Journals / Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1

The Mediating Effect of Internal and External Job Satisfaction on Relationships Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Commitment: A Study on the Banking Sector

Örgütsel Adalet ve Örgütsel Bağlılık Arasındaki İlişkilerde İçsel ve Dışsal İş Tatmininin Aracılık Rolü: Bankacılık Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Pages
245–270
Publication Date
2011-04-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Results shows that the interac‐ tional justice dimension of organizational justice has an effect on organizational commitment with the mediation of intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the present study, we examine the relation‐ ship between organizational justice and organi‐ zational commitment; in the meantime we researched the mediating role of internal and external job satisfaction in this relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Data collected from 269 employees in banking sector are evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Results shows that the interac‐ tional justice dimension of organizational justice has an effect on organizational commitment with the mediation of intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Örgütsel adalet · iş tatmini · örgütsel bağlılık

Abstract

In the present study, we examine the relation‐ ship between organizational justice and organi‐ zational commitment; in the meantime we researched the mediating role of internal and external job satisfaction in this relationship. Data collected from 269 employees in banking sector are evaluated. Results shows that the interac‐ tional justice dimension of organizational justice has an effect on organizational commitment with the mediation of intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction. Results also indicate that neither distributive justice nor procedural justice has an effect directly or indirectly on organizational commitment. As another finding of the study was that distributive justice and interactional justice dimensions have positive and significant effects on extrinsic job satisfaction; whereas interactional justice have positive and significant effects on intrinsic job satisfaction.

Özet

Bu çalışmada örgütsel adaletle ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkiler incelenirken, bu ilişkide içsel ve dışsal iş tatmininin aracılık rolü araştırılmıştır. Bu kapsamda bankacılık sektöründe iş yaşamlarına devam eden 269 çalışan üzerinde bir araştırma yapılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre örgütsel adalet boyutlarından etkileşim adaleti boyutunun çalışanların örgütsel bağlılığını içsel ve dışsal iş tatmini aracılığı ile etkilediği tespit edilmiştir. Dağıtım adaleti ile süreç adaletinin örgütsel bağlılık üzerinde doğrudan veya dolaylı olarak etkilerinin bulunmadığı görülmüştür. Dağıtım adaleti ve etkileşim adaleti boyutlarının ise dışsal iş tatmini, etkileşim adaleti boyutunun ise içsel iş tatmini üzerinde pozitif ve anlam etkileri olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERKUŞ, A., TURUNÇ, Ö., YÜCEL, R. (2011). The Mediating Effect of Internal and External Job Satisfaction on Relationships Between Organizational Justice and Organizational Commitment: A Study on the Banking Sector. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 1, 245–270. https://ajindex.com/articles/106965

References (7)

  1. Adam, J. S. (1965), “Inequity in Social Exchange”, Ed. L. Berkowitz, Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Academic Press, New York, 2, 267‐299. Alexander, P. ve M. Ruderman (1987), “The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior”, Social Justice Research, 1, 177‐198. Baron, R. M. ve D. A. Kenny (1986), “The Moderator Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173‐1182. Bateman, T. S. ve A. Strasser (1984), “Longitudinal Analysis of The Antecedents of Organizational Commitment”, Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 95‐112. Bies, R. J. ve D. L. Shapiro (1988), “Voice and Justification: Their Influence on Procedural Fairness Judgments”, Academy of Management Journal, 31, 676–685.
  2. Bies, R. J. ve J. S. Moag (1986), “Interactional Justice; Communication Criteria of Fairness”. Ed. R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, ve B. H. Bazerman, Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Greenwich, Ct: Jai Pres,1, 43–55.
  3. Blau, P. (1964),
  4. Exchange and Power in Social Life, New York: Wiley. Brown, S. (1996), “A Meta‐Analysis and Review of Organizational Research on Job Involvement”, Psychological Bulletin, 120(2), 235‐255. Chang E. (2002), “Distributive Justice and Organizational Commitment Revisited: Moderation By Layoff in The Case of Korean Employees”, Human Resource Management, 41(2), 261‐270. Cohen‐Charash‐Charash, Y. ve P. E. Spector (2001), “The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta‐Analysis”, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278–321.
  5. Colquitt, J. A., D. E. Conlon, M. J. Wesson, C. O. L. H. Porter ve K. Y. Ng (2001), “Justice At The Millennium: A Meta‐Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425–445.
  6. Cropanzano, R. ve J. Greenberg (1997), ”Progress in Organizational Justice: Tunneling Through The Maze”, Ed. C. L. Cooper ve I. T. Robertson, International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Wiley, New York, 317–372.
  7. Decotis, T. A. ve T. P. Summer (1987), “A Path Analysis of A Model of The Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Commitment”, Human Relations, 40(7), 445‐470. Deutsch, M. (1975), “Equity, Equality and Need: What Determines Which Value Will Be Used As The Basis of Distributive Justice?”, Journal of Social Issues, 31,137‐ 149. Efeoğlu, İ. E. (2006), “İş‐Aile Yaşam Çatışmasının İş Stresi, İş Doyum