Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

Format and Ideology on “Management‐ Organization” Textbooks

“Yönetim‐Organizasyon” Ders Kitaplarında Biçim ve İdeoloji

Pages
239–258
Publication Date
2009-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also found out that their formats are so poor that some academic norms and codes urgently needed to be developed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is twofold: first, to scrutinize the formats readability, contents, literature usage of the selected “management‐ organization” textbooks and second, to explore the ideology extrinsically or intrinsically inherited within those textbooks by examining the language they apply in two selected topics, Empowerment and Downsizing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:By examining the language they use, it is found out that all the textbooks are under the influence of liberal‐ capitalist ideology and discourse and neglect alternative approaches to” management‐ organization” subject matter.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also found out that their formats are so poor that some academic norms and codes urgently needed to be developed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Biçim · ideoloji · yönetim‐ organizasyon ders kitapları.

Abstract

The aim of this study is twofold: first, to scrutinize the formats readability, contents, literature usage of the selected “management‐ organization” textbooks and second, to explore the ideology extrinsically or intrinsically inherited within those textbooks by examining the language they apply in two selected topics, Empowerment and Downsizing. By examining the language they use, it is found out that all the textbooks are under the influence of liberal‐ capitalist ideology and discourse and neglect alternative approaches to” management‐ organization” subject matter. It is also found out that their formats are so poor that some academic norms and codes urgently needed to be developed.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın başlıca iki amacı vardır. Birincisi, seçilmiş “yönetim‐organizasyon” ders kitapları‐ nın biçimlerinin okunabilirlik, içerik, literatür kullanımı mercek altına alınmasıdır. İkincisi ise, seçilen iki konuda ‐güçlendirme ve küçülme‐ kullandıkları dilden hareketle bu ders kitapların‐ da açık veya örtülü olarak sinmiş ideolojiyi açığa çıkarmaktır. Kullandıkları dilin incelenmesi sonucunda bütün kitapların liberal‐kapitalist ideolojinin ve söylemin etkisi altında oldukları ve yönetim‐organizasyon alanındaki alternatif görüşleri ihmal ettikleri ortaya konmuştur. Yine görülmüştür ki bu kitapların biçimlerinde önemli eksiklikler vardır ve bu alanda acilen bazı aka‐ demik norm ve gayrı resmi düzenlemelerin geliştirilmesi gerekmektedir

🔖

Cite This Article

COŞKUN, R. (2009). Format and Ideology on “Management‐ Organization” Textbooks. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 239–258. https://ajindex.com/articles/109756

References (10)

  1. Akat, İ., G. Budak ve G. Budak (1994),
  2. İşletme Yönetimi, İstanbul:
  3. Beta. Alred, G. J. ve E. A Thelen (1993), “Are Textbooks Contributions to Scholarship?” College Composition and Communication, 44(4), 466‐477. Barnard, C. (2003),
  4. Language, Ideology and Japanese History Textbooks, Routledge: Curzon. Bayraktaroğlu, S. (2006), İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi (2. baskı), Sakarya: Sakarya Yayıncılık. Boskin, M. J. (1988), “Observations on the Use of Textbooks in the Teaching of Principles of Economics”, The Journal of Economic Education, 19(2), 157‐164. Bowen, D. D. (1980), “Experiential and Traditional Teaching of OB: A Dubious Distinction”, Exchange: The Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, 5(3), 7‐12. Bowman, J. S., E. M. Berman ve J. P. West (2001), “The Profession of Public Administration: An Ethics Edge in Introductory Textbooks?”, Public Administration Review, 61(2), 194‐205. Can, H. (2005),
  5. Organizasyon ve Yönetim, Ankara:
  6. Siyasal Kitabevi.
  7. Desler, G. (2001), Management (2. ed), Prentice Hall. Dick, P. (2004), “Discourse Analysis”, (içinde) Cassel, C. Ve Symon, G. (derleyenler) Essential Guide to Qualitative Methods in Organizational Research, Sage Publications. Dilley, M. B. (1967), “Textbooks Used in Accounting Courses”, The Accounting Review, 42(4), 800‐802. Downs, A. (1995), Corporate Executions: The Ugly Truth About Layoffs‐How Corporate Greed is Shattering Lives, Companies, and Communities, CIP. Efil, İ. (2006),
  8. İşletmelerde Yönetim ve Organizasyon, İstanbul: Alfa Aktüel Yayınla‐ rı. Eren, E. (2003), Yönetim ve Organizasyon (Çağdaş ve Küresel Yaklaşımlar), İstan‐ bul: Beta. Fairclough, N. (1992),
  9. Discourse and Social Change, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  10. Genç, N. (2004), Yönetim ve Organizasyon‐Çağdaş Sistemler ve Yaklaşımlar, Anka‐ ra: Seçkin. Gilbert, D. R. (2003), “Propaganda, Trusteeship, and Artifact: Locating a New Place for the Management Textbook”, Journal of Management Education, 27, 730‐733. Graham, F. C. (1988), “Some Observations on Sociology Textbooks: An Editorial Perspective”, Teaching Sociology, 16(4), 356‐365. Hill, R. (2000), “The Case of the Missing Organizations: Co‐Operatives and the Textbooks”, The Journal of Economic Education, 31(3), 281‐295. Kent, C. A. (1989), “The Treatment of Entrepreneurship in Principles of Economics Textbooks”, The Journal of Economic Education, (20)2, 153‐164. Kent, C. A. ve Rushing, F.W. (1999), “Coverage of Entrepreneurship in Principles of Economics Textbooks: An Update”, The Journal of Economic Educa