Journals / Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4

Supply chain risk management: Conceptual framework and a supply-side literature review

Tedarik zinciri risk yönetimi: Kavramsal çerçeve ve tedarik yönlü bir literatür araştırması

Pages
764–796
Publication Date
2018-08-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This study, in general terms, differs from the previous review studies by outlining all aspects of the conceptual framework of SCRM, surplus of the reviewed paper, including papers published after 2013, and extend of review coverage.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Supply chain risk management (SCRM) is crucial for a long-term profitable, competitive and sustainable supply chain.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to define the conceptual framework of SCRM, 59 studies from the years 1999-2016, and 137 supply-side studies from the years between 2003 and 2016, in which quantitative methods had been utilized, have been determined.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This study, in general terms, differs from the previous review studies by outlining all aspects of the conceptual framework of SCRM, surplus of the reviewed paper, including papers published after 2013, and extend of review coverage.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Tedarik zinciri risk yönetimi · Risk tanımlama · Risk değerlendirme

Abstract

Supply chain risk management (SCRM) is crucial for a long-term profitable, competitive and sustainable supply chain. Many destructive risk incidents that have affected the global scale have come into play in the historical process. The losses, occurred due to these risk incidents, revealed how the supply chains are fragile against the risks. In this study, a comprehensive supply-side literature review has been conducted on SCRM. In order to define the conceptual framework of SCRM, 59 studies from the years 1999-2016, and 137 supply-side studies from the years between 2003 and 2016, in which quantitative methods had been utilized, have been determined. All 196 studies have been reviewed, and analyses and suggestions have been provided. This study, in general terms, differs from the previous review studies by outlining all aspects of the conceptual framework of SCRM, surplus of the reviewed paper, including papers published after 2013, and extend of review coverage.

Özet

Tedarik zinciri risk yönetimi (TZRY) uzun vadede kârlı, rekabetçi ve sürdürülebilir bir tedarik zinciri için son derece önemlidir. Tarihsel süreç içerisinde küresel çapta etki gösteren pek çok yıkıcı risk olayı meydana gelmiştir. Bu risk olayları sonucu meydana gelen zararlar tedarik zincirlerinin riskler karşısında ne kadar kırılgan olduğunu ortaya koymuştur. Bu çalışmada tedarik yönlü TZRY konusunda kapsamlı bir literatür taraması yapılmıştır. Bu kapsamda TZRY'nin kavramsal çerçevesinin ortaya konulması için 1999-2016 yılları arasında yapılan 59 çalışma ve 2003-2016 yılları arasında yapılan nicel yöntemlerin kullanıldığı 137 tedarik yönlü çalışma belirlenmiştir. Toplam 196 çalışma incelenerek, değerlendirmeler ve öneriler sunulmuştur. Bu çalışma genel hatlarıyla, TZRY’nin kavramsal çerçevesinin tüm yönleriyle ele alınması, incelenen yayın sayısının fazlalığı, 2013 yılından sonraki yayınları da kapsaması ve inceleme kapsamının genişliği bakımından önceki tarama çalışmalardan ayrılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDAL, H. (2018). Supply chain risk management: Conceptual framework and a supply-side literature review. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 4, 764–796. https://ajindex.com/articles/108876

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. Demirdöğen O, Küçük O. Üretim Işlemler Yönetimi. 2. Baskı.
  2. Detay Yayıncılık, Ankara, Türkiye, 2011. Erdal H. Tedarik Zinciri Ağında Riskin Yönetimi: Tedarik Yönlü Bir Karar Destek Sistemi Tasarımı, Doktora Tezi, Atatürk Üniversitesi,
  3. Erzurum, Türkiye, 2017.
  4. Takata S, Yamanaka M. BOM "Based supply chain risk management". CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology, 62(1), 479-482, 2013. Kırılmaz O. Tedarik Zinciri Şebekesinde Risk Yönetimi: Otomotiv Endüstrisinde Bir Uygulama, Doktora Tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi,
  5. Ankara, Türkiye, 2014.
  6. Rowat C. "Supply-chain risk and vulnerability workshop". Logistics and Transports Focus, 5(2), 68-69, 2003.
  7. Ghadge A, Dani S, Kalawsky R. "Supply chain risk management: present and future scope". The International Journal of Logistics Management, 23(3), 313-339, 2012.
  8. Hendricks KB, Singhal VR. "An empirical analysis of the effect of supply chain disruptions on long-run stock price performance and equity risk of the firm". Production and Operations Management, 14(1), 35-52, 2005.
  9. Poirier CC, Quinn FJ. “How are we doing: a survey of supply chain progress”. Supply Chain Management Review. 8(8), 24-31, 2004.
  10. Williams K. "Supply chain risks: are you prepared?". Strategic Finance, 89(11), 23(61), 2008.
  11. Tang CS. "Perspectives in supply chain risk management". International Journal of Production Economics, 103(2), 451-488, 2006a.
  12. Vanany I, Zailani S, Pujawan N. "Supply chain risk management: literature review and future research". IGI Global, 2(1), 16-33, 2009.
  13. Rao S, Goldsby TJ. "Supply chain risks: A review and typology". The International Journal of Logistics Management, 20, 97-123, 2009.
  14. Singhal P, Agarwal G, Mittal ML. "Supply chain risk management: Review, classification and future research directions". International Journal of Business Science and Applied Management, 6(3), 15-42, 2011.
  15. Tang O, Musa SN. "Identifying risk issues and research advancements in supply chain risk management". International Journal of Production Economics, 133(1), 25-34, 2011.
  16. Colicchia C, Strozzi F. "Supply chain risk management: a new methodology for a systematic literature review". Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 17, 403-418, 2012.
  17. Sodhi MS, Son BG, Tang CS. "Researchers’ perspectives on supply chain risk management". Production and Operations Management, 21(1), 1-13, 2012.
  18. Heckmann I, Comes T, Nickel S. "A critical review on supply chain risk-definition, measure and modeling". Omega, 52, 119-132, 2015.
  19. Ho W, Zheng T, Yildiz H, Talluri S. "