SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi / 2024 / Cilt: 37 Sayı: 3

Exploring Ethical Dilemmas in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: Perspectives of Researchers

Akademik Yazım Sürecinde Yapay Zekâ Kullanımı: Araştırmacıların Etik İkilemler Konusundaki Görüşleri

Abdullah Ragıp Ersöz(BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3519-8400
Melih Engin(BURSA ULUDAĞ ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İNEGÖL İŞLETME FAKÜLTESİ, YÖNETİM BİLİŞİM SİSTEMLERİ BÖLÜMÜ, YÖNETİM BİLİŞİM SİSTEMLERİ PR.)0000-0002-4953-6119
Pages
1190–1208
Publication Date
2024-12-31
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results initiate significant discussions on the ethical use of artificial intelligence in academic writing and contribute to the relevant literature.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The use of artificial intelligence in academic writing prompts a profound reconsideration of fundamental ethical issues, including property, accuracy, and privacy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It employed a case study design and used a maximum diversity sampling method, engaging 34 researchers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results initiate significant discussions on the ethical use of artificial intelligence in academic writing and contribute to the relevant literature.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akademik yazım · Yapay Zekâ · Akademik Etik

Abstract

The use of artificial intelligence in academic writing prompts a profound reconsideration of fundamental ethical issues, including property, accuracy, and privacy. This study aims to explore the ethical dilemmas in academic writing, focusing on the perspectives of social sciences researchers. It employed a case study design and used a maximum diversity sampling method, engaging 34 researchers. Data collection utilized open-ended questions, guided by Mason's framework of computer ethics, encouraging participants to provide detailed responses. Data were analyzed using descriptive analysis, focusing on themes of property, accuracy, and privacy. The findings reflect the participants' diverse views on the ethical implications of using artificial intelligence in academic writing. Specifically, the necessity of disclosing sources when artificial intelligence generates information and the importance of ethical citations were emphasized. The results initiate significant discussions on the ethical use of artificial intelligence in academic writing and contribute to the relevant literature.

Özet

Akademik yazım sürecinde yapay zekânın kullanımı, bilginin sahipliği, doğruluğu ve gizliliği gibi temel etik konuları derinlemesine yeniden düşünmeye sevk etmektedir. Bu araştırma, akademik yazım sürecinde yapay zekâ kullanımının etik boyutlarını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, sosyal bilimler alanındaki araştırmacıların görüşlerini içeren bir durum çalışması tasarlanmıştır. Örneklem seçiminde maksimum çeşitlilik yöntemi kullanılmış olup, 34 araştırmacı çalışmaya katılmıştır. Veri toplama sürecinde, Mason'un bilişim etiği çerçevesinde hazırlanan, açık uçlu sorular kullanılmış ve katılımcılardan uzun paragraflar halinde yanıt vermeleri istenmiştir. Veriler, betimsel analiz yöntemi ile analiz edilmiş ve fikir mülkiyeti, doğruluk ve gizlilik temalarında açıklanmıştır. Bulgular, katılımcıların yapay zekânın akademik yazımda kullanımı üzerindeki etik etkileri konusundaki çeşitli görüşlerini yansıtmaktadır. Özellikle, yapay zekânın oluşturduğu bilginin kaynaklarının belirtilmesi gerekliliği ve atıfların önemi araştırmada vurgulanmıştır. Sonuçlar, akademik yazım sürecinde yapay zekânın etik kullanımı konusunda önemli bir tartışma başlatmakta ve ilgili literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

Ersöz, A. R., Engin, M. (2024). Exploring Ethical Dilemmas in the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Academic Writing: Perspectives of Researchers. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 3, 1190–1208. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1514323

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (27)

  1. Ashok, M., Madan, R., Joha, A., & Sivarajah, U. (2022). Ethical framework for Artificial Intelligence and Digital Technologies. International Journal of Information Management, 62, 102433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2021.102433
  2. Azad, Y. & Kumar, A. (2024). Ethics and artificial intelligence: A theoretical framework for ethical decision making in the digital era. In B. Verma, B. Singla, & A. Mittal (Eds.), digital technologies, ethics, and decentralization in the digital era (pp. 228-268). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-1762-4.ch012
  3. Cubelli, R. (2020). Ethics of research in neuropsychology and behavioural neurology. In: Della Salla, S. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Behavioral Neuroscience. Elsevier, (pp. 573–578). http://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809324-5.24094-7
  4. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
  5. Delgado, V., Sales, K., & Abreu, V. (2024). Ethical reflections on the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence in the academic sphere: Writing and authorship. In Anais do V Workshop sobre as Implicações da Computação na Sociedade, (pp. 153-160). Porto Alegre: SBC. https://doi.org/10.5753/wics.2024.3170
  6. Ersoz, A.R. (2023). Development of an AI-powered Chatbot for Quantitative Analysis Selection [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Bursa Uludag University. Bursa
  7. Evgenev, G. B. (2019). Multi-agent methods for creating knowledge bases. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 11(12 Special Issue), 1398-1407. https://doi.org/10.5373/JARDCS/V11SP12/20193360
  8. Fardim, K. A. C., de Paiva Gonçalves, S. E., & Tribst, J. P. M. (2023). Scientific writing with artificial intelligence: key considerations and alerts. Brazilian Dental Science, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3988
  9. Gao, D. K., Haverly, A., Mittal, S., Wu, J., & Chen, J. (2024). AI ethics: A bibliometric analysis, critical ıssues, and key gaps. International Journal of Business Analytics (IJBAN), 11(1), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.4018/IJBAN.338367
  10. Ghotbi, N. (2024). Ethics of artificial intelligence in academic research and education. In: Eaton, S.E. (eds) Second handbook of academic integrity. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_143
  11. Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064–1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661
  12. Graßmann C, Schermuly CC (2021). Coaching with artificial intelligence: Concepts and capabilities. Human Resource Development Review 20(1), 106–126. http://doi.org/10.1177/1534484320982891
  13. Gribincea, A. (2020). Intellectual property rights to an artificial intelligence product. Journal of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine, 27(4), 231-241. https://doi.org/10.37635/jnalsu.27(4).2020.231-241
  14. Khan, Z. R. (2024). Ethics of artificial ıntelligence in academia. In Second Handbook of Academic Integrity (pp. 1551-1582). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_188
  15. Kooli C. (2023). Chatbots in education and research: A critical examination of ethical implications and solutions. Sustainability, 15(7), 5614. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075614
  16. Korobko, M. (2021). Information ethics as a necessary element of the regulation of the modern ınformation society. Ukrainian Cultural Studies, 8(1), 46-50. https://doi.org/10.17721/UCS.2021.1(8).10
  17. Lund, B., Omame, I., Tijani, S., & Agbaji, D. (2020). Perceptions toward artificial intelligence among academic library employees and alignment with the diffusion of innovations' adopter categories. College & Research Libraries, 81(5), 865. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.81.5.865
  18. Mason, R. O. (2017). Four ethical ıssues of the information age. In Computer ethics (pp. 41-48). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697
  19. OpenAI. (2022). Introducing ChatGPT. https://openai.com/blog/chatgpt den alınmıştır. Date accessed 29.05. 2024.
  20. Pugsley, L. (2016). Undertake ethically sound medical education research. Education for Primary Care, 27(2), 148–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/14739879.2016.1149955
  21. Rogers, E. M. (2004). A prospective and retrospective look at the diffusion model. Journal of Health Communication, 9(sup1), 13–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730490271449
  22. Safdar, N. M., Banja, J. D., & Meltzer, C. C. (2020). Ethical Considerations in Artificial Intelligence. European Journal of Radiology, 122, 108768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108768
  23. Saveliev, A. M., Zhurenkov, D. A., Poikin, A. E., & Berkutova, T. A. (2021). Ethics of artificial intelligence and post-non-classical scientific rationality. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(13), 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.10.480
  24. Schwester, R. W. (2020). "Chapter 21: Ethical considerations in public administration research". In Handbook of research methods in public administration, management and policy. Edward Elgar Publishing. Retrieved Jun 22, 2024, From https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903485.00031
  25. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
  26. YÖK. (2024). Yapay zekâ kullanımına dair etik rehber https://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/2024/yapay-zekâ-kullanimina-dair-etik-rehber.pdf. Date accessed 27.06. 2024.
  27. Zhang, J., Andwari, D. (2022). Ethical Reflection on the deep embedding of artificial intelligence in university teaching. In Sun, S., Hong, T., Yu, P., Zou, J. (Eds.), Signal and information processing, networking and computers. Icsınc 2021. Lecture Notes In Electrical Engineering, Vol 895. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4775-9_154