SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Bilig / 2026 / Sayı: 108

Rethinking the Implications of NATO’s Afghanistan Operation and Its Partnership for Peace in Central Asia: Is It the End of NATO’s Presence in Central Asia?

NATO’nun Afganistan Operasyonu ve Barış İçin Ortaklık’ın Orta Asya Üzerindeki Etkilerini Yeniden Düşünmek: NATO’nun Orta Asya’daki Varlığının Sonu mu?

Arif Bağbaşlıoğlu(İZMİR DEMOKRASİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8603-5014
Journal
Bilig
Pages
1–26
Publication Date
2024-01-30
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It then explains why the PfP program did not produce the desired results in developing relations with Central Asian states.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:NATO’s partnership policy, including its Partnership for Peace (PfP) program, which aims to develop cooperation and dialogue with non-NATO countries, represents the first steps for an essentially Euro-Atlantic alliance to establish an institutional relationship with Central Asian states.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The war on terror discourse after the September 11 attacks, the US intervention in Afghanistan in 2001, and NATO’s takeover of the ISAF mission in 2003 made it easier for NATO to establish institutional relations with Central Asian states.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It then explains why the PfP program did not produce the desired results in developing relations with Central Asian states.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Barış için Ortaklık · NATO · Orta Asya Devletleri

Abstract

NATO’s partnership policy, including its Partnership for Peace (PfP) program, which aims to develop cooperation and dialogue with non-NATO countries, represents the first steps for an essentially Euro-Atlantic alliance to establish an institutional relationship with Central Asian states. The war on terror discourse after the September 11 attacks, the US intervention in Afghanistan in 2001, and NATO’s takeover of the ISAF mission in 2003 made it easier for NATO to establish institutional relations with Central Asian states. This study first discusses the effects of the end of the Afghanistan operation on NATO’s approach towards Central Asia in light of current developments, such as the Russia-Ukraine war and NATO’s 2022 Strategic Concept. It then explains why the PfP program did not produce the desired results in developing relations with Central Asian states.

Özet

NATO’nun ortaklık politikası ve bu politikanın bir aracı olan Barış İçin Ortaklık programı, İttifak’ın Orta Asya ülkeleriyle kurumsal bir ilişki oluşturmasının ilk adımını oluşturmuştur. 11 Eylül saldırıları sonrasında oluşan teröre karşı savaş söylemi ve 2003’te NATO’nun ISAF misyonun komutasını devralması NATO’nun Orta Asya ülkeleri ile kurumsal ilişkiler kurmasını daha da kolaylaştırmıştır. Orta Asya ülkelerinin Afganistan’a olan coğrafi yakınlığı, bu ülkelerin NATO üyelerinden askerî ve siyasi konulardaki beklentileri bu ilişkiyi taraflar açısından anlamlı kılmıştı. Ancak, Afganistan operasyonun sona ermesi, Rusya-NATO arasındaki ilişkilerin olumsuz doğası, günümüzde NATO’nun Orta Asya ülkeleri ile kurumsal anlamda ilişkiler geliştirmesini sınırlamaktadırlar. Bu çalışmanın iki temel amacı vardır. Birincisi, Afganistan operasyonunun sona ermesinin NATO’nun Orta Asya’ya yönelik yaklaşımına etkilerini tartışmaktır. Çalışmanın ikinci temel amacı ise BİO programının Orta Asya ülkeleri ile ilişkilerin geliştirilmesinde neden arzu edilen sonuçları doğurmadığını açıklamaktır. Çalışmanın temel iddiası ise NATO-Rusya ilişkilerinin niteliğinin, NATO-Orta Asya ülkeleri arasındaki ilişkilerin etkinliğini ve gelişimini doğrudan etkilediğidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Bağbaşlıoğlu, A. (2024). Rethinking the Implications of NATO’s Afghanistan Operation and Its Partnership for Peace in Central Asia: Is It the End of NATO’s Presence in Central Asia?. Bilig, Sayı: 108, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.12995/bilig.10801

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (38)

  1. Aben, Dauren. “Kazakhstan and NATO’s Partnership for Peace Program.” Eurasian Research Institute weekly e-bulletin, 14.11.2017, https://eurasianresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Weekly-e-bulletin-14.11.2017-20.11.2017-No-138.pdf.
  2. Bağbaşlıoğlu, Arif. “Beyond Afghanistan NATO’s Partnership with Central Asia and South Caucasus: A Tangled Partnership?” Journal of Eurasian Studies, vol. 5, no. 1, 2014, pp. 88-96.
  3. Borawski, John. “Partnership for Peace and Beyond.” International Affairs, vol. 71, no. 2, 1995, pp. 233-246.
  4. Brauss, Heinrich. “NATO: The Current Challenge.” A Hard Look at Hard Power: Assessing the Defense Capabilities of Key US Allies and Security Partners, ed. Gary J. Schmitt. U.S. Army War College, 2020.
  5. Comitato Anlantico Italiano. “NATO and the Republics of Central Asia.” 24.02.2022, http://www.comitatoatlantico.it/COMIT/studi/afghanistansnorthern-neighbors-nato-in-central-asia/.
  6. Connolly, Kate. “Germany to set up €100bn fund to boost its military strength.” The Guardian, 27.02.2022, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/feb/27/germany-set-up-fund-boost-military- strength-ukraine-putin.
  7. Demir, Sertif. “Afganistan’daki Yirmi Yıllık İşgalin Analizi: ABD/NATO ve Barış Çabaları.” Uluslararası Kriz ve Siyaset Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 1, 2021, pp. 114-153.
  8. Henley, Jon. “Denmark votes overwhelmingly to join EU’s common defence policy.” The Guardian, 01.06.2022, https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/jun/01/denmark-votes-on-joining-eus- common-defence-policy.
  9. Kanat, Kılıç Buğra. “Transatlantic Relations in the Age of Donald Trump.” Insight Turkey, vol. 20, no. 3, 2018, pp. 77-88.
  10. Kay, Sean. “Partnerships and Power in American Grand Strategy.” NATO: The Power of the Partnerships, eds. Hakan Edström, Janne Haaland Matlary and Magnus Petersson. Palgrave, 2011.
  11. Keagle, James M. “A Special Relationship: U.S. and NATO Engagement with the Partnership for Peace to Build Partner Capacity Through Education.” Connections, vol. 11, no. 4, 2012, pp. 59-74.
  12. Kirby, Paul. “Why did Russia Invade Ukraine and has Putin’s War Failed?” BBC News, 16.11.2022, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-56720589.
  13. Maranian, Stephen J. “NATO Interoperability: Sustaining Trust and Capacity within the Alliance.” NATO Research Paper, vol. 1. no.115, 2015.
  14. McDermot, Roger N. “NATO Deepens Its Partnership with Central Asia.” Analytical Articles, 17.11.2004, https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/9472-analytical-articles-caci- analyst-2004-11-17-art-9472.html?tmpl=component&print=1.
  15. Mukhtorova, Uguloy. Central Asia and NATO against a Backdrop of Changing Geopolitical Realities, NATO Defense College, 2018.
  16. NATO. A Transformed NATO. NATO Public Diplomacy Division, 2004.
  17. NATO. “Press conference by NATO Secretary General, Jaap de Hoop Scheffer after the Plenary Meeting of the EAPC Security Forum.” 25.05.2005, https://www.nato.int/docu/speech/2005/s050525j.htm.
  18. NATO. “International Security Assistance Force (ISAF): Key Facts and Figures.” 01.12.2013, https://www.nato.int/isaf/placemats_archive/2013-12-01-ISAF-Placemat.pdf.
  19. NATO. “Operation Active Endeavour (2001-2016).” 01.09.2022, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_7932.htm.
  20. NATO. “NATO and Afghanistan.” 31.08.2022, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/topics_8189.htm.
  21. NATO. “Statement by NATO Heads of State and Government on Russia’s attack on Ukraine.” 25.02.2022, https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_192489.htm?selectedLocale=en.
  22. NATO. “NATO 2022 Strategic Concept.” 29.06.2022, https://www.nato.int/strategic-concept/.
  23. NATO. “Partnership Tools.” 01.09.2022, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natolive/topics_80925.htm.
  24. Nichol, Jim. “Central Asia: Regional Developments and Implications for U.S. Interests.” Congressional Research Service, 21.03.2014, https://sgp.fas.org/crs/row/RL33458.pdf.
  25. Nikitina, Yulia. “The Collective Security Treaty Organization Through the Looking Glass.” Problems of Post-Communism, vol. 59, no. 3, 2012, pp. 41-52.
  26. Nogayeva, Ainur. “Central Asian States’ Security Policies.” The Changing Perspectives of Central Asia in the 21st Century, ed. Murat Yorulmaz & Serdar Yılmaz, Kriter, 2020.
  27. North Atlantic Council. “Partnership for Peace: Framework Document.” 10-11 January 1994, http://www.nato.int/docu/comm/49-95/c940110b.htm.
  28. Pifer, Steven. “The Russia-Ukraine War and Its Ramifications for Russia.” Brookings, 08.12.2022, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-russia-ukraine-warand-its-ramifications-for-russia/.
  29. Putin, Vladimir. “Speech and the Following Discussion at the Munich Conference on Security Policy.” 10.02.2007, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/24034.
  30. Ringsmose, Jens, and Sten Rynning. “NATO’s Next Strategic Concept: Prioritise or Perish.” Survival, vol. 63, no. 5, 2021, pp. 147-168.
  31. Sara, Mehwish Hassan. “Security and Political Implications of NATO’s Presence in Central Asian Region.” Strategic Studies, vol. 27. no. 4, 2007, pp. 194-209.
  32. Seren, Merve. “Afganistan’da Ulus-Devlet İnşa Projesinin Başarısızlığı ve Taliban’ın Kazanma Stratejisi.” Amme İdare Dergisi, vol. 54, no. 3, September 2021, pp. 1-40.
  33. Sun, Degang, and Hend Elmahly. “NATO vs. SCO: A Comparative Study of Outside Powers’ Military Presence in Central Asia and the Gulf.” Asian Journal of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, 2018, pp. 438-456.
  34. Tardy, Thierry. “Ukraine, NATO, and the Madrid Strategic Concept.” War in Europe, ed. Tardy, Thierry, NATO Defence College, 2022, pp. 13-24.
  35. U.S. Department of State. “Imposing Sanctions on President Putin and Three Other Senior Russian Officials.” 25.02.2022, https://www.state.gov/imposingsanctions-on-president-putin-and-three- other-senior-russian-officials/.
  36. Wezeman, Pieter D., Aude Fleurant, Alexandra Kuimova, Nan Tian, and Siemon T. Wezeman. “Trends in International Arms Transfers, 2017.” SIPRI Fact Sheet. 01.03.2018, https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/2018-03/fssipri_at2017_0.pdf.
  37. Wishnick, Elizabeth. Growing U.S. Security Interests in Central Asia. U.S. Army War College, 2002.
  38. Yost, David S. NATO Transformed: The Alliance’s New Roles in International Security. US Institute of Peace Press, 2000.