Journals / Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3

Clinical Outcomes and Surgical Management of Traumatic Diaphragmatic Injuries: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis

Travmatik Diyafram Yaralanmalarının Klinik Sonuçları ve Cerrahi Yönetimi: 10 Yıllık Retrospektif Bir Analiz

Mahmut Özbey(SİVAS CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TIP FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0001-8641-1772
Hasan Doğan(SİVAS CUMHURİYET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1166-6513
Pages
392–398
Publication Date
2026-09-21
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In our limited cohort, both deaths occurred in patients with severe associated injuries and hemodynamic instability.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: Diaphragmatic injuries (DIs) are uncommon but life-threatening consequences of both blunt and penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma that may be difficult to diagnose.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 20 patients treated surgically for traumatic DI between January 2015 and December 2025.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In our limited cohort, both deaths occurred in patients with severe associated injuries and hemodynamic instability.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Diyafragma yaralanması · Travma · VATS

Abstract

Background: Diaphragmatic injuries (DIs) are uncommon but life-threatening consequences of both blunt and penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma that may be difficult to diagnose. This study aimed to evaluate the demographic characteristics, injury mechanisms, surgical approaches, and outcomes of patients who underwent surgical management for DI during the study period. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 20 patients treated surgically for traumatic DI between January 2015 and December 2025. Data on age, sex, mechanism and side of injury, associated organ injuries, surgical techniques, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Results: The study group consisted of 17 males (85%) and 3 females (15%), with a mean age of 42.5±19.82 years. The mechanisms of injury was included penetrating trauma in 11 patients, including 10 stab wounds and 1 gunshot wound, and blunt trauma in 9 patients. Right-sided and left-sided injuries were equally distributed with 10 patients in each group. While computed tomography (CT) suggested DI in 60% of cases (n=12), the remaining 7 patients were diagnosed intraoperatively during surgery for associated pathologies. The surgical approaches included video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) in 11 patients (55%), thoracotomy in 8 (40%), and laparotomy in 1 (5%). Primary repair was performed in 17 patients and one patient required prosthetic mesh reinforcement. Associated organ injuries were present in 9 patients (45%). The mortality rate was 10% (n=2), primarily due to concomitant injuries and shock. Conclusions: Diaphragmatic injuries remain a diagnostic challenge due to the lack of specific symptoms and the limited sensitivity of imaging. Clinical suspicion is vital when radiological findings are inconclusive. VATS is a reliable and effective minimally invasive tool for both the diagnosis and treatment of DI. In our limited cohort, both deaths occurred in patients with severe associated injuries and hemodynamic instability.

Özet

Amaç: Diyafragma yaralanmaları (DY), hem künt hem de penetran travmalar sonrası gelişebilen, tanısı zor ve hayati tehlike oluşturan yaralanmalardır. Bu çalışmada, kliniğimizde 10 yıllık süreçte diyafragma yaralanması nedeniyle cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastaların demografik özelliklerini, yaralanma mekanizmalarını, cerrahi yaklaşımları ve sonuçlarını değerlendirmeyi amaçladık. Materyal ve metod: Ocak 2015 ile Aralık 2025 tarihleri arasında travmatik DY tanısıyla opere edilen 20 hastanın verileri retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların yaş, cinsiyet, yaralanma mekanizması, yaralanma tarafı, ek organ yaralanmaları, cerrahi teknikler ve postoperatif sonuçları analiz edildi. Bulgular: Hastaların 17’si (%85) erkek, 3’ü (%15) kadın olup; yaş ortalaması 42,5±19,82 idi. Yaralanmaların %50'si kesici delici alet yaralanması, %45'i künt travma ve %5'i ateşli silah yaralanması sonucu gelişmişti. Yaralanmaların taraf dağılımı sağ ve sol hemidiyafragma için eşitti (%50 - %50). Bilgisayarlı tomografi (BT) hastaların %60'ında (n=12) DY tanısı koydururken; 7 hastada DY, ek patolojiler nedeniyle yapılan operasyonlar sırasında saptandı. Cerrahi yaklaşım olarak %55 oranında (n=11) video yardımlı torakoskopik cerrahi (VATS), %40 (n=8) torakotomi ve %5 (n=1) laparotomi uygulandı. Hastaların 17'sine primer sütürasyon yapılırken, bir hastada prostetik mesh kullanıldı. Dokuz hastada (%45) ek organ yaralanması mevcuttu. Ortalama hastanede yatış süresi 14,6 gün olarak saptandı. İki hasta (%10) ek organ yaralanması ve şok tablosu nedeniyle hayatını kaybetti. Sonuç: Diyafragma yaralanmaları spesifik semptomların yokluğu nedeniyle tanısal zorluklar içermeye devam etmektedir. Radyolojik bulguların yetersiz kaldığı durumlarda klinik şüphe esastır. VATS, hem tanı koymada hem de tedavide güvenilir ve etkin bir minimal invaziv yöntemdir. Her iki ölüm de ciddi eşlik eden yaralanmaları ve hemodinamik instabilitesi olan hastalarda meydana gelmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Özbey, M., Doğan, H., *, M. Ö. (2026). Clinical Outcomes and Surgical Management of Traumatic Diaphragmatic Injuries: A 10-Year Retrospective Analysis. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 3, 392–398. https://ajindex.com/articles/1080779

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Hanna WC, Ferri LE, Fata P, Razek T, Mulder DS. The current status of traumatic diaphragmatic injury: lessons learned from 105 patients over 13 years. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(3):1044-8.
  2. Yasak İH, Giden R. Künt abdominal travma sonrası solid organ hasarı gelişen çocukların incelenmesi. Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2022;19(3):600-4.
  3. Panda A, Kumar A, Gamanagatti S, Patil A, Kumar S, Gupta Traumatic diaphragmatic injury: a review of CT signs and the difference between blunt and penetrating injury. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20(2):121-8.
  4. Abdellatif W, Chow B, Hamid S, Khorshed D, Khosa F, Nicolaou S, et al. Unravelling the mysteries of traumatic diaphragmatic injury: an up-to-date review. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2020;71(3):313-21.
  5. Schellenberg M, Coimbra R, Croft CA, Fox C, Hartwell J, Keric N, et al. The diagnosis and management of acute traumatic diaphragmatic injury: a Western Trauma Association clinical decisions algorithm. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2025;98(4):621-7.
  6. Yucel M, Bas G, Kulali F, Unal E, Ozpek A, Basak F, et al. Evaluation of diaphragm in penetrating left thoracoabdominal stab injuries: the role of multislice computed tomography. Injury. 2015;46(9):1734-7.
  7. Esme H. Travmatik diyafragma yaralanmasının yönetimi: retrospektif 19 olgu çalışması. J Surg Arts. 2025;18(2):28-31.
  8. Oruc M, Onat S, Sahin A, Yildiz I. Minimally invasive approach in diaphragmatic injuries due to stab wounds: 10 years of experience. Dicle Med J. 2023;50(4):490-6.
  9. Hassankhani A, Amoukhteh M, Valizadeh P, Jannatdoust P, Eibschutz LS, Myers LA, et al. Diagnostic utility of multidetector CT scan in penetrating diaphragmatic injuries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Emerg Radiol. 2023;30(6):765-76.
  10. Derdiyok O, Temel U. Benefits of routine uniportal thoracoscopy during rib fixation in the diagnosis and repair of diaphragmatic injury. Curr Thorac Surg. 2024;9(1):1-5.
  11. Akkas Y, Ozdemir Ciflik B, Ciflik KB, Hatipoglu Yetim M, Gokce A, Akboga SA. Timing of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery in the management of thoracic trauma. BMC Surg. 2025;25(1):264.
  12. Reitano E, Cioffi SPB, Airoldi C, Chiara O, La Greca G, Cimbanassi S. Current trends in the diagnosis and management of traumatic diaphragmatic injuries: A systematic review and a diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis of blunt trauma. Injury. 2022;53(11):3586-95.
  13. Cremonini C, Lewis MR, Jakob D, Benjamin ER, Chiarugi M, Demetriades D. Diagnosing penetrating diaphragmatic injuries: CT scan is valuable but not reliable. Injury. 2022;53(1):116-21.
  14. Obaid O, Hammad A, Bible L, Ditillo M, Castanon L, Douglas M, et al. Open versus laparoscopic repair of traumatic diaphragmatic injury: a nationwide propensity-matched analysis. J Surg Res. 2021;268:452-8.
  15. Craugh LE, Salyer C, Tarras S. Traumatic diaphragmatic injury: a narrative review. Curr Chall Thorac Surg. 2025;7:17.
  16. Gillaspie D, Gillaspie EA. Management of traumatic diaphragmatic injuries. Thorac Surg Clin. 2024;34(2):171-8.
  17. Sharma B, Kafaru M, Agriantonis G, Davis A, Bhatia ND, Twelker K, et al. A case series focusing on blunt traumatic diaphragm injury at a level 1 trauma center. Biomedicines. 2025;13(2):325.
  18. Taş İ, Yiğit E. Analysis of traumatic acute diaphragmatic injuries. Singapore Med J. 2025;66(6):333-7.