024, from https://medium.com/@jamesgondola/ai-ethics-and-the-preservation-of-cultural-heritage-e872f5f34a6c
  25. Guilford, J.P. (1950) Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
  26. Gruber, H. E. & Wallace, D. (Ed.). (1999). The case study method and evolving systems approach for understanding unique creative people at work. Handbook of Creativity New York: Cambridge University Press.
  27. Hall, S. (1980). Encoding and Decoding in the Television Discourse. In S. Hall, D. Hobson, A. Lowe, & P. Willis (Eds.), Culture, Media, Language (pp. 128-138). Hutchinson.
  28. Heikkilä, M. (2023). These new tools let you see for yourself how biased AI image models are. Retrieved May 25, 2024, from https://www.technologyreview.com/2023/03/22/1070167/these-news-tool-let-you-see-for-yourself-how-biased-ai-image-models-are/
  29. HMB. (2024). Proje Hakkında. 1Milyonİstihdam - T.C. Hazine ve Maliye Bakanlığı. Retrieved from https://1milyonistihdam.hmb.gov.tr/proje-hakkinda
  30. Hoggart, R. (1957). The Uses of Literacy. Penguin Books.
  31. Howkins, J. (2001). The Creative Economy: How People Make Money from Ideas. The Penguin Press: London.
  32. Hubert, K. F., Awa, K. N., & Zabelina, D. L. (2024). The current state of artificial intelligence generative language models is more creative than humans on divergent thinking tasks. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-53303-w
  33. Hürriyetoğlu, A., Mutlu, O., Yörük, E., Liza, F. F., Kumar, R., & Ratan, S. (2021a). Multilingual protest news detection-shared task 1, case 2021. In Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Challenges and Applications of Automated Extraction of Socio-political Events from Text (CASE 2021) (pp. 79-91).
  34. Hürriyetoğlu, A., Yörük, E., Mutlu, O., Duruşan, F., Yoltar, Ç., Yüret, D., & Gürel, B. (2021b). Cross-context news corpus for protest event-related knowledge base construction. Data Intelligence, 3(2), 308-335. IDB. (2017). Future Landscapes of the Orange Economy: Creative Pathways for Improving Lives in Latin America and the Caribbean. Inter-American Development Bank.
  35. Karterouli, K., & Batsaki, Y. (2021). AI and cultural heritage image collections: Opportunities and challenges. EVA. https://doi.org/10.14236/ewic/EVA2021.33
  36. Kerog, B. (2023). The Influence of Cultural Diversity on AI Ethics: A Global Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Open Publication and Exploration, 11(2), 25-30.
  37. Kulesz, O. (2018). Culture, platforms and machines: The impact of artificial intelligence on the diversity of cultural expressions”. (UNESCO DCE/18/12.IGC/INF.4).
  38. Küçük, Ö. (2016). Popüler kültür: Belirli bir toplumda geniş kitleler tarafından benimsenen ve tüketilen kültürel ürünlerin yansıması. Kültür ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 123-135.
  39. Lazzeretti, L., Capone, F., & Seçilmiş, E. (2014). Türkiye’de Yaratıcı ve Kültürel Sektörlerin Yapısı. Maliye Dergisi, 196.
  40. Lin, Y., Guo, J., Chen, Y., Yao, C., & Ying, F. (2020). It is your turn: Collaborative ideation with a co-creative robot through sketch. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376258
  41. Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308.
  42. Marcinkowski, J. (2024, May 21). A Strategic Shift to Collaborative AI for Cultural Heritage. Retrieved May 25, 2024, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/strategic-shift-collaborative-ai-cultural-heritage-marcinkowski-mzlxf/
  43. Mayer, V. (2018). Cultural and Creative Industries. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.552
  44. Moore, M., & Tambini, D. (2018). Digital dominance: the power of Google, Amazon, Facebook, and Apple. Oxford University Press.
  45. O’Connor, J. (2010). Creativity, Culture and Education. Art Council England. ISBN 978-1-907264-05-4. https://www.creativitycultureeducation.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/CCE-lit-review-creative-cultural-industries-257.pdf
  46. Oksasen, A., Cvetkovic, A., Akin, N., Latikka, R., Bergdahl, J., Chen, Y., & Savela, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in fine arts: A systematic review of empirical research. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans. Our World in Data. (2023). Technological Change.
  47. Pansoni, S. vd. (2023). Artificial Intelligence and Cultural Heritage: Design and Assestment of an Ethical Framework. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLVIII-M-2-2023,1149–1155, https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-M-2-2023-1149-2023.
  48. Pasikowska-Schnass, M., & Lim, Y. S. (2023). Artificial intelligence in the context of cultural heritage and museums: Complex challenges and new opportunities. EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service, PE 747.120. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document/EPRS_BRI(2023)747120
  49. Reinsel, D., Gantz, J., & Rydning, J. (2018). The digitization of the world from edge to core report. (IDC White Paper – #US44413318). https://www.seagate.com/files/www-content/our-story/trends/files/idc-seagate-dataage-whitepaper.pdf
  50. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42, 305-311.
  51. SBB. (2019). ON BİRİNCİ KALKINMA PLANI (2019-2023). Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı.
  52. SBB. (2024). ON İKİNCİ KALKINMA PLANI (2024-2028). Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı.
  53. Storey, J. (2009). Cultural Theory and Popular Culture: An Introduction. Pearson.
  54. Sundarababu, V. (2024). A solution to DALL·E 2’s AI bias problem. Retrieved May 25, 2024, from https://centific.com/solution-dalle-2s-ai-bias-problem
  55. Şen, E. (2022). Yapay Zekâ Ve Yaratıcılık İlişkisinde Karakter Tasarımları (Published proficiency in art thesis). Anadolu University.
  56. Şen Atiker, E. (2024). Güzel Sanatlar Ekseninde Sorumlu Yapay Zekâ: Potansiyel Riskler ve Etik Boyutlar. Reflektif Dergisi, 5(1), 129-137.
  57. The Guardian. (2023). How Hollywood writers triumphed over AI – and why it matters. Retrieved October 1, 2023, from https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2023/oct/01/hollywood-writers-strike-artificial-intelligence
  58. The London Industrial Strategy. (1985). Londra Sanayi Stratejisi-Kültür Endüstrileri Greater London Council. London: GLC.
  59. Torun, A. (2015). Walter Benjamin Sanat Eserinin Aurası ve Yeni Medya Sanatı. International Multilingual Academic Journal, Vol. 2, No 1, May 2015.
  60. Torun, A. (2021). Sinemada veya Netflix'te Dijital İzleme Ortamları ve Yeni Alışkanlıklar. Bir Sosyal Ortam Olarak Sinema ve Film İzleme Pratiklerindeki Dijital Dönüşüm. SineFilozofi, Özel Sayı(3) 2021, 370-387. https://doi.org/10.31122/sinefilozofi.871301
  61. Todd, S., & Latham, W. (1992). Conventional Art and Computers. London: Academic Press.
  62. Toosi, A., Bottino, A. G., Saboury, B., Siegel, E., & Rahmim, A. (2021). A brief history of AI: how to prevent another winter (a critical review). PET clinics, 16(4), 449-469.
  63. Toumi, K., Girandola, F., & Bonnardel, N. (2021). Technologies for supporting creativity in design: A view of physical and virtual environments with regard to cognitive and social processes. Creativity: Theories Research Applications, 8, 189-212. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-0012
  64. UNCTAD. (2022a). Creative Economy Outlook 2022. New York: United Nations Publications.
  65. UNCTAD. (2022b). Creative Industry 4.0: Towards a new globalized creative economy. Retrieved May 14, 2024, from https://unctad.org/webflyer/creative-industry-40-towards-new-globalized-creative-economy
  66. UNESCO. (2015). Cultural Times: The First Global Map of Cultural and Creative Industries. Retrieved May 10, 2024, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235710
  67. UNESCO. (2021). Recommendation on the Ethics of Artificial Intelligence. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000381137
  68. Uğur, Y. (2023). Kültürel Miras Örneğinde Dijital Beşeri Bilimler ve Dijital Osmanlı Çalışmaları. In Uğur, Y. (Ed.), Dijital Beşeri Bilimler ve Osmanlı Çalışmaları (pp. 27-43). İstanbul: Vakıfbank Yayınları.
  69. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.
  70. Williams, R. (1958). Culture and Society: 1780-1950. Columbia University Press.
  71. WIPO. (2017). How to Make a Living in the Creative Industries. World Intellectual Property Organization. Retrieved May 10, 2024, from https://www.wipo.int/publications/en/details.jsp?id=4166
  72. YEKON. (2023a). Yaratıcı Endüstriler İstanbul Strateji Raporu. İstanbul Yaratıcı Endüstriler Merkezi.
  73. YEKON. (2023b). İstanbul Yaratıcı Endüstriler Araştırması Sonuç Raporu. İstanbul Yaratıcı Endüstriler Merkezi.
  74. Yörük, E., Atsızelti, Ş., Kına, M. F., Duruşan, F., Gürerk, O., Yardı, M. C., Hürriyetoğlu, A., Mutlu, O., Etgü, T., Koyuncu, M., & Topçu, I. (2024). A Computational Analysis of Ideologies, Emotions, and Support for Presidential Candidates in Turkey. Developing Economies, 63(1), 97-125
  75. SBB. (2019). ON BİRİNCİ KALKINMA PLANI (2019-2023). Ankara: Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı.