SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3

Digital formula in children

Çocuklarda dijital formül

Erkan Yıldız(Harran Universitesi Tıp Fakültesi Anatomi A.D. Şanlıurfa, Türkiye)
Pages
82–83
Publication Date
2006-12-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

A total of 737 children, 399 females and 338 males, ranging in age from 6 to 15 years were assessed for the morphological aspects of the hands. 3>4>2>5>1 digital formula found more frequently for both sexes and there were no significant difference between sex and age

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study to investigate the digital formula and related that age and sex in children.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study to investigate the digital formula and related that age and sex in children.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:A total of 737 children, 399 females and 338 males, ranging in age from 6 to 15 years were assessed for the morphological aspects of the hands. 3>4>2>5>1 digital formula found more frequently for both sexes and there were no significant difference between sex and age
🔬Design:Makale
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Dijital formül · cinsiyet · el morfolojisi

Abstract

The aim of this study to investigate the digital formula and related that age and sex in children. A total of 737 children, 399 females and 338 males, ranging in age from 6 to 15 years were assessed for the morphological aspects of the hands. 3>4>2>5>1 digital formula found more frequently for both sexes and there were no significant difference between sex and age

Özet

Bu çalışmada çocuklarda dijital formülün cinsiyet ve yaşa göre belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Yaşları 6-15 arasında değişen 399 kız, 338 erkek, toplam 737 çocuğun morfolojik el özellikleri değerlendirildi. Her iki cinsiyettede dijital formül sıklıkla 3>4>2>5>1 şeklinde iken çocuklarda dijital formül ile cinsiyet ve yaş arasında anlamlı bir ilişki bulunamadı

🔖

Cite This Article

Yıldız, E. (2006). Digital formula in children. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 3, 82–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/1081873

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Ernest Gardner et al. Anatomy—A Regional Study of Human Structure. 3. edition. Philadelphia, Saunders Co., 1969. p.149
  2. Okten, A., Kalyoncu, M.,Yari¸ N. The ratio of second- and fourth digit lengths and congenital adrenal hyperplasia due to 21- hydroxylase Development,. 2002; 70, 47–54.
  3. Williams, T.J et al. Finger-length ratios and sexual orientation. Nature, 2000; 404, 455-456. 4-Peters, M., Mackenzie, K., Bryden, P. Finger length and distal finger extent patterns in humans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 2002; 117, 209–217.
  4. Manning, J.T. et al. Sex and ethnic differences in 2nd to 4th digit ratio of children. Early Human Development. 2004; 80, 161-168.
  5. Manning, J.T. et al. The ratio of 2nd to 4th digit length: A predictor of sperm numbers and concentrations of testosterone, luteinizing hormone and oestrogen.Human Reproduction, 1998;13, 3000–3004.
  6. V. Rae Phelps. Relative index finger length as a sex-influenced trait in man. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1952; June; 4(2): 72–89.
  7. Matthew H et al. Sex Dimorphism in Digital Formulae of Children. Am. J. of Physcal Anth. 2006; 129:143–150
  8. Lewis S. Morphological aspects of male and female hands. Ann Hum Biol. 1996; Nov-Dec; 23 (6): 491-4.
  9. Kimura K. Radiological studies on three fingers Anthropological society, Nippon, 1965. 72, 146-162 11-Singh J. and Sengupta S. Some Morpho- genetic and Behavioural Traits Among the Assamese Sikhs. Anthropologist, 2004; 6(4): 253-255