Journals / Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 10 Sayı: 14

Relations of Political Parties and Forestry based on 2007 General Election Declarations

2007 Genel Seçim Bildirgeleri Çerçevesinde Siyasi Partiler ve Ormancılık İlişkileri

Pages
33–42
Publication Date
2008-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The study shows that Turkish political parties do not consider forestry in their declarations, and their opinions about forestry are not based on consistent politics.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In terms of participation in forestry, political parties are one of the important stakeholders.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This study examines the election declarations published by 14 different parties joined the election of 22nd June 2007.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The study shows that Turkish political parties do not consider forestry in their declarations, and their opinions about forestry are not based on consistent politics.
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Siyasal partiler · Ormancılık politikası · Orman-toplum ilişkileri

Abstract

In terms of participation in forestry, political parties are one of the important stakeholders. While forestry policy is formed in Turkey, political parties, particularly the parties in power, have important effects on it. Approaching ofpolitical parties to forestry can be learned from declarations published by them before elections. Election declaration is an important source to evaluate the similarities and differences between opinions of different parties about forestry. This study examines the election declarations published by 14 different parties joined the election of 22nd June 2007. The findings are analyzed and evaluated under eight different headlines. Moreover, the declarations of top three parties (AKP, CHP and MHP) are compared with previous declarations published in 2002 elections. The study shows that Turkish political parties do not consider forestry in their declarations, and their opinions about forestry are not based on consistent politics.

Özet

Siyasi partiler, ormancılıkta katılımın önemli ilgi gruplarından biridir. Türkiye’de ormancılık politikasının

🔖

Cite This Article

Atmiş, E. (2008). Relations of Political Parties and Forestry based on 2007 General Election Declarations. Bartın Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 14, 33–42. https://ajindex.com/articles/1095462

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. o Akyıldız, S. 2004. Sorex (Mammalia:Insectivora)’in Bazı Lokalitelerdeki Taksonomisi, Yükseklisans, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
  2. o Anonim 1941. Traps for Grey Squirrels, Forestry Commission, London.
  3. o Anonim 1971. Wildlife Management Techniques, The Wildlife Society, Edwards Brothers, USA.
  4. o Anonim 1998a. Species Inventory Fundamentals, Ministry of Environment, Lands ands Parks Resources Inventory Branch for the Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force Resources Inventory Committe, Canada, 0- 7726-3691-5.
  5. o Anonim 1998b. Ground-based Inventory Methods for Selected Ungulates: Moose, Elk and Deer, Ministry of Environment, Lands ands Parks Resources Inventory Branch for the Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force Resources Inventory Committe, Canada, 0-7726-3475-0.
  6. o Anonim 1998c. Inventory Methods for Bats, Ministry of Environment, Lands and Parks Resources Inventory Branch for the Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force Resources Inventory Committe, Canada, 0- 7726-3471-8.
  7. o Anonim 1999. Inventory Methods for Medium-sized Territorial Carnivores: Coyote, Red Fox, Lynx, Bobcat, Wolverine, Fisher and Badger, Ministry of Environment, Lands ands Parks Resources Inventory Branch for the Terrestrial Ecosystems Task Force Resources Inventory Committe, Canada, 0-7726-3933-7.
  8. o Anonim 2002. Biodiversity Research Methods, Melbourne by McPherson’s Group, Maryborough, Victoria, 1-87684-377-2.