SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2

Proposal for Balanced Scorecard for Agricultural Credit Cooperatives in Turkey

Türkiye Tarım Kredi Kooperatifleri için Kurumsal Performans Karnesi Önerisi

Abdulkadir Fasal(Sakarya Üniversitesi İşletme Enstitüsü)0000-0002-6997-3236
Özlem Balaban(Sakarya Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi)0000-0001-6830-5052
Pages
277–290
Publication Date
2019-08-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

At the end of the study, that the financial and common aspects are in the foreground in agricultural cooperatives, learning and development aspects are background was stated and solution suggestions were developed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the purpose was to create an Institutional Performance Report based on multidimensional measurement and evaluation system, which will increase the institutional performances of cooperatives, which are important for agricultural sector, which will contribute to the decision-making processes of managers, and which will be adapted to the structures of cooperatives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The questionnaire that was used to obtain the study data in the scope of the study was created as a result of a 9-week effort with a 5-people workgroup of managers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:At the end of the study, that the financial and common aspects are in the foreground in agricultural cooperatives, learning and development aspects are background was stated and solution suggestions were developed.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tarımsal Kooperatif · Kurumsal Performans Karnesi · Türkiye Tarım Kredi Kooperatifleri

Abstract

In this study, the purpose was to create an Institutional Performance Report based on multidimensional measurement and evaluation system, which will increase the institutional performances of cooperatives, which are important for agricultural sector, which will contribute to the decision-making processes of managers, and which will be adapted to the structures of cooperatives. The questionnaire that was used to obtain the study data in the scope of the study was created as a result of a 9-week effort with a 5-people workgroup of managers. The questionnaire was sent to 140 managers who worked at Central Union of Agricultural Credit Cooperatives and 17 Regional Units. A total of 105 questionnaires were returned by the managers. At the end of the study, that the financial and common aspects are in the foreground in agricultural cooperatives, learning and development aspects are background was stated and solution suggestions were developed.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, ülkemiz tarım sektörü açısından önemli konumda bulunan kooperatiflerin kurumsal performanslarında artış sağlayacak, yöneticiler için karar verme süreçlerine katkıda bulunacak ve kooperatiflerin kendi yapılarına uyarlayarak kullanabilecekleri çok boyutlu ölçme ve değerlendirme sistemini baz alan kurumsal performans karnesi oluşturulması amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma kapsamında verilerin elde edilmesinde kullanılan anket formu yöneticilerden oluşan 5 kişilik bir çalışma grubu ile yapılan 9 haftalık çalışmalar sonucu oluşturulmuştur. Sonrasında anket formu Tarım Kredi Kooperatifleri Merkez Birliği ve 17 Bölge Birliğinde çalışan 140 yöneticiye gönderilmiştir. Yöneticiler tarafından 105 ankete geri dönüş yapılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda tarımsal kooperatiflerde finansal ve ortak boyutunun ön planda olduğu, öğrenme ve gelişme boyutunun arka planda kaldığı tespit edilerek, konuya yönelik çözüm önerileri geliştirilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Fasal, A., Balaban, Ö. (2019). Proposal for Balanced Scorecard for Agricultural Credit Cooperatives in Turkey. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 14 Sayı: 2, 277–290. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.433324

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Albright,Thomas; Christopher M.Burgess; Davis Stan (2015), “ The Balanced Scorecard and Twenty-First-Century Thoughts on Motivation.”, Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance Vol:23, No. 1: 73-80
  2. Bose Ranjit (2004), “Knowledge Management Metrics. Industrial Management & Data Systems”, Vol:104, No. 6: 457-468
  3. Griffiths, John (2003), “Balanced Scorecard Use İn New Zealand Goverment Departments and Crown Entities”, Australian Journal Of Public Administration
  4. ICA 1995, “ ICA Adopts New Co-Operative Principles “, Victorian Co-operative News, Vol:2, No. 3: 1-4
  5. T.C Gümrük ve Ticaret Bakanlığı (2012), Türkiye Kooperatifçilik Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı, Ankara
  6. Kaplan, Robert; Norton David (2015), Kurumsal Karne Şirket Stratejisinin Eyleme Dönüştürmek. Çeviren: Serra Egeli, İstanbul: Sistem Kitabevi
  7. Kaplan, Robert S; Norton David (1992), “The Balanced Scorecard - Measures That Drive Performance”, Harvard Business Review, Vol:70, No. 1: 71-79
  8. Kaplan, Robert S; David Norton (1993), "Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work." Harvard Business Re-view Vol:71, No. 5: 2- 17
  9. Lawrie,Gavin; Cobbold Ian (2004), “Third-Generation Balanced Scorecard: Evolution of Aneffective Strategic Control Tool”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management Vol:53 No. 7: 611-623
  10. Letza, Stephen R (1996), “The Design and _mplementation of The Balanced Business Scorecard”, Business Pro-cess Re-Engineering and Management Journal, Vol:2, No. 3: 54-76
  11. MacPherson, Ian (1994), “The Co-operative Identity in the Twenty-First Century”. A background paper. Review of International Co-operation, Vol:87, No. 3: 8-26
  12. Perkins, Mike; Grey Anna; Remmers Helge (2014), ”What do we reaally mean by Balanced Scorecard”, Internati-onal Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol:63, No. 2: 148-169
  13. Polat, Hüseyin (2017), “Yarının İşletmesi Kooperatif” Ankara: Orkide Matbaası
  14. Russell, Levi A; Briggeman Brian C; Featherstone Allen M (2017), “Financial Leverage And Agency Costs İn Agricul-tural Cooperatives”, Agricultural Finance Review, Vol:77, No. 2: 312-323
  15. Staatz, John M (1983), ”The Cooperative as a Coalition: A Game- Theorotic Aproach”, American Journal of Agricul-tural Economics, Vol:65 No. 5: 1084-1089
  16. Szabó, Gábor (2005), “Co-operative Identity: A Theoretical Concept For Economic Analysis of Practical Co-operation Dynamics”, Studies in Agricultural Economics No.105: 5-22
  17. Wake, Nicholas John (2015), ” The Use Of The Balanced Scorecard To Measure Knowledge Work”, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol: 64, No. 4: 590-602
  18. Wilson, Chris; Hagarty David; Gauthier Julie (2004), "Results using the balanced scorecard in the public sector", Journal of Corporate Real Estate, Vol:6, No.1: 53-64
  19. MacPherson, Ian (1994), “The Co-operative Identity in the Twenty-First Century”. A background paper. Review of International Co-operation, Vol:87, No. 3: 8-26